Precision medicine for metastatic colorectal cancer: an evolving era

References

• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(3):177–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleyer A, Barr R, Hayes-Lattin B, et al. The distinctive biology of cancer in adolescents and young adults. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(4):288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):297–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(4):337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Köhne C-H, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408–1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amado R, Wolf M, Peeters M, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(10):1626–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5705–5712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobani ZA, Sawant A, Jafri M, et al. Oncogenic fingerprint of epidermal growth factor receptor pathway and emerging epidermal growth factor receptor blockade resistance in colorectal cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 2016;7(5):340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagan J, Van Allen EM. Next-generation sequencing to guide cancer therapy. Genome Med. 2015;7(1):80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadler ZK, Battaglin F, Middha S, et al. Reliable detection of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancers using mutational load in next-generation sequencing panels. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(18):2141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaltriti M, Baselga J. The epidermal growth factor receptor pathway: a model for targeted therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(18):5268–5272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galizia G, Lieto E, De Vita F, et al. Cetuximab, a chimeric human mouse anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of human colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26(25):3654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer PJ Sr, et al. Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(7):1201–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J, et al. KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol. 2007;19(3):508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):753–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann J, et al. Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(7):1535–1546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douillard J-Y, Siena S, Cassidy J, et al. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4697–4705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price TJ, Peeters M, Kim TW, et al. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):569–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltz L, Rubin M, Hochster H, et al. Acne-like rash predicts response in patients treated with cetuximab (IMC-C225) plus irinotecan (CPT-11) in CPT-11-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) that expresses epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Clin Cancer Res. 2001:3766S–3766S. (Ed.^(Eds) (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH PO BOX 11806, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35202 USA).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincenzi B, Santini D, Rabitti C, et al. Cetuximab and irinotecan as third-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients: a single centre phase II trial. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(6):792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brule S, Jonker D, Karapetis C, et al. Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in NCIC CO. 17. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(11):1405–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Einem J, Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, et al. Left-sided primary tumors are associated with favorable prognosis in patients with KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy: an analysis of the AIO KRK-0104 trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140(9):1607–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeckx N, Koukakis R, Op de Beeck K, et al. Primary tumor sidedness has an impact on prognosis and treatment outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from two randomized first-line panitumumab studies. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):1862–1868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(10):1065–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirakawa S, Kodama S, Kunstfeld R, et al. VEGF-A induces tumor and sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis and promotes lymphatic metastasis. J Exp Med. 2005;201(7):1089–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis S, Cui J, Barnes L, et al. Endothelial barrier disruption by VEGF-mediated Src activity potentiates tumor cell extravasation and metastasis. J Cell Biol. 2004;167(2):223–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Gramont A, Van Cutsem E, Schmoll H-J, et al. Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer (AVANT): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(12):1225–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allegra CJ, Yothers G, O’Connell MJ, et al. Phase III trial assessing bevacizumab in stages II and III carcinoma of the colon: results of NSABP protocol C-08. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(1):11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2335–2342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):2013–2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, et al. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1843–1852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegewisch-Becker S, Graeven U, Lerchenmüller CA, et al. Maintenance strategies after first-line oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (AIO 0207): a randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1355–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, et al. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(1):29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RD, Mitchell M, Sgouros J, et al. Human DNA repair genes. Science. 2001;291(5507):1284–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Nicolaides NC, Markowitz S, et al. Mismatch repair gene defects in sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability. Nat Genet. 1995;9(1):48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidoboni M, Gafà R, Viel A, et al. Microsatellite instability and high content of activated cytotoxic lymphocytes identify colon cancer patients with a favorable prognosis. Am J Pathol. 2001;159(1):297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlik TM, Raut CP, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Colorectal carcinogenesis: MSI-H versus MSI-L. Dis Markers. 2004;20(4, 5):199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland CR, Goel A. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(6):2073–2087. e2073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2509–2520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemery S, Keegan P, Pazdur R. First FDA approval agnostic of cancer site—when a biomarker defines the indication. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(15):1409–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le DT, Durham JN, Smith KN, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science. 2017;357(6349):409–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overman MJ, McDermott R, Leach JL, et al. Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):1182–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overman MJ, Lonardi S, Wong KYM, et al. Durable clinical benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in DNA mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(8):773–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. FDA grants accelerated approval to ipilimumab for MSI-H and dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer. (Ed.^(Eds). 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JA. New NCCN guidelines: recognition and management of immunotherapy-related toxicity. J National Compr Cancer Network. 2018;16(5S):594–596.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ascierto PA, Melero I, Bhatia S et al. Initial efficacy of anti-lymphocyte activation gene-3 (anti–LAG-3; BMS-986016) in combination with nivolumab (nivo) in pts with melanoma (MEL) previously treated with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. (Ed.^(Eds). American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, et al. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature. 2011;474(7351):327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vétizou M, Pitt JM, Daillère R, et al. Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science. 2015;350(6264):1079–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer C, Nezi L, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359(6371):97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittoli V, Sepe RM, Coppola U, et al. A comprehensive analysis of neurotrophins and neurotrophin tyrosine kinase receptors expression during development of zebrafish. J Comp Neurol. 2018;526(6):1057–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatu A, Sartore-Bianchi A, Siena S. NTRK gene fusions as novel targets of cancer therapy across multiple tumour types. ESMO Open. 2016;1(2):e000023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrantonio F, Di Nicolantonio F, Schrock AB, et al. ALK, ROS1, and NTRK rearrangements in metastatic colorectal cancer. JNCI. 2017;109(12).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion–positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(8):731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samowitz WS, Sweeney C, Herrick J, et al. Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellite-stable colon cancers. Cancer Res. 2005;65(14):6063–6069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Kohne C-H, Láng I, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):2011–2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Salvatore L, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(1):57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopetz S, Desai J, Chan E, et al. PLX4032 in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with mutant BRAF tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15_suppl): 3534–3534.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman DM, Puzanov I, Subbiah V, et al. Vemurafenib in multiple nonmelanoma cancers with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(8):726–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran RB, Ebi H, Turke AB, et al. EGFR-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling contributes to insensitivity of BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers to RAF inhibition with vemurafenib. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(3):227–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahallad A, Sun C, Huang S, et al. Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF (V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR. Nature. 2012;483(7387):100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong DS, Morris VK, El Osta B, et al. Phase IB study of vemurafenib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with BRAFV600E mutation. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(12):1352–1365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Cuyle P-J, Huijberts S et al. BEACON CRC study safety lead-in (SLI) in patients with BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): efficacy and tumor markers. (Ed.^(Eds). American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran RB, André T, Atreya CE, et al. Combined BRAF, EGFR, and MEK inhibition in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(4):428–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin IH, Chen WH, Chen Z et al. Impact of genomic alterations (GAs) on outcomes and their distribution by age groups in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts). (Ed.^(Eds). American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Golan T, Kanji Z, Epelbaum R, et al. Overall survival and clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(6):1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson M, Im S-A, Senkus E, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(6):523–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audeh MW, Carmichael J, Penson RT, et al. Oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9737):245–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golan T, Hammel P, Reni M, et al. Maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:317–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichman L, Groshen S, O’Neil BH, et al. Phase II study of olaparib (AZD-2281) after standard systemic therapies for disseminated colorectal cancer. Oncologist. 2016;21(2):172–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kuraya K, Novotny H, Bavi P, et al. HER2, TOP2A, CCND1, EGFR and C-MYC oncogene amplification in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60(7):768–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong JH, Kim J, Hong YS, et al. HER2 amplification and cetuximab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer harboring wild-type RAS and BRAF. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017;16:e147-e152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartore-Bianchi A, Trusolino L, Martino C, et al. Dual-targeted therapy with trastuzumab and lapatinib in treatment-refractory, KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type, HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (HERACLES): a proof-of-concept, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):738–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz H, Raghav KPS, Burris HA et al. Pertuzumab+ trastuzumab for HER2-amplified/overexpressed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): interim data from MyPathway. (Ed.^(Eds). American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Strickler JH, Niedzwiecki D, Zemla T et al. A phase II, open label study of tucatinib (ONT-380) combined with trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)(MOUNTAINEER). (Ed.^(Eds). American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida R, Miyashita K, Inoue M, et al. Concurrent genetic alterations in DNA polymerase proofreading and mismatch repair in human colorectal cancer. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(3):320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinbrot E, Henninger EE, Weinhold N, et al. Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication. Genome Res. 2014;24(11):1740–1750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaire M, Domingo E, Vermeulen L et al. POLE proofreading domain mutation defines a subset of immunogenic colorectal cancers with excellent prognosis. (Ed.^(Eds). European Society for Medical Oncology; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn S-M, Ansari AA, Kim J, et al. The somatic POLE P286R mutation defines a unique subclass of colorectal cancer featuring hypermutation, representing a potential genomic biomarker for immunotherapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7(42):68638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palles C, Cazier J-B, Howarth KM, et al. Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Nat Genet. 2013;45(2):136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santin AD, Bellone S, Buza N, et al. Regression of chemotherapy-resistant polymerase ε (POLE) ultra-mutated and MSH6 hyper-mutated endometrial tumors with nivolumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(23):5682–5687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong J, Wang C, Lee PP, et al. Response to PD-1 blockade in microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer harboring a POLE mutation. J National Compr Cancer Network. 2017;15(2):142–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlskog JK, Larsen BD, Achanta K, et al. ATM/ATR‐mediated phosphorylation of PALB2 promotes RAD51 function. EMBO Rep. 2016;17(5):671–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin IH, Lowery MA, Stadler ZK, et al. Genomic instability in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a new step towards precision medicine and novel therapeutic approaches. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;10(8):893–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell PJ, Yachida S, Mudie LJ, et al. The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467(7319):1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedes KJ, Wilkerson PM, Wetterskog D, et al. Synthetic lethality of PARP inhibition in cancers lacking BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Cell Cycle. 2011;10(8):1192–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson D, Capelletti M, Yelensky R, et al. Identification of new ALK and RET gene fusions from colorectal and lung cancer biopsies. Nat Med. 2012;18(3):382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin E, Li L, Guan Y, et al. Exon array profiling detects EML4-ALK fusion in breast, colorectal, and non–small cell lung cancers. Mol Cancer Res. 2009;7(9):1466–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aisner DL, Nguyen TT, Paskulin DD, et al. ROS1 and ALK fusions in colorectal cancer, with evidence of intratumoral heterogeneity for molecular drivers. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12(1):111–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsten T, Elkin S, Arthur E, et al. The FGFR landscape in cancer: analysis of 4,853 tumors by next-generation sequencing. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(1):259–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang J-H, Shin K-H, Park J-G. Mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 genes associated with human gastric and colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 2001;61(9):3541–3543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm SM, Dumas J, Adnane L, et al. Regorafenib (BAY 73‐4506): a new oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases with potent preclinical antitumor activity. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(1):245–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzaferro V, El-Rayes BF, Dit Busset MD, et al. Derazantinib (ARQ 087) in advanced or inoperable FGFR2 gene fusion-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2019;120(2):165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semrad T, Kim E, Tanaka M, et al. Phase II study of dovitinib in patients (Pts) progressing on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(Suppl): abstract 616.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle S, Powers W, Xu J, et al. Comparison of a large NGS panel to hot-spot testing and small panels for the ability to accurately stratify advanced colorectal cancer patients to appropriate treatment pathways. (Ed.^(Eds). American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Adam R, Spier I, Zhao B, et al. Exome sequencing identifies biallelic MSH3 germline mutations as a recessive subtype of colorectal adenomatous polyposis. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99(2):337–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrock A, Ouyang C, Sandhu J, et al. Tumor mutational burden is predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in MSI-high metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1096–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennell NA, Mutebi A, Zhou Z-Y, et al. Economic impact of next-generation sequencing versus single-gene testing to detect genomic alterations in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer using a decision analytic model. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malapelle U, Vigliar E, Sgariglia R, et al. Ion Torrent next-generation sequencing for routine identification of clinically relevant mutations in colorectal cancer patients. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68(1):64–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salto‐Tellez M, Gonzalez de Castro D. Next‐generation sequencing: a change of paradigm in molecular diagnostic validation. J Pathol. 2014;234(1):5–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocco E, Benhamida J, Middha S, et al. Colorectal carcinomas containing hypermethylated MLH1 promoter and wild-type BRAF/KRAS are enriched for targetable kinase fusions. Cancer Res. 2019;79(6):1047–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alix-Panabières C, Pantel K. Clinical applications of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA as liquid biopsy. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(5):479–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alix-Panabieres C, Pantel K. Circulating tumor cells: liquid biopsy of cancer. Clin Chem. 2013;59(1):110–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitzer E, Ulz P, Geigl JB. Circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy for cancer. Clin Chem. 2015;61(1):112–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz LA Jr, Bardelli A. Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(6):579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogino S, Lochhead P, Chan AT, et al. Molecular pathological epidemiology of epigenetics: emerging integrative science to analyze environment, host, and disease. Mod Pathol. 2013;26(4):465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogino S, Lochhead P, Giovannucci E, et al. Discovery of colorectal cancer PIK3CA mutation as potential predictive biomarker: power and promise of molecular pathological epidemiology. Oncogene. 2014;33(23):2949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: colon cancer, version 2.2018. J National Compr Cancer Network. 2018;16(4):359–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar