Framing a trust game as a power game greatly affects interbrain synchronicity between trustor and trustee

References

• Astolfi, L., Toppi, J., Fallani, F. D. V., Vecchiato, G., Salinari, S., Mattia, D., … Babiloni, F. (2010). Neuroelectrical hyperscanning measures simultaneous brain activity in humans. Brain Topography, 23(3), 243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Babiloni, F., & Astolfi, L. (2014). Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: Past, present and future. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Balconi, M., & Pagani, S. (2014). Personality correlates (BAS-BIS), self-perception of social ranking, and cortical (alpha frequency band) modulation in peer-group comparison. Physiology & Behavior, 133, 207–215.
   Google Scholar
• Beckes, L., & Coan, J. A. (2011). Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 976–988.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. Journal Of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Boksem, M. A., Smolders, R., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Social power and approach-related neural activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(5), 516–520.
   Google Scholar
• Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T., & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(3–4), 466–476.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, A. P. (2013). On the interpretation of synchronization in EEG hyperscanning studies: A cautionary note. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 881.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, T., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (2000). Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(1), 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., & Berntson, G. G. (2003). The anatomy of loneliness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(10), 3721–3726.
   Google Scholar
• Croson, R., & Buchan, N. (1999). Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from trust games. American Economic Review, 89(2), 386–391.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, X., Bryant, D. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2012). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. Neuroimage, 59(3), 2430–2437.
   Google Scholar
• Delaherche, E., Dumas, G., Nadel, J., & Chetouani, M. (2015). Automatic measure of imitation during social interaction: A behavioral and hyperscanning-EEG benchmark. Pattern Recognition Letters, 66, 118–126.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1611–1618.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PloS one, 5(8), e12166.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. M., Dillon, K. D., & Rand, D. G. (2015). Fast but not intuitive, slow but not reflective: Decision conflict drives reaction times in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 951.
   Google Scholar
• Fallani, F. D. V., Nicosia, V., Sinatra, R., Astolfi, L., Cincotti, F., Mattia, D., … He, B. (2010). Defecting or not defecting: How to “read” human behavior during cooperative games by EEG measurements. PloS one, 5(12), e14187.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. NY: Free Press Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Galang, C. M., & Obhi, S. S. (2018). Social power and frontal alpha asymmetry. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–13. doi:10.1080/17588928.2018.1504763
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, P., Weissman-Fogel, I., Dumas, G., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2018). Brain-to-brain coupling during handholding is associated with pain reduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201703643. doi:10.1073/pnas.1703643115
   Google Scholar
• Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55(4), 468–484.
   Google Scholar
• Guinote, A. (2017). How power affects people: Activating, wanting, and goal seeking. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 353–381.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2003). Gaming trust. In E. Ostrom and J. Walker (Eds), Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research, 80–101. NY: Russel Sage Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114–121.
   Google Scholar
• Jahng, J., Kralik, J. D., Hwang, D.-U., & Jeong, J. (2017). Neural dynamics of two players when using nonverbal cues to gauge intentions to cooperate during the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. NeuroImage, 157, 263–274.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal Of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865–889.
   Google Scholar
• Kawasaki, M., Yamada, Y., Ushiku, Y., Miyauchi, E., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2013). Inter-brain synchronization during coordination of speech rhythm in human-to-human social interaction. Scientific Reports, 3, 1692.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130394.
   Google Scholar
• King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 78–83.
   Google Scholar
• Koike, T., Tanabe, H. C., & Sadato, N. (2015). Hyperscanning neuroimaging technique to reveal the “two-in-one” system in social interactions. Neuroscience Research, 90, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping, 8(4), 194–208.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. OUP Oxford. NY: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167–202.
   Google Scholar
• Mu, Y., Guo, C., & Han, S. (2016). Oxytocin enhances inter-brain synchrony during social coordination in male adults. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(12), 1882–1893.
   Google Scholar
• Mu, Y., Han, S., & Gelfand, M. J. (2017). The role of gamma interbrain synchrony in social coordination when humans face territorial threats. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(10), 1614–1623.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (2003). Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons for experimental research. NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, A., Carreiras, M., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2017). Brain-to-brain entrainment: EEG interbrain synchronization while speaking and listening. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 4190.
   Google Scholar
• Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2004). How would you feel versus how do you think she would feel? A neuroimaging study of perspective-taking with social emotions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(6), 988–999.
   Google Scholar
• Ruff, C. C., & Fehr, E. (2014). The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(8), 549.
   Google Scholar
• Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758.
   Google Scholar
• Scharlemann, J. P., Eckel, C. C., Kacelnik, A., & Wilson, R. K. (2001). The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. Journal Of Economic Psychology, 22(5), 617–640.
   Google Scholar
• Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience 1. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393–414.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, H., Mai, X., Wang, S., Zhu, C., Krueger, F., & Liu, C. (2015). Interpersonal brain synchronization in the right temporo-parietal junction during face-to-face economic exchange. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(1), 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., DeGuzman, G. C., & Kelso, J. S. (2007). The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(19), 8190–8195.
   Google Scholar
• Toppi, J., Borghini, G., Petti, M., He, E. J., De Giusti, V., He, B., … Babiloni, F. (2016). Investigating cooperative behavior in ecological settings: An EEG hyperscanning study. PloS one, 11(4), e0154236.
   Google Scholar
• Willinger, M., Keser, C., Lohmann, C., & Usunier, J.-C. (2003). A comparison of trust and reciprocity between France and Germany: Experimental investigation based on the investment game. Journal Of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 447–466.
   Google Scholar
• Zak, P. J., Kurzban, R., Ahmadi, S., Swerdloff, R. S., Park, J., Efremidze, L., … Matzner, W. (2009). Testosterone administration decreases generosity in the ultimatum game. PloS one, 4(12), e8330.
   Google Scholar
• Zoefel, B., & VanRullen, R. (2016). EEG oscillations entrain their phase to high-level features of speech sound. Neuroimage, 124, 16–23.
   Google Scholar