1,571
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical Studies

Experiences and perceptions about undergoing mammographic screening: a qualitative study involving women from a county in Sweden

, , &
Article: 1521256 | Accepted 27 Aug 2018, Published online: 14 Sep 2018

References

  • Achat, H., Close, G., & Taylor, R. (2005). Who has regular mammograms? Effects of knowledge, beliefs, socioeconomic status, and health-related factors. Preventive Medicine, 41(1), 312–10.
  • Borda, A., Sanz, B., Otero, L., Blasco, T., García-Gómez, F. J., & Andrés, D. F. (2011). Tiempo de viaje y participación en el cribado del cáncer de mama en una región de alta dispersión poblacional [Travel time and participation in breast cancer screening in a region with high population dispersion]. Gaceta Sanitaria, 25(2), 151–156.
  • Brustrom, J. E., & Hunter, D. C. (2001). Going the distance: How far will women travel to undergo free mammography? Military Medicine, 166(4), 347–349.
  • Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M. (2007). European strategies for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up, Part 2. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
  • Deandrea, S., Molina-Barceló, A., Uluturk, A., Moreno, J., Neamtiu, L., Peiró-Pérez, R., … Salas, D. (2016). Presence, characteristics and equity of access to breast cancer screening programmes in 27 European countries in 2010 and 2014. Results from an international survey. Preventive Medicine, 91, 250–263.
  • Diderichsen, F. (1995). Market reforms in health care and sustainability of the welfare state: Lessons from Sweden. Health Policy, 32(1–3), 141–153.
  • Duffy, S. W., Tabár, L., Chen, -H.-H., Holmqvist, M., Yen, M.-F., Abdsalah, S., … Holmberg, L. (2002). The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer, 95(3), 458–469.
  • Edgar, L., Glackin, M., Hughes, C., Mary, K., & Rogers, A. (2013). Factors influencing participation in breast cancer screening. British Journal of Nursing, 22(17), 1021–1026.
  • Erickson, B. H. (1979). Some problems of inference from chain data. Sociological Methodology, 10, 276–302.
  • Fallowfield, L., Rodway, A., & Baum, M. (1990). What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 83(9), 547–551.
  • Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Dikshit, R., Eser, S., Mathers, C., Rebelo, M., … Bray, F. (2015). Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal of Cancer, 136, E359–E386.
  • Freeman, H. P. (2006). Patient navigation: A community-centered approach to reducing cancer mortality. Journal of Cancer Education, 21(1 Suppl), S11–14.
  • Gierisch, J. M., O’Neill, S. C., Rimer, B. K., DeFrank, J. T., Bowling, J. M., & Skinner, C. S. (2009). Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s. Cancer Epidemiology, 33(1), 72–78.
  • Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B.-M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34.
  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.
  • Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. (2012). The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: An independent review. Lancet, 380(9855), 1778–1786.
  • Johansson, I., & Berterö, C. M. (2003). Getting no respect: Barriers to mammography for a group of Swedish women. Health Care for Women International, 24(1), 8–17.
  • Jørgensen, K. J., Keen, J. D., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2011). Is mammographic screening justifiable considering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality? Radiology, 260(3), 621–627.
  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Lagerlund, M., Hedin, A., Sparén, P., Thurfjell, E., & Lambe, M. (2000). Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program. Preventive Medicine, 31(4), 417–428.
  • Lagerlund, M., Widmark, C., Lambe, M., & Tishelman, C. (2001). Rationales for attending or not attending mammography screening – A focus group study among women in Sweden. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 10(5), 429–442.
  • Løberg, M., Lousdal, M. L., Bretthauer, M., & Kalager, M. (2015). Benefits and harms of mammography screening. Breast Cancer Research, 17 (1), 63.
  • Manjer, Å. R., Zackrisson, S., & Emilsson, U. M. (2016). On women’s ambivalence about mammography screening: Support in the decision-making process a potential role for health care social workers? The British Journal of Social Work, 46(2), 480–497.
  • Morris, N. (2015). When health means suffering: Mammograms, pain and compassionate care. European Journal of Cancer Care, 24(4), 483–492.
  • Munthe, C. (2008). The goals of public health: An integrated, multidimensional model. Public Health Ethics, 1(1), 39–52.
  • Natale-Pereira, A., Enard, K. R., Nevarez, L., & Jones, L. A. (2011). The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparities. Cancer, 117(S15), 3541–3550.
  • National Board of Health and Welfare. (2014a). Nationella screeningprogram – Modell för bedömning, införande och uppföljning. [National screening programmes – Model for assessment, implementation and evaluation]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
  • National Board of Health and Welfare. (2014b). Screening för bröstcancer. Rekommendation och bedömningsunderlag. [Screening for breast cancer. Recommendation and basis for evaluation]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
  • Official Reports of the Swedish Government. (2009). En nationell cancerstrategi för framtiden. [A national cancer strategy for the future]. (SOU 2009:11). Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.
  • Peek, L., & Fothergill, A. (2009). Using focus groups: Lessons from studying day-care centers, 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina. Qualitative Research, 9(1), 31–59.
  • Pietrzak, P., Godlewski, D., & Adamczak, M. (2011). Breast cancer screening program attitudes among women from Wielkopolska. The report from Focus Group Interview (FGI) studies. Wspolczesna Onkologia, 15(6), 415–416.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Ponti, A., Anttila, A., Ronco, G., Senore, C., Basu, P., & Segnan, N. (2017). Cancer screening in the European Union (2017). Report on the implementation of the Council recommendation on cancer screening. Retrieved February 11, 2017 from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/major_chronic_diseases/docs/2017_cancerscreening_2ndreportimplementation_en. pdf
  • Stewart, B. W., & Wild, C. (Eds.). (2014). World cancer report 2014. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  • Swedish Breast Cancer Association. (2015). Mammografi. [Mammography]. Sundbyberg: Bröstcancerföreningarnas Riksorganisation.
  • Swedish Cancer Society. (2018). Cancerfondsrapporten 2018. [Swedish cancer society report 2018]. Stockholm: Cancerfonden.
  • Törnberg, S., Lidbrink, E., & Henriksson, R. (2014). Avgiftsfri mammografi får fler att komma till undersökning. [Free-of-charge mammography causes more people to come to the examination]. Läkartidningen, 11(CM7X), 1–4.
  • Vainio, H., & Bianchini, F. (Eds.). (2002). IARC handbooks of cancer prevention (Vol. 7). Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  • Van Goethem, M., Mortelmans, D., Bruyninckx, E., Verslegers, I., Biltjes, I., Van Hove, E., & De Schepper, A. (2003). Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography. European Radiology, 13(10), 2384–2389.
  • Watson-Johnson, L. C., DeGroff, A., Steele, C. B., Revels, M., Smith, J. L., Justen, E., … Richardson, L. C. (2011). Mammography adherence: A qualitative study. Journal of Women’s Health, 20(12), 1887–1894.
  • Whelehan, P., Evans, A., & Ozakinci, G. (2017). Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience. European Journal of Cancer Care, 26, e12580.
  • Willis, K. (2008). “I come because I am called”: Recruitment and participation in mammography screening in Uppsala, Sweden. Health Care for Women International, 29(2), 135–150.
  • Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and practice of screening for disease. public health papers, 34. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • World Health Organization. (2017). Guide to cancer early diagnosis. Geneva: Author.
  • World Medical Association. (2001). World medical association declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(4), 373.
  • Zackrisson, S., Lindström, M., Moghaddassi, M., Andersson, I., & Janzon, L. (2007). Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: A multilevel analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35(5), 548–554.
  • Zidar, M. N., Larm, P., Tillgren, P., & Akhavan, S. (2015). Non-attendance of mammographic screening: The roles of age and municipality in a population-based Swedish sample. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14:157.