291
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-analysis

Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in comparison to percutaneous liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 51-57 | Received 30 Sep 2021, Accepted 16 Dec 2021, Published online: 29 Dec 2021

References

  • Singh S, Facciorusso A, Loomba R, et al. Magnitude and kinetics of decrease in liver stiffness after antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(1):27–38.
  • Facciorusso A, Garcia Perdomo HA, Muscatiello N, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: change in liver stiffness during anti-viral therapy in patients with hepatitis B. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50(8):787–794.
  • Lavian JD, Thornton LM, Zybulewski A, et al. Safety of percutaneous versus transjugular liver biopsy: a propensity score matched analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2020;133:109399.
  • Facciorusso A, Stasi E, Di Maso M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 Gauge needles: a meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(6):846–853.
  • Facciorusso A, Wani S, Triantafyllou K, et al. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for eus tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90(6):893–903.
  • Crinò SF, Le Grazie M, Manfrin E, et al. Randomized trial comparing fork-tip and side-fenestrated needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(3):648–658.
  • Crinò SF, Ammendola S, Meneghetti A, et al. Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreatology. 2021;21(2):443–450.
  • Facciorusso A, Sunny SP, Del Prete V, et al. Comparison between fine-needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for EUS-guided sampling of subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jan;91(1):14–22.
  • Mohan BP, Shakhatreh M, Garg R, et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(2): 238–246.
  • Ching-Companioni RA, Diehl DL, Johal AS, et al. 19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2019 Nov;51(11):1059–1065.
  • Bhogal N, Lamb B, Arbeiter B, et al. Safety and adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided random liver biopsy in comparison with transjugular and percutaneous approaches. Endosc Int Open. 2020;8(12):E1850–4.
  • Pineda JJ, Diehl DL, Miao CL, et al. EUS-guided liver biopsy provides diagnostic samples comparable with those via the percutaneous or transjugular route. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(2):360–365.
  • Shuja A, Alkhasawneh A, Fialho A, et al. Comparison of EUS-guided versus percutaneous and transjugular approaches for the performance of liver biopsies. Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51(6):826–830.
  • Bang JY, Ward TJ, Guirguis S, et al. Radiology-guided percutaneous approach is superior to EUS for performing liver biopsies. Gut. 2021 Dec;70(12):2224–2226.
  • Facciorusso A, Ramai D, Conti Bellocchi MC, et al. Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy in Comparison to Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: a Two-Center Experience. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 19;13(12):3062.
  • Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928.
  • Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle – Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. cited Jun 2021. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm
  • DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177–188.
  • Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–1302.
  • Ali AH, Panchal S, Rao DS, et al. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy versus percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with chronic liver disease: a retrospective single-center study. J Ultrasound. 2020 Jun;23(2):157–167.
  • Rombaoa C, Chen AM. The safety and feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided parenchymal liver biopsy at a large community hospital. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(6):AB458.
  • Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Turco A, et al. Long-term liver stiffness assessment in hepatitis C virus patients undergoing antiviral therapy: results from a 5-year cohort study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(4):942–949.
  • Rimbaş M, Crino SF, Gasbarrini A, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions: finally moving from fine-needle aspiration to fine-needle biopsy? Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 May-Jun;7(3):137–140.
  • Crinò SF, Larghi A, Bernardoni L, et al. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Cytopathology. 2019 Mar;30(2):179–186.
  • Di Leo M, Crinò SF, Bernardoni L, et al. EUS-guided core biopsies of pancreatic solid masses using a new fork-tip needle: a multicenter prospective study. Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Sep;51(9):1275–1280.
  • McCarty TR, Bazarbashi AN, Njei B, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided, Percutaneous, and Transjugular Liver Biopsy: a Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Endosc. 2020 Sep;53(5):583–593.
  • Baran B, Kale S, Patil P, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided parenchymal liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5546–5557.
  • Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, et al. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009;49(3):1017–1044.
  • Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H, et al. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology. Gut. 2020;69(8):1382–1403.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.