Controlling complex policy problems: A multimethodological approach using system dynamics and network controllability

References

• Anderson, E. G. (2014). Presidential address. In Proceedings of the 2014 International System Dynamics Conference. Delft: the Netherlands: System Dynamics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Barabási, A.-L. (2016). Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barlas, Y. (2016). Editorial. System Dynamics Review, 32(1), 3–5.10.1002/sdr.v32.1
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, U., Robins, G., McCranie, A. N., & Wasserman, S. (2013). What is network science? Network Science, 1(01), 1–15.10.1017/nws.2013.2
   Google Scholar
• Eberlein, R. L. (1989). Simplification and understanding of models. System Dynamics Review, 5(1), 51–68.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1971). World dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2–3), 245–256.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J., Liu, Y.-Y., D’Souza, R. M., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2014). Target control of complex networks. Nature Communications, 5, 5415.10.1038/ncomms6415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffarzadegan, N., Lyneis, J., & Richardson, G. P. (2010). How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. System Dynamics Review, 27(1), 22–44.10.1002/sdr.442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, P. (2009). Behavior modes, pathways and overall trajectories: Eigenvector and eigenvalue analysis of dynamic systems. System Dynamics Review, 25(1), 35–62.10.1002/sdr.v25:1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopcroft, J. E., & Karp, R. M. (1973). An n5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs. SIAM Journal on Computing, 2(4), 225–231.10.1137/0202019
   Google Scholar
• Jia, T., Liu, Y.-Y., Csoka, E., Posfai, M., Slotine, J.-J., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2013). Emergence of bimodality in controlling complex networks. Nature communications, 4, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. D., Barton, G. W., & Brisk, M. L. (2007). Determination of the generic rank of structural matrices. International Journal of Control, 40(2), 257–264.
   Google Scholar
• Kailath, T. (1980). Linear systems. Prentice-Hall information and system sciences series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kalman, R. E. (1963). Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Series A Control, 1(2), 152–192.10.1137/0301010
   Google Scholar
• Kampmann, C. E. (2012). Feedback loop gains and system behavior (1996). System Dynamics Review, 28(4), 370–395.10.1002/sdr.1483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampmann, C. E., & Oliva, R. (2006). Loop eigenvalue elasticity analysis: Three case studies. System Dynamics Review, 22(2), 141–162.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-T. (1974). Structural controllability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(3), 201–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-Y., & Barabási, A.-L. (2016). Control principles of complex systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 88(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2011). Controllability of complex networks. Nature, 473(7346), 167–173.10.1038/nature10011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2012). Control centrality and hierarchical structure in complex networks. PLoS One, 7(9), e44459.10.1371/journal.pone.0044459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovász, L., & Plummer, M. D. (2009). Matching theory. Providence, RI: AMS Chelsea Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Luenberger, D. G. (1979). Introduction to dynamic systems: Theory, models, and applications. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H. (1989). System dynamics meets the press. System Dynamics Review, 5(1), 69–80.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojtahedzadeh, M. (2008). Do parallel lines meet?: How can pathway participation metrics and eigenvalue analysis produce similar results? System Dynamics Review, 24(4), 451–478.10.1002/sdr.v24:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojtahedzadeh, M. (2011). Consistency in explaining model behavior based on its feedback structure. System Dynamics Review, 27(4), 358–373.10.1002/sdr.v27.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojtahedzadeh, M., Andersen, D., & Richardson, G. P. (2004). UsingDigest to implement the pathway participation method for detecting influential system structure. System Dynamics Review, 20(1), 1–20.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschoyiannis, S., Elia, N., Penn, A. S., Lloyd, D. J., & Knight, C. (2016). A web-based tool for identifying strategic intervention points in complex systems. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, 220, 39–52.10.4204/EPTCS.220
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. (2013). Networks: An introduction (Reprint. with corr). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, R. (2004). Model structure analysis through graph theory: Partition heuristics and feedback structure decomposition. System Dynamics Review, 20(4), 313–336.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva, R. (2015). Linking structure to behavior using eigenvalue elasticity analysis. In H. Rahmandad, R. Oliva, & N. D. Osgood (Eds.), Analytical methods for dynamic modelers (pp. 207–239). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, R. (2016). Structural dominance analysis of large and stochastic models. System Dynamics Review, 32(1), 26–51.10.1002/sdr.v32.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, A. S., Knight, C., Chalkias, G., Velenturf, A., & Lloyd, D. (2017). Extending participatory fuzzy cognitive mapping with a control nodes methodology: A case study of the development of a bio-based economy in the humber region, UK. In S. Gray, M. Paolisso, R. Jordan, & S. Gray (Eds.), Environmental Modeling with Stakeholders: Theory, Methods, and Applications (pp. 171–188). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ruths, J., & Ruths, D. (2014). Control profiles of complex networks. Science, 343(6177), 1373–1376.10.1126/science.1242063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, M., Oliva, R., Kampmann, C. E., & Davidsen, P. I. (2010). A comprehensive analytical approach for policy analysis of system dynamics models. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 673–683.10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenenberger, L., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2014). Can system dynamics learn from social network analysis? In Proceedings of the 2014 International System Dynamics Conference. Delft, the Netherlands: System Dynamics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenenberger, L., Schmid, A., & Schwaninger, M. (2015). Towards the algorithmic detection of archetypal structures in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 31(1–2), 66–85.10.1002/sdr.v31.1-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotine, J.-J. E., & Li, W. (1991). Applied nonlinear control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar