Navigating authority and legitimacy when ‘outsider’ volunteers co-produce emergency management services

References

• AIDR. (2017). Australian disaster resilience handbook 12: Communities responding to disasters: Planning for spontaneous volunteers. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Disaster Resilience.
   Google Scholar
• ANZEMC. (2015). National spontaneous volunteer strategy: Coordination of volunteer effort in the immediate post disaster stage. Melbourne. Retrieved from https://www.emv.vic.gov.au/how-we-help/volunteers/national-spontaneous-volunteer-strategy
   Google Scholar
• Bach, R., Kaufman, D., & Dahns, F. (2015). What works to support community resilience? In R. Bach (Ed.), Strategies for supporting community resilience: Multinational experiences (pp. 309–340). Stockholm: CRISMART, The Swedish Defence University.
   Google Scholar
• Barraket, J., Keast, R. L., & Newton, C. J. (2014). Spontaneous volunteering: Trends and challenges in the Australian context. In M. Oppenheimer, & J. Warburton (Eds.), Volunteering in Australia (pp. 131–141). Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479708003587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T. (2016). Governments and self-organization: A hedgehog’s dilemma. In J. Edelenbos & I. Van Meerkerk (Eds.), Critical reflections on interactive governance: Self-organization and participation in public governance (pp. 337–351). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. (2016). Spontaneous volunteers. Community participation in disaster response and recovery. Ottawa. Retrieved from http://www.conferenceboard.ca/e-library/abstract.aspx?did=7875
   Google Scholar
• COAG. (2011). National strategy for disaster resilience: Building our nation’s resilience to disasters. Canberra: ACT: Council of Australian Governments. Retrieved from https://www.ag.gov.au/EmergencyManagement/Documents/NationalStrategyforDisasterResilience.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2016). Report on government services: Volume D - emergency management sector overview. Canberra: P. Commission. Retrieved from https://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2017/emergency-management
   Google Scholar
• Cope, M. (2010). Coding qualitative data. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 279–294). Ontario: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B. (2016). Community self-organization: Potentials and pitfalls. In J. Edelenbos & I. Van Meerkerk (Eds.), Critical reflections on interactive governance: Self-organization and participation in public governance (pp. 230–253). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., & Richardson, L. (2015). Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dynes, R. R. (1970). Organized behavior in disaster. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dynes, R. R., & Quarantelli, E. L. (1970). Interorganizational relations in communities under stress.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, N., & Pinery Fire Community Action Group. (2017). Reflections on the Pinery fire: 25 November 2015 South Australia: Pinery Fire Community Action Group.
   Google Scholar
• Helsloot, I., & Ruitenberg, A. (2004). Citizen response to disasters: A survey of literature and some practical implications. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12(3), 98–111. doi: 10.1111/j.0966-0879.2004.00440.x
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2017). Security and resilience: Community resilience — Guidelines for planning the involvement of spontaneous volunteers (ISO 22319:2017). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:22319:ed-1:v1:en:sec:A
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, R., Danielsson, E., Kvarnlöf, L., Eriksson, K., & Karlsson, R. (2018). At the external boundary of a disaster response operation: The dynamics of volunteer inclusion. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(4), 519–529. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendra, J. M., & Wachtendorf, T. (2003). Reconsidering convergence and converger legitimacy in response to the World Trade Center Disaster. In L. Clarke (Ed.), Terrorism and disaster: New threats, new ideas (Research in social problems and public policy, volume 11) (pp. 97–122). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, T., Whittaker, J., McLennan, B. J., & Handmer, J. (2017). Recovery volunteering after the Pinery fire, South Australia 2015: An explorative case study. Melbourne: RMIT University; Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC. Retrieved from https://www.bnhcrc.com.au/publications/biblio/bnh-3800
   Google Scholar
• Kvarnlöf, L., & Johansson, R. (2014). Boundary practices at incident sites. International Journal of Emergency Services, 3(1), 65–76. doi:10.1108/IJES-01-2013-0002. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/IJES-01-2013-0002
   Google Scholar
• Lukasiewicz, A., Dovers, S., & Eburn, M. (2017). Shared responsibility: The who, what and how. Environmental Hazards, 16(4), 291–313. doi: 10.1080/17477891.2017.1298510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, B. J. (2018). Conditions for effective coproduction in community-led disaster risk management. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. doi: 10.1007/s11266-018-9957-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, B. J., & Handmer, J. (2012). Reframing responsibility-sharing for bushfire risk management in Australia after Black Saturday. Environmental Hazards, 11(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/17477891.2011.608835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, B. J., Molloy, J., Whittaker, J., & Handmer, J. W. (2016). Centralised coordination of spontaneous emergency volunteers: The EV CREW model. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 31(1), 24–30. Retrieved from https://ajem.infoservices.com.au/items/AJEM-31-01-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, B. J., Whittaker, J., & Handmer, J. W. (2016). The changing landscape of disaster volunteering: Opportunities, responses and gaps in Australia. Natural Hazards, 84(3), 2031–2048. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2532-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C. (2008). Realising the potential of co-production: Negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society, 7(02), 221–231. doi: 10.1017/S1474746407004174
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305750X9600023X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quarantelli, E. L. (1987). Disaster studies: An analysis of the social historical factors affecting the development of research in the area. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 5(3), 285–310.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry. (2012). Final report. Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rafter, F. (2013). Volunteers as agents of co-production: ‘Mud armies’ in emergency services. In E. A. Lindquist (Ed.), Putting citizens first: Engagement in policy and service delivery for the 21st century (pp. 187–192). Canberra: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlappa, H., & Imani, Y. (2018). Who is in the lead? New perspectives on leading service co-production. In T. Brandsen, B. Verschuere, & T. Steen (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 99–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. B. (1980). Toward a new understanding of urban services and citizen participation: The coproduction concept. The American Review of Public Administration, 14(2), 105–118. doi:10.1177/027507408001400203. Retrieved from http://arp.sagepub.com/content/14/2/105.short
   Google Scholar
• South Australian Government. (2016). State emergency management plan part 2 - arrangements. Adelaide. Retrieved from http://www.dpc.sa.gov.au/documents/rendition/State-Emergency-Management-Plan-Part-2-Arrangements.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strandh, V., & Eklund, N. (2017). Emergent groups in disaster research: Varieties of scientific observation over time and across studies of nine natural disasters. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(3), 329–337. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teague, B., McLeod, R., & Pascoe, S. (2010). 2009 Victorian bushfires royal commission: Final report Melbourne. Melbourne: State of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I. (2016). Complementary boundary-spanning leadership: Making civic-induced interactive governance work. In J. Edelenbos & I. Van Meerkerk (Eds.), Critical reflections on interactive governance: Self-organization and participation in public governance (pp. 467–490). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, J., McLennan, B. J., & Handmer, J. (2015). A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 13, 358–368. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.010. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420915300388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, J., McLennan, B. J., & Handmer, J. (2017). Community on ground assistance, Kinglake: A study. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University; Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, A. (2017). Pinery fire recovery final report. Adelaide. https://dhs.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/57418/2015-Pinery-Fire-Recovery-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar