Pediatric endoscopy: how can we improve patient outcomes and ensure best practices?

References

• Gilger MA, Gold BD. Pediatric endoscopy: new information from the PEDS-CORI project. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2005;7(3):234–239. doi: 10.1007/s11894-005-0040-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barakat MT, Triadafilopoulos G, Berquist WE Pediatric endoscopy practice patterns in the United States, Canada and Mexico. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;69(1):24–31. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Lightdale JR, Mack DR, et al. Overview of the pediatric endoscopy quality improvement network quality standards and indicators for pediatric endoscopy: a joint NASPGHAN/ESPGHAN guideline. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022;74(S1):S3–S15. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lightdale JR, Acosta R, Shergill AK, et al. Modifications in endoscopic practice for pediatric patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(5):699–710. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney LB, Lightdale JR. The evolution of sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2023;33(2):213–234. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen J, Pike IM. Defining and measuring quality in endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):46–47. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park WG, Shaheen NJ, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):17–30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):31–53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forget S, Walsh CM. Pediatric endoscopy: need for a tailored approach to guidelines on quality and safety. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;26(10):735. doi: 10.1155/2012/594310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Lightdale JR. Pediatric Endoscopy Quality Improvement Network (PEnQuIN) quality standards and indicators for pediatric endoscopy: an ASGE-endorsed guideline. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;96(4):593–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter M, Rees C. Quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2014;46(6):526–528. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakkar K, Holub JL, Gilger MA, et al. Quality indicators for pediatric colonoscopy: results from a multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(3):533–541. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182(18):E839–E842. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisschops R, Rutter M, Areia M, et al. Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement. Endoscopy. 2021;53(2):196–202. doi: 10.1055/a-1312-6389
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin R. It takes an average of 17 years for evidence to change practice—the burgeoning field of implementation science seeks to speed things up. JAMA. 2023;329(16):1333–1336. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulx AL, Lightdale JR, Acosta RD, et al. Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(2):273–281. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kromann CB, Jensen ML, Ringsted C The effect of testing on skills learning. Med Educ. 2009;43(1):21–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03245.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM. Training and assessment in pediatric endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2016;26(1):13–33. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2015.08.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh CM. Assessment of competence in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2014;16(8):401. doi: 10.1007/s11894-014-0401-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh CM, Lightdale JR, Leibowitz IH, et al. Pediatric endoscopy quality improvement network quality standards and indicators for pediatric endoscopists and endoscopists in training: a joint NASPGHAN/ESPGHAN guideline. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022;74(S1):S44–S52. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarallo L, Russo G, Renzo S, et al. A journey towards pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy and its training: a narrative review. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1201593. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1201593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Ling SC, Walters TD, et al. Development of the gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool for pediatric colonoscopy (GiECATKIDS). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;59(4):480–486. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Ling SC, Mamula P, et al. The gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool for pediatric colonoscopy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60(4):474–480. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM In-training gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tools: types of tools, validation and impact. Best Pr Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30(3):357–374. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyalingam T, Walsh CM. Characterizing the development of colonoscopy competence using assessment data. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(2):214–215. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siau K, Levi R, Iacucci M, et al. Paediatric colonoscopy direct observation of procedural skills: evidence of validity and competency development. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;69(1):18–23. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siau K, Levi R, Howarth L, et al. Validity evidence for direct observation of procedural skills in paediatric gastroscopy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;67(6):e111–e116. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan R, Zheng E, Wani S, et al. Colonoscopy competence assessment tools: a systematic review of validity evidence. Endoscopy. 2021;53(12):1235–1245. doi: 10.1055/a-1352-7293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan R, Homsi H, Gimpaya N, et al. Validity evidence for observational ERCP competency assessment tools: a systematic review. Endoscopy. 2023;55(9):847–856. doi: 10.1055/a-2041-7546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SG, Duloy A, Kaltenbach T, et al. Development and validation of a video-based cold snare polypectomy assessment tool (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6):1222–1230.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.02.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Perbtani YB, Wang Y, et al. Evaluating learning curves and competence in colorectal EMR among advanced endoscopy fellows: a pilot multicenter prospective trial using cumulative sum analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(3):682–690.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takao M, Bilgic E, Kaneva P, et al. Development and validation of an endoscopic submucosal dissection video assessment tool. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(6):2671–2678. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07688-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Draganov PV, Pohl H, et al. Development and initial validation of a video-based peroral endoscopic myotomy assessment tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023; 97(6):AB1083. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.1658
   Google Scholar
• Yang D, Wagh MS, Draganov PV. The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(5):1016–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh CM, Hashimoto DA, Korndorffer JR. The what? how? And who? Of video based assessment. Am J Surg. 2021;221(1):13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyalingam T, Walsh CM. Video-based assessments: a promising step in improving polypectomy competency. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6):1231–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaffidi MA, Grover SC, Carnahan H, et al. A prospective comparison of live and video-based assessments of colonoscopy performance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(3):766–775. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaffidi M, Walsh CM, Khan R, et al. Influence of video-based feedback on self-assessment accuracy of endoscopic skills: a randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open. 2019;7(5):E678–E684. doi: 10.1055/a-0867-9626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattni C, Scaffidi M, Li J, et al. Video-based interventions to improve self-assessment accuracy among physicians: a systematic review. PloS One. 2023;18(7):e0288474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keswani RN, Yadlapati R, Gleason KM, et al. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(8):1134–1139. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahi CJ, Ballard D, Shah AS, et al. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(6):925–931. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishay K, Causada-Calo N, Scaffidi MA, et al. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(5):1030–1040.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinmouth J, Sutradhar R, Li Q, et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of an endoscopist audit and feedback report for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(10):2042–2051. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguly EK, Purvis L, Reynolds N, et al. An accurate and automated method for adenoma detection rate and report card generation utilizing common electronic health records. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001915.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao L, Liu J, Wu L, et al. A gastrointestinal endoscopy quality control system incorporated with deep learning improved endoscopist performance in a pretest and Post-Test Trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021;12(6):e00366. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover SC, Walsh CM. Integrating artificial intelligence into endoscopy training: opportunities, challenges, and strategies. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;9(1):11–13. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00309-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catlow J, Bhardwaj-Gosling R, Sharp L, et al. Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022;31(10):704–715. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster F, Patel J, Rice K, et al. How to make feedback more effective? Qualitative findings from pilot testing of an audit and feedback report for endoscopists. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:4983790. doi: 10.1155/2016/4983790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindran S, Haycock A, Woolf K, et al. Development and impact of an endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) behavioural marker system. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021;7(1):17–25. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CJ, Thomas-Gibson S, Bourke MJ, et al. Managing underperformance in endoscopy: a pragmatic approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88(4):737–744.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.06.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover SC, Ong A, Bollipo S, et al. Approach to remediating the underperforming endoscopic trainee. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2023;165(6):1323–1327. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawaz S How to talk to an employee who isn’t meeting their goals [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://hbr.org/2019/02/how-to-talk-to-an-employee-who-isnt-meeting-their-goals
   Google Scholar
• Scaffidi MA, Khan R, Grover SC, et al. Self-assessment of competence in endoscopy: challenges and insights. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020;4(4):151–157. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwaa020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scaffidi MA, Li J, Genis S, et al. Accuracy of self-assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2021;55(2):176–185. doi: 10.1055/a-1929-1318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(5):609–614. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindran S, Thomas-Gibson S, Siau K, et al. Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) framework for managing underperformance in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Front Gastroenterol. 2022;13(1):5–11. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Causada-Calo NS, Gonzalez-Moreno EI, Bishay K, et al. Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2020;8(10):E1321–E1331. doi: 10.1055/a-1221-4922
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin M-Y, Mishra G, Ellison J, et al. Differences in patient outcomes after outpatient GI endoscopy across settings: a statewide matched cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;95(6):1088–1097.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford E, Sabe R, Sferra TJ, et al. Pediatric endoscopy across multiple clinical settings: efficiency and adverse events. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;14(6):367–357. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i6.367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightdale JR, Walsh CM, Narula P, et al. Pediatric endoscopy quality improvement network quality standards and indicators for pediatric endoscopy facilities: a joint NASPGHAN/ESPGHAN guideline. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022;74(S1):S16–S29. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valori R. Quality improvements in endoscopy in England. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;14(1):63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.tgie.2011.11.001
   Google Scholar
• JAG. Accreditation Global rating scale (GRS) for UK services [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.thejag.org.uk/Downloads/JAG/Accreditation%20-%20Global%20Rating%20Scale%20(GRS)/Guidance%20-%20GRS%20standards%20UK%202023.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donald M, Catherine D, Roger H, et al. The endoscopy global rating scale – Canada: development and implementation of a quality improvement tool. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;27(2):74–82. doi: 10.1155/2013/165804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier S, Sharara N, Barkun AN, et al. Pilot validation study: Canadian Global Rating Scale for colonoscopy services. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:6982739. doi: 10.1155/2016/6982739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaas JS, de JV, Korfage I, et al. Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy using the global rating scale. Endoscopy. 2012;44(5):462–472. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siau K, Green JT, Hawkes ND, et al. Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond. Front Gastroenterol. 2019;10(2):93. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin DR, Valori RM, Anderson JT, et al. The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK. Gut. 2013;62(2):242. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JAG. Paediatric Global Rating Scale (P-GRS): version for paediatric services in the UK [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.thejag.org.uk/Downloads/JAG/Accreditation%20-%20Global%20Rating%20Scale%20(GRS)/Guidance%20-%20paediatric%20GRS%20measures%202.0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wan JWY, Griffiths E, Rabone R, et al. Measuring patient and carer experience related to paediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: multicentre questionnaire study. Front Gastroenterol. 2020;11(6):448–453. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula P, Broughton R, Howarth L, et al. Paediatric endoscopy global rating scale: development of a quality improvement tool and results of a national Pilot. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;69(2):171–175. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASGE. Endoscopy Unit Recognition Program (EURP) [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.asge.org/home/practice-support/recognition-programs/eurp
   Google Scholar
• Ton L, Lee H, Taunk P, et al. Nationwide variability of colonoscopy preparation instructions. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59(8):1726–1732. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3262-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASGE Endoscopy Unit Quality Indicator Taskforce. Day LW, Cohen J. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopy units. VideoGIE. 2017;2(6):119–140. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2017.02.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaminski MF, Anderson J, Valori R, et al. Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut. 2016;65(4):616. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightdale JR, Walsh CM, Oliva S, et al. Pediatric endoscopy quality improvement network quality standards and indicators for pediatric endoscopic procedures: a joint NASPGHAN/ESPGHAN guideline. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022;74(S1):S30–S43. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh CM, Lightdale JR, Fishman DS, et al. Pediatric endoscopy quality improvement network pediatric endoscopy reporting elements: a joint NASPGHAN/ESPGHAN guideline. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022;74(S1):S53–S62. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bretthauer M, Aabakken L, Dekker E, et al. Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European Society of gastrointestinal endoscopy position statement. UEG J. 2016;4(2):172–176. doi: 10.1177/2050640616629079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASGE Technology Committee. Manfredi MA, Chauhan SS. Endoscopic electronic medical record systems. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(1):29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz SP, Rehder KJ. Quality improvement in pediatrics: past, present, and future. Pediatr Res. 2017;81(1–2):156–161. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terao M, Hoffman JM, Brilli RJ, et al. Accelerating improvement in children’s healthcare through quality improvement collaboratives: a synthesis of recent efforts. Curr Treat Options Pediatr. 2019;5(2):111–130. doi: 10.1007/s40746-019-00155-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thakkar K, El-Serag HB, Mattek N, et al. Complications of pediatric EGD: a 4-year experience in PEDS-CORI. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(2):213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakkar K, Alsarraj A, Fong E, et al. Prevalence of colorectal polyps in pediatric colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(4):1050–1055. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1972-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Serag HB, Gilger MA, Shub MD, et al. The prevalence of suspected Barrett’s esophagus in children and adolescents: a multicenter endoscopic study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(5):671–675. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egberg MD, Kappelman MD, Gulati AS. Improving care in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018;47(4):909–919. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ImproveCareNow [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.improvecarenow.org/purpose-success
   Google Scholar
• Lee TJ, Siau K, Esmaily S, et al. Development of a national automated endoscopy database: the United Kingdom national endoscopy database (NED). UEG J. 2019;7(6):798–806. doi: 10.1177/2050640619841539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical outcomes research initiative (CORI) [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/studies/cori/
   Google Scholar
• GI Quality Improvement Consortium (GIQuIC). [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://giquic.org/docs/15-GIQuIC-Brochure-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi PD, Mohapatra A, Morris MK, et al. Prevalence and predictors of young-onset colorectal neoplasia: insights from a nationally Representative colonoscopy registry. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(4):1136–1146.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb JM, Davis C, Williams JL, et al. Wide variability in dysplasia detection rate and adherence to seattle protocol and surveillance recommendations in barrett’s esophagus: a population-based analysis using the GIQuIC national quality benchmarking registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118(5):900–904. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaukat A, Holub J, Pike IM, et al. Benchmarking adenoma detection rates for colonoscopy: results from a US-Based registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(9):1946–1949. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CJ, Koo S, Anderson J, et al. British society of gastroenterology Endoscopy Quality Improvement Programme (EQIP): overview and progress. Front Gastroenterol. 2019;10(2):148. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/data-and-registries/acs-nsqip/
   Google Scholar
• ACS NSQIP Pediatric. Data & Registries ACS NSQIP Pediatric 2024. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/data-and-registries/pediatric/
   Google Scholar
• Ettorchi-Tardy A, Levif M, Michel P Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health. Healthc Polic Politiques sante. 2012;7(4):e101–19. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2012.22872
   Google Scholar
• Willmington C, Belardi P, Murante AM, et al. The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07467-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):72–90. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catlow J, Bray B, Morris E, et al. Power of big data to improve patient care in gastroenterology. Front Gastroenterol. 2022;13(3):237–244. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JS, Walsh CM. Electronic medical records use as tools for improving quality in pediatric endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2023;33(2):267–290. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.11.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solutions for Patient Safety [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.solutionsforpatientsafety.org/our-results
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mazrou AM, Haiqing Z, Guanying Y, et al. Sustained positive impact of ACS-NSQIP program on outcomes after colorectal surgery over the last decade. Am J Surg. 2020;219(1):197–205. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Huang JS, Smith N, Hamilton J, et al. Harnessing electronic medical record tools to provide proceduralist feedback on pediatric endoscopy quality metrics. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023;77(3):422–425. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones B, Scott FI, Espinoza J, et al. Leveraging electronic medical record functionality to capture adenoma detection rate. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):9679. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13943-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uche-Anya E, Anyane-Yeboa A, Berzin TM, et al. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology: how to advance clinical practice while ensuring health equity. Gut. 2022;71(9):1909–1915. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadebecq F, Lovat LB, Stoyanov D. Artificial intelligence and automation in endoscopy and surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;20(3):171–182. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00701-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal J, Walsh CM. Artificial intelligence in pediatric endoscopy Current status and future applications. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2023;33(2):291–308. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.12.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berre CL, Sandborn WJ, Aridhi S, et al. Application of artificial intelligence to gastroenterology and hepatology. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(1):76–94.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JRG, Mansour NM, Wang P, et al. Deep learning computer-aided polyp detection reduces adenoma Miss rate: a United States multi-center randomized tandem colonoscopy study (CADeT-CS trial). Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(7):1499–1507.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadaccini M, Iannone A, Maselli R, et al. Computer-aided detection versus advanced imaging for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(10):793–802. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00215-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berzin TM, Brown JG. Navigating the “trough of disillusionment” for CADe polyp detection: what can we learn about negative AI trials and the Physician-AI Hybrid? Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118(10):1743–1745. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Y-Y, Li P-C, Chang R-F, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning-based algorithm for colonoscopy quality assessment. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(9):6446–6455. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08993-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau LHS, Ho JCL, Lai JCT. Effect of real-time computer-aided polyp detection system (ENDOAID) on adenoma detection in endoscopist-intraining: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial (ENDOAID-TRAIN study). United European Gastroenterol J [Internet]. 2024;22(3): 630–641.
   Google Scholar
• Jin EH, Lee D, Bae JH, et al. Improved accuracy in optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using convolutional neural networks with visual explanations. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(8):2169–2179.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantak SS, Winstein CJ. Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: a focused review and perspective. Behav Brain Res. 2012;228(1):219–231. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson A, Eliasz KL Desirable difficulty: theory and application of intentionally challenging learning. Med Educ. 2023;57(2):123–130. doi: 10.1111/medu.14916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli M, Morin M, Dubrowski A The application of the challenge point framework in medical education. Med Educ. 2012;46(5):447–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04210.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues T, Keswani R. Endoscopy training in the age of artificial intelligence: deep learning or artificial competence? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21(1):8–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner JG, Logghe HJ, Kane ED, et al. A society of gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgeons (SAGES) statement on closed social media (Facebook®) groups for clinical education and consultation: issues of informed consent, patient privacy, and surgeon protection. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6569-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan R, Plahouras J, Johnston BC, et al. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 2018(8):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub3
   Google Scholar
• Lima DL, Viscarret V, Velasco J, et al. Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(7):4674–4684. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonggom P, Rattanakanokchai S, Suebkinorn O. Effectiveness of bowel preparation innovative technology instructions (BPITIs) on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):10783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37044-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh DM, Chun S, Terrones L, et al. Using media to improve the informed consent process for youth undergoing pediatric endoscopy and their parents. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5(01):E41–E46. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-121668
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedlander JA, Loeben GS, Finnegan PK, et al. A novel method to enhance informed consent: a prospective and randomised trial of form-based versus electronic assisted informed consent in paediatric endoscopy. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(4):194. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang X, Zhao L, Leung F, et al. Delivery of instructions via Mobile social media app increases quality of bowel preparation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(3):429–435.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.09.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Zhao Y, Xie F, et al. Educating outpatients for bowel preparation before colonoscopy using conventional methods vs virtual reality videos plus conventional methods. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(11):e2135576. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizri ME, Sheikh ME, Lee GE, et al. Mobile health technologies supporting colonoscopy preparation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0248679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang AL. Navigating and leveraging social media. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2021;31(4):695–707. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.05.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Filicori F, Bitner DP, Fuchs HF, et al. SAGES video acquisition framework—analysis of available or recording technologies by the SAGES AI task force. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(6):4321–4327. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09825-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incze T, Pinkney S, Fan M, et al. Assessing surgical teamwork competencies during moments of uncertainty using or black box. Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc. 2021;10(1):267–271. doi: 10.1177/2327857921101246
   Google Scholar
• van Dalen ASHM, Jansen M, van Haperen M, et al. Implementing structured team debriefing using a Black Box in the operating room: surveying team satisfaction. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:1406–1419. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07526-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon L, Reed C, Sorensen JL, et al. Perceptions of safety culture and recording in the operating room: understanding barriers to video data capture. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(6):3789–3797. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08695-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambadauro P, Magos A. Surgical videos for accident analysis, performance improvement, and complication prevention. Surg Innov. 2012;19(1):76–80. doi: 10.1177/1553350611415424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar