Effectiveness of community forests for forest conservation in Nan province, Thailand

References

• Abadie, A., & Imbens, G.W. (2011). Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 29(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1198/jbes.2009.07333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, Y.O., & Eltayeb, A.M. (2016). Forestry decentralization and poverty alleviation: A review. Forest Policy and Economics, 73, 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, W.M., & Hutton, J. (2007). People, parks and poverty: Political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society, 5(2), 147–183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26392879
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, S., Marathe, A., Ghate, R., Krishnaswamy, J., & Nagendra, H. (2017). Forest protection in Central India: Do differences in monitoring by state and local institutions result in diverse social and ecological impacts? Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(9), 2047–2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1344-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, S., & Nagendra, H. (2020). Classification of Indian cities using Google Earth Engine. Journal of Land Use Science, 14(4–6), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2020.1720842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, S., & Lambin, E. (2022). Interventions to control deforestation in a swidden cultivation landscape in Nan province, Thailand. In Review.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. (1999). Accountability in decentralization: A framework with South Asian and West African cases. The Journal of Developing Areas, 33(4), 473–502. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4192885
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., & Hardin, R. (2008). Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science, 320(5882), 1460–1462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, K., & Gibson, C.C. (2006). Decentralized governance and environmental change: Local institutional moderation of deforestation in Bolivia. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araral, E. (2014). Ostrom, Hardin and the commons: A critical appreciation and a revisionist view. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., & Van Laerhoven, F. (2013). Helping to self-help? External interventions to stimulate local collective action in joint forest management, Maharashtra, India. International Forestry Review, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554813805927246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgiu, M., & Drăguţ, L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2006). From community-based resource management to complex systems: The scale issue and marine commons. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01431-110145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluffstone, R., Dannenberg, A., Martinsson, P., Jha, P., & Bista, R. (2020). Cooperative behavior and common pool resources: Experimental evidence from community forest user groups in Nepal. World Development, 129, 104889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börner, J., Schulz, D., Wunder, S., & Pfaff, A. (2020). The effectiveness of forest conservation policies and programs. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-025703
   Google Scholar
• Bruggeman, D., Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E.F. (2015). Production forests as a conservation tool: Effectiveness of Cameroon’s land use zoning policy. Land Use Policy, 42, 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruggeman, D., Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E.F. (2018). Impact of land-use zoning for forest protection and production on forest cover changes in Bhutan. Applied Geography, 96, 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burivalova, Z., Miteva, D., Salafsky, N., Butler, R.A., & Wilcove, D.S. (2019). Evidence types and trends in tropical forest conservation literature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(7), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnley, S., & Poe, M.R. (2007). Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology, 36(1), 301–336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhatre, A., & Agrawal, A. (2009). Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(42), 17667–17670. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905308106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton, R.G. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Tomás, S.V. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03704-150438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuenca, P., Arriagada, R., & Echeverría, C. (2016). How much deforestation do protected areas avoid in tropical Andean landscapes? Environmental Science & Policy, 56, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darlington, S.M. (2012). The ordination of a tree: The Thai Buddhist environmental movement. Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P.C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong, N.T., & De Groot, W.T. (2020). The impact of payment for forest environmental services (PFES) on community-level forest management in Vietnam. Forest Policy and Economics, 113, 102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro, P.J., Hanauer, M.M., Miteva, D.A., Nelson, J.L., Pattanayak, S.K., Nolte, C., & Sims, K.R. (2015). Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(24), 7420–7425. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406487112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischman, F.D. (2014). Why do foresters plant trees? Testing theories of bureaucratic decision-making in central India. World Development, 62, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furumo, P.R., & Lambin, E.F. (2021). Policy sequencing to reduce tropical deforestation. Global Sustainability, 4, e24. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.21
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, D., & Rattanarat, W. (2021). Thailand’s community forest act: Analysis of the legal framework and recommendations. RECOFTC. https://www.recoftc.org/sites/default/files/publications/resources/recoftc-0000392-0001-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gelo, D. (2020). Forest commons, vertical integration and smallholder’s saving and investment responses: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. World Development, 132, 104962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, D., Lele, S., & Sahu, G. (2020). Promoting a responsive state: The role of NGOs in decentralized forest governance in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajjar, R., Oldekop, J.A., Cronkleton, P., Etue, E., Newton, P., Russel, A.J., Tjajadi, J.S., Zhou, W., & Agrawal, A. (2016). The data not collected on community forestry. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1357–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajjar, R., & Oldekop, J.A. (2018). Research frontiers in community forest management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajjar, R., Oldekop, J.A., Cronkleton, P., Newton, P., Russell, A.J., & Zhou, W. (2021). A global analysis of the social and environmental outcomes of community forests. Nature Sustainability, 4(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00633-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahsay, G.A., & Medhin, H. (2020). Leader turnover and forest management outcomes: Micro-level evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 127, 104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. (2002). Does “participation” in common pool resource management help the poor? A social cost–benefit analysis of joint forest management in Jharkhand, India. World Development, 30(5), 763–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00004-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutty, R., Kodiveri, A., Lele, S., & Setty, S. (2019). India’s forest rights act, 2006 Stuck in a maze of bureaucratic interpretations? The Indian Journal of Social Work, 80(4), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.32444/IJSW.2019.80.4.439-460
   Google Scholar
• Luintel, H., Bluffstone, R.A., & Scheller, R.M. (2018). The effects of the Nepal community forestry program on biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. PLoS One, 13(6), e0199526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magno, F. (2001). Forest devolution and social capital: State-civil society relations in the Philippines. Environmental History, 6(2), 264–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E.F. (2009). Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(38), 16139–16144. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904942106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miteva, D.A., & Pattanayak, S.K. (2021). The effectiveness of protected areas in the context of decentralization. World Development, 142, 105446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte, C., Gobbi, B., de Waroux, Y.L.P., Piquer-Rodríguez, M., Butsic, V., & Lambin, E.F. (2017). Decentralized land use zoning reduces large-scale deforestation in a major agricultural frontier. Ecological Economics, 136, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumu, B., & Muchapondwa, E. (2020). Welfare and forest cover impacts of incentive based conservation: Evidence from Kenyan community forest associations. World Development, 129, 104890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldekop, J.A., Sims, K.R., Karna, B.K., Whittingham, M.J., & Agrawal, A. (2019). Reductions in deforestation and poverty from decentralized forest management in Nepal. Nature Sustainability, 2(5), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0277-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Pagdee, A., Kim, Y., & Daugherty, P.J. (2006). What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society & Natural Resources, 19(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920500323260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, J., Gélinas, N., & Skutsch, M. (2016). The place of community forest management in the REDD+ landscape. Forests, 7(8), 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7080170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, J., Ford, S., Keophoxay, A., Mertz, O., Nielsen, J.Ø., Vongvisouk, T., & Zörner, M. (2021). Large differences in livelihood responses and outcomes to increased conservation enforcement in a protected area. Human Ecology 49, 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-021-00267-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinyopusarerk, K., Tran, T.T.H., & Tran, V.D. (2014). Making community forest management work in northern Vietnam by pioneering participatory action. Land Use Policy, 38, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindranath, N.H., & Sudha, P. (2004). Joint forest management in India: Spread, performance and impact. Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rights and resources. https://rightsandresources.org/tenure-tracking/forest-and-land-tenure/
   Google Scholar
• Sairorkham, B., & Sakitram, P. (2020). Strengthening and empowering community forest network in Nan Province. Social Research Institute (SRI) Chiang Mai University, Muang District, Chiang Mai Province 50200, Thailand; RDG60A0036. Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI).
   Google Scholar
• Santika, T., Meijaard, E., Budiharta, S., Law, E.A., Kusworo, A., Hutabarat, J.A., Indrawan, T.P., Struebig, M., Raharjo, S., Huda, I., Ekaputri, A.D., Trison, S., Stigner, M., & Wilson, K.A. (2017). Community forest management in Indonesia: Avoided deforestation in the context of anthropogenic and climate complexities. Global Environmental Change, 46, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon, J.S. (2008). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: The matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software, Forthcoming. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1009044
   Google Scholar
• Sills, E.O., Pfaff, A., Andrade, L., Kirkpatrick, J., & Dickson, R. (2020). Investing in local capacity to respond to a federal environmental mandate: Forest & economic impacts of the green municipality program in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development, 129, 104891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somanathan, E., Prabhakar, R., & Mehta, B.S. (2009). Decentralization for cost-effective conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4143–4147. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810049106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, G.D., Andersson, K.P., Gibson, C.C., & Evans, T.P. (2016). Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(52), 14958–14963. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610650114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, V.Y., de Neergaard, A., & Bruun, T.B. (2017). ‘To adopt or not to adopt?’Legume adoption in maize-based systems of Northern Thailand: Constraints and potentials. Land Degradation & Development, 28(2), 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Z., Gower, D.B., & Wood, E.F. (2018). Accelerating forest loss in Southeast Asian Massif in the 21st century: A case study in Nan Province, Thailand. Global Change Biology, 24(10), 4682–4695. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar