Parallel society: Myth or reality? A question for policy makers

References

• Andersen, H. S. (2011). Motives for tenure choice during the life cycle: The importance of non-economic factors and other housing preferences. Housing, Theory and Society, 28(2), 183–207.
   Google Scholar
• Boatright, J. R. (1999). Ethics in finance. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Broeke, G. T., Voorn, G., & Ligtenberg, A. (2016). Which sensitivity analysis method should i use for my agent-based model? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 19(1), 5. Retrieved from: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/19/1/5.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantle Report. (2001). Community cohesion: A report of the independent review team (Tech. Rep.). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K., Irwin, E. G., Jayaprakash, C., & Warren, K. (2005). The emergence of racial segregation in an agent-based model of residential location: The role of competing preferences. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 11(4), 333–338.
   Google Scholar
• Dantzler, P. A., & Rivera, J. D. (2018). Settling in or moving out? Exploring the effect of mobility intentions on public housing exits. Housing Studies,1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Durrett, R., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Exact solution for a metapopulation version of schelling’s model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(39), 14036–14041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dychtwald, K., Erickson, T. J., & Morison, R. (2006). Workforce crisis: How to beat the coming shortage of skills and talent. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, B. (2017). Different modelling purposes. In B. Edmonds & R. Meyer (Eds.), Simulating social complexity. A handbook (second ed., pp. 39–58). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, B., & Meyer, R. (Eds.). (2017). Simulating social complexity. A handbook (second ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, B., & Moss, S. (2005). From KISS to KIDS — An ‘anti-simplistic’ modelling approach. In P. Davidson (Ed.), Multi agent based simulation (Vol. 3415, pp. 130–144). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Feliciani, T., Flache, A., & Tolsma, J. (2017). How, when and where can spatial segregation induce opinion polarization? two competing models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(2), 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsé, M., & Parodi, M. (2010). Low levels of ethnic intolerance do not create large ghettos a discussion about an interpretation of schelling’s model. L’Année Sociologique, 60(2), 445–473.
   Google Scholar
• Fossett, M. (2006). Ethnic preferences, social distance dynamics, and residential segregation: Theoretical explorations using simulation analysis. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 30(3–4), 185–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. (1998). Interpreting the dynamics of public housing: Cultural and rational choice explanations. Housing Policy Debate, 9(2), 323–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. (2005). Does housing assistance lead to dependency? Evidence from hud administrative data. Cityscape, 8(2), 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based models (Vol. 153). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Granath Hansson, A., & Lundgren, B. (2018). Defining social housing: A discussion on the suitable criteria. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(2), 149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, J. L. (2004). The race myth: Why we pretend race exists in america. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. M. (1993). Work and welfare among single mothers in poverty. American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 317–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haurin, D. R., Hendershott, P. H., & Wachter, S. M. (1996). Borrowing constraints and the tenure choice of young households (Tech. Rep.) National bureau of economic research.
   Google Scholar
• Hegselmann, R. (2017). Thomas C. Schelling and James M. Sakoda: The intellectual, technical, and social history of a model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungerford, T. L. (1996). The dynamics of housing assistance spells. Journal of Urban Economics, 39(2), 193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannides, Y. M., & Rosenthal, S. S. (1994). Estimating the consumption and investment demands for housing and their effect on housing tenure status. The Review of economics and statistics, 76(1), 127–141.
   Google Scholar
• Laurie, A. J., & Jaggi, N. K. (2003). Role of’vision’in neighbourhood racial segregation: A variant of the schelling segregation model. Urban Studies, 40(13), 2687–2704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-S., Filatovaa, T., Ligmann-Zielinska, A., Hassani-Mahmooei, B., Stonedahl, F., Lorscheid, I., … Parker, D. C. (2015). The complexities of agent-based modeling output analysis. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(1), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. C. (2014). On uncertain ground: Being at home in the context of public housing redevelopment. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(4), 389–410.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Kanaiaupuni, S. M. (1993). Public housing and the concentration of poverty. Social Science Quarterly, 74(1), 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muldoon, R., Smith, T., & Weisberg, M. (2012). Segregation that no one seeks. Philosophy of Science, 79(1), 38–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. A., Bassi, L. J., & Wolf, D. A. (1987). The duration of welfare spells. The review of economics and statistics,69(2), 241–248.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., Ward, C., Reid, L., & Ruel, E. (2011). The poverty deconcentration imperative and public housing transformation. Sociology Compass, 5(9), 824–833.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, H., & Kleinhans, R. (2014). Choice within limits: How the institutional context of forced relocation affects tenants’ housing searches and choice strategies. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(1), 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regeringen. (2018 March). Ét danmark uden parallelsamfund. Ingen ghettoer i 2030 (one denmark without parallel societies. No ghettoes by 2030) (Tech. Rep.). Copenhagen: Økonomiog Indenrigsministeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. (2012). Social housing in England: Testing the logics of reform. Urban Studies, 50(8), 1489–1504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, H. S. (1979). Housing decisions and the us income tax: An econometric analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 11(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruel, E., Oakley, D. A., Ward, C., Alston, R., & Reid, L. W. (2013). Public housing relocations in atlanta: Documenting residents’ attitudes, concerns and experiences. Cities, 35, 349–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1969). Models of segregation. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 488–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., Flacke, J., & Sliuzas, R. (2016). Modelling the impacts of urban upgrading on population dynamics. Environmental Modelling & Software, 78, 150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secchi, D. (2011). Banks and discrimination: How far can we go with competition? A reply to block, snow, and stringham. Business and Society Review, 116(1), 53–83.
   Google Scholar
• Secchi, D., & Seri, R. (2017a). Controlling for ‘false negatives’ in agent-based models: A review of power analysis in organizational research. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 23(1), 94–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secchi, D., & Seri, R. (2017b). Experienced discrimination in home mortgage lending. A case of hospital employees in northern Italy. Business and Society, 56(7), 1068–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seri, R., & Secchi, D. (2017a). ‘How many times should my simulation run?’ Power analysis for agent-based modeling. In Model-based governance for smart organizational future, BSLab SYDIC international workshop, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Seri, R., & Secchi, D. (2017b). How many times should one run a computational simulation? In B. Edmonds & R. Meyer (Eds.), Simulating social complexity. A handbook (2nd ed., pp. 229–251). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tester, G., Ruel, E., Anderson, A., Reitzes, D. C., & Oakley, D. (2011). Sense of place among atlanta public housing residents. Journal of Urban Health, 88(3), 436–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele, J., Kurth, W., & Grimm, V. (2015). Facilitating parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: A cookbook using NetLogo and R. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 17(3), 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toussaint-Comeau, M., & Rhine, S. L. (2004). Tenure choice with location selection: The case of hispanic neighborhoods in chicago. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22(1), 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ham, M., & Manley, D. (2009). Social housing allocation, choice and neighbourhood ethnic mix in england. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(4), 407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (1999). Netlogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. (2004a). A dynamic model of residential segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28(3), 147–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. (2004b). Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(4), 533–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar