4,815
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Thematic Cluster: Children’s agency in the family, in school and in society: implications for health and well-being

Organizing for agency: rethinking the conditions for children’s participation in service provision

Article: 1564515 | Accepted 21 Dec 2018, Published online: 01 Feb 2019

References

  • Aubrey, C., & Dahl, S. (2006). Children’s voices: The views of vulnerable children on their service providers and the relevance of service they receive. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 1–10.
  • Bell, M. (2002). Promoting children’s rights through the use of relationship. Child & Family Social Work, 7(1), 1–11.
  • Bessell, S. (2011). Participation in decision-making in out-of-home care in Australia: What do young people say? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 496–501.
  • Bolin, A. (2011). Shifting subordination. Interprofessional collaboration between teachers and social workers. ( PhD Thesis). Gothenburg University, Department of Social work, Sweden.
  • Bolin, A. (2016). Children’s agency in interprofessional collaborative meetings in child welfare work. Child and Family Social Work, 21, 502–511.
  • Bolin, A., & Sorbring, E. (2017). The self-referral affordances of school-based social work support: A case study. European Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1080/13691457.2016.1278521
  • Chee, L. P., Goh, E. C. L., & Kuczynski, L. (2014). Oversized loads: Child parentification in low-income families and underlying parent-child dynamics. Families in Societies, 95, 204–212.
  • Cohen, B. J. (1999). Fostering innovation in a large human service bureaucracy. Administration in Social Work, 23(2), 47–59.
  • De Mol, J., Reijmers, E., Verhofstadt, L., & Kuczynski, L. (2018). Reconstructing a sense of relational agency in family therapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 2018, 39, 54–66.
  • Franklin, A., & Sloper, P. (2005). Listening and responding? Children’s participation in health care within England. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 13, 11–29.
  • Garrow, E., & Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). Theoretical approaches to human service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 33–57). London: Sage.
  • Goh, E. (2015). Vulnerable families as active agents of their own change process: A bidirectional perspective. Social Work, 60, 145–154.
  • Goh, E., & Baruch. H. (2018). Young persons as epistemological agents in social work assessment and intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 88 (2018), 88–95.
  • Hasenfeld, Y. (2010a). Human services as complex organizations. London: Sage.
  • Hasenfeld, Y. (2010b). The attributes of human service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 9–32). London: Sage.
  • Hasenfeld, Y. (2010c). Worker-client relations: Social policy in practice. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 405–425). London: Sage.
  • Hasenfeld, Y., & Weaver, D. (1996). Enforcement, compliance, and disputes in welfare-to-work programs. Social Service Review, 70, 235–256.
  • Hughes, M., & Wearing, M. (2017). Organisations and management in social work (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Jaskyte, K. (2010). Innovation in human service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 481–502). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Jaskyte, K., & Kisieline, A. (2006). Determinants of employee creativity: A study of Lithuanian nonprofit organizations. VOLUNTAS, International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organization, 17(2), 128–136.
  • Katz, E. (2015). Domestic violence, children’s agency and mother-child relationships: Towards a more advanced model. Children & Society, 29(1), 69–79.
  • Kuczynski, L., & De Mol, J. (2015). Dialectical models of socialization. In W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 1. Theory and method (7th ed., pp. 323–368). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Leeson, C. (2007). My life in care: Experiences of nonparticipation in decision-making processes. Child & Family SocialWork, 12(3), 268–277.
  • Light, P. (1998). Sustaining innovation: Creating nonprofit and government organizations that innovate naturally. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Praimkumara, S., & Goh, E. C. L. (2015). Understanding the impact of the mother-child relationship on sex workers’ decision to enter and leave the streets – Lessons for social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30, 43–58.
  • Rasmusson, B., Hyvönen, U., Nygren, L., & Khoo, E. (2010). Child-centered social work practice – Three unique meanings in the context of looking after children and the assessment framework in Australia, Canada and Sweden. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 452–459.
  • Schmid, H. (2010). Organizational change in human service organizations: Theories, boundaries, strategies, and implementations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 455–480). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W. M., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20, 129–138.
  • Vis, S. A., Strandbu, A., Holtan, A., & Thomas, N. (2011). Participation and health – A research review of child participation in planning and decision-making. Child & Family SocialWork, 16(3), 325–335.
  • Vis, S. A., & Thomas, N. (2009). Beyond talking – Children’s participation in Norwegian care and protection cases. European Journal of Social Work, 12, 155–168.
  • Wilson, J. (2007). The performance of practice: Enhancing the repertoire of therapy with children and families. London: Karnac Books.
  • Wilson, J. (2012). Child-focused practice: A collaborative systemic approach. London, England: Karnac.