3,795
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical Studies

Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts

, ORCID Icon, &
Article: 1444887 | Accepted 20 Feb 2018, Published online: 13 Mar 2018

References

  • Ayling, R., & Mewse, A. J. (2009). Evaluating internet interviews with gay men. Qualitative Health Research, 19(4), 566–10.
  • Botha, A., Makitla, I., Ford, M., Fogwill, T., Seetharam, D., CAbouchabki, C., … Oguneye, O. (2010). The mobile phone in Africa: Providing services to the masses. Paper presented at the Science real and relevant conference, South Africa. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from http://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/bitstream/10204/4246/1/Botha_d1_2010.pdf
  • British Psychological Society. (2017). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. Leicester, UK. Retrieved January 15th, 2018 from http://beta.bps.org.uk/sites/beta.bps.org.uk/files/Policy%20-%20Files/Ethics%20Guidelines%20for%20Internet-mediated%20Research%20%282017%29.pdf
  • Chiumento, A., Rahman, A., Machin, L., & Frith, L. (2017). Mediated research encounters: Methodological considerations in cross-language qualitative interviews. Qualitative Research, Online Early View, 1–19. doi:10.1177/1468794117730121
  • Clifford, J. (1997). Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603–616.
  • Ess, C., & The Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR). (2004). Ethical decision-making and internet research. Retrieved April 28, 2016, from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
  • Ferrante, J. M., Friedman, A., Shaw, E. K., Howard, J., Cohen, D. J., & Shahidi, L. (2015). Lessons learned designing and using an online discussion forum for care coordinators in primary care. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1851–1861.
  • Frisoli, P. S. J. (2010). Assumptions, Emotions, and Interpretations as ethical moments: Navigating a small-scale cross-cultural online interviewing study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 23(4), 393–405.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin, 1990.
  • Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “Ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
  • Hanna, P. (2012). Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: A research note. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 239–242.
  • Hine, C. (2004). Social research methods and the Internet: A thematic review. Sociological Research Online, 9(2), 10–17.
  • Hine, C. (2012). The internet: Understanding qualitative research. [Electronic book]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Holt, A. (2010). Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 113–121.
  • James, N., & Busher, H. (2009). Online interviewing. [Electronic book]. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: Sage.
  • Janghorban, R., Roudsari, R. L., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9(1), 1–3.
  • Karray, A., Coq, J.-M., & Bouteyre, E. (2017). Delivering online clinical interviews with NGO workers in humanitarian and cross-cultural contexts. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 6(2), 115–131.
  • Kovats-Bernat, J. (2002). Negotiating dangerous fields: Pragmatic strategies for fieldwork amid violence and terror. American Anthropologist, (1), 208–222.
  • Markham, A. (2004). The internet as research context. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 328–344). London: Sage Publications.
  • The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research. (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (The Belmont Report). Retrieved December 12, 2017, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
  • O’Connor, H., Madge, C., & Shaw, R. (2008). Internet-based interviewing. In N. Fielding, N. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The Sage handbook of online research methods (pp. 271–289). London: Sage.
  • Rapley, T. (2007). Interviews. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 15–34). London: Sage Publications.
  • Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Salmons, J. (2015). Qualitative online interviews: Strategies, design and skills (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Saumure, K., & Given, L. (n.d.). Using skype as a research tool: Lessons learned from qualitative interviews with distance students in a teacher-librarianship program. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from http://lrsv.umd.edu/abstracts/Saumure_Given.pdf
  • Schutz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, 533–576.
  • Seitz, S. (2016). Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: A research note. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 229–235.
  • Snee, H., Hine, C., Morey, Y., Roberts, S., & Watson, H. (Eds.). (2016). Digital methods for social science: An interdisciplinary guide to research innovation. [Electronic book]. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sullivan, J. R. (2012). Skype: An appropriate method of data collection for qualitative interviews? The Hilltop Review, 6(1), 54–60.
  • Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.