Effects of spatial augmented reality assistance on the efficiency of prefabricating timber frame walls

References

• Andrews, C. M., Henry, A. B., Soriano, I. M., Southworth, M. K. and Silva, J. R. (2020) Registration techniques for clinical applications of three-dimensional augmented reality devices. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 9, 4900214–4900214. doi:10.1109/JTEHM.2020.3045642
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Apt, W. B., Marc, Priesack, K., Weiß, C. and Hartmann, E. A. (2018) Einsatz von digitalen Assistenzsystemen im Betrieb. In: ARBEIT, B. F. S. U. (ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Autodesk Inc (2011) AutoCAD 2012 DXF Reference. Accessed 02 February 2020, Available at: http://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/autocad_2012_pdf_dxf-reference_enu.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Azuma, R. T. (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6, 355–385. doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornewasser, M., Bläsing, D. and Hinrichsen, S. (2018) Informatorische Assistenzsysteme in der manuellen montage: Ein nützliches werkzeug zur reduktion mentaler beanspruchung? Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 72, 264–275. doi:10.1007/s41449-018-0123-x
   Google Scholar
• Bruehl, M. (2005) Laser template projection for composite assembly. Reinforced Plastics, 49, 56–57. doi:10.1016/S0034-3617(05)70769-4
   Google Scholar
• Cuperschmid, A. R., Grachet, M. and Fabrício, M. (2016) Development of an augmented reality environment for the assembly of a precast wood-frame wall using the BIM model. Ambiente Construído, 16, 63–78. doi:10.1590/s1678-86212016000400105
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson, O., Holm, M. and Syberfeldt, A. (2020) Augmented reality smart glasses in industrial assembly: current status and future challenges. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100175. doi:10.1016/j.jii.2020.100175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi, A., Smith, R. T., Thomas, B. H. and Bouras, C. (2017) Use of projector based augmented reality to improve manual spot-welding precision and accuracy for automotive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 89, 1279–1293. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-9164-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, M., Kosch, T. and Schmidt, A. (2016) Interactive worker assistance: comparing the effects of in-situ projection, head-mounted displays, tablet, and paper instructions. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971706.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, M., Lischke, L., Mayer, S., Shirazi, A. and Schmidt, A. (2018) Teach Me How! Interactive Assembly Instructions Using Demonstration and In-Situ Projection. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6404-3_4.
   Google Scholar
• Gattullo, M., Scurati, G. W., Fiorentino, M., Uva, A. E., Ferrise, F. and Bordegoni, M. (2019) Towards augmented reality manuals for industry 4.0: a methodology. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 56, 276–286. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google (n.d.) Glass Enterprise Edition 2 Tech Specs. Accessed 15 February 2021. Available at: https://www.google.com/glass/tech-specs/.
   Google Scholar
• Hallewell Haslwanter, J. D. and Blazevski, B. (2018) Experiences with an assistive system for manual assembly. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197768.3203173.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G. (2016) Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50, 904–908. doi:10.1177/154193120605000909
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G. S. and Lowell, E. (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Human Mental Workload, 139–183. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
   Google Scholar
• Hinrichsen, S., Riediger, D. and Unrau, A. (2016) Assistance Systems in Manual Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Hold, P., Erol, S., Reisinger, G. and Sihn, W. (2017) Planning and evaluation of digital assistance systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 143–150. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.024
   Google Scholar
• Hou, L., Wang, X. and Truijens, M. (2015) Using augmented reality to facilitate piping assembly: an experiment-based evaluation. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurdve, M. (2018) Digital assembly instruction system design with green lean perspective-case study from building module industry. Procedia CIRP, 72, 762–767. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.118
   Google Scholar
• Mark, B. G., Rauch, E. and Matt, D. T. (2021) Worker assistance systems in manufacturing: a review of the state of the art and future directions. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 59, 228–250. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengoni, M., Ceccacci, S., Generosi, A. and Leopardi, A. (2018) Spatial augmented reality: an application for human work in smart manufacturing environment. Procedia Manufacturing, 17, 476–483. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.072
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft (n.d.) HoloLens 2 A new reality for computing. Accessed 16 February 2021, Available at: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, R., Vette, M., Scholer, M. and Ball, J. (2016) Assembly assistance and position data feedback by means of projection lasers. SAE Technical Paper. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-2107.
   Google Scholar
• Neb, A., Brandt, D., Rauhöft, G., Awad, R., Scholz, J. and Bauernhansl, T. (2021) A novel approach to generate augmented reality assembly assistance automatically from CAD models. Procedia CIRP, 104, 68–73. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.012
   Google Scholar
• Oestreich, H., Töniges, T., Wojtynek, M. and Wrede, S. (2019) Interactive learning of assembly processes using digital assistance. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 14–19. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Österreichischer Fertighausverband (2019) Pressemappe PK 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Österreichisches Normungsinstitut (2005) ÖNORM B 2310, Fertighäuser Begriffsbestimmungen und Mindestleistungsumfang (Vienna).
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. (2020) DXFtool. Accessed 02 March 2020, Available at: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/66632-dxftool.
   Google Scholar
• Qeshmy, D. E., Makdisi, J., Ribeiro da Silva, E. H. D. and Angelis, J. (2019) Managing human errors: augmented reality systems as a tool in the quality journey. Procedia Manufacturing, 28, 24–30. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Quandt, M., Knoke, B., Gorldt, C., Freitag, M. and Thoben, K.-D. (2018) General requirements for industrial augmented reality applications. Procedia CIRP, 72, 1130–1135. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.061
   Google Scholar
• Radkowski, R., Herrema, J. and Oliver, J. (2015) Augmented reality-based manual assembly support with visual features for different degrees of difficulty. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31, 337–349. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.994194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt Destatis (2020) Baugenehmigungen, Baufertigstellungen nach der Bauweise - Lange Reihen bis 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Stork, S. and Schubö, A. (2010) Human cognition in manual assembly: theories and applications. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24, 320–328. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Such, M., Ward, C., Hutabarat, W. and Tiwari, A. (2014) Intelligent composite layup by the application of low cost tracking and projection technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.10.020.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, A., Owen, C., Biocca, F. and Mou, W. (2003) Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2003 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642626.
   Google Scholar
• Uva, A. E., Gattullo, M., Manghisi, V. M., Spagnulo, D., Cascella, G. L. and Fiorentino, M. (2018) Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial augmented reality in smart manufacturing: a solution for manual working stations. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94, 509–521. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0846-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Ong, S. K. and Nee, A. Y. C. (2016) A comprehensive survey of augmented reality assembly research. Advances in Manufacturing, 4, 1–22. doi:10.1007/s40436-015-0131-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159–177. doi:10.1080/14639220210123806
   Google Scholar
• Zaeh, M. F., Wiesbeck, M., Stork, S. and Schubö, A. (2009) A multi-dimensional measure for determining the complexity of manual assembly operations. Production Engineering, 3, 489–496. doi:10.1007/s11740-009-0171-3
   Google Scholar