Performance monitoring of self and other in a turn-taking piano duet: A dual-EEG study

References

• Balser, N., Lorey, B., Pilgramm, S., Naumann, T., Kindermann, S., Stark, R., … Munzert, J. (2014). The influence of expertise on brain activation of the action observation network during anticipation of tennis and volleyball serves. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 568.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert, M., & Altenmüller, E. O. (2003). Mapping perception to action in piano practice: A longitudinal DC-EEG study. BMC Neuroscience, 4, 26.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175.
   Google Scholar
• Bellebaum, C., Kobza, S., Thiele, S., & Daum, I. (2010). It was not MY fault: Event-related brain potentials in active and observational learning from feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2874–2883.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243–1249.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16, 1905–1910.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, H. W., Swainson, R., Durham, L., Benham, L., & Cools, R. (2011). Feedback-related negativity codes prediction error but not behavioral adjustment during probabilistic reversal learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(4), 936–946.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Lu, J., Wang, Y., Feng, Z., & Yuan, B. (2017). Social distance influences the outcome evaluation of cooperation and conflict: Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 647, 78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Colling, L. J., Thompson, W. F., & Sutton, J. (2014). The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 1193–1206.
   Google Scholar
• Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, E. S., Ramsey, R., Liepelt, R., Prinz, W., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2016). The shaping of social perception by stimulus and knowledge cues to human animacy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150075.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ausilio, A., Novembre, G., Fadiga, L., & Keller, P. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111–114.
   Google Scholar
• Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K. (2005). Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(50), 11730–11737.
   Google Scholar
• di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima, H., & Hiraki, K. (2009). Whose loss is it? Human electrophysiological correlates of non-self reward processing. Social Neuroscience, 4(3), 261–275.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzola, V., Rizzolatti, G., Wicker, B., & Keysers, C. (2007). The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. NeuroImage, 35, 1674–1684.
   Google Scholar
• Gentsch, K., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2013). Temporal dynamics of event-related potentials related to goal conduciveness and power appraisals. Psychophysiology, 50, 1010–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, L. V., Novembre, G., Keller, P. E., & Pickering, M. J. (2015). Causal role of motor simulation in turn-taking behavior. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(50), 16516–16520.
   Google Scholar
• Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2003). To err is autonomic: Error-related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post-error compensatory behavior. Psychophysiology, 40, 895–903.
   Google Scholar
• Hoefler, A., Athenstaedt, U., Corcoran, K., Ebner, F., Ischebeck, A., & Siegel, A. (2015). Coping with self-threat and the evaluation of self-related traits: An fMRI study. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0136027.
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109(4), 679–709.
   Google Scholar
• Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653–670.
   Google Scholar
• Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., Rizzolatti, G., & Ashe, J. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), e79.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S. K., Hirsh, J. B., & Chasteen, A. L. (2010). Your mistakes are mine: Self-other overlap predicts neural response to observed errors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 229–232.
   Google Scholar
• Katahira, K., Abla, D., Masuda, S., & Okanoya, K. (2008). Feedback-based error monitoring processes during musical performance: An ERP study. Neuroscience Research, 61, 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522–525.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2003). Action identity: Evidence from self-recognition, prediction, and coordination. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 620–632.
   Google Scholar
• Knutson, B., & Cooper, J. C. (2005). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction. Current Opinion in Neurology, 18, 411–417.
   Google Scholar
• Koban, L., & Pourtois, G. (2014). Brain systems underlying the affective and social monitoring of actions: An integrative review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Koban, L., Pourtois, G., Bediou, B., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012). Effects of social context and predictive relevance on action outcome monitoring. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 460–478.
   Google Scholar
• Kobza, S., Thoma, P., Daum, I., & Bellebaum, C. (2011). The feedback-related negativity is modulated by feedback probability in observational learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 225, 396–404.
   Google Scholar
• Lahav, A., Saltzman, E., & Schlaug, G. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(2), 308–314.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, M. J., Fair, J. E., Good, D. A., & Baldwin, S. A. (2010). Empathy and error processing. Psychophysiology, 47, 415–424.
   Google Scholar
• Leng, Y., & Zhou, X. (2010). Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by interpersonal relationship: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 48, 448–455.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P., Han, C., Lei, Y., Holroyd, C. B., & Li, H. (2011). Responsibility modulates neural mechanisms of outcome processing: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 48, 1129–1133.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P., Jia, S., Feng, T., Liu, Q., Suo, T., & Li, H. (2010). The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. NeuroImage, 52, 1727–1733.
   Google Scholar
• Liepelt, R., & Brass, M. (2010). Automatic imitation of physically impossible movements. Social Cognition, 28(1), 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Loehr, J. D., Kourtis, D., & Brazil, I. A. (2015). It’s not just my fault: Neural correlates of feedback processing in solo and joint action. Biological Psychology, 111, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Loehr, J. D., Kourtis, D., Vesper, C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint action outcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1049–1061.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Q., Shen, Q., Xu, Q., Li, D., Shu, L., & Weber, B. (2011). Empathic responses to others’ gains and losses: An electrophysiological investigation. NeuroImage, 54, 2472–2480.
   Google Scholar
• Maidhof, C., Vavatzanidis, N., Prinz, W., Rieger, M., & Koelsch, S. (2010). Processing expectancy violations during music performance and perception: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(10), 2401–2413.
   Google Scholar
• Mathias, B., Gehring, W. J., & Palmer, C. (2017). Auditory N1 reveals planning and monitoring processes during music performance. Psychophysiology, 54, 235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Moors, A. (2007). Can cognitive methods be used to study the unique aspect of emotion: An appraisal theorist’s answer. Cognition and Emotion, 21(6), 1238–1269.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, S., Holroyd, C. B., Mol, N., & Coles, M. G. H. (2004). Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: Origins and functional significance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 441–448.
   Google Scholar
• Novembre, G., Ticini, L. F., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Keller, P. E. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in joint action. Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2894–2903.
   Google Scholar
• Novembre, G., Ticini, L. F., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Keller, P. E. (2014). Motor simulation and the coordination of self and other in real-time joint action. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1062–1068.
   Google Scholar
• Obhi, S. S., & Hall, P. (2011). Sense of agency in joint action: Influence of human and computer co-actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 663–670.
   Google Scholar
• Osinsky, R., Ulrich, N., Mussel, P., Feser, L., Gunawardena, A., & Hewig, J. (2017). The feedback-related negativity reflects the combination of instantaneous and long-term values of decision outcomes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(3), 424–434.
   Google Scholar
• Pfabigan, D. M., Alexopoulos, J., Bauer, H., Lamm, C., & Sailer, U. (2011). All about the money? External performance monitoring is affected by monetary, but not by socially conveyed feedback cues in more antisocial individuals. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 100.
   Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148.
   Google Scholar
• Press, C. (2011). Action observation and robotic agents: Learning and anthropomorphism. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1410–1418.
   Google Scholar
• Press, C., Gillmeister, H., & Heyes, C. (2007). Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2509–2514.
   Google Scholar
• Rak, N., Bellebaum, C., & Thoma, P. (2013). Empathy and feedback processing in active and observational learning. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 869–884.
   Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof, R. K., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. V., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306(5695), 443–447.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, B., Barat, M., & Fujioka, T. (2017). Sound-making actions lead to immediate plastic changes of neuromagnetic evoked responses and induced beta-band oscillations during perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(24), 5948–5959.
   Google Scholar
• Santesso, D. L., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2009). The error-related negativity is related to risk taking and empathy in young men. Psychophysiology, 46, 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knöblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Severo, M. C., Walentowska, W., Moors, A., & Pourtois, G. (2017). Goal impact influences the evaluative component of performance monitoring: Evidence from ERPs. Biological Psychology, 129, 90–102.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183–242). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tadel, F., Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., Pantazis, D., & Leahy, R. M. (2011). Brainstorm: A user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, Y. F., Scherfler, C., Brooks, D. J., Sawamoto, N., & Castiello, U. (2004). The human premotor cortex is ‘mirror’ only for biological actions. Current Biology, 14(2), 117–120.
   Google Scholar
• Talmi, D., Atkinson, R., & El-Deredy, W. (2013). The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8264–8269.
   Google Scholar
• Thoma, P., & Bellebaum, C. (2012). Your error’s got me feeling – How empathy relates to the electrophysiological correlates of performance monitoring. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 135.
   Google Scholar
• Ullsperger, M., Fischer, A. G., Nigbur, R., & Endrass, T. (2014). Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Vesper, C., Abramova, E., Bütepage, J., Ciardo, F., Crossey, B., Effenberg, A., … Wahn, B. (2017). Joint action: Mental representations, shared information and general mechanisms for coordinating with others. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2039.
   Google Scholar
• Walentowska, W., Moors, A., Paul, K., & Pourtois, G. (2016). Goal relevance influences performance monitoring at the level of the FRN and P3 components. Psychophysiology, 53, 1020–1033.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M., Cassidy, R. J., & Zbyszyński, M. F. (2004). Audio and gesture latency measurements on Linux and OSX. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 423–429). Miami, FL: International Computer Music Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, R., & Zhou, X. (2006). Brain responses to outcomes of one’s own and other’s performance in a gambling task. NeuroReport, 17(16), 1747–1751.
   Google Scholar
• Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L., & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 547–558.
   Google Scholar