Integration process simulator: A tool for performance evaluation of task scheduling of integration processes

References

• Aazam, M., Huh, E.-N., St-Hilaire, M., Lung, C.-H., & Lambadaris, I. (2016). Cloud of things: Integration of IoT with cloud computing. In Koubaa A, Shakshuki E., Robots and sensor clouds (pp. 77–940). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silvertein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhanak, E. N., Lee, S. P., Rezaei, R., & Parizi, R. M. (2016). Cost optimization approaches for scientific workflow scheduling in cloud and grid computing: A review, classifications, and open issues. Journal of Systems and Software, 113(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.11.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, A. W. (n.d.). A runtime system. LISP and Symbolic Computation, 3(4), 343–380. doi:10.1007/BF01807697
   Google Scholar
• Basili, V. R., Rombach, D., Kitchenham, K. S. B., Selby, D., & Pfahl, R. W. (2007). Empirical software engineering issues. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, J., Jain, S., Deelman, E., Gil, Y., Vahi, K., Mandal, A., & Kennedy, K. (2005). Task scheduling strategies for workflow-based applications in grids. In IEEE international symposium on cluster computing and the grid (CCGrid), Cardiff, UK. CCGrid 2005. IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2005: IEEE, 2, pp.759–767.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, M., Habich, D., Preissler, S., Lehner, W., & Wloka, U. (2011). Cost-based vectorization of instance-based integration processes. Information Systems, 36(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyya, R., & Murshed, M. (2002). Gridsim: A toolkit for the modeling and simulation of distributed resource management and scheduling for grid computing. Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience, 14(13–15), 1175–1220. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calheiros, R. N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., Rose, C. A. F. D., & Buyya, R. (2011). Cloudsim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Software: Practice & Experience, 41(1), 23–50. doi:10.1002/spe.995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canon, L.-C., & Jeannot, E. (2007). A comparison of robustness metrics for scheduling DAGs on heterogeneous systems. International conference on cluster computing (ieee cluster), Austin, TX, USA. (pp. 558–567). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cervin, A., & Årzén, K.-E. (2018). Truetime: Simulation tool for performance analysis of real time embedded systems. In Model-based design for embedded systems (pp. 169–200). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chirkin, A. M., Belloum, A. S. Z., Kovalchuk, S. V., Makkes, M. X., Melnik, M. A., Visheratin, A. A., & Nasonov, D. A. (2017). Execution time estimation for workflow scheduling. Future Generation Computer Systems, 75(October 2017), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, C. D. (2006). Programa genes: Estatística experimental e matrizes. Editora Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
   Google Scholar
• Cruzes, D. S., & Ben Othman, L. (2017). Threats to validity in empirical software security research. In Empirical research for software security (pp. 295–320). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eker, J., & Cervin, A. (1999). A matlab toolbox for real-time and control systems co design. In Proceedings sixth international conference on real-time computing systems and applications (RTCSA), Hong Kong, China. (pp. 320–327). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, K., Zhai, Y., Li, X., & Wang, M. (2018). Review and classification of hybrid shop scheduling. Production Engineering, 12(5), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0832-1
   Google Scholar
• Feldt, R., & Magazinius, A. (2010). Validity threats in empirical software engineering research and an initial survey. In International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), Redwood City, San Francisco Bay, CA, USA. (pp. 374–379). Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Cerero, D., Fernández-Montes, A., Jakobi, A., Kołodziej, J., & Toro, M. (2018). Score: Simulator for cloud optimization of resources and energy consumption. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 82(May 2020), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Cerero, D., Fernandez-Montes, A., Ortega, F. J., Jakóbik, A., & Widlak, A. (2019). Sphere: Simulator of edge infrastructures for the optimization of performance and resources energy consumption. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 101(May 2020), 101966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2019.101966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Cerero, D., Jakobik, A., Fernández-Montes, A., & Kołodziej, J. (2019). GAME SCORE: Game-based energy-aware cloud scheduler and simulator for computational clouds. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 93(May 2019), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, R. Z., Corchuelo, R., & Arjona, J. L. (2011). An efficient orchestration engine for the cloud. In (pp. 711–716).
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, R. Z., Corchuelo, R., & Molina-Jiménez, C. (2012). A proposal to detect errors in enterprise application integration solutions. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(3), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.10.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, R. Z., Corchuelo, R., & Roos-Frantz, F. (2016). On the design of a maintainable software development kit to implement integration solutions. Journal of Systems and Software, 111(January 2016), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.08.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, D. L., Frantz, R. Z., & Roos-Frantz, F. (2019). Towards optimal thread pool configuration for run-time systems of integration platforms. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, XX(in–press), 1–18. doi:10.1504/IJCAT.2020.104692
   Google Scholar
• Freire, D. L., Frantz, R. Z., Roos-Frantz, F., & Basto-Fernandes, V. (2021). Queue priority optimized algorithm: A novel task scheduling for runtime systems of application integration platforms. The Journal of Supercomputing, 78(1), 1–31. doi:10.1007/s11227-021-03926-x. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03926-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, D. L., Frantz, R. Z., Roos-Frantz, F., & Sawicki, S. (2019). Survey on the run time systems of enterprise application integration platforms focusing on performance. Software: Practice & Experience, 49(3), 341–360. doi:10.1002/spe.2670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georges, A., Buytaert, D., & Eeckhout, L. (2007). Statistically rigorous java performance evaluation. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 42(10), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/1297105.1297033
   Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Yu, L., Tian, S., & Yu, J. (2015). A workflow task scheduling algorithm based on the resources’ fuzzy clustering in cloud computing environment. International Journal of Communication Systems, 28(6), 1053–1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.2743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, I., Gupta, S., Choudhary, A., & P. K., Jana (2019). A hybrid meta-heuristic approach for load balanced workflow scheduling in iaas cloud. In International conference on distributed computing and internet technology (ICDCIT), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. (pp. 73–89). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Haugg, I. G., Frantz, R. Z., Roos-Frantz, F., Sawicki, S., & Zucolotto, B. (2019). Towards optimisation of the number of threads in the integration platform engines using simulation models based on queueing theory. Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada, 11(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.5335/rbca.v11i1.8784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilman, M. H., Rodriguez, M. A., & Buyya, R. (2018). Multiple workflows scheduling in multi-tenant distributed systems: A taxonomy and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 1(1), 1–33. doi:10.1145/3368036
   Google Scholar
• Hohpe, G. (2005). Your coffee shop doesn’t use two-phase commit [asynchronous messaging architecture]. IEEE Software, 22(2), 64–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2005.52
   Google Scholar
• Hohpe, G., & Woolf, B. (2004). Enterprise integration patterns: Designing, building, and deploying messaging solutions. Addison-Wesley Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, F., & McNab, R. (1998). Simjava: A discrete event simulation package for java with applications in computer systems modelling. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Web-based Modelling and Simulation, San Diego, CA, USA. pp.(51–56). Institute for Computing Systems Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Jedlitschka, A., & Pfahl, D. (2005). Reporting guidelines for controlled experiments in software engineering. In International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ESEM), Noosa Heads, QLD, Australia. (pp. 95–104).IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, S., & Jung, I. (2018). Experimental evaluation of improved IoT middleware for flexible performance and efficient connectivity. Ad Hoc Networks, 70(1 March 2018), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2017.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanagaraj, K., & Swamynathan, S. (2016). A study on performance of dominant scheduling algorithms on standard workflow systems in cloud. International conference on informatics and analytics (ICIA), Pondicherry, India. (pp. 1–6). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Manekar, Amitkumar S, Poundeka, Mukesh D, Gupta, Hitesh, Nagle, Malti. (2012). A Pragmatic Study and Analysis of Load Balancing Techniques In Parallel Computing. International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 2(4), 1914–1918. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7563-6_46
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, G., Castor, F., & Liu, Y. D. (2014). Understanding energy behaviors of thread management constructs. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 49(10), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1145/2714064.2660235
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, K., Shah, S. M. H., & Manuel, P. (2011). Empirical performance evaluation of schedulers for cluster of workstations. Cluster Computing, 14(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-010-0128-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz, R., Kazmi, S. H., Kazmi, Z. H., & Shah, S. A. (2018). Randomized dynamic quantum cpu scheduling algorithm. Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Robotic Applications, 9(2), 19–27. http://jictra.com.pk/index.php/jictra/article/view/100
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, D., May, N., & Rinderle-Ma, S. (2017). Patterns for emerging application integration scenarios: A survey. Information Systems, 67(July 2017), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2017.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, D., Rinderle-Ma, S., Montali, M., & Rivkin, A. (2021). Formal foundations for responsible application integration. Information Systems, 101(November 2021), 101439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2019.101439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saifullah, A., Li, J., Agrawal, K., Lu, C., & Gill, C. (2013). Multi-core real-time scheduling for generalized parallel task models. Real-Time Systems, 49(4), 404–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11241-012-9166-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, R. G. (2013). Verification and validation of simulation models. Journal of Simulation, 7(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2012.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzkopf, M., Konwinski, A., Abd-El-Malek, M., & Wilkes, J. (2013). Omega: Flexible, scalable schedulers for large compute clusters. Proceedings of the 8th ACM European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys), Prague, Czech Republic. (pp. 351–364). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shoukry, A., Khader, J., & Gani, S. (2019). Improving business process and functionality using IoT based E3-value business model. Electronic Markets, 31(March 2021), 1–10. doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00344-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2012). Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. C., & Forman, E. H. (1971). Throughput measurement using a synthetic job stream. Fall joint computer conference ,Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. (pp. 51–56). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Pota, H., Chu, -C.-C., & Gadh, R. (2018). Real-time renewable energy incentive system for electric vehicles using prioritization and cryptocurrency. Applied Energy, 226(15 September 2018), 582–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Shen, Z.-J. M., & Song, S. (2018). Exact algorithms for distributionally β-robust machine scheduling with uncertain processing times. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 30(4), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2018.0807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar