Diagnostic and prognostic value of Ang-2 in ARDS: a systemic review and meta-analysis

References

• Meyer NJ, Gattinoni L, Calfee CS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet. 2021;398(10300):622–637. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00439-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beitler JR, Thompson BT, Baron RM, et al. Advancing precision medicine for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10(1):107–120. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00157-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA. 2018;319(7):698–710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0069-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo L, Jin F, Ma Z, et al. Redox signaling and antioxidant therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021;15(10):1355–1365. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1924681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan Z. A Review of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management and Treatment. Am J Ther. 2021;28(2):e189–e195. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagens LA, Heijnen NFL, Smit MR, et al. Systematic review of diagnostic methods for acute respiratory distress syndrome. ERJ Open Res. 2021;7(1):00504–2020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00504-2020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orbegozo D, Rahmania L, Irazabal M, et al. Endocan as an early biomarker of severity in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2017;7(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0311-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bime C, Casanova N, Oita RC, et al. Development of a biomarker mortality risk model in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2697-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajwa EK, Boyce PD, Januzzi JL, et al. Biomarker evidence of myocardial cell injury is associated with mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(11):2484–2490. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000281852.36573.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bime C, Camp SM, Casanova N, et al. The acute respiratory distress syndrome biomarker pipeline: crippling gaps between discovery and clinical utilityVol. 226. Transl Res; 2020p. 105–115. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, et al. Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science. 1997;277(5322):55–60. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5322.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden M, van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Koolwijk P, et al. Angiopoietin-2, permeability oedema, occurrence and severity of ALI/ARDS in septic and non-septic critically ill patients. Thorax. 2008;63(10):903–909. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.087387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salameh JP, Bossuyt PM, McGrath TA, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist. BMJ. 2020;370:m2632. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2632
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–536. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwamena BA, Sylvester R, Carlos RC, Midas: Meta-Analysis Of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies[j]. Available at: (Accessed on Feb 28, 2023) http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/m/midas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, et al. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caraguel CG, Vanderstichel R. The two-step Fagan’s nomogram: ad hoc interpretation of a diagnostic test result without calculation. Evid Based Med. 2013;18(4):125–128. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogelgesang F, Schlattmann P, Dewey M. The Evaluation of Bivariate Mixed Models in Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies with SAS, Stata and R. Methods Inf Med. 2018;57(3):111–119. doi: 10.3414/ME17-01-0021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei XF, Li T. Serum angiopoietin-2, citrulline and procalcitonin for diagnosis and prognosis evaluation in patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Nanchang Univ (Med Sci). 2022;62(1):43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Fu X, Lin, J, Seery S, et al. A retrospective, nested case-control study to develop a biomarker-based model for ARDS diagnostics. Clin Lab. 2023;69(1): doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2022.220210
   Google Scholar
• Wen J, Zhang YJ, Chen Q. Changes of serum VE-Cad and Ang-2 levels in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS and their relationship with prognosis. J Hebei Med Univ. 2021;42(4):376–385.
   Google Scholar
• Wang XG, Wang GH, Ren QS. Dynamic changes and clinical significance of IL-33, Ang-2 and GM-CSF in patients with ARDS after trauma. J Fujian Med Univ. 2022;42(4):376–385.
   Google Scholar
• Ma S, Zhao ML, Wang K, et al. Association of Ang-2, vWF, and EVLWI with risk of mortality in sepsis patients with concomitant ARDS: a retrospective study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(5):950–956. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng XF, Lu DX, Zhang XJ. Predictive and prognostic evaluation of five serum markers for acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ (Med Sci). 2019;40(4):588–592, 618.
   Google Scholar
• Ji CL, Zhou HR, Yang XL. The role of angiopoietin-2 in patients with sepsis complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Chin J TCM WM Crit Care. 2018;25(4):342–345.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Wu GM, Li Q, et al. Predictive value of combined lips and Ang-2 level in critically ill patients with ARDS risk factors. Mediators Inflamm. 2018;2018:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2018/1739615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu X, The clinical study on the combined detection of Cc16, Ang-2, sRAGE, HMGB1 in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Master thesis. Guangdong Medical University, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Li YT, Study on the expression of sRAGE, KL-6 and Ang-2 in patients with ARDS and their influence on prognosis. Master thesis. Sourhwest Medical University, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wang R, Zhang Q, Ma QL, et al. Predictive values of serological biomarkers in progress and prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Third Mil Med Univ. 2017;39(19):1926–1932.
   Google Scholar
• Wang K. Early sepsis with ARDS patients EVLWl, Ang-2, WF and New Berlin grading and prognosis evaluation. Master thesis. Zhengzhou University. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong MM, Zhang L, Wang P. The levels of angiopoietin-2 in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and its value on prognosis. Chin Crit Care Med. 2014;26(11):804–809.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Matthay MA, Kangelaris KN, et al. Plasma angiopoietin-2 predicts the onset of acute lung injury in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(7):736–742. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1460OC
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JL, Zhang LZ, Fan LR, et al. The role of Ang⁃2 and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products in the pathogenesis of septic associated Acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Pract Med. 2022;38(24):3095–3099,3105.
   Google Scholar
• Ye JB, Lin JL, Zhong C, et al. The clinical value of combined detection of serum angiopoietin 2 and Clara cell protein 16 in the early diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Chin J Emerg Med. 2019;28(9):1112–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Li CS, Chang C, Dai HL, et al. Value of EVLWI and Ang-2 in predicting prognosis of sepsis complicated with ARDS. J Intern Intens Med. 2018;24(5):372–374.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Peng ZM. The clinical value of Angiopoietin 2 in prediction of the onset of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Chin J Emerg Med. 2014;23(10):1151–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpers P, van Meurs M, David S, et al. Time course of angiopoietin-2 release during experimental human endotoxemia and sepsis. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R64. doi: 10.1186/cc7866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel JV, Lim HS, Varughese GI, et al. Angiopoietin-2 levels as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension. Ann Med. 2008;40(3):215–222. doi: 10.1080/07853890701779586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KW, Lip GY, Blann AD. Plasma angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, angiopoietin receptor tie-2, and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2004;110(16):2355–2360. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138112.90641.7F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar FR, Summers C, Griffiths MJ, et al. The pulmonary endothelium in acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights and therapeutic opportunities. Thorax. 2016;71(5):462–473. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi HJ, Zhang H, Park H, et al. Yes-associated protein regulates endothelial cell contact-mediated expression of angiopoietin-2. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):6943. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7943
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong Y, Liang X, Yu X. Prognostic value of the dynamic changes in extra vascular lung water index and angiopoietin-2 in severe multiple trauma patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Chin J Crit Care Med. 2019;31(5):571–576.
   Google Scholar
• Li F, Yin R, Guo Q. Circulating angiopoietin-2 and the risk of mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 prospective cohort studies. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020;14:1753466620905274. doi: 10.1177/1753466620905274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar