On the application of drones: a progress report in mining operations

References

• S.L. Jämsä-Jounela, Future trends in process automation, Finland, annual reviews in control. 31 (2007), pp. 211–220.
   Google Scholar
• S. Javad, E. Talebi, P. Roghanchi, and M. Hassanalian, A comprehensive review of applications of drone technology in the mining industry, (2020), doi: 10.3390/drones4030034.
   Google Scholar
• M. Hassanalian and A. Abdelkefi, Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 91 (2017), pp. 99–131. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.R. Newcome, Unmanned aviation: a brief history of unmanned aerial vehicles, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• B. Holman, The first air bomb: Venice, 15 July 1849, Airminded. Airpower and British society, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• U. Hannerz, Media and the world as a single place, in foreign news: exploring the world of foreign correspondents, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• J.G. Leishman and B. Johnson, Engineering analysis of the 1907 cornu helicopter, J. Am. Helicopter Soc (2009). doi:10.4050/jahs.54.034001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.D. Harvey, Floatplanes, Flying Boats and Oceanic Warfare, 1939-1945, Air Power Hist. 57 (2010), pp. 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• R.R.L. Constantine and J. Rey, Eyes in the sky: a review of civilian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Int. J. Comput. Appl 173:6 (2017), pp. 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• R.P.G. Collinson and R.P.G. Collinson, Unmanned air vehicles, introduction to avionics systems, (2011).
   Google Scholar
• A.J. Slack, Sources: military robots and drones: a reference handbook, Ref. User Serv. Q. (2013) doi: 10.5860/rusq.53n1.88b.
   Google Scholar
• A.M.R.A. Bappy, M.D. Asfak-Ur-Rafi, M.D.S. Islam, A. Sajjad, K.N. Imran, and P.K. Saha, Design and development of unmanned aerial vehicle (Drone) for civil applications, (2015).
   Google Scholar
• M. Schulzke and M. Schulzke, The drone revolution, the morality of drone warfare and the politics of regulation, (2017).
   Google Scholar
• J. Ford, The history of drones (Drone history timeline from 1849 To 2018), DroneThusiast, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• A.C. Watts, V.G. Ambrosia, and E.A. Hinkley, Unmanned aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific research: Classification and considerations of use, Remote Sens. 6 (2012), pp. 1671–1692.
   Google Scholar
• G. Singhal, B. Bansod, and L. Mathew, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle classification, Applications and challenges: a review, (2018).
   Google Scholar
• R. Weibel and R.J. Hansman, Safety Considerations for Operation of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Civil Airspace, Iraq, 2003, published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission.
   Google Scholar
• W. Ren, J.S. Sun, R. Beard, and T. McLain, Experimental validation of an autonomous control system on a mobile robot platform, IET Control Theory Appl 1 (2007), pp. 1621–1629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Ren, Y. Zhao, W. Xiao, and Z. Hu, A review of UAV monitoring in mining areas: Current status and future perspectives, Int. J. Coal Sci. Tech. 6 (2019), pp. 320–333.
   Google Scholar
• H. Yang, Y. Lee, S.Y. Jeon, and D. Lee, Multi-rotor drone tutorial: Systems, mechanics, control and state estimation, Intell. Serv. Robo. (2017). doi:10.1007/s11370-017-0224-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Shyy, H. Aono, C. Kang, and H. Liu, An Introduction to flapping wing aerodynamics. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• K. Dalamagkidis, K.P. Valavanis, L.A. Piegl, K. Dalamagkidis, K.P. Valavanis, and L.A. Piegl, Thoughts and recommendations on a UAS integration roadmap, on integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system, (2012), pp. 161–191.
   Google Scholar
• Civil aviation authority, aircraft icing handbook. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• B.T. Clough, Unmanned aerial vehicles: Autonomous control challenges, a researcher’s perspective, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun. 2 (2005). doi:10.2514/1.5588
   Google Scholar
• H. Yao, R. Qin, and X. Chen, Unmanned aerial vehicle for remote sensing applications - A review, Remote Sens. (2019). doi:10.3390/rs11121443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Berg, Detection and Tracking in Thermal Infrared Imagery. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• M. Shan, F. Wang, F. Lin, Z. Gao, Y.Z. Tang, and B.M. Chen, Google map aided visual navigation for UAVs in GPS-denied environment, Zhuhai, China, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, IEEE-ROBIO (2015) doi: 10.1109/ROBIO.2015.7418753.
   Google Scholar
• Y.J. Wang, F. Tian, Y. Huang, J. Wang, and C.J. Wei, Monitoring coal fires in Datong coalfield using multi-source remote sensing data, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 14 25 (2015), pp. 3421–3428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Liu, et al., Estimates of rice lodging using indices derived from UAV visible and thermal infrared images, Agric. For. Meteorol. 252 (2018), pp. 144–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Li, Z. Chen, L. Wang, J. Liu, and Q. Zhou, Area extraction of maize lodging based on remote sensing by small unmanned aerial vehicle, Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions Chinese Soc. Agric. Eng. 9 (2014), pp. 207–213.
   Google Scholar
• J.A.J. Berni, P.J. Zarco-Tejada, L. Suárez, V. González-Dugo, and E. Fereres, Remote sensing of vegetation from UAV platforms using lightweight multispectral and thermal imaging sensors, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inform. Sci. 19 (2009), pp. 193–208.
   Google Scholar
• P. Rossi, F. Mancini, M. Dubbini, F. Mazzone, and A. Capra, Combining nadir and oblique uav imagery to reconstruct quarry topography: methodology and feasibility analysis, Eur. J. Remote Sens. 50 (2017), pp. 1211–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Uysal, A.S. Toprak, and N. Polat, PHOTO REALISTIC 3D MODELING WITH UAV: GEDİK AHMET PASHA MOSQUE IN AFYONKARAHİSAR, ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci XL-5/W2 (2013), pp. 659–662.
   Google Scholar
• Z.H. Xu, L.X. Wu, S.J. Chen, and Z. Wang, Method of engineering volume monitoring and calculation for open-pit mine from UAV images, Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/J. Northeast. Univ. 37 (2016), pp. 84–88.
   Google Scholar
• M. Francioni, R. Salvini, D. Stead, R. Giovannini, S. Riccucci, C. Vanneschi, and D. Gullì, An integrated remote sensing-GIS approach for the analysis of an open pit in the Carrara marble district, Italy: slope stability assessment through kinematic and numerical methods, Comput. Geotech. 67 (2015), pp. 46–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.R.N.P. Kumar, Unlocking the potentiality of UAVs in mining industry and its Implications, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol 4 (2015), pp. 852–855.
   Google Scholar
• R. Mlambo, I.H. Woodhouse, F. Gerard, and K. Anderson, Structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry with drone data: A low cost method for monitoring greenhouse gas emissions from forests in developing countries, Forests (2017). doi:10.3390/f8030068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Dash, M.S. Watt, G.D. Pearse, M. Heaphy, and H.S. Dungey, Assessing very high resolution UAV imagery for monitoring forest health during a simulated disease outbreak, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 131 (2017), pp. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.H. Reddy, B. Kalyan, and C.S.N. Murthy, Mine rescue robot system – a review, Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 11 (2015), pp. 457–462.
   Google Scholar
• J.I.N. Wei, G.E. Hong-li, and D.U. Hua-qiang, A review on unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing and its application [J], Remote Sens. 1 (2009), pp. 88-92.
   Google Scholar
• V. Otero, V.D. Ruben, K.B. Satyanarayanaa, C. Martínez-Espinosaa, M.A.B. Fisolc, M.R.B. Ibrahimc, I. Sulong, H. Mohd-Lokman, R. Lucasd, and F. Dahdouh-Guebas, Managing mangrove forests from the sky: Forest inventory using field data and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery in the matang mangrove forest reserve, peninsular Malaysia, For. Ecol. Manage 411 (2018), pp. 35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ridge, A. Seymour, A.B. Rodriguez, J. Dale, E. Newton, and D.W. Johnston, Advancing UAS methods for monitoring coastal environments, paper presented at AGU Fall Meeting, New Orleans, Dec 11–15. (2017).
   Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, J. Hu, J. Lian, Z. Fan, X. Ouyang, and W. Ye, Seeing the forest from drones: Testing the potential of lightweight drones as a tool for long-term forest monitoring, Biol. Conserv. 198 (2016), pp. 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.R.A. Almeida, E.N. Broadbent, A.M.A. Zambrano, B.E. Wilkinson, M.E. Ferreira, R. Chazdon, P. Meli, E.B. Gorgens, C.A. Silva, S.C. Stark, R. Valbuena, D.A. Papa, and P.H.S. Brancalion, Monitoring the structure of forest restoration plantations with a drone-lidar system, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 79 (2019), pp. 192–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hern, DHL launches first commercial drone ‘parcelcopter’ delivery service, Pharmaceuticals industry. The Guardian, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• M. Moshref-Javadi and S. Lee, Using drones to minimize latency in distribution systems, 67th Annual Conference and Expo of the Institute of Industrial Engineers, Pitsburgh, PA, USA, (2017).
   Google Scholar
• M.R. Haque, M. Muhammad, D. Swarnaker, and M. Arifuzzaman Autonomous quadcopter for product home delivery, 1st International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information and Communication Technology, ICEEICT, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2014, doi: 10.1109/ICEEICT.2014.6919154.
   Google Scholar
• W.C. Chiang, Y. Li, J. Shang, and T.L. Urban, Impact of drone delivery on sustainability and cost: realizing the UAV potential through vehicle routing optimization, Appl. Energy. 242 (2019), pp. 1164–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Ackerman and E. Strickland, Medical delivery drones take flight in east Africa, IEEE Spectr. (2018). doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2018.8241731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Balasingam, Drones in medicine—The rise of the machines, Int. J. Clin. Pract (2017). doi:10.1111/ijcp.12989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Yoo, E. Yu, and J. Jung, Drone delivery: Factors affecting the public’s attitude and intention to adopt, Telemat. Informatics 6 (2018), pp. 1687–1700.
   Google Scholar
• U.T.M. NASA: Air traffic management for low-altitude drones, (2018).
   Google Scholar
• D.E. Smith, W.L. Sjogren, G.L. Tylter, G. Balmino, F.G. Lemoine, and A.S. Konopliv, The gravity field of mars: results from mars global surveyor, Science 286 (1999), pp. 94–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hassanalian, D. Rice, and A. Abdelkefi, Evolution of space drones for planetary exploration: A review, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 97 (2018), pp. 61–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Hallewas and A. Momont, TU Delft’s ambulance drone drastically increases chances of survival of cardiac arrest patients, Delft University of Technology, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• C. Wiltz, Ambulance drone could save lives, des. News, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• S. Hayat, E. Yanmaz, T.X. Brown, and C. Bettstetter, Multi-objective UAV path planning for search and rescue, Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Singapore, Singapore, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989656.
   Google Scholar
• T. Fettermann, L. Fiori, M. Bader, A. Doshi, D. Breen, K.A. Stockin, and B. Bollard, Behaviour reactions of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Sci. Rep. 8558 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44976-9
   Google Scholar
• C. Wefelscheid, R. Hänsch, and O. Hellwich, Three-dimensional building reconstruction using images obtained by unmanned aerial vehicles, ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci XXXVIII-1/C22 (2011), pp. 183–188.
   Google Scholar
• D. Roca, S. Lagüela, L. Díaz-Vilariño, J. Armesto, and P. Arias, Low-cost aerial unit for outdoor inspection of building façades, Autom. Constr 36 (2013), pp. 128–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Liu, M. Jennesse, and P. Holley, Utilizing light unmanned aerial vehicles for the inspection of curtain walls: a case study, construction research congress 2016: old and new construction technologies converge in historic San Juan. Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC, San Juan, Puerto Rico, (2016), doi: 10.1061/9780784479827.264.
   Google Scholar
• D. Kang and Y.J. Cha, Autonomous UAVs for structural health monitoring using deep learning and an ultrasonic beacon system with geo-tagging, Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng, 00 (2018), pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• C. Eschmann, C.-M. Kuo, C.-H. Kuo, and C. Boller, High-resolution multisensor infrastructure inspection with unmanned aircraft systems, ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci XL-1/W2 (2013), pp. 125–129.
   Google Scholar
• G. Morgenthal and N. Hallermann, Quality assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based visual inspection of structures, Adv. Struct. Eng (2014). doi:10.1260/1369-4332.17.3.289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Niethammer, M.R. James, S. Rothmund, J. Travelletti, and M. Joswig, UAV-based remote sensing of the super-sauze landslide: evaluation and results, Eng. Geol 128 (2012), pp. 2–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ruggles, J. Clark, K.W. Franke, D. Wolfe, B. Reimschiissel, R.A. Martin, T.J. Okeson, and J.D. Hedengren, Comparison of SfM computer vision point clouds of a landslide derived from multiple small UAV platforms and sensors to a TLS-based model, J. Unmanned Veh. Syst. 4 (2016). doi:10.1139/juvs-2015-0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Carvajal, F. Agüera, and M. Pérez, Surveying a landslide in a road embankment using unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry, ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci XXXVIII-1/C22 (2012), pp. 201–206.
   Google Scholar
• -C.-C. Liu, P.-L. Chen, T. Matsuo, and C.-Y. Chen, Rapidly responding to landslides and debris flow events using a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle, J. Appl. Remote Sens. 9 (2015). doi:10.1117/1.jrs.9.096016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Car, D.J. Kaćunić, and M.-S. Kovačević, Application of unmanned aerial vehicle for landslide mapping, International Symposium on Engineering Geodesy, Varazdin, Croatia, (2016).
   Google Scholar
• A.M. Samad, N. Kamarulzaman, M.A. Hamdani, T.A. Mastor, and K.A. Hashim. The potential of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for civilian and mapping application, proceedings. 2013 IEEE 3rd International Conference on System Engineering and Technology, ICSET, Shah Alam, Malaysia, (2013), doi: 10.1109/ICSEngT.2013.6650191.
   Google Scholar
• C.H. Hugenholtz, J. Walker, O. Brown, and S. Myshak, Earthwork volumetrics with an unmanned aerial vehicle and softcopy photogrammetry, J. Surv. Eng (2015). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.H. Kim, S.W. Kwon, S.W. Jung, S. Park, J.W. Park, and J.W. Seo, A study on generation of 3D model and mesh image of excavation work using UAV, 32nd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining: Connected to the Future, Proceedings, Oulu, Finland, (2015).
   Google Scholar
• F. Alidoost and H. Arefi, An image-based technique for 3d building reconstruction using multi-view UAV images, in international archives of the photogrammetry, Remote Sens.Spatial Infor.Sci. ISPRS Arch. XL-1/W5 (2015), pp. 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• K.P. Valavanis and G.J. Vachtsevanos, Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Handb. Unmanned Aer. Veh, 2015, Springer, Netherland, pp. 1–3022.
   Google Scholar
• W.S. Hart and N.G. Gharaibeh, Use of micro unmanned aerial vehicles in roadside condition surveys, in T and DI congress 2011: integrated transportation and development for a better tomorrow. Proceedings of the 1st Congress of the Transportation and Development Institute of ASCE, Chicago, Illinois, (2011), doi: 10.1061/41167(398)9.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Xu and Y. Turkan, Bridge inspection using bridge information modeling (BrIM) and unmanned aerial system (UAS). Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering. (2019).
   Google Scholar
• D. Wierzbicki, Application of unmanned aerial vehicles in monitoring of communication routes on country areas, Eng. Rural Dev. (2018). doi:10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N199.
   Google Scholar
• K. Kanistras, G. Martins, M.J. Rutherford, and K.P. Valavanis, Survey of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Uavs) for Traffic Monitoring, Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, 2015, Springer, Netherland.
   Google Scholar
• H. Püschel, M. Sauerbier, and H. Eisenbeiss, A 3D model of castle landenberg (CH) from combined photogrametric processing of terrestrial and UAV based images, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci, XXXVII(B6b), (2008), pp. 93-98.
   Google Scholar
• H. Yoon, J. Shin, and B.F. Spencer, Structural displacement measurement using an unmanned aerial system, Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 33 (2018), pp. 183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Scaioni, L. Barazzetti, and R. Brumana, RC-Heli and structure & motion techniques for the 3-D reconstruction of a Milan Dome spire, ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 38(5/W1), (2009), pp. 38.
   Google Scholar
• D. Bulatov, P. Solbrig, H. Gross, P. Wernerus, E. Repasi, and C. Heipke, CONTEXT-BASED URBAN TERRAIN RECONSTRUCTION FROM UAV-VIDEOS FOR GEOINFORMATION APPLICATIONS, ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci XXXVIII-1/C22 (2011), pp. 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• F. Xie, Z. Lin, D. Gui, and H. Lin, Study on construction of 3d building based on uav images, ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci XXXIX-B1 (2012), pp. 469–473.
   Google Scholar
• R. Qin, A. Gruen, and X. Huang, UAV project - Building a reality-based 3D model of the NUS (National University of Singapore) campus, 33rd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2012, ACRS 2012, Pattaya, Thailand, (2012).
   Google Scholar
• A. Gruen, X. Huang, R. Qin, T. Du, W. Fang, J. Boavida, and A. Oliveira, Joint processing of UAV imagery and terrestrial MMS data for very high resolution 3D city modeling, Gis. Science - Die Zeitschrift fur Geoinformatik, XL-1/W2, (2015), pp. 175-182.
   Google Scholar
• M. Manyoky, P. Theiler, D. Steudler, and H. Eisenbeiss, Unmanned aerial vehicle in cadastral applications. ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm, Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci XXXVIII-1/C22 (2012), pp. 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• F.J. Mesas-Carrascosa, M.D. Notario-García, M.D.N.G. de Larriva, M.S. de la Orden, and A.G.F. Porras, Validation of measurements of land plot area using UAV imagery, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 33 (2014), pp. 270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Vetrivel, M. Gerke, N. Kerle, and G. Vosselman, “Segmentation of UAV-based images incorporating 3D point cloud information,” International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, XL-3/W2, (2015) pp. 261–268.
   Google Scholar
• G.J.M. Kruijff, V. Tretyakov, T. Linder, F. Pirri, M. Gianni, E. Pianese, and S. Corrao, Rescue robots at earthquake-hit Mirandola, Italy: A field report, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics, SSRR 2012, (2012), College Station, TX, USA. doi: 10.1109/SSRR.2012.6523866.
   Google Scholar
• C. Achille, A. Adami, S. Chiarini, S. Cremonesi, F. Fassi, L. Fregonese, and L. Taffurelli, UAV-based photogrammetry and integrated technologies for architectural applications—methodological strategies for the after-quake survey of vertical structures in Mantua (Italy), Sensors (Switzerland) (2015). doi:10.3390/s150715520.
   Google Scholar
• A. Puri, A survey of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for traffic surveillance, Dep. Comput. Sci. Eng. Uni. South Florida, (2005). .
   Google Scholar
• S.M. Adams, M.L. Levitan, and C.J. Friedland, High resolution imagery collection for post-disaster studies utilizing unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 12 (2014), pp. 1161–1168.
   Google Scholar
• C.A.F. Ezequiel, M. Cua, N.C. Libatiquel, G.L. Tangonan, R. Alampay, R.T. Labuguen, C.M. Favila, J.E. Honrado, V. Canos, C. Devaney, A.B. Loreto, J. Bacusmo, and B. Palma, UAV aerial imaging applications for post-disaster assessment, environmental management and infrastructure development. International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, ICUAS 2014 , (2014), Orlando FL, USA. doi: 10.1109/ICUAS.2014.6842266.
   Google Scholar
• K.O. Said, M. Onifade, and A.I. Lawal, Computational intelligence-based models for predicting the spontaneous combustion liability of coal, Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. (2020), pp. 1–25. doi:10.1080/19392699.2020.1741558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.S. Osasan and T.B. Afeni, Review of surface mine slope monitoring techniques, J. Min. Sci. 46, 2 (2010), 10.1007/s10913-010-0023-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.D. Martin, P.K. Kaiser, D.D. Tannant, and S. Yazici, Stress path and instability around mine openings, 9th ISRM Congress, (1999). Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• C.F. Cole and R.L. Kerch, Air quality management. (1990).
   Google Scholar
• P.M.B. Pillai, Naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM V),Proc. Fifth Int. Symp. (2007) pp, 19–22. Seville, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• R. Jackisch, S. Lorenz, R. Zimmermann, R. Möckel, and R. Gloaguen, Drone-borne hyperspectral monitoring of acid mine drainage: An example from the Sokolov lignite district, Remote Sens (2018). doi:10.3390/rs10030385.
   Google Scholar
• I. Colomina and P. Molina, Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sensi. 92 (2014), pp. 79–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sayab, D. Aerden, M. Paananen, and P. Saarela, Virtual structural analysis of Jokisivu open pit using ‘structure-from-motion’ unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) photogrammetry: Implications for structurally-controlled gold deposits in Southwest Finland, Remote Sens (2018). doi:10.3390/rs10081296.
   Google Scholar
• J. Chen, K. Li, K.J. Chang, G. Sofia, and P. Tarolli, Open-pit mining geomorphic feature characterisation, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 42 (2015), pp. 76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Ruzgiene, T. Berteška, S. Gečyte, E. Jakubauskiene, and V.Č. Aksamitauskas, The surface modelling based on UAV photogrammetry and qualitative estimation, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed (2015). doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2015.04.018.
   Google Scholar
• G. Esposito, G. Mastrorocco, R. Salvini, M. Oliveti, and P. Starita, Application of UAV photogrammetry for the multi-temporal estimation of surface extent and volumetric excavation in the Sa Pigada Bianca open-pit mine, Sardinia, Italy, Environ. Earth Sci (2017). doi:10.1007/s12665-017-6409-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lee and Y. Choi, Reviews of unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) technology trends and its applications in the mining industry, Geosystem Eng. 19 (2016), pp. 197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.C. Jhariya, R. Khan, and G.S. Thakur, Impact of mining activity on water resource : an overview study, National Seminar on Recent Practices and Innovationsin Mining Industry (RPIMI,2016), Raipur, India.
   Google Scholar
• L.J. Donnelly, H. De La Cruz, I. Asmar, O. Zapata, and J.D. Perez, The monitoring and prediction of mining subsidence in the Amaga, Angelopolis, Venecia and Bolombolo Regions, Antioquia, Colombia, Eng. Geol 59 (2001), pp. 103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Huang, S.N. Goward, J.G. Masek, N. Thomas, Z. Zhu, and J.E. Vogelmann, An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks, Remote Sens. Environ. 114 (2010), pp. 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.G. Darmody, R.T. Hetzler, and F.W. Simmons, Coal mine subsidence: Effects of mitigation on crop yields, Int. J. Surf. Mining, Reclam. Environ. 59 (1992), pp. 187–190.
   Google Scholar
• H. Ren, Y. Zhao, W. Xiao, and Z. Hu, A review of UAV monitoring in mining areas: Current status and future perspectives, Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 6 (2019), pp. 320–333.
   Google Scholar
• A.C. Keatleya, P.G. Martina, K.R. Hallama, O.D. Paytona, R. Awberyb, F. Carvalhoc, J.M. Oliveirac, L. Silvac, M. Maltac, and T.B. Scotta, Source identification of uranium-containing materials at mine legacy sites in Portugal, J. Environ. Radioact. 183 (2018), pp. 102–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Bendiga, K. Yua, H. Aasena, A. Boltena, S. Bennertz, J. Broscheit, M.L. Gnypa, and G. Baretha, Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible, and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 39 (2015), pp. 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Iverson and S. Signer, Assessment and detection of loose rock hazards in underground metal mines using thermal imaging, 2014 SME Annual Meeting and Exhibit, SME 2014: Leadership in Uncertain Times, (2014). Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
   Google Scholar
• K.O. Said, M. Onifade, A.I. Lawal, and J.M. Githiria, An Artificial intelligence-based model for the prediction of spontaneous combustion liability of coal based on its proximate analysis, Combust. Sci. Technol (2020), pp. 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2020.1736577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Onifade and B. Genc, A review of spontaneous combustion studies–South African context, Int. J. Mining, Reclam. Environ 33 (2019), pp. 527–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.C. Harvey, J.V. Rowland, and K.M. Luketina, Drone with thermal infrared camera provides high resolution georeferenced imagery of the Waikite geothermal area, New Zealand, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.M. Turner, N.P. Bhagwat, L.J. Galayda, C.S. Knoll, E.A. Russell, and M.M. MacLaughlin, Geotechnical characterization of underground mine excavations from UAV-captured photogrammetric & thermal imagery, 52nd U.S. Rock Mech. Symp. Seattle, Washington, (2018).
   Google Scholar
• D. Hausamann, W. Zirnig, G. Schreier, and P. Strobl, Monitoring of gas pipelines – A civil UAV application, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 77 (2005), pp. 352–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Rossi, D. Brunelli, A. Adami, L. Lorenzelli, F. Menna, and F. Remondino, Gas-drone: Portable gas sensing system on UAVs for gas leakage localization, Proc IEEE Sens (2014). doi:10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• W. Xiao, J. Chen, H. Da, H. Ren, J. Zhang, and L. Zhang, Inversion and analysis of maize biomass in coal mining subsidence area based on UAV images, Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions Chinese Soc. Agric. Mach. 8 (2018), pp. 169–180.
   Google Scholar
• D.V. Beregovoi, J.A. Younes, and M.G. Mustafin, Monitoring of quarry slope deformations with the use of satellite positioning technology and unmanned aerial vehicles, Procedia Eng. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• N. Ngadiman, I.A. Badrulhissham, M. Mohamad, N. Azhari, M. Kaamin, and N.B. Hamid, Monitoring slope condition using UAV technology, Civ. Eng. Archit. 7, 6 (2019), pp. 1–6. doi:10.13189/cea.2019.071401.
   Google Scholar
• S. Wang, Z. Ahmed, M.Z. Hashmi, and W. Pengyu, Cliff face rock slope stability analysis based on unmanned arial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry, Geomech. Geophys. Geo-Energy Geo-Res 5 (2019), pp. 333–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Hu, C. Chen, W. Xiao, X. Wang, and M. Gao, Surface movement and deformation characteristics due to high-intensive coal mining in the windy and sandy region, Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 3 (2016), pp. 339–348.
   Google Scholar
• W. Xiao, Z. Hu, and Y. Fu, Zoning of land reclamation in coal mining area and new progresses for the past 10 years, Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol 1 (2014), pp. 177–183.
   Google Scholar
• T.G. Whiteside and R.E. Bartolo, A robust object-based woody cover extraction technique for monitoring mine site revegetation at scale in the monsoonal tropics using multispectral RPAS imagery from different sensors, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 73 (2018), pp. 300–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Johansen, P.D. Erskine, and M.F. McCabe, Using unmanned aerial vehicles to assess the rehabilitation performance of open cut coal mines, J. Clean. Prod (2019). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Padró, V. Carabassa, J. Balagué, L. Brotons, J.M. Alcañiz, and X. Pons, Monitoring opencast mine restorations using Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) imagery, Sci. Total Environ. 657 (2019), pp. 1602–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Pajares, Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing (2015). doi:10.14358/PERS.81.4.281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rauhala, A. Tuomela, C. Davids, and P.M. Rossi, UAV remote sensing surveillance of a mine tailings impoundment in Sub-Arctic conditions, Remote Sens 9 (2017), pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• P.G. Martin, O.D. Payton, J.S. Fardoulis, D.A. Richards, and T.B. Scott, The use of unmanned aerial systems for the mapping of legacy uranium mines, J, Environ. Radioact. 143 (2015), pp. 135–140. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Suh and Y. Choi, Mapping hazardous mining-induced sinkhole subsidence using unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) photogrammetry, Environ. Earth Sci (2017). doi:10.1007/s12665-017-6458-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Stumpf, J.P. Malet, P. Allemand, and P. Ulrich, Surface reconstruction and landslide displacement measurements with Pléiades satellite images, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 95 (2014), pp. 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Tong, et al., Integration of UAV-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for the three-dimensional mapping and monitoring of open-pit mine areas, Remote Sens. 7 (2015), pp. 6635–6662.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Fernández-Guisuraga, E. Sanz-Ablanedo, S. Suárez-Seoane, and L. Calvo, Using unmanned aerial vehicles in postfire vegetation survey campaigns through large and heterogeneous areas: opportunities and challenges, Sensors (Switzerland) (2018). doi:10.3390/s18020586.
   Google Scholar
• L. Wallace, A. Lucieer, Z. Malenovskỳ, D. Turner, and P. Vopěnka, Assessment of forest structure using two UAV techniques: A comparison of airborne laser scanning and structure from motion (SfM) point clouds, Forests (2016). doi:10.3390/f7030062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Salach, K. Bakula, M. Pilarska, W. Ostrowski, K. Górski, and Z. Kurczynski, Accuracy assessment of point clouds from LidaR and dense image matching acquired using the UAV platform for DTM creation, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information. 7 (2018), pp. 342–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The fleye drone could be the safest flying robot at CES|engadget. Available at https://www.engadget.com
   Google Scholar
• Flybotix–professional portable drone. Available at https://flybotix.com/
   Google Scholar
• Fleye|Home. Available at https://www.gofleye.com/(accessed on 27 September 2019
   Google Scholar
• H. Shakhatreh, et al., Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): a survey on civil applications and key research challenges, IEEE Access. 7(2019),48572–48634. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, Y.H. Nam, and M. Debbah, A tutorial on UAVs for wireless networks: applications, challenges, and open problems, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials. (2019). doi:10.1109/COMST.2019.2902862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar