Application of response surface methodology for evaluating particleboard properties made from cotton stalk particles

References

• Agricultural Statistics Year Book (2006) Ministry of Jihad-e-agriculture, Deputy of Planning and Economic Affairs, Bureau of Statistics and Information Technology. Vol. 84/5.
   Google Scholar
• Avci, E., Candan, Z. and Gonultas, O. (2014) Performance properties of bio composites from renewable natural resource. Journal of Composite Materials, 48(26), 3237–3242. doi: 10.1177/0021998313508595
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, M., Jayabalan, V. and Balasubramanian, V. (2008) A mathematical model to predict impact toughness of pulsed current gas tungsten arc welded titanium alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35(9/10), 852–858. doi: 10.1007/s00170-006-0763-4
   Google Scholar
• Batiancela, M. A., Acda, M. N. and Cabangon, R. J. (2014) Particleboard from waste tea leaves and wood particles. Journal of Composite Materials, 48(8), 911–916. doi: 10.1177/0021998313480196
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, D., Kanti Bose, S. and Mozaffar Hossain, M. (2011) Physical and mechanical properties of urea formaldehyde bonded particleboard made from bamboo waste. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 31(2), 84–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Cochran Cox, G. M. (1962) Experimental design. New Delhi: Asia Publishing House, 42(5), 304–309.
   Google Scholar
• Cosereanu, C., Brenci, L. M. N. G., Zeleniur, O. I. and Fatin, A. N. (2015) Effect of particle size and geometry on the performance of single-layer and three-layer particleboard made from sunflower seed husks. BioResources, 10(1), 1127–1136.
   Google Scholar
• European Standard EN 310 (1996) Wood Based Panels, Determination of Modulus of Elasticity in Bending and Bending Strength (Brussell: European Standardization Committee), 16 pp.
   Google Scholar
• European Standard EN 317 (1996) Particleboards and Fiberboards, Determination of Swelling in Thickness after Immersion (Brussell: European Standardization Committee), 20 pp.
   Google Scholar
• European Standard EN 319 (1996) Wood Based Panels, Determination of Tensile Strength Perpendicular to Plane of the Board (Brussell: European Standardization Committee), 15 pp.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (2012) Forest product statistics, Global forest products facts and figures, available at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics
   Google Scholar
• Filiz, M., Usta, P. and Sahin, H. T. (2011) Evaluation of som technical properties obtained from the particleboard with melamine urea formaldehyde glue, red pine and tea waste. Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 15(2), 88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Halip, J. A., Tahir, P. M., Choo, A. C. Y. and Ashaari, Z. (2014) Effect of kenaf parts on the performance of single-layer and three-layer particleboard made from kenaf and rubberwood. BioResources, 9(1), 1401–1416.
   Google Scholar
• Heebink, B. and Lehmann, W. (1977) Particleboards from lower-grade hardwoods. USDA Forest Service Research Paper 297, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Hiziroglu, S., Jarusombuti, S. and Fuengvivat, V. (2005) Surface characteristics of wood composites manufactured in Thailand. Building and Environment, 39(4), 1359–1364.
   Google Scholar
• Hua, L. S., Ashaari, Z., Chen, L. W., San, H. P., Peng, T. L., Jinn, C. M., Wen, C. E. and Ling, C. K. (2015) Properties of particleboard with oil palm trunk as core layer in comparison to three-layer ruberwood particleboard. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 27(1), 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Jahan Latibari, A. (2005) Science and Technology of Adhesion for Lignocellulosic Substances (Karaj: Islamic Azad University Karaj Press), 348 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kargarfard, A. (2011) The effect of cotton stalks storage time on physical and mechanical properties of produced particleboard. Journal of Natural Environment, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 65(4), 453–460.
   Google Scholar
• Kargarfard, A., Nourbakhsh, A. and Golbabaei, F. (2006) Investigation on utilization of cotton stalk in particleboard production. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research, 21(2), 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kawaluk, G. (2014) Properties of lignocellulosic composites containing regenerated cellulose fibers. BioResources, 9(3), 5339–5348.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshminarayanan, A. K. and Balasubramanian, V. (2009) Comparison of RSM with ANN in predicting tensile strength of friction stir welded AA7039 aluminium alloy joints. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 19(1), 9–18. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60221-6
   Google Scholar
• Meinlschmidt, P., Schirp, A., Dix, B., Thole, V. and Brinker, N. (2008) Agricultural residues with light parenchyma cells and expandable filler materials for the production of lightweight particleboards. In Proceedings of the International Panel Products Symposium, 24–26 September, Finland, pp. 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Nazerian, M. and Moazami, V. (2015) Bending strength of sandwich-type particleboard manufactured from giant reed (Arundo donax). Forest Products Journal, 65(5–6), 292–300. doi: 10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00046
   Google Scholar
• Rangavar, H., Bazyar, B. and Akbari, H. (2013) Study on the possibility of particle board tree-layer manufacturing using chick-pea (Cicer arietinum) stem. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research, 28(2), 224–237.
   Google Scholar
• Tabarsa, T. and Chui, H. (2000) Wood behavior in transverse compression. Part1: Apparatus and preliminary results. Wood and Fiber Science, 32(2), 144–115.
   Google Scholar