A double-blind HD-tDCS/EEG study examining right temporoparietal junction involvement in facial emotion processing

References

• Accornero, N., Capozza, M., Pieroni, L., Pro, S., Davi, L., & Mecarelli, O. (2014). EEG mean frequency changes in healthy subjects during prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 112(6), 1367–1375.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the mind in the eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, malesand females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., & Taylor, M. J. (2003). Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 613–620.
   Google Scholar
• Bickart, K. C., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). The amygdala as a hub in brain networks that support social life. Neuropsychologia, 63, 235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Biervoye, A., Dricot, L., Ivanoiu, A., & Samson, D. (2016). Impaired spontaneous belief inference following acquired damage to the left posterior temporoparietal junction. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(10), 1513–1520.
   Google Scholar
• Boksem, M. A., Meijman, T. F., & Lorist, M. M. (2005). Effects of mental fatigue on attention: An ERP study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Boksem, M. A., Meijman, T. F., & Lorist, M. M. (2006). Mental fatigue, motivation and action monitoring. Biological Psychology, 72(2), 123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Campanella, S., Schroder, E., Monnart, A., Vanderhasselt, M. A., Duprat, R., Rabijns, M., … Baeken, C. (2017). Transcranial direct current stimulation over the right frontal inferior cortex decreases neural activity needed to achieve inhibition: A double-blind ERP study in a male population. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 48(3), 176–188.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. M., & Huettel, S. A. (2013). A nexus model of the temporal-parietal junction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(7), 328–336.
   Google Scholar
• Cunillera, T., Brignani, D., Cucurell, D., Fuentemilla, L., & Miniussi, C. (2016). The right inferior frontal cortex in response inhibition: A tDCS-ERP co-registration study. NeuroImage, 140, 66–75.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S., Holland, P., Frens, M. A., & Donchin, O. (2016). Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on neuronal functions. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 550.
   Google Scholar
• Demirtas-Tatlidede, A., Vahabzadeh-Hagh, A. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2013). Can noninvasive brain stimulation enhance cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders? Neuropharmacology, 64, 566–578.
   Google Scholar
• Dmochowski, J. P., Datta, A., Bikson, M., Su, Y., & Parra, L. C. (2011). Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. Journal of Neural Engineering, 8(4), 046011.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, P. H., Rinehart, N. J., & Enticott, P. G. (2015). Noninvasive stimulation of the temporoparietal junction: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 547–572.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, C. M. (2016). The junction between self and other? Temporo-parietal dysfunction in neuropsychiatry. Neuropsychologia. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.030
   Google Scholar
• Enticott, P. G., Fitzgibbon, B. M., Kennedy, H. A., Arnold, S. L., Elliot, D., Peachey, A., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2014). A double-blind, randomised trial of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for autism spectrum disorder. Brain Stimulation, 7(2), 206–211.
   Google Scholar
• Enticott, P. G., Johnston, P. J., Herring, S. E., Hoy, K. E., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2008). Mirror neuron activation is associated with facial emotion processing. Neuropsychologia, 46(11), 2851–2854.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 459–473.
   Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J., & Vossel, S. (2013). Re-evaluating the role of TPJ in attentional control: Contextual updating? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10 Pt 2), 2608–2620.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, J., Bikson, M., Kappenman, E. S., Clark, V. P., Coslett, H. B., Hamblin, M. R., … Calabrese, E. (2017). Mechanisms and effects of transcranial direct current stimulation. Dose-Response, 15(1), 1559325816685467.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Z., Chen, R., Zhang, K., Pan, Y., & Wu, J. (2016). The impairing effect of mental fatigue on visual sustained attention under monotonous multi-object visual attention task in long durations: An event-related potential based study. PloS one, 11(9), e0163360.
   Google Scholar
• Hampson, E., van Anders, S. M., & Mullin, L. I. (2006). A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: Test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(6), 401–416.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. W., & Marois, R. (2014). Functional fractionation of the stimulus-driven attention network. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(20), 6958–6969.
   Google Scholar
• Heimrath, K., Sandmann, P., Becke, A., Müller, N., & Zaehle, T. (2012). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the parietal cortex in a visuo-spatial working memory task. Frontiers In Psychiatry, 3(56). doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00056
   Google Scholar
• Heinisch, C., Dinse, H. R., Tegenthoff, M., Juckel, G., & Bruene, M. (2011). An rTMS study into self-face recognition using video-morphing technique. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(4), 442–449.
   Google Scholar
• Heinisch, C., Krüger, M. C., & Brüne, M. (2012). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the temporoparietal junction influences distinction of self from famous but not unfamiliar others. Behavioral Neuroscience, 126(6), 792–796.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, M. J., Ehlis, A. C., Ellgring, H., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2005). Early stages (P100) of face perception in humans as measured with event-related potentials (ERPs). Journal of Neural Transmission, 112(8), 1073–1081.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, H., Kessler, H., Eppel, T., Rukavina, S., & Traue, H. C. (2010). Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 278–283.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, J., Carter, O., & Forte, J. D. (2014). Transcranial direct current stimulation: Five important issues we aren’t discussing (but probably should be). Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. A., Cowell, P. E., Boucher, J., Broks, P., Mayes, A., Farrant, A., & Roberts, N. (2000). Convergent neuroanatomical and behavioural evidence of an amygdala hypothesis of autism. NeuroReport, 11(13), 2931–2935.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, B., Hopwood, C. J., Wainer, A., & Brent Donnellan, M. (2011). A comparison of three self-report measures of the broader autism phenotype in a non-clinical sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(12), 1646-1657. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1192-2
   Google Scholar
• Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004). Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects. Neuroreport, 15(8), 1261–1265.
   Google Scholar
• Izurieta Hidalgo, N. A., Oelkers-Ax, R., Nagy, K., Mancke, F., Bohus, M., Herpertz, S. C., & Bertsch, K. (2016). Time course of facial emotion processing in women with borderline personality disorder: An ERP study. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 41(1), 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, L., Koslowsky, M., & Lavidor, M. (2012). tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: A meta-analytical review. Experimental Brain Research, 216(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. J., Enticott, P. G., Mayes, A. K., Hoy, K. E., Herring, S. E., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2010). Symptom correlates of static and dynamic facial affect processing in schizophrenia: Evidence of a double dissociation? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(4), 680–687.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, C., & Rossion, B. (2005). The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(11), 2613–2631.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Somerville, L., Johnstone, T., Alexander, A., & Whalen, P. (2003). Inverse amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex responses to surprised faces. Neuroreport, 14(18), 2317–2322.
   Google Scholar
• Kleih, S. C., Nijboer, F., Halder, S., & Kübler, A. (2010). Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain–Computer interface use. Clinical Neurophysiology, 121(7), 1023–1031.
   Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., & Hanslmayr, S. (2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–Timing hypothesis. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Koster-Hale, J., Richardson, H., Velez, N., Asaba, M., Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2017). Mentalizing regions represent distributed, continuous, and abstract dimensions of others’ beliefs. NeuroImage, 161, 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kubit, B., & Jack, A. I. (2013). Rethinking the role of the rTPJ in attention and social cognition in light of the opposing domains hypothesis: Findings from an ALE-based meta-analysis and resting-state functional connectivity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 323.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, S. F., Nelson, C. A., & Collins, P. F. (1990). Event-related potentials to emotional and neutral stimuli. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12(6), 946–958.
   Google Scholar
• Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Bonora, I., Harnett Sheehan, K., … Dunbar, G. C. (1997). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry, 12(5), 224–231.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. M., Uehara, K., & Hanakawa, T. (2015). The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 9, 181.
   Google Scholar
• Linden, D. E. J. (2005). The P300: Where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us? The Neuroscientist, 11(6), 563–576.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, M. V., Chakrabarti, B., Bullmore, E. T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Specialization of right temporo-parietal junction for mentalizing and its relation to social impairments in autism. NeuroImage, 56(3), 1832–1838.
   Google Scholar
• López-Alonso, V., Cheeran, B., Río-Rodríguez, D., & Fernández-del-Olmo, M. (2014). Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimulation, 7(3), 372–380.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. J. (2014). Towards a reconceptualization of the temporoparietal junction in stimulus-driven attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(40), 13277–13278.
   Google Scholar
• Mai, X., Zhang, W., Hu, X., Zhen, Z., Xu, Z., Zhang, J., & Liu, C. (2016). Using tDCS to explore the role of the right temporo-parietal junction in theory of mind and cognitive empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 380.
   Google Scholar
• Mars, R., Sallet, J., Schüffelgen, U., Jbabdi, S., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2012). Connectivity-based subdivisions of the human right “temporoparietal junction area”: Evidence for different areas participating in different cortical networks. Cerebral Cortex, 22(8), 1894–1903.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, M., Clewett, D., Sakaki, M., & Harley, C. W. (2016). Norepinephrine ignites local hotspots of neuronal excitation: How arousal amplifies selectivity in perception and memory. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 39, e200.
   Google Scholar
• Mavratzakis, A., Herbert, C., & Walla, P. (2016). Emotional facial expressions evoke faster orienting responses, but weaker emotional responses at neural and behavioural levels compared to scenes: A simultaneous EEG and facial EMG study. NeuroImage, 124(Part A), 931–946.
   Google Scholar
• Meaux, E., Roux, S., & Batty, M. (2014). Early visual ERPs are influenced by individual emotional skills. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), 1089–1098.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, V. (2015). Salience network. In A. W. Toga (Ed.), Brain mapping: An encyclopedic reference (pp. 597–611). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miniussi, C., Brignani, D., & Pellicciari, M. C. (2012). Combining transcranial electrical stimulation with electroencephalography: A multimodal approach. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 43(3), 184–191.
   Google Scholar
• Nejadgholi, I., Davidson, T., Blais, C., Tremblay, F., & Bolic, M. (2015). Classification of responders versus non-responders to tDCS by analyzing voltage between anode and cathode during treatment session. In D. A. Jaffray (Ed.), World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering, June 7– 12,2015, Toronto, Canada (pp. 990–993). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• neuroConn. (2014). neuroConn programmable direct current stimulator user’s manual (MC version). Ilmenau, Germany: neuroConn GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsche, M. A., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., … Pascual-Leone, A. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation, 1(3), 206–223.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 527(Pt 3), 633–639.
   Google Scholar
• Oberman, L. M., Rotenberg, A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2013). Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(2), 524–536.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, J. K., & Polich, J. (2007). Affective visual event-related potentials: Arousal, repetition, and time-on-task. Biological Psychology, 75(1), 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Pizzagalli, D., Regard, M., & Lehmann, D. (1999). Rapid emotional face processing in the human right and left brain hemispheres: An ERP study. NeuroReport, 10(13), 2691–2698.
   Google Scholar
• Ramaraju, S., Izzidien, A., Roula, M. A., & McCarthy, P. (2014). Effect of tDCS application on P300 potentials: A randomized, double blind placebo controlled study. In Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE Symposium on computational intelligence, cognitive algorithms, mind, and brain (CCMB). Orlando, FL: IEEE Computational Intelligence Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009). Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(12), 2008–2039.
   Google Scholar
• Rozenkrants, B., Olofsson, J. K., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective visual event-related potentials: Arousal, valence, and repetition effects for normal and distorted pictures. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 67(2), 114–123.
   Google Scholar
• Santiesteban, I., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2015). Functional lateralization of temporoparietal junction - imitation inhibition, visual perspective-taking and theory of mind. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 42(8), 2527–2533.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, R. (2010). The right temporo-parietal junction: A specific brain region for thinking about thoughts. In A. M. Leslie & T. German (Eds.), Handbook of theory of mind. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1835–1842.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, J., Triantafyllou, C., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Brown, E. N., & Saxe, R. (2009). Distinct regions of right temporo-parietal junction are selective for theory of mind and exogenous attention. PloS one, 4(3), e4869.
   Google Scholar
• Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sellaro, R., Guroglu, B., Nitsche, M. A., van Den Wildenberg, W. P., Massaro, V., Durieux, J., … Colzato, L. S. (2015). Increasing the role of belief information in moral judgments by stimulating the right temporoparietal junction. Neuropsychologia, 77, 400–408.
   Google Scholar
• Sellaro, R., Nitsche, M. A., & Colzato, L. S. (2016). The stimulated social brain: Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on social cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369(1), 218–239.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, M., Kim, D. W., Yoon, S., Park, G., Im, C. H., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Influence of spatial frequency and emotion expression on face processing in patients with panic disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 197, 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Siegal, M., & Varley, R. (2002). Neural systems involved in “theory of mind”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(6), 463–471.
   Google Scholar
• Sowden, S., Wright, G. R., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2015). Transcranial current stimulation of the temporoparietal junction improves lie detection. Current Biology, 25(18), 2447–2451.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., … Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168(3), 242–249.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, P., Hsu, T.-Y., Chang, C.-F., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., Muggleton, N. G., … Juan, C.-H. (2012). Unleashing potential: Transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(31), 10554.
   Google Scholar
• Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829–858.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke, S., Bardi, L., Lamm, C., & Goubert, L. (2016). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in the elicitation of vicarious experiences and detection accuracy while observing pain and touch. Experimental Brain Research, 234(4), 1019–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Villamar, M. F., Volz, M. S., Bikson, M., Datta, A., Dasilva, A. F., & Fregni, F. (2013). Technique and considerations in the use of 4 × 1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Journal of Visualised Experiments, (77), e50309. doi:10.3791/50309
   Google Scholar
• Wiethoff, S., Hamada, M., & Rothwell, J. C. (2014). Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimulation, 7(3), 468–475.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F. (2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials (ERPs) in studies of perception and attention. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(8). doi:10.3758/APP.72.8.2031
   Google Scholar
• Ye, H., Chen, S., Huang, D., Zheng, H., Jia, Y., & Luo, J. (2015). Modulation of neural activity in the temporoparietal junction with transcranial direct current stimulation changes the role of beliefs in moral judgment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 659.
   Google Scholar
• Young, L., Dodell-Feder, D., & Saxe, R. (2010). What gets the attention of the temporo-parietal junction? An fMRI investigation of attention and theory of mind. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2658–2664.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, K., Zhao, J., Zhang, M., Cui, Q., & Fu, X. (2017). Neural responses to rapid facial expressions of fear and surprise. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(761). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00761
   Google Scholar