How different data supports affect geostatistical modelling: the new aggregation method and comparison with the classical regularisation and the theoretical punctual model

References

• D.A. Tarasov, A.G. Buevich, and A.V. Shichkinab, High variation topsoil pollution forecasting in the Russian Subarctic: Using artificial neural networks combined with residual kriging, J. Appl. Geochem. 88 (2018), pp. 188–197. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mohammadi, A. Seifi, and T. Foroud, A robust Kriging model for predicting accumulative outflow from a mature reservoir considering a new horizontal well, J. Pet Sci. Eng. 82–83 (2012), pp. 113–119. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2012.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Choudhury, Comparative study on linear and non-linear geo-statistical estimation methods: A case study on iron deposit, J. PROCEDIA Earth Planet Sci. 11 (2015), pp. 131–139. doi:10.1016/j.proeps.2015.06.017[4]
   Google Scholar
• J.P. Chiles and P. Delfiner, Geostatistics Modeling Spatial Uncertainty, 2th ed., ISBN: 978-0-470-18315-1, WILEY, Hoboken, NJ, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• G. Matheron, The Theory Of Regionalized Variables And Its Application. Mathematical Statistics, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines, Paris, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• M. Guarascio and G. Raspa, Valuation and production optimization of a metal mine, Proceedings of the 12 International APCOM Symposium, Golden, Colorado, 2: 50–64, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• I. Clark, Regularization of a semivariograms, J. Comput. Geosci 3 (1977), pp. 341–346. doi:10.1016/0098-3004(77)90010-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Atkinson and N. Tate, Spatial scale problems and geostatistical solutions: A review, J. Prof. Geogr. 52 (2000), pp. 607–623. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Carrasco, J.P. Chiles, and S. Seguret, Additivity, Metallurgical Recovery and Grade, 8th international Geostatistics Congress, Santiago, Chile, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kasmaee and F. Torab, Risk reduction in Sechahun iron ore deposit by geological boundary modification using multiple indicator Kriging, J. Cent. South. Univ. 21, 5 (2014), pp. 2011–2017. doi:10.1007/s11771-014-2150-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Bassani and J. Costa, Grade estimation with samples of different length with samples of different length, J. Appl. Earth Sci. 125, 4 (2016), pp. 1–6. doi:10.1080/03717453.2016.1194947
   Google Scholar
• A.G. Journel and C.J. Huijbregts, Mining Geostatistics, Academic Press, London, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• M. Armstrong, Basic Linear Geostatistics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• H. Wackernagel, Multivariate Geostatistics An Introduction With Applications, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• C.A. Gotway and L.J. Young, Combining incompatible spatial data, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97 (459) (2002), pp. 632–648. doi:10.1198/016214502760047140
   Google Scholar
• C.A. Gotway and L.J. Young, A geostatistical approach to linking geographically-aggregated data from different sources, Technical report, Department of Statistics, University of Florida, 2004, pp. 012
   Google Scholar
• P.A. Kyriakidis, Geostatistical framework for area-to-point spatial interpolation, Geogr. Anal. 36 (2) (2004), pp. 259–289. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2004.tb01135.x
   Google Scholar
• P. Goovaerts, Geostatistical analysis of disease data: Accounting for spatial support and population density in the isopleth mapping of cancer mortality risk using area-to-point Poisson kriging, Int. J. Health Geogr. 5, 52 (2006), doi:10.1186/1476-072X-5-52
   Google Scholar
• C.J. Morgan, Theoretical and practical aspects of variography: In particular, estimation and modelling of semi-variograms over areas of limited and clustered or widely spaced data in a two dimensional South African gold mining context, Ph.D. thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• P. Goovaerts, Kriging and semivariogram deconvolution in the presence of irregular geographical units, Math. Geol. 40 (1) (2008), pp. 101–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M.A. Bassani, J. Costa, W. Guaglianoni, and R. Rubio, Comparison between the indirect approach and kriging with samples of different support for estimation using samples of different length, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 32 (2018), pp. 785–797. doi:10.1007/s00477-017-1398-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Marcotte, Generalized cross-validation for covariance model selection and parameter estimation, Math. Geol. 27 (6) (1995), pp. 749–762. doi:10.1007/BF02273536
   Google Scholar
• R. Pan, T. Yang, J. Cao, K. Lu, and Z. Zhang, Missing data imputation by K nearest neighbours based on grey relational structure and mutual information, Appl. Intell. 43 (3) (2015), pp. 614–632.
   Google Scholar
• J. Rivoirard, Two key parameters when choosing the kriging neighborhood, J. Math. Geo. 19 (8) (1987), pp. 851–856. doi:10.1007/BF00893020
   Google Scholar
• I. Clark, The Art of Cross Validation in Geostatistical Applications, Society of Mining Engineers, Inc, Littleton Colorado, 1986. Chapter 20, 211–220.
   Google Scholar
• M. Oliver and R. Webster, A tutorial guide to geostatistics: Computing and modelling variograms and kriging, J. Catena. 113 (2014), pp. 56–69. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.H. Koelbel, High Performance Fortran Handbook, FORTRAN, MIT Press, Cambridge,  ISBN. 978-0-262-29123-1, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• P. Darling, SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed., Vol. V1, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Englewood, Colorado, 2001.
   Google Scholar