The time course of neural responses to social versus non-social unfairness in the ultimatum game

References

• Abbink, K., Sadrieh, A., & Zamir, S. (2004). Fairness, public good, and emotional aspects of punishment behavior. Theory and Decision, 57(1), 25–57.
   Google Scholar
• Amodio, D. M., Devine, P. G., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: The role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholow, B. D., Pearson, M. A., Dickter, C. L., Sher, K. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2005). Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: Beyond errors and response conflict. Psychophysiology, 42(1), 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, P. S., Scheffers, M. K., & Coles, M. G. H. (1995). “Where did I go wrong?” A psychophysiological analysis of error detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1312–1322.
   Google Scholar
• Boksem, M. A. S., & Cremer, D. D. (2010). Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining. Social Neuroscience, 5(1), 118–128.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. E., & Zwick, R. (1995). Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 95–121.
   Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
   Google Scholar
• Brüne, M., Juckel, G., & Enzi, B. (2013). “An Eye for an Eye”? Neural correlates of retribution and forgiveness. PLoS One, 8(8), e73519.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Wu, Y., Tong, G., Guan, X., & Zhou, X. (2012). ERP correlates of social conformity in a line judgment task. BMC Neuroscience, 13(43), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K. (2005). Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(50), 11730–11737.
   Google Scholar
• Eadeh, F. R., Peak, S. A., & Lambert, A. J. (2017). The bittersweet taste of revenge: On the negative and positive consequences of retaliation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68(1), 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295(5563), 2279–2282.
   Google Scholar
• Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367–388.
   Google Scholar
• Halali, E., Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Meiran, N. (2011). When rationality and fairness conflict: The role of self-control in the ultimatum game. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1868852
   Google Scholar
• Harlé, K. M., Chang, L. J., Van’t Wout, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2012). The neural mechanisms of affect infusion in social economic decision-making: A mediating role of the anterior insula. Neuroimage, 61(1), 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hewig, J., Kretschmer, N., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., Coles, M. G., Holroyd, C. B., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2011). Why humans deviate from rational choice. Psychophysiology, 48(4), 507–514.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, J. B., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Error-related negativity predicts academic performance. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 192–196.
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109(4), 679–708.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, J., Cao, Y., Blue, P. R., & Zhou, X. (2014). Low social status decreases the neural salience of unfairness. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(11), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Knutson, B. (2004). Sweet revenge? Science, 305(5688), 1246–1247.
   Google Scholar
• Koban, L., Pichon, S., & Vuilleumier, P. (2014). Responses of medial and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to interpersonal conflict for resources. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 561–569.
   Google Scholar
• Krompinger, J. W., Moser, J. S., & Simons, R. F. (2008). Modulations of the electrophysiological response to pleasant stimuli by cognitive reappraisal. Emotion, 8(1), 132–137.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. K., & Harris, L. T. (2013). How social cognition can inform social decision making. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7(7), 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Wu, T., Broster, L. S., Feng, C., Zhang, D., Gu, R., & Luo, Y. J. (2014). The temporal course of the influence of anxiety on fairness considerations. Psychophysiology, 51(9), 834–842.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Q., Hu, Y., Jiang, S., & Meng, L. (2015). The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the ultimatum game: An ERP study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, L., & di Pellegrino, G. (2010). Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions. Emotion, 10(2), 169–180.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, J. S., Hajcak, G., Bukay, E., & Simons, R. F. (2006). Intentional modulation of emotional responding to unpleasant pictures: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 43(3), 292–296.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, M. C., Bradley, M. M., Löw, A., Versace, F., Moltó, J., & Lang, P. J. (2008). Affective picture perception: Emotion, context, and the late positive potential. Brain Research, 1189(1), 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Polezzi, D., Daum, I., Rubaltelli, E., Lotto, L., Civai, C., Sartori, G., & Rumiati, R. (2008). Mentalizing in economic decision-making. Behavioural Brain Research, 190(2), 218–223.
   Google Scholar
• Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. NeuroImage, 22(4), 1694–1703.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. E. (1995). Bargaining experiments. In J. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 253–348). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758.
   Google Scholar
• Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 257–261.
   Google Scholar
• Telpaz, A., Webb, R., & Levy, D. J. (2015). Using EEG to predict consumers’ future choices. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 511–529.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(4), 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Thiruchselvam, R., Blechert, J., Sheppes, G., Rydstrom, A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The temporal dynamics of emotion regulation: An EEG study of distraction and reappraisal. Biological Psychology, 87(1), 84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Van’t Wout, M., Kahn, R. S., Sanfey, A. G., & Aleman, A. (2006). Affective state and decision-making in the ultimatum game. Experimental Brain Research, 169(4), 564–568.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Li, J., Li, Z., Wei, M., & Li, S. (2016). Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1639, 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Hu, J., van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2012). Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: Does the initial ownership play a role?. PLoS One, 7(6), e39627.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., van Dijk, E., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2011). Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(1), 131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931–959.
   Google Scholar