Selection of wooden furniture joints with multi-criteria decision-making techniques

References

• Abdulrahman, H.K., 2022. Analysing and determining of wall elements for building construction projects using multi-criteria decision-making methods. Karabük University.
   Google Scholar
• Acar, M., Diler, H., and Erdil, Y.Z., 2018. Effects of cross-sectional shape on the bending strength in furniture joints. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (2), 164–170. doi:10.17475/kastorman.342070.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan, R. A., 2022. A multi-criteria decision making approach for robot selection in a manufacturing environment. Atılım University.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D1037-12. 2020. Standard Test Methods for Evaluating Properties of Wood-Base Fiber and Particle Panel Materials. https://compass.astm.org/document/?contentCode=ASTM%7CD1037-12R20%7Cen-US&proxycl=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.astm.org&fromLogin=true
   Google Scholar
• Bardak, T., et al., 2017. The bending and tension strength of furniture joints bonded with polyvinyl acetate nanocomposites. Maderas. Ciencia y Tecnología, 19. doi:10.4067/S0718-221X2017005000005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastani, A., Adamopoulos, S., and Militz, H., 2017. Shear strength of furfurylated, N-methylol melamine and thermally modified wood bonded with three conventional adhesives. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 12 (4), 236–241. doi:10.1080/17480272.2016.1164754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayatkashkoli, A., et al., 2017. Investigation of the maximum front to back load in the chairs made from curved and modified poplar wood. Journal of Wood Science, 63 (6), 580–590. doi:10.1007/s10086-017-1650-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boadu, K.B., and Antwi-Boasiako, C., 2017. Assessment of the bending strength of mortise-tenon and dovetail joints in leg-and-rail construction using Klainedoxa gabonensis Pierre Ex Engl. and Entandrophragma cylindricum (Sprague) Sprague. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 12 (4), 242–250. doi:10.1080/17480272.2016.1174883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandner, R., 2019. Properties of axially loaded self-tapping screws with focus on application in hardwood. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 14 (5), 254–268. doi:10.1080/17480272.2019.1635204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branowski, B., Zabłocki, M., and Sydor, M., 2017. Experimental analysis of New furniture joints. BioResources, 13 (1), 370–382. doi:10.15376/biores.13.1.370-382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BS 6948. (1989). Methods of test for mechanically fastened joints in timber and wood-based materials (British Standard). In Bsi. https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/bsi/bs69481989
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., and Guan, H., 2023. A novel method and validation for obtaining the optimal interference fit of round-end mortise-and-tenon joint. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 1–11. doi:10.1080/17480272.2023.2165451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalbudak, E., and Rençber, ÖF, 2022. Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri Üzerine Literatür İncelemesi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (1), 1–17. doi:10.55769/gauniibf.1068692.
   Google Scholar
• Demircioğlu, M. E., 2021. Multi criteria decision making techniques in environmental impact assessment. Galatasaray University.
   Google Scholar
• Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., and Papayannakis, L., 1995. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22 (7), 763–770. doi:10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erol, Ü. N., 2022. GIS-based multi-criteria decision making for ev charging station site selection. Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University.
   Google Scholar
• Göçen, M. U., 2022. Technology selection with multi-criteria decision making methods and data analysis algorithms using patent data. Konya Food and Agriculture University.
   Google Scholar
• Güneş, H. G., 2022. Wide-body aircraft selection using multi-criteria decision making methods. Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Güray, A., Kılıç, M., and Özyurt, A., 2002. Investigation of the effects of different edge joint elements on diagonal tensile strength in furniture edge joints. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 8 (1), 131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdarevic, S., et al., 2023. Strength and stiffness of 3D-printed connectors compared with the wooden mortise and tenon joints for chairs. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 18 (3), 870–883. doi:10.1080/17480272.2022.2086065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, W., et al., 2022. Study on tensile strength of single dovetail joint: experimental, numerical, and analytical analysis. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 1–9. doi:10.1080/17480272.2022.2155872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 6237. 2017. Adhesives — Wood-to-wood adhesive bonds — Determination of shear strength by tensile loading. https://www.iso.org/standard/72817.html
   Google Scholar
• Karaman, A., 2021. Effects of wooden-dowel species, edge banding thickness, and adhesive types on withdrawal strength in MDF-Lam. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 16 (4), 269–278. doi:10.1080/17480272.2021.1881999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaşan, A., 2021. Novel fuzzy multi criteria decision making methods using intuitionistic fuzzy, Pythagorean fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets. Istanbul Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Khodabocus, S. F., 2022. Multi-criteria decision-making approach for risk management in modular construction projects. Özyeğin University.
   Google Scholar
• Khojasteh-Khosro, S., Shalbafan, A., and Thoemen, H., 2022. Consumer behavior assessment regarding lightweight furniture as an environmentally-friendly product. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 17 (3), 192–201. doi:10.1080/17480272.2020.1847187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshabi, P., et al., 2020. Developing a multi-criteria decision making approach to compare types of classroom furniture considering mismatches for anthropometric measures of university students. PLOS ONE, 15 (9), e0239297. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyżaniak, Ł, and Smardzewski, J., 2021. Impact damage response of L-type corner joints connected with new innovative furniture fasteners in wood-based composites panels. Composite Structures, 255, 113008. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipušček, I., et al., 2010. A multi-criteria decision-making model for classifying wood products with respect to their impact on environment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15 (4), 359–367. doi:10.1007/s11367-010-0157-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki, S., et al., 2012. Load-carrying capacity of mitered furniture corner joints with dovetail keys under diagonal tension load. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 36 (5), 636–643. doi:10.3906/tar-1112-44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, Y., Pan, S., and Xu, W., 2022. Staple holding strength of furniture frame joints constructed of plywood and solid wood. Forests, 13 (12), 2006. doi:10.3390/f13122006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandanwar, A., Naidu, M.V., and Pandey, C.N., 2013. Development of test methods for wooden furniture joints. Wood Material Science and Engineering, 8 (3), 188–197. doi:10.1080/17480272.2013.814712.
   Google Scholar
• Ogrodniczek, J., et al., 2022. Influence of technological factors on the strength of wood adhesive joints. Technologia i Automatyzacja Montażu, 2, 3–7. doi:10.7862/tiam.2022.2.1.
   Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, A., Ferri, D., and Pellerano, A., 2016. Tests for outdoor window profiles: 90° mortise tenon corner joints strength assessment. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 11 (1), 25–35. doi:10.1080/17480272.2014.939712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, A., and Pellerano, A., 2014. Assessment of wood particleboards milling by means of energy consumption tests. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 9 (4), 193–201. doi:10.1080/17480272.2013.847494.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Grau, G., et al., 2022. Flexural strength characterisation of oblique radiata pine splice joints. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 17 (6), 1010–1019. doi:10.1080/17480272.2021.1990405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybiński, K., and Borysiuk, P., 2022. The influence of selected factors on the strength of angle joints of frame elements. Annals of WULS, Forestry and Wood Technology, 118, 5–14. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0015.9367.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarze, R., et al., 2022. Application and potential of shape memory alloys for dowel-type connections in timber structures. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 17 (6), 636–647. doi:10.1080/17480272.2021.1920625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, B., et al., 2023. A comprehensive mortise and tenon structure selection method based on Pugh’s controlled convergence and rough Z-number MABAC method. PLOS ONE, 18 (5), e0283704. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Śmietańska, K., and Mielczarek, M., 2022. Strength properties of furniture corner joints constructed with different wooden connectors and wood-based materials. Annals of WULS, Forestry and Wood Technology, 118, 55–66. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0016.0489.
   Google Scholar
• Stendahl, M., and Eliasson, L., 2014. Integrated production of semi-finished components in sawmills, part II: management of internal operations. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 9 (1), 12–30. doi:10.1080/17480272.2013.853690.
   Google Scholar
• Stendahl, M., McCluskey, D., and Eliasson, L., 2013. Integrated production of semi-finished components in sawmills, part I: external interactions. Wood Material Science and Engineering, 8 (4), 253–270. doi:10.1080/17480272.2013.834965.
   Google Scholar
• Tankut, A.N., and Tankut, N., 2004. Effect of some factors on the strength of furniture corner joints constructed with wood biscuits. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28 (5), 301–309. doi:10.3906/tar-0311-1.
   Google Scholar
• Tsalagkas, D., Börcsök, Z., and Pásztory, Z., 2021. The effect of finger length and adhesive type on the curing time of finger-jointed black pine (Pinus nigra L.) lumber. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 16 (5), 312–320. doi:10.1080/17480272.2020.1735517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TS ISO 13061-1. 2021. Wood, determination of moisture content for physical and mechanical test. Ankara: TSE. https://intweb.tse.org.tr/Standard/Standard/Standard.aspx?081118051115108051104119110104055047105102120088111043113104073087051081111103079098084082055099.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., et al., 2020. Comparative study on the tensile performance of box frames constructed by keyed joints and dovetail joints. BioResources, 15 (4), 9291–9302. doi:10.15376/biores.15.4.9291-9302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., et al., 2023. A parametric optimized method for three-dimensional corner joints in wooden furniture. Forests, 14 (5), 1063. doi:10.3390/f14051063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y. and Erdoğan, S. 2014. Spss Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 4th ed. Detay Publishing. https://www.detayyayin.com.tr/urun/spss-uygulamali-bilimsel-arastirma-yontemler.
   Google Scholar
• Záborský, V., et al., 2019. Effects of selected factors on spruce dowel joint stiffness. BioResources, 14 (1), 1127–1140. doi:10.15376/biores.14.1.1127-1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E.K., and Turskis, Z., 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16 (2), 159–172. doi:10.3846/tede.2010.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar