Designing sustainability programs to avoid and escape the capability trap

References

• Anderson, S. T., & Newell, R. G. (2004). Information programs for technology adoption: The case of energy-efficiency audits. Resource and Energy Economics, 26(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2013). Escaping capability traps through problem driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). World Development, 51(November), 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.05.011
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Barriers to acting in time on energy and strategies for overcoming them. Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. V. (2017). Climbing Out of the rabbit hole. Construction Business Owner, 59–61.http://digital.constructionbusinessowner.com/february-2017
   Google Scholar
• Card, D., & Comer, E. (1994). Why do so many reuse programs fail? IEEE Software, 11(5), 114–115. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.311078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrico, A. R., & Riemer, M. (2011). Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda‐Carrion, G., Cegarra‐Navarro, J. G., & Jimenez‐Jimenez, D. (2012). The effect of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: Context and information systems capability as catalysts. British Journal of Management, 23(1), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00725.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, K.-H., & Yeo, C. (2012). Overcoming energy efficiency barriers through systems approach—A conceptual framework. Energy Policy, 46(July), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.012
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-M., Lin, C.-W., Hsieh, S.-H., Chao, H.-F., Chen, C.-S., Shiu, R.-S., Ye, S.-R., & Deng, Y.-C. (2012). Persuasive feedback model for inducing energy conservation behaviors of building users based on interaction with a virtual object. Energy and Buildings, 45(February), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.029
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M, and Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods. AMR, 32(2), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351453
   Google Scholar
• Driffield, N., & Pal, S. (2002). The East Asian crisis and financing corporate investment: Is there a cause for concern? Journal of Asian Economics, 12(4), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-0078(01)00099-9
   Google Scholar
• Đula, I., Videira, N., & Größler, A. (2019). Degrowth dynamics: Modelling policy proposals with system dynamics. Journal of Simulation, 15(1–2), 93–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2019.1646108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erzurumlu, S., Joglekar, N., Levesque, M., & Tanrisever, F. (2013). Avoiding capability traps through contingent contracts: The Role of cash and knowhow in startups. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 11019. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2013.9
   Google Scholar
• Faghihi, V., Hessami, A. R., & Ford, D. N. (2015). Sustainable campus improvement program design using energy efficiency and conservation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107(November), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.040
   Google Scholar
• Fontoura, W. B., Ribeiro, G. M., & Chaves, G. D. (2020). A framework for evaluating the dynamic impacts of the Brazilian urban mobility policy for transportation socioeconomic systems: A case study in Rio de Janeiro. Journal of Simulation, 14(4), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2019.1701392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. N, and White, R. J. (2020). Social impact bonds: The goose and the golden eggs at risk. Syst Res Behav Sci, 37(2), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forliano, C., Ferraris, A., Bivona, E. & Couturier, J. (2022). Pouring new wine into old bottles: A dynamic perspective of the interplay among environmental dynamism, capabilities development, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 142, 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin, M. J., & Ford, D. N. (2012). Real options in infrastructure projects: Theory, practice and prospects. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2(1–2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.632096
   Google Scholar
• Gram-Hanssen, K. (2013). Efficient technologies or user behaviour, which is the more important when reducing households’ energy consumption? Energy Efficiency, 6(3), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-012-9184-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara, J., Garvin, M., & Ghaffarzadegan, N. (2017). Capability trap of the U.S. Highway system: Policy and management implications. ASCE Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000512
   Google Scholar
• Handgraaf, M. J. J., Jeude, M. A. V. L. D., & Appelt, K. C. (2013). Public praise vs. private pay: Effects of rewards on energy conservation in the workplace. Ecological Economics, 86(February), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Harrison G, Bivona E and Rossetti R. (2020). Editorial: Special issue on Simulation in Transportation. Journal of Simulation, 14(4), 239–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2020.1829514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessami, A. R., Faghihi, V., Kim, A., & Ford, D. N. (2020). Evaluating planning strategies for prioritizing projects in sustainability improvement programs. Construction Management and Economics, 38(8), 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1608369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hottenrott, H., & Peters, B. (2012). Innovative capability and financing constraints for innovation: More money, more innovation? Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 1126–1142. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, R. B., & Sanstad, A. H. (1995). Discount rates and energy efficiency. Contemporary Economic Policy, 13(3), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1995.tb00726.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda, K. B. (2011). Buildings ’don’t use energy: People do. Architectural Science Review, 54(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2009.0050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, R. S. (1992). Why operations improvement programs fail: Four managerial contradictions. Sloan Management Review, 34(1), 83. https://www.proquest.com/docview/224961558
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A., Hessami, A., Faghihi, V., & Ford, D. (2012). Designing perpetual sustainability improvement programs for built infrastructures. Paper presented at the 30th international conference of the system dynamics society. St. Gallen, Switzerland. System Dynamics Society. http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2012/proceed/papersP
   Google Scholar
• Kunc, M., Morecroft, J. D., & Brailsford, S. (2018). Special issue on advances in system dynamics modelling from the perspective of other simulation methods. Journal of Simulation, 12(2), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2018.1469385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunc, M., Mortenson, M. J., & Vidgen, R. (2018). A computational literature review of the field of system dynamics from 1974 to 2017. Journal of Simulation, 12(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2018.1468950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnéusson, G., Ng, A. H., & Aslam, T. (2018). Quantitative analysis of a conceptual system dynamics maintenance performance model using multi-objective optimisation. Journal of Simulation, 12(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2018.1467849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyneis, J., & Sterman, J. (2016). How to save a leaky ship: capability traps and the failure of win-win investments in sustainability and social responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2015.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, L. C., Lloyd-Williams, F., Taylor-Robinson, D. C., Moonan, M., O’Flaherty, M., & Capewell, S. (2011). Prioritising public health: A qualitative study of decision making to reduce health inequalities. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 821. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471–2458-11-821
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perissi, I. (2019). Highlighting the archetypes of sustainability management by means of simple dynamics models. Journal of Simulation, 15(1–2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2019.1679612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchett, L. (2010). Capability traps? The mechanisms of persistent implementation failure. Working paper 234 (Vol. 234): Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M., & Andrews, M. (2012). Capability traps in development: How initiatives to improve administrative systems succeed at failing. Prism: A Journal of the Center for Complex Operations, 3(3), 63–74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26469746
   Google Scholar
• Repenning, N. P., & Sterman, J. D. (2001). Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: Creating and sustaining process improvement. California Management Review, 43(4), 64. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repenning, N., & Sterman, J. (2002). Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2), 265–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush, H., Bessant, J., & Hobday, M. (2007). Assessing the technological capabilities of firms: Developing a policy tool. R&D Management, 37(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, L. (2002). Green campuses: The road from little victories to systemic transformation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370210422357
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2011). Texas A&M University - A detailed account of how one university is improving its energy efficiency and campus environment through effective management and performance contracting. Siemens. https://w3.usa.siemens.com/buildingtechnologies/us/en/consulting-engineer/engineeradvantage/Documents/texas-a-and-m-energy-improvements.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Siemens Industry US (Producer). (2011, May 24, 2017). Answers for Texas A&M University. YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIa8Ix91_rk
   Google Scholar
• State Energy Conservation Office. (2010). Building efficiency and retrofit program round I: Awarded projects to date. from http://seco.cpa.state.tx.us/arra/sep/building/ber_awards.php
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J. C. (2003). Agency, information and corporate investment. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 111–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01006-9
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, John D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. (2013). Stumbling towards sustainability: Why organizational learning and radical innovation are necessary to build a more sustainable world—but not sufficient. Paper presented at the Change and Sustainability Conference, Cambridge, MA. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TAMU Office of Sustainability. (2012). Office of sustainability biennial report Retrieved May 24, 2017, from http://sustainability.tamu.edu/Data/Sites/1/downloads/biennialreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TAMU Utilities & Energy Services. (2017). Departmental strategic plan overview, priorities & strategies. Retrieved May 24, 2017, from https://utilities.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/UES-FY17-Strategic-Plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T., Ford, D., & Ford, A. (2007). Model analysis using statistical screening: Extensions and example applications. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 25th international conference of the system dynamics society, 29 July–2 August 2007, Boston, Massachusetts. System Dynamics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T., Ford, D., & Ford, A. (2010). Improving model understanding using statistical screening. System Dynamics Review, 26(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Texas A&M University and Siemens Industry, Inc. (2010). Performance Contracting Agreement between The Texas A&M University System and Siemens Industry, Inc., Building Technologies Division. College Station, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, S. M., & Aronson, E. (1983). A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. American Psychologist, 38(4), 435. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.4.435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yik, F. W., Lee, W., & Ng, C. (2002). Building energy efficiency and the remuneration of operation and maintenance personnel. Facilities, 20(13/14), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770210454331
   Google Scholar