Land cover conversion and land use change combine to reduce grazing

References

• Andersen, M.A., Blank, S.C., LaMendola, T., & Sexton, R.J. (2002). California’s cattle and beef industry at the crossroads. Calif. Agric, 56(5), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v056n05p152
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M.A., Duke, J.M., & Messer, K.D. (2013). Adverse selection in reverse auctions for ecosystem services. Land Econ, 89(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.89.3.387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbara, S. (2020). Agricultural Production Report.https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/8fbef220-212b-4724-96d0-8a234f01ac4c?cache=1800
   Google Scholar
• Bartolome, J.W., Allen-Diaz, B.H., Barry, S., Ford, L.D., Hammond, M., Hopkinson, P., Ratcliff, F., Spiegal, S., & White, M.D. (2014). Grazing for biodiversity in Californian Mediterranean grasslands. Source: Rangelands, 36(5), 36–43 doi:10.2111/Rangelands-D-14-00024.1.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2011). Public Participation GIS: A new method for national park planning. Landsc. Urban Plan, 102(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchman, L.T. (1956). Historical backgrounds of range land use in California. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. Range Manag. Arch, 9(2), 81–86 https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/jrm/article/viewFile/4711/4322.
   Google Scholar
• Butsic, V., Lewis, D.J.D.J.J., & Ludwig, L. (2011). An econometric analysis of land development with endogenous zoning. Land Econ, 87(3), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.87.3.412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Department of Conservation. (2021). Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program [WWW Document]. URL https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/
   Google Scholar
• Cason, T.N., & Gangadharan, L. (2004). Auction design for voluntary conservation programs. Am. J. Agric. Econ, 86(5), 1211–1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00666.x
   Google Scholar
• Colantoni, A., Egidi, G., Quaranta, G., D’Alessandro, R., Vinci, S., Turco, R., & Salvati, L. (2020). Sustainable land management, wildfire risk and the role of grazing in Mediterranean urban-rural interfaces: A regional approach from Greece. Land, 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9010021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conservation Biology Institute. (2021a). Land use and vegetation- santa barbara county [WWW Document]. URL https://sbcblueprint.databasin.org/
   Google Scholar
• Conservation Biology Institute. (2021b). Data basin [WWW Document]. URL https://databasin.org/
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K.W., Boyd, C.S., Bates, J.D., & Hulet, A. (2015). Winter grazing can reduce wildfire size, intensity and behaviour in a shrub-grassland. Int. J. Wildl. Fire, 25(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J.M., Call, C.A., & Devoe, N. (2009). Effects of targeted cattle grazing on fire behavior of cheatgrass-dominated rangeland in the northern Great Basin, USA. Int. J. Wildl. Fire, 18(8), 944–950. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didonato, J. (2006). CAL-PAC society for range management symposium-grazing for biological conservation-Endangered Amphibian Research within Grazed Grasslands. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M609039200
   Google Scholar
• Ernoul, L., Wardell-Johnson, A., Willm, L., Béchet, A., Boutron, O., Mathevet, R., Arnassant, S., & Sandoz, A. (2018). Participatory mapping: Exploring landscape values associated with an iconic species. Appl. Geogr, 95, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, J.A., DeFries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., Gibbs, H.K., Helkowski, J.H., Holloway, T., Howard, E.A., Kucharik, C.J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J.A., Prentice, I.C., Ramankutty, N., & Snyder, P.K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science (80-.), 309(5734), 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N.D., O’Connell, C., Zaks, D.P.M., Tilman, D., Siebert, S., Sheehan, J., Rockström, J., Polasky, S., Monfreda, C., Hill, J., Carpenter, S.R., Bennett, E.M., Balzer, C., … Ray, D.K. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeger, J.W. (2020). Pacific Pinot Noir (Univ of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1996). Sources of selection bias in evaluating social programs: An interpretation of conventional measures and evidence on the effectiveness of matching as a program evaluation method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 93(23), 13416–13420. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.13416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellerstein, D.M. (2017). The US conservation reserve program: The evolution of an enrollment mechanism. Land Use Policy, 63, 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, D.E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E.A. (2006). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit. Anal, 15(3), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K.W., & Lewis, D.J. (2015). Estimating the counterfactual impact of conservation programs on land cover outcomes: The role of matching and panel regression techniques. PLoS One, 10(10), e0141380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppa, L.N., Loarie, S.R., & Pimm, S.L. (2008). On the protection of “protected areas”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 105(18), 6673–6678. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802471105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, A., & Brown, G. (2017). Assessing multiple approaches for modelling land-use conflict potential from participatory mapping data. Land Use Policy, 67, 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, J.E., & Fotheringham, C.J. (2001). Historic fire regime in southern California shrublands. Conserv. Biol, 15(6), 1536–1548. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00097.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, J.E., & Zedler, P.H. (2009). Large, high-intensity fire events in Southern California shrublands: Debunking the fine-grain age patch model. Ecol. Appl, 19(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0281.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, J.E., & Syphard, A.D. (2018). South coast bioregion. In J.W. Wagtendonk, N. Sugihara, S.I. Sephens, A.E. Thode, K.E. Shaffer, & J.A. Fites-Kaufman (Eds.), Fire California’s Ecosyst (University of California Press) (pp. 319–351).
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, S., Kirkpatrick, J., & Marsden-Smedley, J. (2010). Variation in the effects of vertebrate grazing on fire potential between grassland structural types. J. Appl. Ecol, 47(4), 876–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01840.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., & Luck, G. (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421(6922), 530–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., Hertel, T.W., Izaurralde, R.C., Lambin, E.F., Li, S., Martinelli, L.A., McConnell, W.J., Moran, E.F., Naylor, R., Ouyang, Z., Polenske, K.R., Reenberg, A., de Miranda Rocha, G., Simmons, C.S., and Zhu, C. (2013). Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecol. Soc, 18(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, A.T., Quintana Ashwell, N.E., Maczko, K.A., Taylor, D.T., Tanaka, J.A., & Reeves, M.C. (2021). An economic valuation of federal and private grazing land ecosystem services supported by beef cattle ranching in the United States. Transl. Anim. Sci, 5(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P., Rudel, T.K., & Lambin, E.F. (2010). Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 107(49), 20917–20922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014773107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P. (2016). Approaches and terminology for causal analysis in land systems science. J. Land Use Sci, 11(5), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1117530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P., Roy Chowdhury, R., de Bremond, A., Ellis, E.C., Erb, K.H., Filatova, T., Garrett, R.D., Grove, J.M., Heinimann, A., Kuemmerle, T., Kull, C.A., Lambin, E.F., Landon, Y., le Polain de Waroux, Y., Messerli, P., Müller, D., Nielsen, J., Peterson, G.D., Rodriguez García, V., and Verburg, P.H. (2018). Middle-range theories of land system change. Glob. Environ. Chang, 53, 52–67 doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nader, G., Henkin, Z., Smith, E., Ingram, R., & Narvaez, N. (2007). Planned herbivory in the management of wildfire fuels. Rangelands, 29(5), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-501X(2007)29[18:PHITMO]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Pikkemaat, B., Peters, M., Boksberger, P., & Secco, M. (2009). The staging of experiences in wine tourism. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(2–3), 237–253.
   Google Scholar
• Plieninger, T., & Huntsinger, L. (2018). Complex rangeland systems: Integrated social-ecological approaches to silvopastoralism 2 3. Rangel. Ecol. Manag, 71(5), 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N.P., Allred, B.W., Naugle, D.E., & Jones, M.O. (2019). Patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: Implications for conservation and management. Ecol. Appl, 29(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santa Barbara County. (2021). Mapping and GIS Resources [WWW Document]. URL https://www.countyofsb.org/mapping.sbc
   Google Scholar
• Santa Barbara Office of Emergency Management. (2017). Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. (2021). Stata statistical software: release 17 https://www.stata.com/company/.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiouvaras, C., Havlik, N., & Bartolome, J. (1989). Effects of goats on understory vegetation and fire hazard reduction in a coastal forest in California. Forest Science, 35(4), 1125–1131 doi:10.1093/forestscience/35.4.1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B.L., Lambin, E.F., & Reenberg, A. (2007). The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 104(52), 20666–20671. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704119104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA- Forest Service. (2009). CALVEG. https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/r5/landmanagement/resourcemanagement/?cid=stelprdb5347192
   Google Scholar
• USDA National Agricultrual Statistics Service. (2014). Cropland data layer [WWW Document]. URL http://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/
   Google Scholar
• USDA NRCS. (2021). Range and pastureland overview [WWW Document]. URL https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=nrcsdev11_001074
   Google Scholar
• USDA-NASS. (2017). 2017 census of agriculture- county data Table 11
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, N.E. (1988). The market effects of zoning undeveloped land: does zoning follow the market? J. Urban Econ, 23(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(88)90021-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, K.M., Baldwin, R.A., & Barry, S. (2017). Compatibility of livestock grazing and recreational use on coastal California public lands: importance, interactions, and management solutions. Rangel. Ecol. Manag, 70(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2016.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar