Positionality, ‘the field,’ and implications for knowledge production and research ethics in land change science

References

• Barre, R.Y., Grant, M., & Draper, D. (2009). The role of taboos in conservation of sacred Groves in Ghana’s Tallensi-Nabdam district. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(1), 25–39 doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802553194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, M.J., Argüelles, C.C., Cordis, S., Ihmoud, S., & Velásquez, E.E. (2017). Toward a fugitive anthropology: Gender, race and violence in the field. Cultural Anthropology, 32(4), 537–565. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca32.4.05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Moheno, M., & Aide, T.M. (2020). Beyond deforestation: Land cover transitions in Mexico. Agricultural Systems 178, 102734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannstrom, C., & Vadjunec, M. (2013). Integrating LCS and PE. In C. Brannstrom & J. Vadjunec (Eds.), Land change science, political ecology, and sustainability (pp. 1–23). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, J. (2011). Walking the line: Participatory mapping, indigenous rights, and neoliberalism. Geoforum, 42(1), 24–32 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, M.S. (2004). Ontological politics: Mapping a complex environmental problem. Environmental Values, 13(1), 497–522 doi:10.3197/0963271042772587.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, J.A., James, P., Cushing, L., Jesdale, B.M., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2017). Race, ethnicity, income concentration and 10-year change in urban greenness in the United States. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14(12), 1546. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, S. (2012). Getting personal while narrating the ‘field’: A researcher’s journey to the villages of the narmada valley. Gender, Place & Culture, 20(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2011.649348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy, K.B.H., Nelson, R.G., Rutherford, J.N., & Hinde, K. (2014). Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE): Trainees report harassment and assault. PLoS ONE, 9(7), Article e102172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sherbinin, A., VanWey, L.K., McSweeney, K., Aggarwal, R., Barbieri, A., Henry, S., Hunter, L.M., Twine, W., & Walker, R. (2008). Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debela, B., Shively, G., Angelsen, A., & Wik, M. (2012). Economic shocks, diversification, and forest use in Uganda. Land Economics, 88(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1353/lde.2012.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloria, V., Jr., & Deloria, P.J. (2006). The world we used to live in: Remembering the powers of the medicine men. Fulcrum Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, J., Wrathall, D., Aguilar-González, B., Benessaiah, K., Tellman, B., Ghaffari, Z., & Ponstingel, D. (2021). Narco-degradation: Cocaine trafficking’s environmental impacts in Central America’s protected areas. World Development, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domosh, M. (2014, August 1). The more-than-conference conference. Newsletter of the Assocation of American Geographers, President‘s Column. http://news.aag.org/2014/08/the-more-than-conference-conference/
   Google Scholar
• Domosh, M. (2003). Towards a more fully reciprocal feminist inquiry. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 2(1), 107–111. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/711
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2015). An indigenous people’s history of the United States. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eakin, H., Lerner, A.M., Manuel-Navarrete, D., Aguilar, B.H., Martínez-Canedo, A., Tellman, B., Charli-Joseph, L., Lvarez, R.F., & Bojórquez-Tapia, L. (2016). Adapting to risk and perpetuating poverty: Household’s strategies for managing flood risk and water scarcity in Mexico City. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2006). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer, 58((2)), 197–208 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00526.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, K.V.L. (1994). Getting Personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, C., & Mollett, S. (2016). Critical feminist reflexivity and the politics of whiteness in the ‘field’. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.958065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Diaz, J.C., Cohen, A.S., González, A.M., & Fisher, C. (2018). Shifting perspectives and ethical concerns in the era of remote sensing technologies. SAA Archaeological Record 18 (2) 8–15 . March 2018 http://onlinedigeditions.com/publication/?m=16146&i=486133&p=10&ver=html5.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Diaz, J.C., & Cohen, A.S. (2020). Whose data is it anyway? Lessons in data management and sharing from resurrecting and repurposing lidar data for archaeology research in honduras. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 3(1), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.51
   Google Scholar
• Ferring, D. (2013). Critical geospatial technologies of infectious disease dynamics – Buruli ulcer in Ghana. Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M., Fradley, M., Flohr, P., Rouhani, B., & Simi, F. (2021). Ethical considers for remote sensing and open data in relation to the endangered archeologiy in the Middle East and North Africa project. Archaeological Prospection, 2021, 1–14 doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1816.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Suryanata, K., & Hershock, P. (2005). Mapping communities: Ethics, values and practices. East-West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. (2007). Coded spatialities of fieldwork. Area, 39(2), 242–245 https://www.jstor.org/stable/40346031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R.W. (2002). Fatal couplings of power and difference: Notes on racism and geography. The Professional Geographer, 54(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Land Programme (GLP). (2021). https://glp.earth/our-science, last accessed September 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Green, L., Schmook, B., Radel, C., & Mardero, S. (2020). Living smallholder vulnerability: The everyday experience of climate change in Calakmul, Mexico. Journal of Latin American Geography, 19(2), 110–142. https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2020.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D.J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausermann, H., Adomako, J., & Robles, M. (2020). Fried eggs and all-women gangs: The geopolitics of Chinese gold mining in Ghana, bodily vulnerability, and resistance. Human Geography, 13(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620910900
   Google Scholar
• Hausermann, H., Ferring, D., Atosona, B., Mentz, G., Amankwah, R., Chang, A., Hartfield, K., Effah, E., Yeboah-Asuamah, G., Mansell, C., & Sastri, N. (2018). Land-grabbing, land-use transformation and social differentiation: Deconstructing “small-scale” in Ghana’s recent gold rush. World Development, 108 C , 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.014
   Google Scholar
• Hausermann, H., & Ferring, D. (2018). Unpacking land-grabbing: subjects, performances, and the State in Ghana’s ‘small-scale’ gold mining sector. Development and Change, 49(4), 1010–1033 https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausermann, H., & Ferring, D. (2021). Unpacking land-grabbing: Subjects, performances, and the state in Ghana’s “small-scale” gold mining sector. In D.A. Ghertner & R.W. Lake (Eds.), Land fictions: The commodification of land in City and Country (pp. 227–240). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausermann, H. (2012). From polygons to politics: Everyday practice and environmental governance in Veracruz, Mexico. Geoforum, 43(5), 1002–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausermann, H. (2014). Maintaining the coffee canopy: Understanding change and continuity in Central Veracruz. Human Ecology, 42(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9644-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausermann, H. (2018). “Ghana must progress, but we are really suffering”: Bui Dam, antipolitics development, and the livelihood implications for rural people. Society & Natural Resources, 31(6), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1422062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausermann, H. (2019). Spirit hospitals and “concern with herbs”: A political ecology of healing and being-in-common in Ghana. special issue titled, “commons, commoning and co-becoming: nurturing life-in-common and post-capitalist futures,”. Environment & Planning E 4 (4) . https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619893915
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, S. (2014). Fresh fruit, broken bodies: Migrant farmworkers in the United States. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isreal, B., Eng, E., Schultz, A., & Parker, E. (2013). Methods for community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K. (2020). Academic motherhood and fieldwork: Juggling time, emotions, and competing demands. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(3), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, L.C., Peluso, N.L., Carlson, K.M., & Afiff, S. (2020). Circular labor migration and land-livelihood dynamics in Southeast Asia’s concession landscapes. Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnebrew, E., Shoffner, E., Farah-Pérez, A., Mills-Novoa, M., & Siegel, K. (2021). Approaches to interdisciplinary mixed methods research in land-change science and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 35(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleemann, J., Baysal, G., Bulley, H., & Fürst, C. (2017). Assessing driving forces of land use and land cover change by a mixed-method approach in north-eastern Ghana, West Africa. Journal of Environmental Management 196, 411–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin, E.F., & Geist, H.J. (Eds.). (2006). Land-use and land-cover change: Local processes to global impacts. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• LaRocca, A.A., Shinn, J.E., & Madise, K. (2019). Reflections on positionalities in social science fieldwork in Northern Botswana: A call for decolonizing research. Politics & Gender, 16(3), 845–873. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverman, D., & Cuesta, R. (2008). Human interactions with the Earth system: People and pixels revisited. Geomorphology and Earth System Science, 33(9), 1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1715.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, C.K. (2008). Anthropology from the Bones: A memoir of fieldwork, survival, and commitment. Anthropology and Humanism, 33(1–2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1409.2008.00001.x
   Google Scholar
• Mahtani, M. (2014). Toxic geographies: Absences in critical race thought and practice in social and cultural geography. Social & Cultural Geography, 15(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.888297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, B., Lave, R., McSweeney, K., Bonds, A., Cockburn, J., Domosh, M., Hamilton, T., Hawkins, R., Hessl, A., Munroe, D., Ojeda, D., & Radel, C. (2019). It’s time to recognize how men’s careers benefit from sexually harassing women in academia. Human Geography, 12(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861901200110
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. (2021). Out of the dark night. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. (1999). Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McSweeney, K. (2005). Natural insurance, forest access, and compounded misfortune: Forest resources in smallholder coping strategies before and after hurricane mitch, northeastern honduras. World Development, 33(9), 1453–1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. (2013). Escaping the ‘field trap’: Exploitation and the global politics of educational fieldwork in ‘conflict zones. Third World Quarterly, 34(7), 1247–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.824642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mott, C., & Cockayne, D. (2017). Citation matters: Mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of ‘conscientious engagement’. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(7), 954–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mott, C., & Roberts, S. (2014). Not everyone has (the) balls: Urban exploration and the persistence of masculinist geography. Antipode, 46(1), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munroe, D.K., Croissant, C., & York, A.M. (2005). Land use policy and landscape fragmentation in an urbanizing region: Assessing the impact of zoning. Applied Geography, 25(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, A. (2010). Camp delta, google earth and the ethics of remote sensing in archeology. World Archaeology, 42(3), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2010.498640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nast, H.J. (1994). Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A.H., & Nguse, T. (2015). Relationships and research methods: Entanglements, intra-actions, and diffraction. In T. Perreault, G. Bridge, & J. McCarthy (Eds.), The routledge handbook of political ecology (pp. 140–149). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nichter, M. (2008). Global health: Why cultural perceptions, social representations, and biopolitics matter. University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peake, L., & Kobayashi, A. (2002). Policies and practices for an antiracist geography at the millennium. The Professional Geographer, 54(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, S., Southworth, J., Barnes, G., Qiu, Y., Xia, Y., Sun, J., & Rocha, K. (2013). Political ecology and land change science in the study of infrastructure impacts: The case of the Southwestern Amazon. In C. Brannstrom & J. Vadjunec (Eds.), Land change science, political ecology, and sustainability (pp. 150–168). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Propen, A.D. (2006). Critical GPS: Toward a new politics of location. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4(1), 131–144. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1119&context=engl_fac.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. (2002). Reflections on a white discipline. The Professional Geographer, 54(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. (1994). (Representing) post-colonial women: Authority, difference and feminisms. Area, 26(1), 25–32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20003369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radel, C., Schmook, B., Haenn, N., & Green, L. (2017). The gender dynamics of conditional cash transfers and smallholder farming in Calakmul, Mexico. Women’s Studies International Forum, 65, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindfuss, R., Walsh, S., Turner, B., Fox, J., & Mishra, V. (2004). Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. PNAS, 101(39), 13976–13981. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401545101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. (2001). Tracking invasive land covers in India, or why our landscapes have never been modern. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(4), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, R. (2006). Social justice and women of color in geography: Philosophical musings, trying again. Gender, Place & Culture, 13(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690500530982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, J., & Dowler, L. (2011). Chapter 9: Framing the field. In V.J. Del Casino, J.M. Thomas, P. Cloke, & R. Panelli (Eds.), A companion to social geography (pp. 146–160). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. (2005). Geography and gender: Feminist methodologies in collaboration and in the field. Progress in Human Geography, 29(3), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph550pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, L.B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slonecker, T., Shaw, D., & Lillesand, T. (1998). Emerging legal and ethical issues in advanced remote sensing technology. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 64(6), 589–595. https://ibis.geog.ubc.ca/courses/geog373/lectures/Handouts/PERS_Remote_Sensing_Ethics.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. (2014). Intimacy and angst in the field. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.958067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L.A., & Nagar, R. (2002). Feminists talking across worlds. Gender, Place and Culture, 9(2), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663960220139671
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 374–385. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/786
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing posthuman geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013486067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TallBear, K. (2015) Disrupting life/Not life. DOPE 2015 Keynote Address. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v.iE-gaDG-kLQ (accessed 1 December 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Tellman, B., Magliocca, N., Turner, B., & Verburg, P. (2020). Understanding the role of illicit transactions in land-change dynamics. Nature Sustainability, 3, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0457-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriault, N. (2017). A forest of dreams: Ontological multiplicity and the fantasies of environmental government in the Philippines. Political Geography, 58, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B.L.I.I., Lambin, E.F., & Reenberg, A. (2008). The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105(7), 20666–20671. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704119104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B.L.I.I., & Robbins, P. (2008). Land-change science and political ecology: Similarities, differences, and implications for sustainability science. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.022207.104943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright, J. (2012). Geopiracy: Oaxaca, militant empiricism, and geographical thought. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wasowski, R. (1991). Some ethical aspects of international satellite remote sensing. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57(1), 41–48. https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/1991journal/jan/1991_jan_41-48.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. (2020). Indigenous environmental justice: Anti-colonial action through kinship. In B. Coolsaet (Ed.), Environmental justice: Key issues (pp. 266–278). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, P., Feng, Y., Li, M., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralization. Land-use Policy, 108 (2), 105578. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105578.
   Google Scholar