Computational modeling – an approach to the development of blood grouping reagents

References

• International Society of Blood Transfusion: Red Cell Immunogenetics and Terminology Working Party. Red cell immunogenetics and blood group terminology: international society of blood transfusion; 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 10]. Available from: https://www.isbtweb.org/working-parties/red-cell-immunogenetics-and-blood-group-terminology/
   Google Scholar
• Flegel WA. The genetics of the Rhesus blood group system. Blood Transfusion. 2007;5(2):50–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner FF, Flegel WA. Review: the molecular basis of the Rh blood group phenotypes. Immunohematology. 2004;20(1):23–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott ML, Voak D, Jones JW, et al. A structural model for 30 Rh D epitopes based on serological and DNA sequence data from partial D phenotypes. Transfus Clin Biol. 1996 Jan 01;3(6):391–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyers SA, Ridgwell K, Mawby WJ, et al. Topology and organization of human Rh (rhesus) blood group-related polypeptides. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 4;269(9):6417–6423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongruamklang P, Grimsley S, Thornton N, et al., Characterization of GYP*Mur and novel GYP*Bun-like hybrids in Thai blood donors reveals a qualitatively altered s antigen. Vox Sang. 2020;115(5):472–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyrard T, Lam Y, Saison C, et al. Anti-U-like as an alloantibody in S-s-U- and S-s-U+(var) black people. Transfusion 2011;52:622–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peréz S, Mouhous-Riou N, Nifant’ev NE, et al. Crystal and molecular structure of a histo-blood group antigen involved in cell adhesion: the Lewis x trisaccharide. Glycobiology. 1996;6(5):537–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupo D, Li X-D, Durand A, et al. The 1.3-Å resolution structure of Nitrosomonas europaea Rh50 and mechanistic implications for NH3 transport by Rhesus family proteins. PNAS. 2007;104(49):19303–19308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy MJ, Bullough PA, Merrick M, et al. Modelling the human rhesus proteins: implications for structure and function. Br J Haematol. 2005;131(4):543–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankelow TJ, Burton N, Stefansdottir FO, et al. The Laminin 511/521–binding site on the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein is located at the flexible junction of Ig domains 2 and 3. Blood. 2007;110(9):3398–3406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter EP, Beis K, Cameron AD, et al. Overcoming the challenges of membrane protein crystallography. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008 Oct 01;18(5):581–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway E. Revolutionary cryo-EM is taking over structural biology. Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7794):201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y. Membrane protein structural biology in the era of single particle cryo-EM. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2018 Oct 01;52:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai X-C, McMullan G, Scheres SHW. How cryo-EM is revolutionizing structural biology. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015 Jan 01;40(1):49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaskiewicz E, Czerwinski M, Syper D, et al. Anti-M monoclonal antibodies cross-reacting with variant Mg antigen: an example of modulation of antigenic properties of peptide by its glycosylation. Blood. 1994;84(7):2340–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalisz HM, Hecht H-J, Schomburg D, et al. Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction studies of a deglycosylated glucose oxidase from Aspergillus niger. JMB. 1990 May 20;213(2):207–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, et al., SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W296–W303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks DS, Hopf TA, Sander C. Protein structure prediction from sequence variation. Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Nov 01;30(11):1072–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx D, Hutter J. Ab initio molecular dynamics: basic theory and advanced methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Yan Z-Y, Bush CA. Molecular dynamics simulations and the conformational mobility of blood group oligosaccharides. Biopolymers. 1990;29(4‐5):799–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imberty A, Mikros E, Koca J, et al. Computer simulation of histo-blood group oligosaccharides: energy maps of all constituting disaccharides and potential energy surfaces of 14 ABH and Lewis carbohydrate antigens. Glycoconj J. 1995 Jun 01;12(3):331–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy R, Ghosh B, Kar P. Investigating conformational dynamics of lewis Y oligosaccharides and elucidating blood group dependency of cholera using molecular dynamics. ACS Omega. 2020 Mar 03;5(8):3932–3942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalli AC, Reithmeier RAF. Interaction of the human erythrocyte Band 3 anion exchanger 1 (AE1, SLC4A1) with lipids and glycophorin A: molecular organization of the Wright (Wr) blood group antigen. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14(7):e1006284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman S, Barnard RT, Flower R, et al. The interaction between Glycophorin A (GPA) and Band 3 in the formation of the Wright b (Wrb) antigen. Vox Sang. 2020 Dec 18;n/a(n/a). 10.1111/vox.13055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman S, Flower R, Mahler S, et al. In Silico molecular dynamics of human glycophorin A (GPA) extracellular structure. Ann Blood. 2020;N/A(N/A):N/A.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez GH, Wilson B, Liew Y-W, et al. An alloantibody in a homozygous GYP*Mur individual defines JENU (MNS49), a new high-frequency antigen on glycophorin B. Transfusion. 2017;57(3):716–717. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telen M, Chasis J. Relationship of the human erythrocyte Wrb antigen to an interaction between glycophorin A and band 3. Blood. 1990;76(4):842–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaroff S, Tan G. Hybridoma technology: the preferred method for monoclonal antibody generation for in vivo applications. BioTechniques. 2019;67(3):90–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinitz M. Production of human monoclonal antibodies by the Epstein-Barr virus method. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2014;1060:111–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marks JD, Hoogenboom HR, Bonnert TP, et al. By-passing immunization: human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage. JMB. 1991 Dec 05;222(3):581–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones ML, Alfaleh MA, Kumble S, et al. Targeting membrane proteins for antibody discovery using phage display. Sci Rep. 2016 May 18;6(1):26240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegel DL. Developing phage display tools for use in transfusion medicine. Transfusion. 2005;45:100S–108S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman S, Flower R, Hyland C, et al. Identification of novel monoclonal antibodies recognising JENU and U antigens of the MNS blood group system. Pathology. 2019;51:S123.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell KJ, Watterson D, Young PR, et al. Chimeric molecules and uses thereof. Australia. 2018 Mar 29.
   Google Scholar
• Protein Structure Prediction Center. The critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP): University of California; 2020 [cited 2020]. Available from: https://predictioncenter.org/index.cgi
   Google Scholar