Potential efficacy and application of a new statistical meta based-model to predict TBM performance

References

• Y.L. Zheng, Q.B. Zhang, and J. Zhao, Challenges and opportunities of using tunnel boring machines in mining, Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 57 (2016), pp. 287–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cigla, S. Yagiz, and L. Ozdemir, Application of tunnel boring machines in underground mine development. In: International Mining Congress, Ankara, Turkey, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• L. Home and O.G. Askilsrud, Tunnel boring machines in mining, in SME Mining Engineering Handbook, P. Darling, ed., third, SME, USA, 2011, pp. 1255–1270.
   Google Scholar
• D. Brox, Technical considerations for the application of TBMs for mining projects, Trans. Soc. Mining Metall. Explor. 334 (2013), pp. 498–505.
   Google Scholar
• J. Rostami and L. Ozdemir. A new model for performance prediction of hard rock TBM, in Proceedings of RETC, L.D. Bowerman, ed.. Boston, MA, 1993, 793–809.
   Google Scholar
• N. Barton, TBM Tunneling in Jointed and Faulted Rock, Balkema, Brookfield, 2000, pp. 173.
   Google Scholar
• S. Yagiz , Development of rock fracture and brittleness indices to quantify the effects of rock mass features and toughness in the CSM Model basic penetration for hard rock tunneling machines. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mining and Earth Systems Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA, 2002, pp. 289.
   Google Scholar
• S. Yagiz. TBM performance prediction based on rock properties, in EUROCK’06—Multiphysics Coupling and Long Term Behavior in Rock Mechanics, Cotthem, ed., Liege, Belgium, 2006, pp. 663–670.
   Google Scholar
• S. Yagiz, Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 23 (2008), pp. 326–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yagiz and H. Karahan, Prediction of hard rock TBM penetration rate using particle swarm optimization, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 48 (2011), pp. 427–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yagiz and H. Karahan, Application of various optimization techniques and comparison of their performances for predicting TBM penetration rate in rock mass, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 80 (2015), pp. 308–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Ozdemir, Development of theoretical equations for predicting tunnel borability. Ph.D. Thesis, T-1969, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• O.T. Blindheim, Boreabilty predictions for tunneling. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of geological engineering. The Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1979, pp. 406.
   Google Scholar
• D.F. Howarth, W.R. Adamson, and R.J. Berndt, Correlation of model tunnel boring and drilling machine performances with rock properties, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 23 (1986), pp. 171–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Cassinelli, S. Cina, N. Innaurato, R. Mancini, and A. Sampaolo, Power consumption and metal wear in tunnel-boring machines: Analysis of tunnel boring machine operation in hard rock, Tunneling 82 (1982), pp. 73–81.
   Google Scholar
• U. Aeberli and H. Wanner, On the influence of geologic conditions at the application of tunnel boring machines. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Cong., Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol., Madrid, section III, 2, Madrid, Spain, (1978), pp. 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• H.P. Sanio, Prediction of the performance of disc cutters in anisotropy rocks, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 22 (1985), pp. 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Tarkoy, Rock hardness index properties and geotechnical parameters for predicting tunnel boring machine performance. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1975, pp. 326.
   Google Scholar
• P. Graham, Rock exploration for machine manufacturers, in Exploration for Rock Engineering, Z.T. Bieniawski, ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, 1976, pp. 173–180.
   Google Scholar
• I. Farmer and N. Glossop, Mechanics of disc cutter penetration, Tunn Tunn 12 (1980), pp. 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• W. Bamford, Rock test indices are being successfully correlated with tunnel boring machine performance. In: Proceedings of the 5th Australian tunneling conference, Melbourne, Australian, 1984, pp 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• J. Rostami, Development of a force estimation model for rock fragmentation with disc cutters through theoretical and physical measurement of crushed zone pressure. Ph.D Dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bruland, Hard rock tunnel boring, Ph.D. Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• G. Dollinger, H. Handewith, and C. Breeds, Use of the punch test for estimating TBM performance, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 13 (1998), pp. 403–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sapigni, M. Berti, E. Bethaz, A. Busillo, and G. Cardone, TBM performance estimation using rock mass classifications, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39 (2002), pp. 771–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Ribacchi and A.L. Fazio, Influence of rock mass parameters on the performance of a TBM in a gneissic formation (Varzo Tunnel), Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 38 (2005), pp. 105–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hassanpour, J. Rostami, M. Khamehchiyan, and A. Bruland, Developing new equations for TBM performance prediction in carbonate-argillaceous rocks: A case history of Nowsood water conveyance tunnel, GeoMech. GeoEng. Int. J. 4 (2009), pp. 287–297.
   Google Scholar
• K. Gehring, The influence of TBM design and machine features on performance and tool wear in rock, Der Einfluss Von TBM-Konstruktion Und Maschineneigenschaften Auf Leistung Und Werkzeugverbrauch in Gestein Geomech Tunnel 2 (2009), pp. 140–155.
   Google Scholar
• J.K. Hamidi, K. Shahriar, B. Rezai, and J. Rostami, Performance prediction of hard rock TBM using rock mass rating (RMR) system, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 25 (2010), pp. 333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hassanpour, J. Rostami, and J. Zhao, A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for project planning, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 26 (2011), pp. 595–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Farrokh, J. Rostami, and C. Laughton, Study of various models for estimation of penetration rate of hard rock TBMs, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 30 (2012), pp. 110–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Moradi and M.A.E. Farsangi, Application of the risk matrix method for geotechnical risk analysis and prediction of the advance rate in rock TBM tunneling, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (2014), pp. 1951–1960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Jahed Armaghani, E.T. Mohamad, M.S. Narayanasamy, et al, Development of hybrid intelligent models for predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 63 (2017), pp. 9–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Jahed Armaghani, R.S. Faradonbeh, E. Momeni, et al., Performance prediction of tunnel boring machine through developing a gene expression programming equation, Eng. Comput. (2017), doi:10.1007/s00366-017-0526-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Koopialipoor, H. Tootoonchi, D. Jahed Armaghani, et al., Application of deep neural networks in predicting the penetration rate of tunnel boring machines, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 78 (2019c), pp. 6347–6360. doi:10.1007/s10064-019-01538-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Xu, J. Zhou, G.P. Asteris, et al, Supervised machine learning techniques to the prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate, Appl. Sci. 9 (2019), pp. 3715.
   Google Scholar
• J. Zhou, J.Y. Qiu, S. Zhu, D.J. Armaghani, M. Khandelwal, and E.T. Mohamad, Estimation of the TBM advance rate under hard rock conditions using XGBoost and Bayesian optimization, Underground Space (2020). doi:10.1016/j.undsp.2020.05.008.
   Google Scholar
• J. Zhou, B.Y. Bejarbaneh, D.J. Armaghani, et al, Forecasting of TBM advance rate in hard rock condition based on artificial neural network and genetic programming techniques, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 79 (2020), pp. 2069–2084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Grima, P. Bruines, and P. Verhoef, Modeling tunnel boring machine performance by neuro-fuzzy methods, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 15 (2000), pp. 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Benardos and D. Kaliampakos, A methodology for assessing geotechnical hazards for TBM tunnelling—illustrated by the Athens Metro, Greece, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 41 (2004), pp. 987–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Benardos and D. Kaliampakos, Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 19 (2004), pp. 597–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Zhao, Q. Gong, Y. Zhang, and J. Zhao, Prediction model of tunnel boring machine performance by ensemble neural networks, GeoMech. GeoEng. Int. J. 2 (2007), pp. 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• O. Acaroglu, L. Ozdemir, and B. Asbury, A fuzzy logic model to predict specific energy requirement for TBM performance prediction, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 23 (2008), pp. 600–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yagiz, Assessment of brittleness using rock strength and density with punch penetration test, Tunn. Undergr. Sp Technol. 24 (2009), pp. 66–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Torabi, H. Shirazi, H. Hajali, and M. Monjezi, Study of the influence of geotechnical parameters on the TBM performance in Tehran-Shomal highway project using ANN and SPSS, Arab. J. Geosci. 6 (2013), pp. 1215–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mahdevari, K. Shahriar, S. Yagiz, and M.A. Shirazi, A support vector regression model for predicting tunnel boring machine penetration rates, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 72 (2014), pp. 214–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Ghasemi, S. Yagiz, and M. Ataei, Predicting penetration rate of hard rock tunnel boring machine using fuzzy logic, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 73 (2014), pp. 23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Salimia, C. Moormanna, T. Singh, and P. Jainc, TBM performance prediction in rock tunneling using various artificial intelligence algorithms. In: 11th Iranian and 2nd regional tunnelling conference Iran, Tehran, Iran, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• A. Salimi, J. Rostami, and C. Moormann, Application of rock mass classification systems for performance estimation of rock TBMs using regression tree and artificial intelligence algorithms, Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 92 (2019), pp. 103046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Jahed Armaghani, M. Koopialipoor, A. Marto, and S. Yagiz, Application of several optimization techniques for estimating TBM advance rate in granitic rocks, J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 11 (2019), pp. 779–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Shi, L. Zhang, W. Sun, and X. Song, A fuzzy c-means algorithm guided by attribute correlations and its application in the big data analysis of tunnel boring machine, Knowledge Based Syst. 182 (2019), pp. 104859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.C. Adoko, C. Gokceoglu, and S. Yagiz, Bayesian prediction of TBM penetration rate in rock mass, Eng. Geol. 226 (2017), pp. 245–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yagiz, New equations for predicting the field penetration index of tunnel boring machines in fractured rock mass, Arabian J. Geosci. 10 (2017), pp. 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yagiz, C. Gokceoglu, E. Sezer, and S. Iplikci, Application of two non-linear prediction tools to the estimation of tunnel boring machine performance, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 22 (2009), pp. 808–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zare Naghadehi, M. Samaei, M. Ranjbarnia, and V. Nourani, State-of-the-art predictive modeling of TBM performance in changing geological conditions through gene expression programming, Measurement 126 (2018), pp. 46–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Gholamnejad and N. Tayarani, Application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate, Min. Sci. Technol. 20 (2010), pp. 727–733.
   Google Scholar
• K. Oraee, M.T. Khorami, and N. Hosseini, Prediction of the penetration rate of TBM using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (anfis). In: Proceeding of SME Annual Meeting & Exhibit, From the Mine to the Market, Now It’s Global, Seattle, WA, USA, 2012, pp. 297–302.
   Google Scholar
• J. Zhou, E. Li, F. Gong, M. Wang, and Q. Qiao, Development of random forests and Cubist models for predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition. In: The 15th Annual Meeting of Chinese rock mechanics and Engineering (China Rock 2018). Beijing, China, 2018, pp. 10.
   Google Scholar
• B. Keshtegar, M.F. Allawi, H.A. Afan, and A. El-Shafie, Optimized river stream-flow forecasting model utilizing high-order response surface method, Water Resour. Manage. 30 (2016), pp. 3899–3914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Keshtegar, Limited conjugate gradient method for structural reliability analysis, Eng. Comput. 33 (2017), pp. 621–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Keshtegar, B. Mansour, C.W. Fei, C. Lu, O. Taylan, and D.C. Thai, Multi-extremum-modified response basis model for nonlinear response prediction of dynamic turbine blisk, Eng. Comput. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01273-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xiao, J. Zhang, and L. Gao, A system active learning Kriging method for system reliability-based design optimization with a multiple response model, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 199 (2020), pp. 106935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.P. Zhu, B. Keshtegar, S. Chakraborty, and N.T. Trung, Novel probabilistic model for searching most probable point in structural reliability analysis, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 366 (2020), pp. 113027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, L. Gao, and M. Xiao, Maximizing natural frequencies of inhomogeneous cellular structures by Kriging-assisted multiscale topology optimization, Comput. Struct. 230 (2020), pp. 106197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, M. Xiao, L. Gao, and S. Chu, A combined projection-outline-based active learning Kriging and adaptive importance sampling method for hybrid reliability analysis with small failure probabilities, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 344 (2019), pp. 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Gao, M. Xiao, X. Shao, P. Jiang, L. Nie, and H. Qiu, Analysis of gene expression programming for approximation in engineering design, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 46 (2012), pp. 399–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.P. Zhu, B. Keshtegar, K. Tian, and N.T. Trung, Optimization of load-carrying hierarchical stiffened shells: Comparative survey and applications of six hybrid heuristic models, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09528-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Friedman, Multivariate adaptive regression splines, Ann. Stat. (1991), pp. 1–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, M. Xiao, and L. Gao, A new method for reliability analysis of structures with mixed random and convex variables, Appl. Math. Model. 70 (2019), pp. 206–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zhang and A.T.C. Goh, Multivariate adaptive regression splines for analysis of geotechnical engineering systems, Comput. Geotech. 48 (2013), pp. 82–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Xiu and G.E. Karniadakis, The Wiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24 (2002), pp. 619–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.W. Fei, H. Li, H.-T. Liu, C. Lu, and B. Keshtegar, Multilevel nested reliability-based design optimization with hybrid intelligent regression for operating assembly relationship, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 103 (2020), pp. 105906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, M. Xiao, L. Gao, and S. Chu, Probability and interval hybrid reliability analysis based on adaptive local approximation of projection outlines using support vector machine, Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 34 (2019), pp. 991–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Wiener, The homogeneous chaos, Am. J. Math. 60 (1938), pp. 897–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wang, G. Huang, B. Baetz, and W. Huang, A polynomial chaos ensemble hydrologic prediction system for efficient parameter inference and robust uncertainty assessment, J. Hydrol. 530 (2015), pp. 716–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Lasota, R. Stocki, P. Tauzowski, and T. Szolc, Polynomial chaos expansion method in estimating probability distribution of rotor-shaft dynamic responses, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 63 (2015), pp. 413–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Blatman and B. Sudret, An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis, Probab. Eng. Mech. 25 (2010), pp. 183–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. He, S.P. Zhu, D. Liao, and X.P. Niu, Probabilistic fatigue assessment of notched components under size effect using critical distance theory, Eng. Fract. Mech. 103 (2020), pp. 107150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Keshtegar, D. Meng, M.E.A. Ben Seghier, M. Xiao, N.T. Trung, and D.T. Bui, A hybrid sufficient performance measure approach to improve robustness and efficiency of reliability-based design optimization, Eng. Comput. (2020). doi:10.1007/s00366-019-00907-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Jahed Armaghani, P.G. Asteris, S.A. Fatemi, M. Hasanipanah, et al, On the use of neuro-swarm system to forecast the pile settlement, Appl. Sci. 10(2020) (1904). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10061904
   Google Scholar
• D. Jahed Armaghani and P.G. Asteris, A comparative study of ANN and ANFIS models for the prediction of cement-based mortar materials compressive strength, Neural. Comput. Applic. (2020). doi:10.1007/s00521-020-05244-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhou, X. Li, and X. Shi, Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines, Saf. Sci. 50, 4 (2012), pp. 629–644. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhou, X. Li, and H.S. Mitri, Comparative performance of six supervised learning methods for the development of models of hard rock pillar stability prediction, Nat. Hazards 79 (2015), pp. 291–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhou, X. Li, and H.S. Mitri, Classification of rockburst in underground projects: Comparison of ten supervised learning methods, J. Comput. Civil Eng. 30, 5 (2016), pp. 04016003. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhou, X. Li, and H.S. Mitri, Evaluation method of rockburst: State-of-the-art literature review, Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 81 (2018), pp. 632–659. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Nikafshan Rad, M. Hasanipanah, M. Rezaei, and A.L. Eghlim, Developing a least squares support vector machine for estimating the blast-induced flyrock, Eng. Comput. 34 (2019), pp. 709–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhou, E. Li, S. Yang, M. Wang, X. Shi, S. Yao, and H.S. Mitri, Slope stability prediction for circular mode failure using gradient boosting machine approach based on an updated database of case histories, Saf. Sci. 118 (2019), pp. 505–518. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Huang, T. Duan, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Zhang, and Y. Lei, Predicting the permeability of pervious concrete based on the beetle antennae search algorithm and random forest model, Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020 (2020), pp. 8863181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hasanipanah, B. Keshtegar, D.K. Thai, and N.T. Troung, An ANN-adaptive dynamical harmony search algorithm to approximate the flyrock resulting from blasting, Eng. Comput. (2020). doi:10.1007/s00366-020-01105-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Sun, Y. G. Li, and J. Zhang, Developing hybrid machine learning models for estimating the unconfined compressive strength of jet grouting composite: A comparative study, Appl. Sci. 10 (2020), pp. 1612.
   Google Scholar
• M. Hasanipanah, W. Zhang, D.J. Armaghani, and H.N. Rad, The potential application of a new intelligent based approach in predicting the tensile strength of rock, IEEE Access 8 (2020), pp. 57148–57157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hasanipanah and H.B. Amnieh, Developing a new uncertain rule-based fuzzy approach for evaluating the blast-induced backbreak, Eng. Comput. (2020). doi:10.1007/s00366-019-00919-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xiao, J. Zhang, L. Gao, S. Lee, and A.T. Eshghi, An efficient Kriging-based subset simulation method for hybrid reliability analysis under random and interval variables with small failure probability, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 59 (2019), pp. 2077–2092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.J. Willmott, On the validation of models, Phys. Geogr. 2 (1981), pp. 184–194.
   Google Scholar
• J.E. Nash and J.V. Sutcliffe, River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol. 10 (1970), pp. 282–290.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Yang and O. Zang, A hierarchical analysis for rock engineering using artificial neural networks, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 30 (1997), pp. 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar