Determination of CNC processing parameters for the best wood surface quality via artificial neural network

References

• Antanasijević, D. Z., Pocajt, V. V., Povrenović, D. S., Ristić, M. Đ. and Perić-Grujić, A. A. (2013) PM10 emission forecasting using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm input variable optimization. Science of the Total Environment, 443, 511–519. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajić, D., Lela, B. and Živković, D. (2008) Modeling of machined surface roughness and optimization of cutting parameters in face milling. Metalurgija, 47(4), 331–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bal, B. C. and Akcakaya, E. (2018) The effects of step over, feed rate and finish depth on the surface roughness of fiberboard processed with CNC machine. Furniture and Wooden Material Research Journal, 1(2), 86–93. doi:10.33725/mamad.481278
   Google Scholar
• Bal, B. C. and Gündeş, Z. (2020) Surface roughness of medium-density fiberboard processed with CNC machine. Measurement, 153, 107421. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirkir, C., Özsahin, Ş, Aydin, I. and Colakoglu, G. (2013) Optimization of some panel manufacturing parameters for the best bonding strength of plywood. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 46, 14–20. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deus, P. R., de Sampaio Alves, M. C. and Vieira, F. H. A. (2015) The quality of MDF workpieces machined in CNC milling machine in cutting speeds, feedrate, and depth of cut. Meccanica, 50(12), 2899–2906. doi:10.1007/s11012-015-0187-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIN 4768 (1990) Determination of Values of Surface Roughness Parameters Ra, Rz, Rmax Using Electrical Contact (Stylus) Instruments, Concepts and Measuring Conditions (Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Norming).
   Google Scholar
• Esteban, L. G., Fernandez, F. G. and Palacios, P. (2011) Prediction of plywood bonding quality using an artificial neural network. Holzforschung, 65(2), 209–214. doi:10.1515/hf.2011.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, F. G., Esteban, L. G., Palacios, P., Navarro, N. and Conde, M. (2008) Prediction of standard particleboard mechanical properties utilizing an artificial neural network and subsequent comparison with a multivariate regression model. Investigación agraria: Sistemas y recursos forestales, 17(2), 178–187.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, T. (2013) Optimisation of CNC routing operations of wooden furniture parts. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67(9-12), 2259–2267. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4647-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazir, E. and Koc, K. H. (2019) Optimization of wood machining parameters in CNC routers: Taguchi orthogonal array based simulated angling algorithm. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología, 21(4), 493–510. doi:10.4067/S0718-221X2019005000406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iskra, P. and Hernández, R. E. (2009) The influence of cutting parameters on the surface quality of routed paper birch and surface roughness prediction modeling. Wood and Fiber Science, 41(1), 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc, K. H., Erdinler, E. S., Hazir, E. and Öztürk, E. (2017) Effect of CNC application parameters on wooden surface quality. Measurement, 107, 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küçükönder, H., Boyaci, S. and Akyüz, A. (2016) A modeling study with an artificial neural network: developing estimationmodels for the tomato plant leaf area. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 40(2), 203–212. doi:10.3906/tar-1408-28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozsahin, S. and Aydin, I. (2014) Prediction of the optimum veneer drying temperature for good bonding in plywood manufacturing by means of artificial neural network. Wood Science and Technology, 48(1), 59–70. doi:10.1007/s00226-013-0583-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozsahin, S. and Murat, M. (2018) Prediction of equilibrium moisture content and specific gravity of heat treated wood by artificial neural networks. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 76(2), 563–572. doi:10.1007/s00107-017-1219-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, S. and Palanikumar, K. (2011) Modeling for prediction of surface roughness in drilling MDF panels using response surface methodology. Journal of Composite Materials, 45(16), 1639–1646. doi:10.1177/0021998310385026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja, S. B. and Baskar, N. (2011) Particle swarm optimization technique for determining optimal machining parameters of different work piece materials in turning operation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(5-8), 445–463. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2958-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarikaya, M. and Gullu, A. (2014) Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 604–616. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlecký, M., Kvietková, M. S. and Kminiak, R. (2018) Medium-density fiberboard (MDF) and edge-glued panels (EGP) after edge milling-surface roughness after machining with different parameters. BioResources, 13(1), 2005–2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofuoglu, S. D. (2017) Determination of optimal machining parameters of massive wooden edge glued panels which is made of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) using Taguchi design method. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 75(1), 33–42. doi:10.1007/s00107-016-1028-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, R., Basavarajappa, S., Gaitonde, V. N. and Samuel, G. L. (2012) Machinability investigations on hardened AISI 4340 steel using coated carbide insert. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 33, 75–86. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcu, A. (2013) Investigation of parameters affecting surface roughness in CNC routing operation on wooden EGP. Bioresources, 8(1), 795–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcu, A. and Karagoz, U. (2012) Effect of machining parameters on surface quality after face milling of MDF. Wood Research, 57(2), 231–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcu, A. and Karagoz, U. (2013) The influence of process parameters on the surface roughness in aesthetic machining of wooden edge-glued panels (EGPs). BioResources, 8(4), 5435–5448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taşpınar, F. and Bozkurt, Z. (2014) Application of artificial neural networks and regression models in the prediction of daily maximum PM10 concentration in Düzce, Turkey. Fresenius Environ. Bull, 23, 2450–2459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiryaki, S., Bardak, S. and Aydın, A. (2016) Modeling of wood bonding strength based on soaking temperature and soaking time by means of artificial neural networks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 153–157. doi:10.18201/ijisae.2016Special%20Issue-146964
   Google Scholar
• Tiryaki, S., Özşahin, Ş and Aydın, A. (2017) Employing artificial neural networks for minimizing surface roughness and power consumption in abrasive machining of wood. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 75(3), 347–358. doi:10.1007/s00107-016-1050-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol, T., Canakci, A. and Ozsahin, S. (2018) Prediction of effect of reinforcement content, flake size and flake time on the density and hardness of flake AA2024-SiC nanocomposites using neural networks. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 739, 1005–1014. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, V. and Nath, S. (2017) Forecasting of PM 10 using autoregressive models and exponential smoothing technique. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 14(4), 109–113. doi:10.3233/AJW-170041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, Z. W., Hiziroglu, S. and Chan, C. T. M. (2013) Measurement of the surface roughness of wood based materials used in furniture manufacture. Measurement, 46(4), 1482–1487. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar