Exploring the capabilities of portable device photogrammetry for 3D surface roughness evaluation

References

• J.P. Monticeli Roughness characterization of discontinuity sets by profilometer and scanner images, ISRM Regional Symposium-8th South American Congress on Rock Mechanics, Buenos Aires, Argentina, OnePetro, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• V.P. Cantarella, JRC estimation with 3D laser scanner images – SBMR 2016, Brazilian Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• N. Fardin, Q. Feng, and O. Stephansson, Application of a new in situ 3D laser scanner to study the scale effect on the rock joint surface roughness, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 41 (2) (2004), pp. 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00111-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Luetzenburg, A. Kroon, and A.A. Bjørk, Evaluation of the Apple iPhone 12 Pro LiDAR for an application in geosciences, Sci. Rep. 11 (1) (2021), pp. 22221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01763-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.A. Asmare, L.D. Stetler, and Z.J. Hladysz, A New Method for Estimating 3D Rock Discontinuity Roughness from a Terrestrial LiDAR Data using Slope Angles of Triangular Facets, 48th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• J. Sirkiä, Photogrammetric calculation of JRC for rock slope support design, Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Luleå, Sweden, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• P. An, K. Fang, Q. Jiang, H. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, et al., Measurement of rock joint surfaces by using smartphone structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry, sensors 21 (3) (2021), pp. 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.B.V. choubey, The Shear Strength of Rock Joints in Theory and Practice, Rock Mech. 10 (1–2) (1977), pp. 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261801.
   Google Scholar
• A.J. Beer and J.S. Coggan, Technical note estimation of the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) by visual comparison, Rock Mech. Rock Eng 35 (1) (2002), pp. 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006030200009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Weissbach, A new method for the determination of the roughness of rock joints in the laboratory, Int. J. Rock Mech. Rock Eng 15 (3) (1978), pp. 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)90007-4.
   Google Scholar
• P. Alameda-Hernández, J. Jiménez-Perálvarez, J.A. Palenzuela, R. El Hamdouni, C. Irigaray, M.A. Cabrerizo, and J. Chacón, Improvement of the JRC calculation using different parameters obtained through a new survey method applied to rock discontinuities, Rock Mech. Rock Eng 47 (6) (2014), pp. 2047–2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0532-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Tse and D. Cruden, Estimating joint roughness coefficients, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 16 (5) (1979), pp. 303–307. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)90241-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.H. Maerz, J.A. Franklin, and C.P. Bennett, Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 27 (5) (1990), pp. 329–343. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(90)92708-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.S. Tatone and G. Grasselli, A new 2D discontinuity roughness parameter and its correlation with JRC, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 47 (8) (2010), pp. 1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bao, Geometrical heterogeneity of the joint roughness coefficient revealed by 3D laser scanning, Eng. Geol. 265 (2020), pp. 105415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.-C. Xia, New Peak Shear Strength Criterion of Rock Joints Based on Quantified Surface Description, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (2) (2013), pp. 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0395-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Heinze, S. Frank, and S. Wohnlich, FSAT – A fracture surface analysis toolbox in MATLAB to compare 2D and 3D surface measures, Comput. Geotech. 132 (2021), pp. 103997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Grasselli, P. Egger, Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40 (1)(2003), pp. 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00101-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.S. Tatone, Quantitative Characterization of Natural Rock Discontinuity Roughness In-situ and in the Laboratory, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Q. Jiang, B. Yang, F. Yan, C. Liu, Y. Shi, L. Li, New Method for Characterizing the Shear Damage of Natural Rock Joint Based on 3D Engraving and 3D Scanning, Int. J. Geomech. 20 (2), (2020), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Jiang, Y. Yang, F. Yan, J. Zhou, S. Li, B. Yang, and H. Zheng, et al., Deformation and failure behaviours of rock-concrete interfaces with natural morphology under shear testing, Constr. Build. Mater. 293 (2021), pp. 123468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Aubertin and D.J. Hutchinson, Scale-dependent rock surface characterization using LiDAR surveys, Eng. Geol. 301 (2022), pp. 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Lato, M.S. Diederichs, D.J. Hutchinson, and R. Harrap, et al., Optimization of LiDAR scanning and processing for automated structural evaluation of discontinuities in rockmasses, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 46 (1) (2009), pp. 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Westoby, S.A. Dunning, J. Woodward, A.S. Hein, S.M. Marrero, K. Winter, and D.E. Sugden, Interannual surface evolution of an Antarctic blue-ice moraine using multi-temporal DEMs, Earth Surf. Dynam. 4 (2) (2016), pp. 515–529. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-515-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kingsland, Comparative analysis of digital photogrammetry software for cultural heritage, Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Heritage 18 (2020), pp. e00157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00157.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Han, S. Wang, D. Gong, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, and X. Ma, State of the art in digital surface modelling from multi-view high-resolution satellite images, ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2 (2020), pp. 351–356. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-351-2020.
   Google Scholar
• A. Corradetti, T. Seers, M. Mercuri, C. Calligaris, A. Busetti, and L. Zini, et al., Benchmarking different SfM-MVS photogrammetric and iOS LiDAR acquisition methods for the digital preservation of a short-lived excavation: A case study from an area of sinkhole related subsidence, Remote Sens. 14 (20) (2022), pp. 5187. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205187.
   Google Scholar
• S. Tavani, A. Billi, A. Corradetti, M. Mercuri, A. Bosman, M. Cuffaro, T. Seers, and E. Carminati, et al., Smartphone assisted fieldwork: Towards the digital transition of geoscience fieldwork using LiDAR-equipped iPhones, Earth-Sci. Rev. 227 (2022), pp. 2022. 227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Micheletti, J.H. Chandler, and S.N. Lane, Investigating the geomorphological potential of freely available and accessible structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry using a smartphone, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 40 (4) (2015), pp. 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Jaud, M. Kervot, C. Delacourt, and S. Bertin, et al., Potential of smartphone SfM photogrammetry to measure coastal morphodynamics, Remote Sens. 11 (19) (2019), pp. 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192242.
   Google Scholar
• P. An, K. Fang, Y. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and Y. Yang, et al., Assessment of the trueness and precision of smartphone photogrammetry for rock joint roughness measurement, measurement 188 (2022), pp. 110598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Fang, J. Zhang, H. Tang, X. Hu, H. Yuan, X. Wang, P. An, and B. Ding, et al., A quick and low-cost smartphone photogrammetry method for obtaining 3D particle size and shape, Eng. Geol. 322 (2023), pp. 107170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Fang, P. An, H. Tang, J. Tu, S. Jia, M. Miao, and A. Dong, et al., Application of a multi-smartphone measurement system in slope model tests, Eng. Geol. 295 (2021), pp. 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Fang et al, Comprehensive assessment of the performance of a multismartphone measurement system for landslide model test, Landslides. 20 (2023), pp. 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-02009-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.N. Gillihan. Accuracy Comparisons of iPhone 12 Pro LiDAR Outputs, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, United States, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Ge, K. Chen, G. Liu, Y. Zhang, and H. Tang, et al., A low-cost approach for the estimation of rock joint roughness using photogrammetry, Eng. Geol. 305 (2022), pp. 106726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Paixão, J. Muralha, R. Resende, and E. Fortunato, Close-range photogrammetry for 3D rock joint roughness evaluation, Rock Mech. Rock Eng 55 (6) (2022), pp. 3213–3233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02789-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Lague, N. Brodu, and J. Leroux, Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (NZ), ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 82 (2013), pp. 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Zahs, L. Winiwarter, K. Anders, J.G. Williams, M. Rutzinger, and B. Höfle, et al., Correspondence-drivenplane-based M3C2 for lower uncertainty in 3D topographic change quantification, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 183 (2022), pp. 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Beer, J.M. Turowski, and J.W. Kirchner, Spatial patterns of erosion in a bedrock gorge, J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 122 (1) (2017), pp. 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF003850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Zahs, M. Hämmerle, K. Anders, S. Hecht, R. Sailer, M. Rutzinger, J.G. Williams, and B. Höfle, Multi‐temporal 3D point cloud‐based quantification and analysis of geomorphological activity at an alpine rock glacier using airborne and terrestrial LiDAR, Permafr. Periglac. Process. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Spreafico, F. Chiabrando, L. Teppati Losè, and F. Giulio Tonolo, The ipad pro built-in lidar sensor: 3d rapid mapping tests and quality assessment, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 43 (2021), pp. 63–69. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2021-63-2021.
   Google Scholar
• P. Chase, K. Clarke, A. Hawkes, S. Jabari, and J. Jakus, Apple IPhone 13 Pro Lidar Accuracy Assessment for Engineering Applications, Transforming Construction with Reality Capture Technologies: The Digital Reality of Tomorrow, August 23–25, 2022, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 2022. https://doi.org/10.57922/tcrc.645
   Google Scholar
• L.-P. Gelinas, Advanced geotechnical monitoring technology to assess ground support effectiveness, Ground Support 2019: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Perth, WA, Australia, 2019. pp. 59–74. https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1925_02_Gelinas.
   Google Scholar
• R. Eker, 3d Modelling of a Historic Windmill: Ppk-Aided Terrestrial Photogrammetry Vs Smartphone App. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLIII-B2-2022 (2022), pp. 787–792. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-787-2022.
   Google Scholar
• G. Grasselli, J. Wirth, and P. Egger, Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39 (6) (2002), pp. 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00070-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.-S. Jang, S.-S. Kang, and B.-A. Jang, Determination of Joint Roughness Coefficients Using Roughness Parameters, Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (6) (2014), pp. 2061–2073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0535-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Barton, Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints, Eng. Geol. 7 (4) (1973), pp. 287–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(73)90013-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Song, Q. Jiang, L.-F. Li, C. Liu, X.-P. Liu, and J. Xiong, An enhanced index for evaluating natural joint roughness considering multiple morphological factors affecting the shear behavior, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ 79 (4) (2020), pp. 2037–2057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01700-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Babanouri and S. Karimi Nasab, Proposing Triangulation-Based Measures for Rock Fracture Roughness, Rock Mech. Rock Eng 50 (4) (2016), pp. 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1139-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Ban, W. Du, C. Qi, and C. Zhu, et al., Modified 2D roughness parameters for rock joints at two different scales and their correlation with JRC, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 137 (2021), pp. 104549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Chen, A Simplified form of Grasselli’s 3D Roughness Measure θ*max/(C + 1), Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 54 (8) (2021), pp. 4329–4346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02512-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Chen, The physical meaning of Grasselli’s morphology parameters and its correlations with several other 2D fracture roughness parameters, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 145 (2021), pp. 104854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS), ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 81 (2015), pp. A1–A26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Zhang, A simulation study on stress-seepage characteristics of 3D rough single fracture based on fluid-structure interaction, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 211 (2022), pp. 110215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar