Electromagnetic radiation: a new charming actor in hematopoiesis?

References

• Özdemir F, Kargi A. Electromagnetic waves and human health. Electromagn Waves. 2011;2:473.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlbom A, Bridges J, De Seze R, et al. Possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on human health–opinion of the scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks (SCENIHR). Toxicology. 2008;246(2–3):248–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, M., Biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Bioelectrochemistry and bioenergetics. 1993;32(3): p. 203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulder JE, Foster KR. Biological effects of power-frequency fields as they relate to carcinogenesis. Pro Soc Exp Biol Med. 1995;209(4):309–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi K, Kaneko I, Date M, et al. Effect of pulsing electromagnetic fields on DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in culture. Experientia. 1986;42(2):185–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kavand H, Haghighipour N, Zeynali B, et al. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field in mesenchymal stem cells gene regulation: chondrogenic markers evaluation. Artif Organs. 2016;40(10):929–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross C.L., et al. The effect of low-frequency electromagnetic field on human bone marrow stem/progenitor cell differentiation. Stem cell research. 2015;15(1): p. 96–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CC, Lin RW, Chang CW, et al. Single‐pulsed electromagnetic field therapy increases osteogenic differentiation through Wnt signaling pathway and sclerostin downregulation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015;36(7):494–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai MT, Li WJ, Tuan RS, et al. Modulation of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells by specific pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(9):1169–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani M, Ballerini M, Ferraro L, et al. Magnetic field effects on human lymphocytes. Electro Magnetobiol. 2001;20(1):81–106.
   Google Scholar
• Reddig A, Fatahi M, Roggenbuck D, et al. Impact of in vivo high-field-strength and ultra-high-field-strength MR imaging on DNA double-strand-break formation in human lymphocytes. Radiology. 2017;282(3):782–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friebe B, Godenschweger F, Fatahi M, et al. The potential toxic impact of different gadolinium-based contrast agents combined with 7-T MRI on isolated human lymphocytes. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018;2(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saino E, Fassina L, Van Vlierberghe S, et al. Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells seeded onto gelatin cryogel. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011;24(1_suppl2):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsia G, Vlastos D, Matthopoulos DP. Effect of 910-MHz electromagnetic field on rat bone marrow. Sci World J. 2004;4:48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lisi A, Pozzi D, Pasquali E, et al. Three dimensional (3D) analysis of the morphological changes induced by 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on human lymphoblastoid cells (Raji). Bioelectromagnetics. 2000;21(1):46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund R, Leszczynski D. Mobile phone radiation causes changes in gene and protein expression in human endothelial cell lines and the response seems to be genome‐and proteome‐dependent. Proteomics. 2006;6(17):4769–4780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Johnson D, Dunbar K, et al. 2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured human cells. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(21):4829–4836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes FS, Greenebaum B. The effects of weak magnetic fields on radical pairs. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015;36(1):45–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H, Singh NP. Acute low‐intensity microwave exposure increases DNA single‐strand breaks in rat brain cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 1995;16(3):207–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H. Single-and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1996;69(4):513–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank M, and R. Goodman, Initial interactions in electromagnetic field‐induced biosynthesis. Journal of cellular physiology. 2004;199(3): p. 359–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama S, Nakahara T, Wake K, et al. Effects of high frequency electromagnetic fields on micronucleus formation in CHO-K1 cells. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2003;541(1–2):81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavicic I, Trosic I. In vitro testing of cellular response to ultra high frequency electromagnetic field radiation. Toxicol in Vitro. 2008;22(5):1344–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JL, Singh NP, Lai H. Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage. Pathophysiology. 2009;16(2–3):79–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manti L, Braselmann H, Calabrese M, et al. Effects of modulated microwave radiation at cellular telephone frequency (1.95 GHz) on X-ray-induced chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes in vitro. Radiat Res. 2008;169(5):575–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baohong W, Lifen J, Lanjuan L, et al. Evaluating the combinative effects on human lymphocyte DNA damage induced by ultraviolet ray C plus 1.8 GHz microwaves using comet assay in vitro. Toxicology. 2007;232(3):311–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baohong W, Jiliang H, Lifen J, et al. Studying the synergistic damage effects induced by 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field radiation (RFR) with four chemical mutagens on human lymphocyte DNA using comet assay in vitro. Mutat Res. 2005;578(1–2):149–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes A, Collier M, Slaets D, et al. 954 MHz microwaves enhance the mutagenic properties of mitomycin C. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1996;28(1):26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes A, Collier M, Van Gorp U, et al. Cytogenetic effects of 935.2-MHz (GSM) microwaves alone and in combination with mitomycin C. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 1997;393(1–2):151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Hong SY, Lee YM, et al. In vitro assessment of clastogenicity of mobile‐phone radiation (835 MHz) using the alkaline comet assay and chromosomal aberration test. Environ Toxicol. 2008;23(3):319–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, et al. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: an international perspective. Environ Pollut. 2018;242:643–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Jin X, Yan C, et al. Case-only study of interactions between DNA repair genes (hMLH1, APEX1, MGMT, XRCC1 and XPD) and low-frequency electromagnetic fields in childhood acute leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49(12):2344–2350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H, Singh NP. Melatonin and N‐tert‐butyl‐α‐phenylnitrone block 60‐Hz magnetic field‐induced DNA single and double strand breaks in rat brain cells. J Pineal Res. 1997;22(3):152–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson OM, McRobert TL, Campbell LJ, et al. A chromosomal study of workers with long‐term exposure to radio‐frequency radiation. Med J Aust. 1991;155(5):289–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken RJ, Bennetts LE, Sawyer D, et al. Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int JAndrology. 2005;28(3):171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaev IY, Koch CB, Terenius O, et al. Exposure of rat brain to 915 MHz GSM microwaves induces changes in gene expression but not double stranded DNA breaks or effects on chromatin conformation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2006;27(4):295–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyakoshi J, Yamagishi N, Ohtsu S, et al. Increase in hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase gene mutations by exposure to high-density 50-Hz magnetic fields. Mutat Res. 1996;349(1):109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyakoshi J. Mutation induction by high-density, 50-Hz magnetic fields in human MeWo cells exposed in the DNA synthesis phase. Int J Radiat Biol. 1997;71(1):75–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordenson I, Mild KH, Andersson G, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in human amniotic cells after intermittent exposure to fifty hertz magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1994;15(4):293–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tice RR, Hook GG, Donner M, et al. Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals. I. Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002;23(2):113–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juutilainen J, Lang S. Genotoxic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of electromagnetic fields. Introduction and overview. Mutat ResRev Mutat Res. 1997;3(387):165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Ponder BA. Cancer genetics. Nature. 2001;411(6835):336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes F, Kandala S. Effects of time delays on biological feedback systems and electromagnetic field exposures: gain and sign changes with time delay. Bioelectromagnetics. 2018;39(3):249–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom MP, Lane JM, Berberian WS, et al. Immunolocalization and expression of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in fracture healing. J Orthop Res. 1995;13(3):357–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton CT System and method of up-regulating bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) gene expression in bone cells via the application of fields generated by specific and selective electric and electromagnetic signals. Google Patents; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Yong Y, Ming ZD, Feng L, et al. Electromagnetic fields promote osteogenesis of rat mesenchymal stem cells through the PKA and ERK1/2 pathways. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;10(10):E537–E45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttiglione M, Roca L, Montemurno E, et al. Radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz) induces Egr‐1 gene expression and affects cell‐cycle control in human neuroblastoma cells. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213(3):759–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Q, Chen G, Weng Y, et al. Effects of global system for mobile communications 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on gene and protein expression in MCF‐7 cells. Proteomics. 2006;6(17):4732–4738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhadobov M, Sauleau R, Le Coq L, et al. Low‐power millimeter wave radiations do not alter stress‐sensitive gene expression of chaperone proteins. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28(3):188–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czyz J, Guan K, Zeng Q, et al. High frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM signals) affect gene expression levels in tumor suppressor p53‐deficient embryonic stem cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004;25(4):296–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H-J, Jung J, Park J-H, et al. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields induce neural differentiation in bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Biol Med. 2013;238(8):923–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakurai T, Kiyokawa T, Narita E, et al. Analysis of gene expression in a human-derived glial cell line exposed to 2.45 GHz continuous radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. J Radiat Res. 2011;52(2):185-92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper OM, Callaghan MJ, Chang EI, et al. Electromagnetic fields increase in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis through endothelial release of FGF-2. Faseb J. 2004;18(11):1231–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atasoy A, Sevim Y, Kaya I, et al. The effects of electromagnetic fields on peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2009;110(9):526–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zotti-Martelli L, Peccatori M, Maggini V, et al. Individual responsiveness to induction of micronuclei in human lymphocytes after exposure in vitro to 1800-MHz microwave radiation. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2005;582(1–2):42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdal N, Gürgül S, Çelik A. Cytogenetic effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field on Wistar rat bone marrow. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2007;630(1–2):69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trosic I, Busljeta I, Modlic B. Investigation of the genotoxic effect of microwave irradiation in rat bone marrow cells: in vivo exposure. Mutagenesis. 2004;19(5):361–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trosic I, Busljeta I, Kasuba V, et al. Micronucleus induction after whole-body microwave irradiation of rats. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2002;521(1–2):73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trosic I, Busljeta I. Erythropoietic dynamic equilibrium in rats maintained after microwave irradiation. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2006;57(3):247–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busljeta I, Trosic I, Milkovic-Kraus S. Erythropoietic changes in rats after 2.45 GHz nonthermal irradiation. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2004;207(6):549–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdolmaleki A, Sanginabadi F, Rajabi A, et al. The effect of electromagnetic waves exposure on blood parameters. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2012;6(2)13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Li K, Teng Z, Liu Z, et al. Alterations of hematologic and hematopoietic parameters in mice exposed to pulsed electromagnetic field. J Immunol Res. 2019;2019:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghamdi MS, El-Ghazaly NA. Effects of exposure to electromagnetic field on of some hematological parameters in mice. Open J Med Chem. 2012;2(2):30.
   Google Scholar
• Jelodar G, Nazifi S, Nuhravesh M. Effect of electromagnetic field generated by BTS on hematological parameters and cellular composition of bone marrow in rat. Comp Clini Pathol. 2011;20(6):551–555.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayalaxmi FMR, Dusch SJ, Guel V, et al. Frequency of micronuclei in the peripheral blood and bone marrow of cancer-prone mice chronically exposed to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation. Radiat Res. 1997;147(4):495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovà E, Hillert L, Malmgren L, et al. Microwaves from GSM mobile telephones affect 53BP1 and γ-H2AX foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(9):1172–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaev IY, Hillert L, Protopopova M, et al. 915 MHz microwaves and 50 Hz magnetic field affect chromatin conformation and 53BP1 foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;26(3):173–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi G, Singh P. Cytogenetic damage in mobile phone users: preliminary data. Int J Human Genet. 2005;5(4):259–265.
   Google Scholar
• Maes A, Verschaeve L, Arroyo A, et al. In vitro cytogenetic effects of 2450 MHz waves on human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics. 1993;14(6):495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garaj-Vrhovac V. Micronucleus assay and lymphocyte mitotic activity in risk assessment of occupational exposure to microwave radiation. Chemosphere. 1999;39(13):2301–2312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garaj-Vrhovac V, Fučić A, Horvat D. The correlation between the frequency of micronuclei and specific chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes exposed to microwave radiation in vitro. Mutat Res Lett. 1992;281(3):181–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mashevich M, Folkman D, Kesar A, et al. Exposure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to electromagnetic fields associated with cellular phones leads to chromosomal instability. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24(2):82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazor R, Korenstein-Ilan A, Barbul A, et al. Increased levels of numerical chromosome aberrations after in vitro exposure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields for 72 hours. Radiat Res. 2008;169(1):28–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal BZ, Szilagyi M, Prihoda TJ, et al. Primary DNA damage in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation. Radiat Res. 2000;153(4):479–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz C, Kratochvil E, Pilger A, et al. Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;81(6):755–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NMM MELTZ, Ma Wittler V. Proliferation and cytogenetic studies in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1997;72(6):751–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonopoulos A, Eisenbrandt H, Obe G. Effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human lymphocytes in vitro. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 1997;395(2–3):209–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayalaxmi RL, Seaman MB, Doyle JM, et al., PJ. Frequency of micronuclei in the blood and bone marrow cells of mice exposed to ultra-wideband electromagnetic radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1999;75(1):115–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisht KS, Pickard WF, Meltz ML, et al. Chromosome damage and micronucleus formation in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to radiofrequency radiation at a cellular telephone frequency (847.74 MHz, CDMA). Radiat Res. 2001;156(4):430–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B-D G, Müller M, Ebert S, et al. Effects of 1-week and 6-week exposure to GSM/DCS radiofrequency radiation on micronucleus formation in B6C3F1 mice. Radiat Res. 2005;164(4):431–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfì MR, Fresegna AM, Villani P, et al. Exposure to radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz, GSM signal) does not affect micronucleus frequency and cell proliferation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: an interlaboratory study. Radiat Res. 2006;165(6):655–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logani MK, Bhanushali A, Ziskin MC, et al. Micronuclei in peripheral blood and bone marrow cells of mice exposed to 42 GHz electromagnetic millimeter waves. Radiat Res. 2004;161(3):341–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathonnet G, Krajinovic M, Labuda D, et al. Role of DNA mismatch repair genetic polymorphisms in the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2003;123(1):45–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebian A, Shaito A, Mazurier F, et al. XPC beyond nucleotide excision repair and skin cancers. Mutat Res/Rev Mutat Res. 2019;782:108286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho YH, Chung HW. The effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) on the frequency of micronuclei and sister chromatid exchange in human lymphocytes induced by benzo (a) pyrene. Toxicol Lett. 2003;143(1):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar G, Wood AW, Anderson V, et al. Evaluation of hematopoietic system effects after in vitro radiofrequency radiation exposure in rats. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011;87(2):231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gläser K, Rohland M, Kleine-Ostmann T, et al. Effect of radiofrequency radiation on human hematopoietic stem cells. Radiat Res. 2016;186(5):455–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prisco MG, Nasta F, Rosado MM, et al. Effects of GSM-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res. 2008;170(6):803–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jazayeri M, Shokrgozar MA, Haghighipour N, et al. Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on gene expression of mesenchymal stem cells and repair of bone lesions. Cell J (Yakhteh). 2017;19(1):34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasawa T, Omatsu Y, Sugiyama T. Control of hematopoietic stem cells by the bone marrow stromal niche: the role of reticular cells. Trends Immunol. 2011;32(7):315–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvi L, Adams G, Weibrecht K, et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425(6960):841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri L, Pellati A, Rizzo P, et al. Notch pathway is active during osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induced by pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12(2):304–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier S, Cheng T, Dombkowski D, et al. Notch1 activation increases hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal in vivo and favors lymphoid over myeloid lineage outcome. Blood. 2002;99(7):2369–2378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willert K, Brown JD, Danenberg E, et al. Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors. Nature. 2003;423(6938):448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia M, Bonnet D, Wu D, et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins regulate the developmental program of human hematopoietic stem cells. J Exp Med. 1999;189(7):1139–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuda T, Nishimura M, Nakao M, et al. RUNX1/AML1: a central player in hematopoiesis. Int J Hematol. 2001;74(3):252–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taoudi S, Bee T, Hilton A, et al. ERG dependence distinguishes developmental control of hematopoietic stem cell maintenance from hematopoietic specification. Genes Dev. 2011;25(3):251–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collard JF, Mertens B, Hinsenkamp M. In vitro study of the effects of ELF electric fields on gene expression in human epidermal cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011;32(1):28–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsenkamp M, Collard J-F. Bone morphogenic protein–mRNA upregulation after exposure to low frequency electric field. Int Orthop. 2011;35(10):1577–1581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryaby JT. Clinical effects of electromagnetic and electric fields on fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:S205–S15.
   Google Scholar
• Li -JK-J, Lin JC-A, Liu H-C, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and electromagnetic field effects on osteoblast growth. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32(5):769–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park B-W, Hah Y-S, Choi M-J, et al. In vitro osteogenic differentiation of cultured human dental papilla-derived cells. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2009;67(3):507–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZM, Jiang LS, Jiang SD, et al. Osteogenic potential and responsiveness to leptin of mesenchymal stem cells between postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(8):1067–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledda M, D’Emilia E, Giuliani L, et al. Nonpulsed sinusoidal electromagnetic fields as a noninvasive strategy in bone repair: the effect on human mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015;21(2):207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song M, Zhao D, Wei S, et al. The effect of electromagnetic fields on the proliferation and the osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells modulated by dexamethasone. Bioelectromagnetics. 2014;35(7):479–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Watt C, Karystinou A, et al. Directed migration of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in a physiological direct current electric field. Eur Cell Mater. 2011;22(344):58.
   Google Scholar
• Aaron RK, Ciombor DM. Therapeutic effects of electromagnetic fields in the stimulation of connective tissue repair. J Cell Biochem. 1993;52(1):42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y-Z, Yang S, Wu G. Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition. Nutrition. 2002;18(10):872–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft RJ, Chandler JS, Burgess AP, et al. Acute mobile phone operation affects neural function in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113(10):1623–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özmen İ, Nazıroğlu M, Alici HA, et al. Spinal morphine administration reduces the fatty acid contents in spinal cord and brain by increasing oxidative stress. Neurochem Res. 2007;32(1):19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Chen C, Deng P, et al. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields promote in vitro neuronal differentiation and neurite outgrowth of embryonic neural stem cells via up-regulating TRPC1. PloS One. 2016;11(3):e0150923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshmukh PS, Megha K, Banerjee BD, et al. Detection of low level microwave radiation induced deoxyribonucleic acid damage vis-a-vis genotoxicity in brain of Fischer rats. Toxicol Int. 2013;20(1):19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ÖG D, Kıvrak EG, Kaplan AA, et al. Effects of folic acid on rat kidney exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic radiation. J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2017;5(4):198–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozgur E, Güler G, Seyhan N. Mobile phone radiation-induced free radical damage in the liver is inhibited by the antioxidants N-acetyl cysteine and epigallocatechin-gallate. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010;86(11):935–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes F, Greenenbaum B. Some effects of weak magnetic fields on biological systems: RF fields can change radical concentrations and cancer cell growth rates. IEEE Power Electron Mag. 2016;3(1):60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Obajuluwa AO, Akinyemi AJ, Afolabi OB, et al. Exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic waves alters acetylcholinesterase gene expression, exploratory and motor coordination-linked behaviour in male rats. Toxicol Rep. 2017;4:530–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou X, Hui Y, Han Q, et al. Effects of magnetic field on MAPK signaling pathways of human retinal pigment epithelial cells bound with beads in vitro. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2006;42(12):1103–1108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nie K, Henderson A. MAP kinase activation in cells exposed to a 60 Hz electromagnetic field. J Cell Biochem. 2003;90(6):1197–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraveji M, Haghighipour N, Keshvari H, et al. Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field on MAP2 and nestin gene expression of hair follicle dermal papilla cells. Int J Artif Organs. 2016;39(6):294–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuge, L., et al., Physical stress by magnetic force accelerates differentiation of human osteoblasts. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2003;311(1): p. 32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson TE, Sakai Y, Grabiner MD, et al. Exposure of murine cells to pulsed electromagnetic fields rapidly activates the mTOR signaling pathway. Bioelectromagnetics. 2006;27(7):535–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisi A, Ledda M, Rosola E, et al. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure promotes differentiation of pituitary corticotrope‐derived AtT20 D16V cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2006;27(8):641–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishido M, Nitta H, Kabuto M. Magnetic fields (MF) of 50 Hz at 1.2 μT as well as 100 μT cause uncoupling of inhibitory pathways of adenylyl cyclase mediated by melatonin 1a receptor in MF-sensitive MCF-7 cells. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22(7):1043–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Yao G, Zhang J, et al. CREB DNA binding activation by a 50-Hz magnetic field in HL60 cells is dependent on extra-and intracellular Ca2+ but not PKA, PKC, ERK, or p38 MAPK. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;296(4):1013–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pall ML. Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage‐gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17(8):958–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerkov H, Lohmann C, Liu Y, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase growth factor release by nonunion cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:265–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron RK, Boyan BD, Ciombor DM, et al. Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthopaedics Related Res (1976–2007). 2004;419:30–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvamurugan N, Kwok S, Vasilov A, et al. Effects of BMP‐2 and pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on rat primary osteoblastic cell proliferation and gene expression. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(9):1213–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KT, Kim JH, Woo HS. et al. In vitro effects of electromagnetic field stimulation on cells in tissue engineering. 조직공학과 재생의학. 2009;6(4):675–684.
   Google Scholar
• Massari L, Caruso G, Sollazzo V, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields and low intensity pulsed ultrasound in bone tissue. Clin Cases Mineral Bone Metab. 2009;6(2):149.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado AJ, Oliveira JT, Pedro AJ, et al. Adult stem cells in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2006;1(3):345–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ceccarelli G, Bloise N, Mantelli M, et al. A comparative analysis of the in vitro effects of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment on osteogenic differentiation of two different mesenchymal cell lineages. Biores Open Access. 2013;2(4):283–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brookes PS, Yoon Y, Robotham JL, et al. Calcium, ATP, and ROS: a mitochondrial love-hate triangle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287(4):C817–C33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar