Telecoupling as a framework to support a more nuanced understanding of causality in land system science

References

• Andriamihaja, O.R., Metz, F., Zaehringer, J.G., Fischer, M., & Messerli, P. (2019). Land competition under telecoupling: Distant actors’ environmental versus economic claims on land in North-Eastern Madagascar. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(3), 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, I., & Fox, J. (2015). How Land Concessions Affect Places Elsewhere: Telecoupling, Political Ecology, and Large-Scale Plantations in Southern Laos and Northeastern Cambodia. Land, 4(2), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.3390/land4020436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banitz, T., Hertz, T., Johansson, L.-G., Lindkvist, E., Martí-nez-Peña, R., Radosavljevic, S., Schlüter, M., Wennberg, K., Ylikoski, P., & Grimm, V. (2022). Visualization of causation in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 27(1):31. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13030-270131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. (2016). Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. University of Michigan Press, 14-62 and 302-337. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6576809
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006). Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political ScienceAnnual Review of Political Science, 9, 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., & George, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bicudo da Silva, R.F., Millington, J.D.A., Moran, E.F., Batistella, M., & Liu, J. (2020). Three decades of land-use and land-cover change in mountain regions of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Landscape and Urban Planning, 204(August), 103948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103948
   Google Scholar
• Boillat, S., Gerber, J.-D., Oberlack, C., Zaehringer, J., Ifejika Speranza, C., & Rist, S. (2018). Distant Interactions, Power, and Environmental Justice in Protected Area Governance: A Telecoupling Perspective. Sustainability, 10(11), 3954. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, A., Zaehringer, J., Garrett, R., Felipe Bicudo Silva, R., Furumo, P., Raya Rey, A., Torres, A., Gon Chung, M., Li, Y., & Liu, J. (2018). Toward rigorous telecoupling causal attribution: A systematic review and typology. Sustainability, 10(12), 4426. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N.H., Viña, A., Hull, V., McConnell, W.J., Axinn, W., Ghimire, D., & Liu, J. (2014). Coupled human and natural systems approach to wildlife research and conservation. Ecology and Society, 19(3):43. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06881-190343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, M., Klassen, S., Kreitzman, M., Semmelink, A., Sharp, K., Singh, G., & Chan, K.M.A. (2017). 5 Key Challenges and Solutions for Governing Complex Adaptive (Food) Systems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(9), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. (1994). Cumulative effects assessment: A tool for sustainable development. Impact Assessment, 12(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1994.9725869
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., Busck-Lumholt, L.M., Mempel, F., & Rodríguez-Labajos, B. (2019). Environmental justice in telecoupling research. In C. Friis & J.Ø. Nielsen (Eds.), Telecoupling: Exploring land-use change in a globalised world (pp. 213–232). Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-11105-2.
   Google Scholar
• Creutzig, F., Bren D’Amour, C., Weddige, U., Fuss, S., Beringer, T., Gläser, A., Kalkuhl, M., Steckel, J.C., Radebach, A., & Edenhofer, O. (2019). Assessing human and environmental pressures of global land-use change 2000-2010. Global Sustainability, 2, e1–17 doi:10.1017/sus.2018.15.
   Google Scholar
• Dou, Y., Millington, J.D.A., Bicudo, R.F., Silva, D., Mccord, P., Viña, A., Song, Q., Yu, Q., Wu, W., Batistella, M., Moran, E., Liu, J., Felipe, R., & Da Silva, B. (2019). Land-use changes across distant places: Design of a telecoupled agent-based model) Land-use changes across distant places: Design of a telecoupled agent-based model Land-use changes across distant places: Design of a telecoupled agent-based model. Journal of Land Use Science, 14(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2019.1687769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity - Emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0491.2008.00402.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin, H., DeFries, R., Kerr, S., Lambin, E.F., Liu, J., Marcotullio, P.J., Messerli, P., Reenberg, A., Rueda, X., Swaffield, S.R., Wicke, B., & Zimmerer, K. (2014). Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land-use change. In Rethinking global land use in an urban era (MIT Press) (Issue March, pp. 141–161). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262026901.003.0008.
   Google Scholar
• Eakin, H., Rueda, X., & Mahanti, A. (2017). Transforming governance in telecoupled food systems. Ecology and Society, 22(4):32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09831-220432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efroymson, R.A., Kline, K.L., Angelsen, A., Verburg, P.H., Dale, V.H., Langeveld, J.W.A., & McBride, A. (2016). A causal analysis framework for land-use change and the potential role of bioenergy policy. Land Use Policy, 59(October), 516–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Friis, C., Nielsen, J.Ø., Otero, I., Haberl, H., Niewöhner, J., & Hostert, P. (2016). From teleconnection to telecoupling: Taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science. Journal of Land Use Science, 11(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1096423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friis, C., & Nielsen, J.Ø. (2017). On the system. Boundary choices, implications, and solutions in telecoupling land use change research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, T.L., Narins, T.P., Nackoney, J., Bonebrake, T.C., Sesink Clee, P., Morgan, K., Tróchez, A., Bocuma Meñe, D., Bongwele, E., Njabo, K.Y., Anthony, N.M., Gonder, M.K., Kahn, M., Allen, W.R., & Smith, T.B. (2018). Assessing the impact of China’s timber industry on Congo Basin land use change. Area, 51(2), 340– 349. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaz, V., Crona, B., Dauriach, A., Scholtens, B., & Steffen, W. (2018). Finance and the Earth system – Exploring the links between financial actors and non-linear changes in the climate system. Global Environmental Change, 53(September), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.008
   Google Scholar
• Gasparri, N.I., Kuemmerle, T., Meyfroidt, P., le Polain de Waroux, Y., & Kreft, H. (2015). The emerging soybean production frontier in Southern Africa: Conservation challenges and the role of south-south telecouplings. Conservation Letters, 9(1), 21–31 doi:10.1111/conl.12173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geist, H.J., & Lambin, E.F. (2002). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience, 52(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., Williams, J., & Ostrom, E. (1999). Social capital and the governance of forest resources. Conference on the creation and returns of social capital, 812, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer, J., & Nielsen, J.Ø. (2020). Making land-use change and markets: The global-local entanglement of producing rice in Bagré, Burkina Faso. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 102(1), 84–100 doi:10.1080/04353684.2020.1723121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., Godar, J., Frey, G.P., Börner, J., & Gardner, T. (2021). The Paraguayan Chaco at a crossroads: Drivers of an emerging soybean frontier. Regional Environmental Change, 21(3):72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01804-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulina, J., Bocetti, C., Campa, H., III, Hull, V., Yang, W., Liu, J., Kapuscinski, A.R., Hellmann, J.J., & Locke, K.A. (2017). Telecoupling framework for research on migratory species in the Anthropocene. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 5, 5. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, V., & Liu, J. (2018). Telecoupling: A new frontier for global sustainability. Ecology and Society, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10494-230441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapsar, K., Hovis, C., Bicudo da Silva, R., Buchholtz, E., Carlson, A., Dou, Y., Du, Y., Furumo, P., Li, Y., Torres, A., Yang, D., Wan, H., Zaehringer, J., & Liu, J. (2019). Telecoupling research: The first five years. Sustainability, 11(4), 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner, T., Erb, K.H., & Haberl, H. (2015). Global human appropriation of net primary production for biomass consumption in the European Union, 1986-2007. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 825–836 doi:10.1111/jiec.12238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, P.W., & Wang-Erlandsson, L. (2018). On the social dynamics of moisture recycling. Earth System Dynamics, 9(2), 829–847. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-829-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak, J., & Szwagrzyk, M. (2016). Have there been forest transitions? Forest transition theory revisited in the context of the modifiable areal unit problem. Area, 48(4), 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin, E.F., Turner, B.L., Geist, H.J., Agbola, S.B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J.W., Coomes, O.T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., George, P.S., Homewood, K., Imbernon, J., Leemans, R., Li, X., Moran, E.F., Mortimore, M., Ramakrishnan, P.S., Richards, J.F., … Xu, J. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11(4), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land matrix. (n.d.). https://landmatrix.org/
   Google Scholar
• Leisz, S.J., Rounds, E., An, N.T., Yen, N.T.B., Bang, T.N., Douangphachanh, S., & Ninchaleune, B. (2016). Telecouplings in the east-west economic corridor within borders and across. Remote Sensing, 8(12), 1–30 doi:10.3390/rs8121012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., Hertel, T.W., Izaurralde, R.C., Lambin, E.F., Li, S., Martinelli, L.A., McConnell, W.J., Moran, E.F., Naylor, R., Ouyang, Z., Polenske, K.R., Reenberg, A., de Miranda Rocha, G., Simmons, C.S., & Zhu, C. (2013). Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Hull, V., Luo, J., Yang, W., Liu, W., Viña, A., Vogt, C., Xu, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., An, L., Chen, X., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Xu, W., & Zhang, H. (2015). Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships. Ecology and Society, 20(3):44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07868-200344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Hull, V., Moran, E., Nagendra, H., Swaffield, S.R., & Turner, B.L., II. (2014). Applications of the telecoupling framework to land-change science. Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era, 14(June 2018), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262026901.003.0007
   Google Scholar
• Llopis, J.C., Diebold, C.L., Schneider, F., Harimalala, P.C., Patrick, L., Messerli, P., & Zaehringer, J.G. (2020). Capabilities under telecoupling: Human well-being between cash crops and protected areas in North-Eastern Madagascar. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3(January), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00126
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marola, E., Schöpfner, J., Gallemore, C., & Jespersen, K. (2020). The bandwidth problem in telecoupled systems governance: Certifying sustainable winemaking in Australia and Chile. Ecological Economics, 171(July 2019), 106592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106592
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Advances in Bioethics, 11(January), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11003-7
   Google Scholar
• McCord, P., Tonini, F., & Liu, J. (2018). The Telecoupling GeoApp: A Web-GIS application to systematically analyze telecouplings and sustainable development. Applied Geography, 96(March), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P. (2016). Approaches and terminology for causal analysis in land systems science. Journal of Land Use Science, 11(5), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1117530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P. (2019). Explanations in telecoupling research. Telecoupling, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11105-2_4
   Google Scholar
• Millington, J., Xiong, H., Peterson, S., & Woods, J. (2017). Integrating modelling approaches for understanding telecoupling: Global food trade and local land use. Land, 6(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6030056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D.G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., Alencar, A., Azevedo, A., Swette, B., Bezerra, T., DiGiano, M., Shimada, J., Da Motta, R.S., Armijo, E., Castello, L., Brando, P., Hansen, M.C., McGrath-Horn, M., Carvalho, O., & Hess, L. (2014). Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344(6188), 1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Challies, E., Cotta, B., Lenschow, A., & Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (2020). Governing global telecoupling toward environmental sustainability. Ecology and Society, 25(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11844-250421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J.Ø., Hauer, J., & Friis, C. (2019). Toolbox: Capturing and Understanding Telecoupling through Qualitative Research. In C. Friis, J. Nielsen (Eds.), Telecoupling. Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management (pp. 303–312). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11105-2_16
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J.Ø., Hauer, J., & Friis, C. (2019). Toolbox: Capturing and understanding telecoupling through qualitative research. In Telecoupling, (Issue January). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11105-2.
   Google Scholar
• Norder, S., Seijmonsbergen, A.C., Rughooputh, S.D.D.V., van Loon, E.E., Tatayah, V., Kamminga, A.T., & Rijsdijk, K.F. (2017). Assessing temporal couplings in social–ecological island systems: Historical deforestation and soil loss on Mauritius (Indian Ocean). Ecology and Society, 22(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09073-220129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberlack, C., Boillat, S., Brönnimann, S., Gerber, J.D., Heinimann, A., Speranza, C.I., Messerli, P., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2018). Polycentric governance in telecoupled resource systems. Ecology and Society, 23(1):16. doi:10.5751/ES-09902-230116).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, M.L., & Gephart, J.A. (2017). Trade: A Driver of Present and Future Ecosystems. Ecosystems (New York, N.Y.), 20(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0021-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paitan, C.P., & Verburg, P.H. (2019). Methods to assess the impacts and indirect land use change caused by telecoupled agricultural supply chains: A review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4):1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041162
   Google Scholar
• Petursson, J.G., & Vedeld, P. (2017). Rhetoric and reality in protected area governance: Institutional change under different conservation discourses in Mount Elgon National Park, Uganda. Ecological Economics, 131(January), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.028
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2003). Big, slow-moving, and … Invisible: Macro-social processes in the study of comparative politics. In R.I. James Mahoney, Brown University, Rhode Island, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Brown University (Ed.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 177–207). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803963.006.
   Google Scholar
• Rauschmayer, F., Berghöfer, A., Omann, I., & Zikos, D. (2009). Examining processes or/and outcomes? Evaluation concepts in European governance of natural resources. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.506
   Google Scholar
• Ringel, M. (2018). Tele-coupling energy efficiency polices in Europe: Showcasing the German governance arrangements. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6):1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061754
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2009). Complexity and transition management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rounsevell, M.D.A., Pedroli, B., Erb, K., Gramberger, M., Busck, A.G., Haberl, H., Kristensen, S., Kuemmerle, T., Lavorel, S., Lindner, M., Lotze-Campen, H., Metzger, M.J., Murray-Rust, D., Popp, A., Pérez-Soba, M., Reenberg, A., Vadineanu, A., Verburg, P.H., & Wolfslehner, B. (2013). Challenges for Land System Science. Land Use Policy, January . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Rounsevell M DA et al. (2012). Challenges for land system science. Land Use Policy, 29(4), 899–910. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rulli, M.C., Casirati, S., Dell’Angelo, J., Davis, K.F., Passera, C., & D’Odorico, P. (2019). Interdependencies and telecoupling of oil palm expansion at the expense of Indonesian rainforest. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidel, A., & Gingrich, S. (2020). Toward sustainable and just forest recovery: research gaps and potentials for knowledge integration. One Earth, 3(6), 680–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Schierhorn, F., Kastner, T., Kuemmerle, T., Meyfroidt, P., Kurganova, I., Prishchepov, A.V., Erb, K.H., Houghton, R.A., & Müller, D. (2019). Large greenhouse gas savings due to changes in the post-Soviet food systems. Environmental Research Letters, 14(6), 65009. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab1cf1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter, M., McAllister, R.R.J., Arlinghaus, R., Bunnefeld, N., Eisenack, K., Hölker, F., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Müller, B., Nicholson, E., Quaas, M., & Stöven, M. (2012). New horizons for managing the environment: A review of coupled social-ecological systems modeling. Natural Resource Modeling, 25(1), 219–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaquist, J.W., Johansson, E.L., & Nicholas, K.A. (2014). Architecture of the global land acquisition system: Applying the tools of network science to identify key vulnerabilities. Environmental Research Letters, 9(11), 114006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonderegger, G., Oberlack, C., Llopis, J.C., Verburg, P.H., & Heinimann, A. (2020). Telecoupling visualizations through a network lens: A systematic review. Ecology and Society, 25(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11830-250447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugihara, G., May, R., Ye, H., Hsieh, C.H., Deyle, E., Fogarty, M., & Munch, S. (2012). Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. Science, 338(6106), 496–500. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telecoupling toolbox. (n.d.). https://telecouplingtoolbox.org/
   Google Scholar
• Tonini, F., & Liu, J. (2017). Telecoupling toolbox: Spatially-explicit tools for studying telecoupled human and natural systems. Ecology and Society, 22(4):11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, S.M., Moran, E.F., & da Silva, R.F.B. (2017). Property rights and the soybean revolution: Shaping how China and Brazil are telecoupled. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060954
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B.L., Matson, P.A., McCarthy, J.J., Corell, R.W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Hovelsrud-Broda, G.K., Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., Luers, A., Martello, M.L., Mathiesen, S., Naylor, R., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., Schiller, A., Selin, H., & Tyler, N. (2003). Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8080–8085. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231334100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicol, M., Neilson, J., Hartatri, D.F.S., & Cooper, P. (2018). Upgrading for whom? Relationship coffee, value chain interventions and rural development in Indonesia. World Development, 110, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, G., Hertel, T.W., & Taheripour, F. (2018). Economic drivers of telecoupling and terrestrial carbon fluxes in the global soybean complex. Global Environmental Change, 50, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, K.S., Lambin, E.F., & Vanek, S.J. (2018). Smallholder telecoupling and potential sustainability. Ecology and Society, 23(1 30). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09935-230130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar