435
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Seeing is believing: Early perceptual brain processes are modified by social feedback

, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 519-529 | Received 05 Apr 2018, Published online: 23 Aug 2018

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations (pp. 177–190). Oxford, England: Carnegie Press.
  • Berns, G. S., Chappelow, J., Zink, C. F., Pagnoni, G., Martin-Skurski, M. E., & Richards, J. (2005). Neurobiological correlates of social conformity and independence during mental rotation. Biological Psychiatry, 58, 245–253.
  • Bublatzky, F., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J., Schmälzle, R., & Schupp, H. T. (2010). The interaction of anticipatory anxiety and emotional picture processing: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 47, 687–696.
  • Bublatzky, F., & Schupp, H. T. (2012). Pictures cueing threat: Brain dynamics in viewing explicitly instructed danger cues. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 611–622.
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
  • Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15(2), 95–111.
  • Eskenazi, T., Montalan, B., Jacquot, A., Proust, J., Grèzes, J., & Conty, L. (2016). Social influence on metacognitive evaluations: The power of nonverbal cues. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2233–2247.
  • Gatton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55(4), 468–484.
  • Groh-Bordin, C., Busch, N. A., Herrmann, C. S., & Zimmer, H. D. (2007). Event-related potential repetition effects at encoding predict memory performance at test. Neuroreport, 18(18), 1905–1909.
  • Henson, R. N. A., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia, 41(3), 263–270.
  • Herrmann, C. S., & Knight, R. T. (2001). Mechanisms of human attention: Event-related potentials and oscillations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 465–476.
  • Hillyard, S. A., & Annlo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 781–787.
  • Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 353, 1257–1270.
  • Hopfinger, J. B., & West, V. M. (2006). Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing. NeuroImage, 31, 774–789.
  • Johannes, S., Münte, T. F., Heinze, H. J., & Mangun, G. R. (1995). Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 2, 189–205.
  • Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., & van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the radboud faces database. Cognition & Emotion, 24(8), 1377–1388.
  • Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Luck, S. J., Heinze, H. J., Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1990). Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 528–542.
  • Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: An electrophysiological analysis. International Journal of Neuroscience, 80(1–4), 281–297.
  • Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicated changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 17(4), 1057–1074.
  • McCurdy, L. Y., Maniscalco, B., Metcalfe, J., Liu, K. Y., de Lange, F. P., & Lau, H. (2013). Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(5), 1897–1906.
  • Michalowski, J. M., Melzig, C. A., Weike, A. I., Stockburger, J., Schupp, H. T., & Hamm, A. O. (2009). Brain dynamics in spider-phobic individuals exposed to phobia-relevant and other emotional stimuli. Emotion, 9(3), 306–315.
  • Michalowski, J. M., Pané-Farré, C. A., Löw, A., & Hamm, A. O. (2015). Brain dynamics of visual attention during anticipation and encoding of threat- and safe-cues in spider-phobic individuals. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(9), 1177–1186.
  • Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32(4), 365–380.
  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.
  • Oliver, Z. J., Cristino, F., Roberts, M. V., Pegna, A. J., & Leek, E. C. (2017). Stereo viewing modulates three-dimensional shape processing during object recognition: A high-density ERP study. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 44(4), 518–534.
  • Olofsson, J. K., & Polich, J. (2007). Affective visual event-related potentials: Arousal, repetition, and time-on-task. Biological Psychology, 75(1), 101–108.
  • Pegna, A. J., Darque, A., Roberts, M. V., & Leek, E. C. (2017). Effects of stereoscopic disparity on early ERP components during classification of three-dimensional objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 1–35.
  • Schindler, S., Wegrzyn, M., Steppacher, I., & Kissler, J. M. (2014). It´s all in your head - how anticipating evaluation affects the processing of emotional trait adjectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1292), 1–10.
  • Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (1997). Social categorization and perceptual judgment of size: When perception is social. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1177–1190.
  • Trautmann-Lengsfeld, S. A., & Herrmann, C. S. (2013). EEG reveals an early influence of social conformity on visual processing in group pressure situations. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 75–89.
  • Wykowska, A., Wiese, E., Prosser, A., & Müller, H. (2014). Beliefs about the minds of others influence how we process sensory information. Plos One, 9(4), 1–11.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.