267
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The neural correlates of implicit theory violation

&
Pages 431-447 | Received 28 Mar 2014, Accepted 13 Jan 2015, Published online: 04 Feb 2015

REFERENCES

  • Allen, T. J., Sherman, J. W., Conrey, F. R., & Stroessner, S. J. (2009). Stereotype strength and attentional bias: Preference for confirming versus disconfirming information depends on processing capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1081–1087. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.002
  • Baetens, K., Van Der Cruyssen, L., Achtziger, A., Vandekerckhove, M., & Van Overwalle, F. (2011). N400 and LPP in spontaneous trait inferences. Brain Research, 1418, 83–92. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.08.067
  • Bartholow, B. D., Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2001). A psychophysiological examination of cognitive processing of and affective responses to social expectancy violations. Psychological Science, 12, 197–204. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00336
  • Burton, C. M., & Plaks, J. E. (2013). Lay theories of personality as cornerstones of meaning. In K. D. Markman, T. Proulx, & M. J. Lindberg (Eds.), The psychology of meaning (pp. 115–133). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Cacioppo, J. T., Crites Jr., S. L., Berntson, G. G., & Coles, M. G. H. (1993). If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should they not affect the event-related brain potential? Psychological Science, 4, 108–112. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00470.x
  • Cacioppo, J. T., Crites Jr., S. L., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorizations: I. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of trait negativity and extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 115–125. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.115
  • Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19–30. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
  • Coulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21–58. doi:10.1080/016909698386582
  • Cowles, H. W., Kluender, R., Kutas, M., & Polinsky, M. (2007). Violations of information structure: An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions. Brain and Language, 102, 228–242. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.004
  • Crites Jr., S. L., Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1995). Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorization: II. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 997–1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.997
  • Debruille, J. B. (2007). The N400 potential could index a semantic inhibition. Brain Research Reviews, 56, 472–477. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.10.001
  • Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 355–425. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00058027
  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis/Psychology Press.
  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
  • Erber, R., & Fiske, S. T. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709–726. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.709
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
  • Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Strack, F. (2000). When stereotype disconfirmation is a personal threat: How prejudice and prevention focus moderate incongruency effects. Social Cognition, 18, 178–197. doi:10.1521/soco.2000.18.2.178
  • Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Hajcak, G., Weinberg, A., MacNamara, A., & Foti, D. (2012). ERPs and the study of emotion. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of ERP Components (pp. 441–474). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44–56. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.44
  • Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25–38. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.25
  • Heider, J. D., Scherer, C. R., Skowronski, J. J., Wood, S. E., Edlund, J. E., & Hartnett, J. L. (2007). Trait expectancies and stereotype expectancies have the same effect on person memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 265–272. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.01.004
  • Herron, J. E. (2007). Decomposition of the ERP late posterior negativity: Effects of retrieval and response fluency. Psychophysiology, 44, 233–244. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00489.x
  • Heslin, P. A., Latham, G. P., & VandeWalle, D. (2005). The effect of implicit person theory on performance appraisals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 842–856. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.842
  • Hong, Y. (1994). Predicting trait versus process inferences: The role of implicit theories (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University.
  • Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered Assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Johansson, M., & Mecklinger, A. (2003). The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: Action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions. Biological Psychology, 64, 91–117. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00104-2
  • Kammrath, L., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Voicing conflict: Preferred conflict strategies among incremental and entity theorists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1497–1508. doi:10.1177/0146167206291476
  • Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 205–225. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002
  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–470. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.7350657
  • Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421–1436. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421
  • Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Milne, A. B. (1999). Tales of the unexpected: Executive function and person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 200–213. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.200
  • Molden, D. C., Plaks, J. E., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). “Meaningful” social inferences: Effects of implicit theories on inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 738–752. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.005
  • Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McLaughlin, J. (1997). Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Memory and Cognition, 25, 273–285. doi:10.3758/BF03211283
  • Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z
  • Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 786–803.
  • Osterhout, L., Kim, A., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). The neurobiology of sentence comprehension. In M. Spivey, M. Joannisse, & K. McCrae (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 365–389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Plaks, J. E., & Chasteen, A. (2013). Entity versus incremental theories predict older adults’ memory performance. Psychology and Aging, 28, 948–957. doi:10.1037/a0034348
  • Plaks, J. E., Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Violations of implicit theories and the sense of prediction and control: Implications for motivated person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 245–262. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.245
  • Plaks, J. E., & Halvorson, H. G. (2013). Does accountability attenuate or amplify stereotyping? The role of implicit theories. Social Cognition, 31, 543–561. doi:10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.543
  • Plaks, J. E., Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2009). Lay theories of personality: Cornerstones of meaning in social cognition. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1069–1081. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00222.x
  • Plaks, J. E., Malahy, L. W., Sedlins, M., & Shoda, Y. (2012). Folk beliefs about human genetic variation predict discrete versus continuous racial categorization and evaluative bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 31–39. doi:10.1177/1948550611408118
  • Plaks, J. E., McNichols, N. K., & Fortune, J. L. (2009). Thoughts versus deeds: Distal and proximal intent in lay judgments of moral responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1687–1701. doi:10.1177/0146167209345529
  • Plaks, J. E., & Stecher, K. (2007). Unexpected improvement, decline, and stasis: A prediction confidence perspective on achievement success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 667–684. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.667
  • Plaks, J. E., Stroessner, S. J., Dweck, C. S., & Sherman, J. W. (2001). Person theories and attention allocation: Preferences for stereotypic versus counterstereotypic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 876–893. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.876
  • Roese, N. J., & Sherman, J. W. (2007). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 91–115). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695–703. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
  • Sherman, J. W., Lee, A. Y., Bessenoff, G. R., & Frost, L. A. (1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 589–606. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.589
  • Skowronski, J. J. (2002). Honesty and intelligence judgments of individuals and groups: The effects of entity-related behavior diagnosticity and implicit theories. Social Cognition, 20, 136–169. doi:10.1521/soco.20.2.136.20993
  • Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689–699. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.689
  • Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2003). Implicit theories about personality and intelligence and their relationship to actual personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 939–951. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00310-0
  • Srull, T. L. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 440–463.
  • Stangor, C., & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social-developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42–61. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.42
  • Van Berkum, J. J. A., Van Den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580–591. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20054
  • Van Duynslaeger, M., Sterken, C., Van Overwalle, F., & Verstraeten, E. (2008). EEG components of spontaneous trait inferences. Social Neuroscience, 3, 164–177. doi:10.1080/17470910801907226
  • Van Duynslaeger, M., Van Overwalle, F., & Verstraeten, E. (2007). Electrophysiological time course and brain areas of spontaneous and intentional trait inferences. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 174–188. doi:10.1093/scan/nsm016
  • Weary, G., & Edwards, J. A. (1996). Causal-uncertainty beliefs and related goal structures. In R. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3, The interpersonal context (pp. 148–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Weisz, C., & Jones, E. E. (1993). Expectancy disconfirmation and dispositional inference: Latent strength of target-based and category-based expectancies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 563–573. doi:10.1177/0146167293195008
  • White, K. R., Crites Jr., S. L., Taylor, J. H., & Corral, G. (2009). Wait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 191–198. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp004

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.