Collaboration and shared logic for creating value-added in three Finnish wooden multi-storey building projects

References

• Aarikka-Stenroos, L. and Ritala, P. (2017) Network management in the era of ecosystems: Systematic review and management framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 23–36. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Håkansson, H. and Johanson, J. (1994) Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1–15. doi: 10.1177/002224299405800401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blayse, A. M. and Manley, K. (2004) Key influences on construction innovation. Construction Innovation, 4(3), 143–154. doi: 10.1108/14714170410815060
   Google Scholar
• Bosch-Sijtsema, P. and Henriksson, L. (2014) Managing projects with distributed and embedded knowledge through interactions. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 1432–1444. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdeau, L. (1999) Sustainable development and the future of construction: A comparison of visions from various countries. Building Research & Information, 27(6), 354–366. doi: 10.1080/096132199369183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brege, S., Stehn, L. and Nord, T. (2014) Business models in industrialized building of multi-storey houses. Construction Management and Economics, 32, 208–226. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2013.840734
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L. E. and Ingemansson, M. (2014) The logic of innovation in construction. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 512–524. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespin-Mazet, F., Ingemansson Havenvid, M. and Linne, Å (2015) Antecedents of project partnering in the construction industry – The impact of relationship history. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 4–15. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzini, F., Toivonen, R. and Toppinen, A. (2018). Why not wood? benefits and barriers of wood as a multi-storey construction material: Perceptions of municipal civil servants from Finland. Buildings, 8(11), 159. doi: 10.3390/buildings8110159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gann, D. M. and Salter, A. J. (2000) Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 955–972. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin, A., Blanchet, P., Lehoux, N. and Cimon, Y. (2017) Main motivations and barriers for using wood in multi-story and non-residential construction projects. BioResouces, 12(1), 546–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, E. (2016) Responding to the bioeconomy: Business model innovation in the forest sector. In A. Kutnar and S. S. Muthu (eds.) Environmental Impacts of Traditional and Innovative Forest-Based Bioproducts (Singapore: Springer), pp. 227–248.
   Google Scholar
• Hemström, K., Gustavsson, L. and Mahapatra, K. (2017) The sociotechnical regime and Swedish contractor perceptions of structural frames. Construction Management and Economics, 35(4), 184–195. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1245428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmekoski, E., Pykäläinen, J. and Hetemäki, L. (2018) Long-term targets for green building: Explorative Delphi backcasting study on wood-frame multi-story construction in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 72, 3644–3654. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.031
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. (2015) Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 3rd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P. (2012) Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 57–79. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2011.648947
   Google Scholar
• Lazarevic, D., Kautto, P. and Antikainen, R. (2019) Finland’s wood-frame multi-storey construction innovation system: Analysing motors of creative destruction. Forest Policy and Economics. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessing, J. and Brege, S. (2015) Business models for product-oriented house-building companies – Experience from two Swedish case studies. Construction Innovation, 15(4), 449–472. doi: 10.1108/CI-02-2015-0009
   Google Scholar
• Lähtinen, K., Harju, C. and Toppinen, A. (2019a) Consumers’ perceptions on the properties of wood affecting their willingness to live in and prejudices against houses made of timber. Wood Material Science and Engineering. doi: 10.1080/17480272.2019.1615548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähtinen, K., Malm, N. and Toppinen, N. (2019b) Lobbying urban Planners’ views on wood material in multi-storey building sector in Finland. Bioproducts Business, 4(7), 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Loss, C., Piazza, M. and Zandonini, R. (2016) Connections for steel–timber hybrid prefabricated buildings. part I: Experimental tests. Construction and Building Materials, 122, 781–795. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahapatra, K. and Gustavsson, L. (2008) Multi-storey timber buildings: Breaking industry path dependency. Building Research & Innovations, 36(6), 638–648. doi: 10.1080/09613210802386123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matinaro, V. and Liu, Y. (2017) Towards increased innovativeness and sustainability through organizational culture: A case study of a Finnish construction business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3184–3193.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, I. (2010) How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: The impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 629–637. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miilumäki, N., Kylkilahti, E., Autio, M., Pöyhönen, J. and Toppinen, A. (in press) With a collaborative effort towards sustainability – A business ecosystem approach to a wooden multi-storey construction project. Manuscript in review.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhlesian, S. and Holmen, M. (2012) Business model changes and green construction processes. Construction Management and Economics, 30, 761–775. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2012.694457
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, F., Öberg, C., Kollberg, B. and Nord, T. (2010) Building a new supply chain position: An exploratory study of companies in the timber housing industry. Construction Management and Economics, 28(10), 1071–1083. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2010.494680
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., Pigner, Y. and Tucci, C. (2005) Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.01601
   Google Scholar
• Pulkka, L., Ristimäki, M., Rajakallio, K. and Junnila, S. (2016) Applicability and benefits of the ecosystem concept in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 34(2), 129–144. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1179773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pynnönen, M., Hallikas, J. and Ritala, P. (2012) Managing customer-driven business model innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(4), 1250022. doi: 10.1142/S1363919612003836
   Google Scholar
• Toppinen, A., Autio, M., Sauru, M. and Berghäll, S. (2018). Sustainability driven new business models in wood construction towards 2030. In W. Filho, I. de Lima, D. Pociovalisteanu and P. Brito (eds.) Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives. World Sustainability Series. (Cham: Springer), pp. 499–516.
   Google Scholar
• Toppinen, A., Sauru, M., Pätäri, S., Lähtinen, K. and Tuppura, A. (2019) Internal and external factors of competitiveness shaping the future of wooden multi-storey construction. Construction Management and Economics, 37(4), 201–216. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2018.1513162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. D. W. and Autio, E. (2014) The fifth facet: The ecosystem as an organizational field, DRUID society Conference, Copenhagen, 16–18 June 2014, available at: http://conference.druid.dk/acc_papers/qpja8vqx0vto0qkn5vg3uiqafb24.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vischer, J. C. (2008) Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment. Building Research and Information, 36(3), 231–240. doi: 10.1080/09613210801936472
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, S. and Hoegl, M. (2006) Involving suppliers in product development: Insights from R&D directors and project managers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(8), 936–943. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Toppinen, A. and Juslin, H. (2014) Use of wood in green building: A study of expert perspectives from the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 350–361. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar