Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis

References

• Facciorusso A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling of pancreatic lesions. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2020;66(1):41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsubayashi H, Matsui T, Yabuuchi Y, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography guided-fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreaticobiliary lesions: clinical aspects to improve the diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(2):628–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai A, Davis-Yadley A, Lipka S, et al. The use of a stylet in endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;53(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh J, et al. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy. 2013;45(6):445–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wani S, Mullady D, Early DS, et al. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(10):1429–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facciorusso A, Stasi E, Di Maso M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 gauge needles: A meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(6):846–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facciorusso A, Wani S, Triantafyllou K, et al. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for eus tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90(6):893–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Buccino VR, et al. Diagnostic yield of franseen and fork-tip biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: a meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2019;7(10):E1221–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seicean A, Samarghitan A, Bolboaca SD, et al., Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2020; 52(12): 1084–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou X, Jin Z, Xu C, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a retrospective study. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusaroli P, Napoleon B, Gincul R, et al. The clinical impact of ultrasound contrast agents in EUS: a systematic review according to the levels of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(4):587–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusaroli P, Spada A, Mancino MG, et al. Contrast harmonic echo-endoscopic ultrasound improves accuracy in diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(7):629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitano M, Kudo M, Yamao K, et al., Characterization of small solid tumors in the pancreas: the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012; 107(2): 303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairley KJ, Diehl DL, Johal AS. “Invisible” pancreatic masses identified by EUS by the “ductal cutoff sign”. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019;8(2):125–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facciorusso A, Cotsoglou C, Chierici A, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a propensity score analysis. Diagnostics. 2020;10(10):792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The newcastle – ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses; available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm, accessed on Oct 2020
   Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Hikichi T, et al., Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial. Pancreatology. 2015; 15(5): 538–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seicean A, Badea R, Moldovan-pop a, et al. harmonic contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for the guidance of fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic masses. Ultraschall Med. 2017;38(2):174–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itonaga M, Kitano M, Kojima F, et al. The usefulness of EUS-FNA with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35(12):2273–2280. in press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seicean A, Jinga M. Harmonic contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration: fact or fiction? Endosc Ultrasound. 2017;6(1):31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saftoiu A, Napoleon B, Arcidiacono PG, et al., Do we need contrast agents for EUS? Endosc Ultrasound. 2020; 9(6): 361–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusaroli P, D’Ercole MC, De Giorgio R, et al. Contrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in the characterization of pancreatic metastases (with video). Pancreas. 2014;43(4):584–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crinó SF, Brandolese A, Vieceli F, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound features associated with malignancy and aggressiveness of nonhypovascular solid pancreatic lesions: results from a prospective observational study ultraschall med. Ultraschall in Der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound. 2019; in press. 10.1055/a-1014-2766
   Google Scholar
• Facciorusso A, Bajwa HS, Menon K, et al. Comparison between 22G aspiration and 22G biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: A meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound. 2020;9(3):167–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar