Institutional and policy frameworks shaping the wooden multi-storey construction markets: a comparative case study on Austria and Finland

References

• A-Kruunu (2019) A-Kruunu toteuttaa puukerrostalokohteen Sipooseen (15.2.2019). Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: https://www.a-kruunu.fi/uutiset/kruunu-toteuttaa-puukerrostalokohteen-sipooseen
   Google Scholar
• Antikainen, R., Antikainen, R., Dalhammar, C., Hildén, M., Judl, J., Jääskeläinen, T., Kautto, P., Koskela, S., Kuisma, M., Lazarevic, D., Mäenpää, I., Ovaska, J.-P., Peck, P., Rodhe, H., Temmes, A. and Thidell, Å. (2017) Renewal of Forest Based Manufacturing towards a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy (Reports of the Finnish Environment Institute 13/2017). Accessed 1 August 2018, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/186080
   Google Scholar
• Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C. and Vedung, E. (eds.). (1998) Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments & Their Evaluation (New Brunswick & New Jersey: Transaction Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Bioökonomie-FTI-Strategie für Österreich (2018) Accessed 1 December 2018, available at: https://nachhaltigwirtschaften.at/resources/nw_pdf/biooekonomie-fti-strategie-ag2-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buchner, J. (2018) Innovationsprozesse im Holzbau in Österreich. Thesis (M. Sc.). University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Nachhaltigkeit und Tourismus (2019) Bioökonomie - Eine Strategie für Österreich. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: https://www.bmnt.gv.at/umwelt/klimaschutz/biooekonomie/Bioökonomie-Strategie-für-Österreich.html
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. (eds.). (2008) Approaches and Methods in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E. (2002) The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: Implications for productivity and innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 621–631. doi: 10.1080/01446190210163543
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC) (2018) A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. Accessed 23 May 2019, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/ec_bioeconomy_strategy_2018.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
   Google Scholar
• European Organization of the Sawmill Industry (EOS) (2017) Annual report 2016/2017. Accessed 24 May 2019, available online: www.eos-oes.eu
   Google Scholar
• Fadai, A., Fuchs, M. and Winter, W. (2014) Wood-based construction for multi-storey buildings: Application of cement bonded wood composites as structural element. In S. Aicher, H. W. Reinhardt, and H. Garrecht (eds.), Materials and Joints in Timber Structures. RILEM Bookseries, vol 9 (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 471–484.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (2016) Promoting sustainable building materials and the implications on the use of wood in buildings, Annex 1. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/45854-0d636bd187f82f1efa970922196ddbb1e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FAO (2018) Forest Products Annual Market Review 2017-2018. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/FPAMR2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Federation of the Finnish Wood Working Industries and Työtehoseura (2019) Puutuoteteollisuuden ja puurakentamisen kilpailukyvyn varmistaminen koulutuksen kehittämisen avulla. (report on the competitiveness of the wood working industry and wood construction in Finnish). Accessed 20 April 2019, available at: https://www.puuinfo.fi/sites/default/files/Puutuoteteollisuuden%20ja%20puurakentamisen%20kilpailukyvyn%20varmistaminen%20koulutuksen%20kehitt%C3%A4misen%20avulla.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2006) An Introduction to Qualitative Research (London: Sage). Third Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Europe (2015) State of Europe’s Forests 2015 (Madrid: Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Forest Europe Liaison Unit).
   Google Scholar
• Forest Sector Technology Platform (2012) Horizons – revised vision 2030 for the European forest-based sector. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: http://www.cepi.org/system/files/public/documents/publications/forest/2013/FTP_Vision_final_Feb_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Franzini, F., Toivonen, R. and Toppinen, A. (2018) Why Not wood? benefits and barriers of wood as a Multistory construction material: Perceptions of municipal Civil Servants from Finland. Buildings, 8(11), 159. Accessed 25 May 2019, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8110159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. (2014) The Delphi technique in educational research (SAGE Open). Accessed 25 May 2019, available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014529773
   Google Scholar
• Heino, P. (2019) Puurakentamisen kehityskatsaus. (Magazine article on the development of wood construction in Finnish). Rakennettu Ympäristö, 1/2019, Accessed 22 March 2019, available at: http://proofer.faktor.fi/epaper/RY119/files/assets/common/downloads/RY0418.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hemström, K., Gustavsson, L. and Mahapatra, K. (2017) The sociotechnical regime and Swedish contractor perceptions of structural frames. Construction Management and Economics, 35, 184–195. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1245428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrant, J., Hagemann, N. and Thrän, D. (2017) The contribution of wood-based construction materials for leveraging a low carbon building sector in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society, 34, 405–418. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmekoski, E., Hetemäki, L. and Linden, M. (2015a) Factors affecting sawnwood consumption in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 236–248. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmekoski, E., Jonsson, R. and Nord, T. (2015b) Context, drivers, and future potential for wood-frame multi-storey construction in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 181–196. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmekoski, E., Pykäläinen, J. and Hetemäki, L. (2018) Long-term targets for green building: Explorative Delphi backcasting study on wood-frame multi-story construction in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3644–3654. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuhka, S. and Lahdensivu, J. (2016) A statistical and geographical study on demolished buildings. Building Research and Information, 44(1), 73–96. DOI:10.1080/09613218.2014.980101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadefors, A. (1995) Institutions in building projects: Implications for flexibility and change. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 395–408. doi: 10.1016/0956-5221(95)00017-P
   Google Scholar
• Kalcher, J., Praxmarer, G. and Teischinger, A. (2017) Quantification of future availabilities of recovered wood from Austrian residential buildings. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 123, 143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalt, G. (2015) Biomass streams in Austria: Drawing a complete picture of biogenic material flows within the national economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95, 100–111. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, H., Krötsch, S. and Winter, S. (2017) Atlas: Mehrgeschossiger Holzbau (München: Detail Business Information).
   Google Scholar
• Kitek Kuzman, M., Lähtinen, K. and Sandberg, D. (2017) Initiatives supporting timber constructions in Finland, Slovenia and Sweden. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO 2017 division 5 conference “forest sector innovations for a Greener future”, 12–16 June 2017, Vancouver BC, Canada. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: http://www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:1127496/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kollar, M. (2014) Innovation processes in energy-efficient timber construction in Austria. Thesis (M.Sc.). University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Kuittinen, M. (2013) Introduction: Case studies. In M. Kuittinen, A. Ludvig, and G. Weiss (eds.), Wood in Carbon Efficient Construction. Tools, Methods and Cases (Brussels: CEI-Bois), pp. 111–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarevic, D., Kautto, P. and Antikainen, R. (2019) Finland's wood-frame multi-storey construction innovation system: Analysing motors of creative destruction. Forest Policy & Economics, Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, F. and Schauerte, T. (2017) Identifying drivers facilitating product development within the industry for wooden multi-family houses. Pro Ligno, 13(4), 602–609.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A. and Turoff, M. (eds.). (1975a) The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications (London: Addison-Wesley).
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A. and Turoff, M. (1975b) General applications: Policy Delphi. In H. A. Linstone, and M. Turoff (eds.), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications (London: Addison-Wesley), pp. 311–329.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvig, A. and Weiss, G. (2013) Governing carbon efficiency. The international regime of standards in wooden construction. Osterr z Politwizz, 42(3), 329–342. Accessed 1.12.2018, available at: https://oezp.univie.ac.at/index.php/zfp/article/view/133
   Google Scholar
• Mahapatra, K., Gustavsson, L. and Hemström, K. (2012) Multi-storey wood-frame buildings in Germany, Sweden and the UK. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 12, 62–85. doi: 10.1108/14714171211197508
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2008) Concepts and concept formation. In D. Della Porta, and M. Keating (eds.), Approaches and Methods in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 177–198.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Suter, M. and Ingold, K. (2016) Socio-technical transitions and policy change – advocacy Coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovations and Societal Transitions, 18, 215–237. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, O., Hämäläinen, K., Häyrinen, L., Berghäll, S., Lähtinen, K. and Toppinen, A. (2016) Strategic business networks in the Finnish wood products industry: A case of two small and medium-sized enterprises. Silva Fennica, 50(3), Accessed 15 May 2019, available at: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1544
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1, 2. Accessed 25 May 2019, available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2014) Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt, Accessed 25 March 2019, available at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment (MEEA) (2014) Sustainable Growth from Bioeconomy: The Finnish Bioeconomy Strategy. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: http://biotalous.fi/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/The_Finnish_Bioeconomy_Strategy_110620141.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment (MEEA) (2017) Government report on the National Energy and Climate Strategy for 2030. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: http://tem.fi/en/energy-and-climate-strategy
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, F. J. (2009) Die Wertschöpfung der österreichischen Forst- und Holzwirtschaft inclusive nachgelagerter Branchen, Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Marketing und Innovation, Band 2 (Wien: Universität für Bodenkultur Wien).
   Google Scholar
• Nord, T. (2008) Prefabrication Strategies in the Timber Housing Industry: Case studies from Swedish and Austrian markets. Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, Technical report 2008:6. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:995332/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Novotony, M. (2015) Wien: Weil Holz ein machwachsender Baustoff ist. Zuschnitt, 59, September 2015, 9, 18–19. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: www.proholz.at/zuschnitt/liste.
   Google Scholar
• proHolz Austria (2019a) Genialerstoff.at, Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: http://www.proholz.at/genialerstoff/
   Google Scholar
• proHolz Austria (2019b) Holz ist genial. Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: https://www.holzistgenial.at/
   Google Scholar
• Rakennuslehti (2018) Puurakentamisen kasvu alkaa näkyä markkinaosuuksissa (5.11.2018)
   Google Scholar
• Rakennustutkimus RTS Oy (2018) Asunto- ja palvelurakentaminen kunnissa 2018–2020 (Helsinki: Rakennustutkimus RTS Oy). Accessed 26 May 2019, available at: https://www.ym.fi/download/noname/%7BA73C81E3-DA1E-4838-B067-6E55AB89BD23%7D/139890
   Google Scholar
• Riala, M. and Ilola, L. (2014) Multi-storey timber construction and bioeconomy – barriers and opportunities. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29(4), 367–377. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.926980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmler, T., Rimmler, T., Coppock, R., Oberwimmer, R., Pirc, A., Posavec, S. and Weiss, G. (2011) How to support Firm competitiveness in timber Industries? Clusters as policy means in four European countries. In G. Weiss, D. Pettenella, P. Ollonqvist, and B. Slee (eds.), Innovation in Forestry: Territorial and Value Chain Relationships (Oxfordshire: CAB International), pp. 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Ruuska, A. and Häkkinen, T. (2016) Efficiency in the delivery of multi-story timber buildings. Energy Procedia, 96, 190–201. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.120
   Google Scholar
• Sipiläinen, I. (2018) Toimialaraportit: Puutuoteteollisuus. Työ- ja Elinkeinoministeriön Julkaisuja 37/2018. Accessed 25 May 2019, available at: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/161135/Toimialaraportit%20-%20Puutuoteteollisuus.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Stingl, R., Zukal, M. L. and Teischinger, A. (2011) Holzbaustudie Österreich – Stingl – Teischinger, Holzbauanteil in Österreich. Statistische Erhebung von Hochbauvorhaben. Zuschnitt Attachment att., 23, proHolz Austria, Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Teischinger, A., Stingl, R., Berger, V. and Eder, A. (2015) Holzbauanteil in Österreich? – Erhebung des Holzbauanteils aller österreichischen Bauvorhaben, präsentation proholz. Accessed 26 March 2018, available at: www.proholz.atfileadmin/proholz/media/presse/150924_PK_Vortrag_Teischinger_14Folien.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Toppinen, A., Röhr Axel, Pätäri Satu, Lähtinen Katja, Toivonen Ritva (2018) The future of wooden multistory construction in the forest bioeconomy – A Delphi study from Finland and Sweden. Journal of Forest Economics, 31, 3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppinen, A., Sauru Miska, Pätäri Satu, Lähtinen Katja, Tuppura Anni (2019) Internal and external factors of competitiveness shaping the future of wooden multistory construction. Construction Management and Economics, 37(4), 201–216. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2018.1513162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tykkä, S., McCluskey, D., Nord, T., Ollonqvist, P., Hugosson, M., Roos, A., Ukrainski, K., Nyrud, A. Q. and Bajric, F. (2010) Development of timber framed firms in the construction sector – Is EU policy one source of their innovation? Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban Innovation Vienna (2018) Smart City Wien: Gebäude, Artikel Smart City Wien. Accessed 25 March 2019, available at: https://smartcity.wien.gv.at/site/initiative/themengebiete/gebaeude/
   Google Scholar
• Vaahtera, E., Vaahtera, E., Aarne, M., Ihalainen, A., Mäki-Simola, E., Peltola, A. and Torvelainen, J. (2018) Finnish Forest Statistics (Helsinki: Luonnonvarakeskus). Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: https://stat.luke.fi/sites/default/files/suomen_metsatilastot_2018_verkko.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2008) Service-Dominant Logic Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, P., Büch, R. and Greenwood, R. (2007) The impact of governmental policies in institutional Fields: The case of innovation in the Dutch concrete industry. Organization Studies, 28(4), 515–540. doi: 10.1177/0170840606067927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald in Österreich - Das Portal zu Wald und Holz (2019) Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: http://www.wald-in-oesterreich.at/holzbaucharta/
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Toppinen, A. and Juslin, H. (2014) The use of wood in green building: A study of expert perspectives from the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 350–361. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, G., Ollonqvist, P. and Slee, B. (2011) How to support innovation in the forest sector: Summary and Conclusions. In G. Weiss, D. Pettenella, P. Ollonqvist, and B. Slee (eds.), Innovation in Forestry: Territorial and Value Chain Relationships (Oxfordshire: CAB International), pp. 303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, G., Pelli, P., Orazio, C., Tykka, S., Zivojinovic, I. and Ludvig, A. (2017) Forest industry clusters as innovation systems: Analysing innovation support frameworks in five European regions. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 134(2), 119–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood Info Ltd (2019) Valmistuneet puukerrostalot (27.3.2019). Accessed 24 May 2019, available at: https://www.puuinfo.fi/articles/valmistuneet-puukerrostalot
   Google Scholar
• Zuo, J. and Zhao, Z. (2014) Green building research - current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar