Spatial impact of automated driving in urban areas

References

• Alexandra, M., Jennie, C., Karen, W., Robin, K., David, R., & Alistair, W. (2014). The societal costs and benefits of commuter bicycling: Simulating the effects of specific policies using system dynamics modeling. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. M., Kalra, N., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., & Oluwatola, T. A. (2016). Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr443-2
   Google Scholar
• Ashkrof, P., de Correia, G. H. A., Cats, O., & van Arem, B. (2019). Impact of automated vehicles on travel mode preference for different trip purposes and distances. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(5), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119841032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auping, W. L. (2018). Modelling uncertainty: Developing and using simulation models for exploring the consequences of deep uncertainty in complex problems [Delft University of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:0e0da51a-e2c9-4aa0-80cc-d930b685fc53
   Google Scholar
• Bagloee, S. A., Tavana, M., Asadi, M., & Oliver, T. (2016). Autonomous vehicles: Challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies. Journal of Modern Transportation, 24(4), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-016-0117-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankes, S. (2008). Exploratory modeling for policy analysis. Operations Research, 41(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.41.3.435
   Google Scholar
• Bankes, S., Walker, W. E., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2013). Exploratory modeling and analysis. In Gass, S. I., & M. C. Fu, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of operations research and management science (Vols. 532–537). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1153-7_314
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, J., & Maciejewski, M. (2016). Simulation of city-wide replacement of private cars with autonomous taxis in Berlin. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.121
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, B. P., & Lempert, R. J. (2010). Thinking inside the box: A participatory, computer-assisted approach to scenario discovery. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conceição, L., de Correia, G. H. A., & Tavares, J. P. (2020). The reversible lane network design problem (RL-NDP) for smart cities with automated traffic. Sustainability, 12(3), 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copenhagen Municipality. (2017). Analyse Af Københavns Kommunes Muligheder Og Udfordringer I Forbindelse Med Udviklingen Af Selvkørende Køretøjer. https://www.kk.dk/sites/default/files/edoc/5e1a7bb6-baad-491b-804d-b115a1b6b9d4/ac260228-f929-4f4a-a42a-b105d0e918ff/Attachments/18151346-23498478-14.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Correia, G., & Viegas, J. M. (2009). A conceptual model for carpooling systems simulation. Journal of Simulation, 3(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2008.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L., Bassi, A., Kolling, J., Procter, A., Flanders, N., Tanners, N., & Araujo, R. (2017). Exploring synergies between transit investment and dense redevelopment: A scenario analysis in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167, 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Correia, G. H. A., Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & Hoogendoorn, R. (2016). Vehicle automation and transport system performance. In M. Bliemer, C. Mulley, & C. Moutou (Eds.), Handbook on transport and urban planning in the developed world (pp. 498–516). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471393
   Google Scholar
• De Correia, G. H. A., Looff, E., van Cranenburgh, S., Snelder, M., & van Arem, B. (2019). On the impact of vehicle automation on the value of travel time while performing work and leisure activities in a car: Theoretical insights and results from a stated preference survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 119, 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Correia, G. H. A., & van Arem, B. (2016). Solving the user optimum privately owned automated vehicles assignment problem (UO-POAVAP): A model to explore the impacts of self-driving vehicles on urban mobility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 87, 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emberger, G., Pfaffenbichler, P., & Riedl, L. (2009). MARS meets ANIMAP: Interlinking the model MARS with dynamic internet cartography. Journal of Maps, 6(1), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.4113/jom.2010.1079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. L. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eskinasi, M. (2014). Towards housing system dynamics. Projects on embedding system dynamics in housing policy research [Radboud University Nijmegen]. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/129859/129859.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eskinasi, M., Rouwette, E., & Vennix, J. (2009). Simulating urban transformation in Haaglanden, the Netherlands. System Dynamics Review, 25(3), 182–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euler, L. (1768). Institutionum calculi integralis volumen primum: Vol. II. Impensis Academiae Imperialis Scientiarum. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/euler-works/342
   Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1969). Urban dynamics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W., & Senge, P. M. (1980). Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. In A. A. Lagasto, J. W. Forrester, & J. M. Lyneis (Eds.), TIMS studies in the management sciences (Vol. 14, pp. 209–228). North-Holland Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H., & Fisher, N. I. (1999). Bump hunting in high-dimensional data. Statistics and Computing, 9(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008894516817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelauff, G., Ossokina, I., & Teulings, C. (2017). 1 introduction. Spatial effects of automated driving: dispersion, concentration or both? https://www.kimnet.nl/binaries/kimnet/documenten/papers/2017/09/19/spatial-effects-of-automated-driving-dispersion-concentration-or-both/Spatial+effects+of+automated+driving+_+dispersion%2C+concentration+or+both.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gruel, W., & Stanford, J. M. (2016). Assessing the long-term effects of autonomous vehicles: A speculative approach. Transportation Research Procedia, 13, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., Hayashi, Y., Cao, X., & Imura, H. (2009). Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: A case study of Shanghai, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havelaar, M., Jaspers, W., van Nederveen, S., Auping, W., & Wolfert, R. (2019). Multivariate simulation modelling for adaptive long-term infrastructure planning. Infrastructure Asset Management, 6(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.18.00031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• international transport, f. (2015). urban mobility system upgrade: How shared self-driving cars could change city traffic (Issue 9783662458532). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-016-2048-3
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel, J. H. (2017). The exploratory modeling workbench: An open source toolkit for exploratory modeling, scenario discovery, and (multi-objective) robust decision making. Environmental Modelling and Software, 96, 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel, J. H. (2018). EMA workbench documentation release 1.1. https://emaworkbench.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
   Google Scholar
• Lauf, S., Haase, D., Hostert, P., Lakes, T., & Kleinschmit, B. (2012). Uncovering land-use dynamics driven by human decision-making – A combined model approach using cellular automata and system dynamics. Environmental Modelling & Software, 27–28, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W., & Bankes, S. C. (2003). Shaping the next one hundred years: new methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis (Issue MR-1626). http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR1626.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Liang, X., de Correia, G. H. A., An, K., & van Arem, B. (2020). Automated taxis’ dial-a-ride problem with ride-sharing considering congestion-based dynamic travel times. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112, 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2014). Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning (Issues 0-7803-3213–X). https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.301
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, L. M., de Correia, G. H. A., & Viegas, J. M. (2015). An agent-based simulation model to assess the impacts of introducing a shared-taxi system: An application to Lisbon (Portugal). Journal of Advanced Transportation, 49(3), 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1268522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., Becker, H., Bösch, P. M., & Axhausen, K. W. (2017). Autonomous vehicles: The next jump in accessibilities? Research in Transportation Economics, 62, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2017.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., Snelder, M., van Arem, B., van Wee, B., & de Correia, G. H. A. (2017). Development and transport implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands: Scenarios for 2030 and 2050. European Journal of Transportation and Infrastructure Research, 17(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2017.17.1.3180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & van Wee, B. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(4), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuijsen, J., de Correia, G. H. A., Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & van Daalen, E. (2018). Towards a quantitative method to analyze the long-term innovation diffusion of automated vehicles technology using system dynamics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 86(May2017), 300–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.11.016
   Google Scholar
• Pfaffenbichler, P. (2011). Modelling with systems dynamics as a method to bridge the gap between politics, planning and science? Lessons learnt from the development of the land use and transport model MARS. Transport Reviews, 31(2), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.534570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaffenbichler, P., Emberger, G., & Shepherd, S. P. (2010). A system dynamics approach to land use transport interaction modelling: The strategic model MARS and its application. System Dynamics Review, 26(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigole, P.-J. (2014). Study of a shared autonomous vehicles based mobility solution in Stockholm. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf;jsessionid=kS81CXqhOs0_dmrLKUFTDaNVPVCycHsxfNNBxBRF.diva2-search7-vm?pid=diva2:746893&dswid=4734
   Google Scholar
• Rodoulis, S. (2014). The impact of autonomous vehicles on cities. Journeys - Sharing Urban Transport Solutions, 12, 12–20. http://www.lta.gov.sg/ltaacademy/doc/Journeys_Issue_12_Nov_2014.pdf#page=14
   Google Scholar
• SAE International. (2016). Summary of SAE international’s levels of driving automation for on-road vehicle. Global Ground Vehicle Standards, J3016. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201609/
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, A., & Victor, D. (1997). The past and future of global mobility. Scientific American, October, 36–39. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1097-58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheltes, A., & de Correia, G. H. A. (2017). Exploring the use of automated vehicles as last mile connection of train trips through an agent-based simulation model: An application to Delft, Netherlands. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 6(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Q., Chen, Q., Tang, B., Yeung, S., Hu, Y., & Cheung, G. (2009). A system dynamics model for the sustainable land use planning and development. Habitat International, 33(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soteropoulos, A., Berger, M., & Ciari, F. (2019). Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: An international review of modelling studies. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1523253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, P., Kinghorn, R., & Grace, R. (2016). Urban form and function in the autonomous era. Australasian Transport Research Forum Proceedings, November, 15. https://www.australasiantransportresearchforum.org.au/sites/default/files/ATRF2016_paper_138.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, S. (2014). Automated vehicles symposium attendee survey results. Automated Vehicles Symposium, San Francisco, California, United States. https://www.automatedvehiclessymposium.org/avs2014/program/tuesday
   Google Scholar
• Van Loon, R. J., & Martens, M. H. (2015). Automated driving and its effect on the safety ecosystem: How do compatibility issues affect the transition period? Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3280–3285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.401
   Google Scholar
• Ventana Systems. (2010). Vensim reference manual. Ventana Systems. http://www.vensim.com/documentation.html
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., de Correia, G. H. A., & Lin, H. X. (2019). Exploring the performance of different on-demand transit services provided by a fleet of shared automated vehicles: An agent-based model. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7878042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakharenko, R. (2016). Self-driving cars will change cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 61, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., Fang, J., & Zhang, G. (2015). Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 19, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar