2,134
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Gender and authorship patterns in urban land science

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 245-261 | Received 10 Jul 2021, Accepted 09 Dec 2021, Published online: 03 Jan 2022

References

  • Aguinis, H., Ji, Y.H., & Joo, H. (2018). Gender productivity gap among star performers in STEM and other scientific fields. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1283. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000331
  • Aiston, S.J., & Jung, J. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: An international comparison. Gender and Education, 27(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1024617
  • Andersen, J.P., Schneider, J.W., Jagsi, R., & Nielsen, M.W. (2019). Meta-Research: Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige. Elife, 8(p), e45374. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45374
  • Bastian, S., Ippolito, J.A., Lopez, S.A., Eloy, J.A., & Beebe, K.S. (2017). The use of the h-index in academic orthopaedic surgery. JBJS, 99(4), e14. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01354
  • Bell, M.L., & Fong, K.C. (2021). Gender differences in first and corresponding authorship in public health research submissions during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Public Health, 111(1), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305975
  • Bendels, M.H., Müller, R., Brueggmann, D., Groneberg, D.A., & Lozano, S. (2018). Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals. PloS One, 13(1), e0189136. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189136
  • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609
  • Chen, T.H.K., Qiu, C., Schmitt, M., Zhu, X.X., Sabel, C.E., & Prishchepov, A.V. (2020). Mapping horizontal and vertical urban densification in Denmark with Landsat time-series from 1985 to 2018: A semantic segmentation solution. Remote Sensing of Environment, 251, 112096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112096
  • Conley, D., & Stadmark, J. (2012). A call to commission more women writers. Nature, 488(7413), 590-590. https://doi.org/10.1038/488590a
  • Duch, J., Zeng, X.H.T., Sales-Pardo, M., Radicchi, F., Otis, S., Woodruff, T.K., Amaral, L.A.N., & Perc, M. (2012). The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact. PloS One, 7(12), e51332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051332
  • Dworkin, J.D., Linn, K.A., Teich, E.G. Zurn, P., Shinohara, R.T., & Bassett, D.S. (2020). The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nature Neuroscience, 23(8), 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y
  • Faria, J.R., & Mixon, F.G. (2021). The marginal impact of a publication on citations, and its effect on academic pay. Scientometrics 1269 , 8217–8226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04073-z
  • Fox, M.F. (2001). Women, science, and academia: Graduate education and careers. Gender & Society, 15(5), 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015005002
  • Grossbard, S., Yilmazer, T., & Zhang, L. (2020). The gender gap in citations of articles published in two demographic economics journals. Review of Economics of the Household, 19, 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-020-09508-9
  • Hechtman, L.A., Moore, N.P., Schulkey, C.E., Miklos, A.C., Calcagno, A.M., Aragon, R., & Greenberg, J.H. (2018). NIH funding longevity by gender. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(31), 7943–7948. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800615115
  • Henley, M.M. (2015). Women’s success in academic science: Challenges to breaking through the ivory ceiling. Sociology Compass, 9(8), 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12291
  • Heymann, J. (2013). Children’s Chances. Harvard University Press.
  • Hirsch, J.E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics, 85(3), 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0193-9
  • Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C.E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology, 16(4), e2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956
  • Hopkins, N. (1999). MIT and gender bias: Following up on victory. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(40), B4–B5 http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Juliette.Leblond/Parite/doc-mixite/Women%20Faculty%20at%20MIT.pdf.
  • Huang, J., Gates, A.J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9), 4609–4616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117
  • Huang, K., Lee, X., Stone, B., Jr, Knievel, J., Bell, M.L., & Seto, K.C. (2021). Persistent increases in nighttime heat stress from urban expansion despite heat Island mitigation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 126(4), e2020JD033831. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033831
  • Jadidi, M., Karimi, F., Lietz, H., & Wagner, C. (2018). Gender disparities in science? Dropout, productivity, collaborations and success of male and female computer scientists. Advances in Complex Systems, 21(3n04), p 1750011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525917500114
  • Karimi, F., Wagner, C., Lemmerich, F., Jadidi, M., & Strohmaier, M. (2016). Inferring gender from names on the web: A comparative evaluation of gender detection methods. Proceedings of the 25th International conference companion on World Wide Web Montréal Québec Canada (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee).
  • King, M.M., Bergstrom, C.T., Correll, S.J., Jacquet, J., & West, J.D. (2017). Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Socius, 3, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117738903
  • Krukowski, R.A., Jagsi, R., & Cardel, M.I. (2021). Academic productivity differences by gender and child age in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Women’s Health, 30(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8710
  • Lee, D.D., & Seung, H.S. (1999). Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401(6755), 788–791. https://doi.org/10.1038/44565
  • Lerchenmueller, M.J., Sorenson, O., & Jena, A.B. (2019). Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: Observational study. bmj, 367, I6573. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6573
  • Lerchenmüller, C., Schmallenbach, L., Jena, A.B., & Lerchenmueller, M.J. (2021). Longitudinal analyses of gender differences in first authorship publications related to COVID-19. BMJ Open, 11(4), e045176. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045176
  • Long, J.S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579971
  • Lundine, J., Bourgeault, I.L., Clark, J., Heidari, S., & Balabanova, D. (2018). The gendered system of academic publishing. The Lancet, 391(10132), 1754–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30950-4
  • Lutter, M., & Schröder, M. (2020). Is there a motherhood penalty in academia? The gendered effect of children on academic publications in German sociology. European Sociological Review, 36(3), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz063
  • Mauleón, E., & Bordons, M. (2006). Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of materials science. Scientometrics, 66(1), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0014-3
  • McDonald, R.I., Mansur, A.V., Ascensão, F., Colbert, M., Crossman, K., Elmqvist, T., Güneralp, B., Haase, D., Hamann, M., Hillel, O., Huang, K., Kahnt, B., Maddox, D., Pacheco, A., Pereira, H.M., Seto, K.C., Simkin, R., Walsh, B., Werner, A.S., … Gonzalez, A. (2020). Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity. Nature Sustainability, 3(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0436-6
  • Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L.A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  • Moss-Racusin, C.A., Dovidio, J.F., Brescoll, V.L., Graham, M.J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
  • Muric, G., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2021). Gender disparity in the authorship of biomedical research publications during the covid-19 pandemic: retrospective observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e25379. https://doi.org/10.2196/25379
  • Nafade, V., Sen, P., & Pai, M. (2019). Global health journals need to address equity, diversity and inclusion. BMJ Global Health, 4(5), e002018. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002018
  • Nunkoo, R., Thelwall, M., Ladsawut, J., & Goolaup, S. (2020). Three decades of tourism scholarship: Gender, collaboration and research methods. Tourism Management, 78(p), 104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104056
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Education at a Glance 2012 (Paris: OECD).
  • Pinchoff, J., Mills, C.W., Balk, D., & Liu, S.Y. (2020). Urbanization and health: The effects of the built environment on chronic disease risk factors among women in Tanzania. PloS One, 15(11), e0241810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241810
  • Rivers, E. (2017). National Science Foundation (National Science Foundation) https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/downloads
  • Sarsons, H. (2017). Recognition for group work: Gender differences in academia. American Economic Review, 107(5), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171126
  • Schiebinger, L., & Gilmartin, S.K. (2010). Housework is an academic issue. Academe, 96(1), 39–44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20694619.
  • Seto, K.C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L.R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), 16083–16088. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109
  • Shen, H. (2013). Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. Nature News, 495(7439), 22. https://doi.org/10.1038/495022a
  • Shughrue, C., Werner, B., & Seto, K.C. (2020). Global spread of local cyclone damages through urban trade networks. Nature Sustainability, 3(8), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0523-8
  • Sotudeh, H., & Khoshian, N. (2014). Gender differences in science: The case of scientific productivity in nano science & technology during 2005–2007. Scientometrics, 98(1), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1031-7
  • Stokes, E.C., & Seto, K.C. (2019). Characterizing urban infrastructural transitions for the sustainable development goals using multi-temporal land, population, and nighttime light data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 234, 111430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111430
  • Stone, B., Hess, J.J., & Frumkin, H. (2010). Urban form and extreme heat events: Are sprawling cities more vulnerable to climate change than compact cities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(10), 1425–1428. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901879
  • Tamblyn, R., Girard, N., Qian, C.J., & Hanley, J. (2018). Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada. CMAJ, 190(16), E489–E499. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170901
  • Thomas, E.G. Jayabalasingham, B., Collins, T., Geertzen, J., Bui, C., & Dominici, F. (2019). Gender disparities in invited commentary authorship in 2459 medical journals. JAMA Network Open, 2(10), e1913682–e1913682. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13682
  • West, J.D., Jacquet, J., King, M.M., Correll, S.J., & Bergstrom, C.T. (2013). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PloS One, 8(7), e66212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066212
  • Wolfinger, N.H., Mason, M.A., & Goulden, M. (2009). Stay in the game: Gender, family formation and alternative trajectories in the academic life course. Social Forces, 87(3), 1591–1621. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0182