Conflict monitoring and stimulus categorization processes involved in the prosocial attitude implicit association test: Evidence from event-related potentials

REFERENCES

• Arcuri, L., Castelli, L., Galdi, S., Zogmaister, C., & Amadori, A. (2008). Predicting the vote: Implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters. Political Psychology, 29(3), 369–387. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00635.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azar, B. (2008). IAT: Fad or fabulous? Monitor in Psychology, 39(7), 44.
   Google Scholar
• Balconi, M., & Canavesio, Y. (2013). Prosocial attitudes and empathic behavior in emotional positive versus negative situations: Brain response (ERPs) and source localization (LORETA) analysis. Cognitive Processing, 14(1), 63–72. doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0525-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balconi, M., & Canavesio, Y. (2014). High-frequency rTMS on DLPFC increases prosocial attitude in case of decision to support people. Social Neuroscience, 9(1), 82–93. doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.861361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.), T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 463–484). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M., Uebel, J., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Being mimicked increases prosocial behavior in 18-month-old infants. Child Development, 84(5), 1511–1518. doi:10.1111/cdev.12083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, P. C., Ma, H. K., & Shek, D. T. L. (1998). Conceptions of success: Their correlates with prosocial orientation and behaviour in Chinese adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 21(1), 31–42. doi:10.1006/jado.1997.0127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, M. A., & Campbell, K. B. (2010). Event-related potential measures of processing during an implicit association test. Neuroreport, 21(16), 1029–1033. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833f5e7d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colzato, L. S., Hommel, B., Van Den Wildenberg, W., & Hsieh, S. (2010). Buddha as an eye opener: A link between prosocial attitude and attentional control. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00156
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. C., Rugg, M. D., & Wells, T. (1996). A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming. Psychophysiology, 33(2), 132–147. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02117.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2007). Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 15–31. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, V., Codispoti, M., Cardinale, R., & Bradley, M. M. (2008). Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(10), 1753–1761. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischhauer, M., Strobel, A., Diers, K., & Enge, S. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence for early perceptual facilitation and efficient categorization of self-related stimuli during an implicit association test measuring neuroticism. Psychophysiology, 51(2), 142–151. doi:10.1111/psyp.12162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 152–170. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, H. M., Ambady, N., Lowenthal, W. T., & Deldin, P. (2004). P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 216–224. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00092-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Supplemental material for understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–1385. doi:10.1177/0146167205275613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntjens, R. J., Rijkeboer, M. M., Krakau, A., & De Jong, P. J. (2014). Implicit versus explicit measures of self-concept of self-control and their differential predictive power for spontaneous trait-relevant behaviors. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45(1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibanez, A., Melloni, M., Huepe, D., Helgiu, E., Rivera-Rei, A., Canales-Johnson, A., & Moya, A. (2012). What event-related potentials (ERPs) bring to social neuroscience? Social Neuroscience, 7(6), 632–649. doi:10.1080/17470919.2012.691078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, D., Wang, X. R., Fu, L., & Zhou, R. L. (2008). A study on implicit altruistic behavior. Psychological Science (In Chinese), 5, 79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Karpinski, A., Steinman, R. B., & Hilton, J. L. (2005). Attitude importance as a moderator of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitude measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(7), 949–962. doi:10.1177/0146167204273007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 432–440. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01545-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Bruin, R. H. (2004). Predictive validity of the implicit association test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 405–415. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 510–532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, S., Holroyd, C. B., Mol, N., & Coles, M. G. H. (2004). Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: Origins and functional significance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(4), 441–448. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(1), 17–26. doi:10.3758/CABN.3.1.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 152–159. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the implicit association test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Experimental Psychology (Formerly “Zeitschrift Für Experimentelle Psychologie”), 54(1), 14–29. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.14
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Electrophysiological activity generated during the implicit association test: A study using event-related potentials. Psychological Record, 59(2), 207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77(3), 247–265. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., & Cole, E. (2013). High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(1), 3–7. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner, L. A. (2002). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 447–467. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v489/n7416/abs/nature11467.html#supplementary-information
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, A. R. (2011). Validity and reliability of the IAT: Measuring gender and ethnic stereotypes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1937–1941. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schupp, H. T., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J., & Junghofer, M. (2006). Emotion and attention: Event-related brain potential studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 31–51. doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56002-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lange, P. A. M., Bekkers, R., Schuyt, T. N. M., & Vugt, M. V. (2007). From games to giving: Social value orientation predicts donations to noble causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 375–384. doi:10.1080/01973530701665223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Nunspeet, F., Ellemers, N., Derks, B., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2014). Moral concerns increase attention and response monitoring during IAT performance: ERP evidence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(2), 141–149. doi:10.1093/scan/nss118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 190–203. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. K., & Themanson, J. R. (2011). Neural correlates of the implicit association test: Evidence for semantic and emotional processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(4), 468–476. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. C., & Scior, K. (2014). Attitudes towards individuals with disabilities as measured by the implicit association test: A literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(2), 294–321. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931–959. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar