Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment

References

• Bauman, C. W., McGraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., & Warren, C. (2014). Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 536–554. doi:10.1111/spc3.12131
   Google Scholar
• Choe, S. Y., & Min, K.-H. (2011). Who makes utilitarian judgments? The influences of emotions on utilitarian judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 580–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. F., & Gomila, A. (2012). Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1249–1264. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, F., Young, L., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view. In J. M. Doris (Ed.), Oxford handbook of moral psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford: Blackwell. (Reprinted in Foot (1978), Virtues and Vices.)
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, A. L., Koleva, S., Iyer, R., Graham, J., & Ditto, P. H. (2010). Moral identity in psychopathy. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 497–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, W. (1793/1926). Enquiry concerning political justice and its influence on general virtue and happiness. New York, NY: Alfred A Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The neuroscience of morality (pp. 35–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144–1154. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2107. doi:10.1126/science.1062872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahane, G. (2012). On the wrong track: Process and content in moral psychology. Mind and Language, 27(5), 519–545. doi:10.1111/mila.12001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahane, G. (2014). Intuitive and counterintuitive morality. In D. Jacobson & J. D’Arms (eds.), The science of ethics: Moral psychology and human agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane, G., Everett, J., Earp, B., Farias, M., & Savulescu, J. (2015). ‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, 193–209. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahane, G., & Shackel, N. (2008). Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias? Nature, 452, E7185. doi:10.1038/nature06785
   Google Scholar
• Kahane, G., & Shackel, N. (2010). Methodological issues in the neuroscience of moral judgement. Mind and Language, 25, 561–582. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01401.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahane, G., Wiech, K., Shackel, N., Farias, M., Savulescu, J., & Tracey, I. (2012). The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 393–402. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamm, F. M. (2007). Intricate ethics: Rights, responsibilities, and permissible harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314(5800), 829–832. doi:10.1126/science.1129156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson, K. M., Krueger, F., Koenigs, M., Hawley, A., Escobedo, J. R., Vasudeva, V., … Grafman, J. (2010). Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 378–384. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenigs, M., Kruepke, M., Zeier, J., & Newman, J. P. (2012). Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(6), 708–714. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenigs, M., & Tranel, D. (2007). Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: Evidence from the ultimatum game. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 951–956. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4606-06.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T. (2009). The role of moral commitments in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 33(2), 273–286. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01013.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. B., Clark, B. A., & Kane, M. J. (2008). Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 19, 549–557. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02122.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrinovich, L., O’Neill, P., & Jorgensen, M. (1993). An empirical study of moral intuitions: Toward an evolutionary ethics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 467–478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachels, J. (1975). Active and passive euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine, 292, 78–80. doi:10.1056/NEJM197501092920206 (Reprinted in: Singer P, ed. Applied Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430. doi:10.1038/nature11467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosas, A., & Koenigs, M. (2014). Beyond “utilitarianism”: Maximizing the clinical impact of moral judgment research. Social Neuroscience, 1–7. doi:10.1080/17470919.2014.937506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, W. D. (1930/2002). The right and the good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royzman, E. B., Landy, J. F., & Leeman, R. F. (2015). Are thoughtful people more utilitarian? CRT as a unique predictor of moral minimalism in the dilemmatic context. Cognitive Science, 39(2), 325–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(1), 229–243.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2005). Ethics and intuitions. The Journal of Ethics, 9, 331–352.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S., Niki, K., Fujisaki, S., & Akiyama, E. (2011). Neural basis of conditional cooperation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(3), 338–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W. B., Gómez, Á., Dovidio, J. F., Hart, S., & Jetten, J. (2010). Dying and killing for one’s group identity fusion moderates responses to intergroup versions of the trolley problem. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1176–1183. doi:10.1177/0956797610376656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415. doi:10.2307/796133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A. O. (1973). A critique of utilitarianism. In J. J. C. Smart & B. A. O. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar