240
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Research circles as a method for implementing new services in the public health and welfare system

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2366087 | Received 22 Mar 2024, Accepted 06 Jun 2024, Published online: 11 Jun 2024

References

  • Acar, L., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2023). Public values? A systematic literature review into the outcomes of public service co-creation. Public Management Review, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2288248
  • Bottomley, J. S., Feigelman, W. T., & Rheingold, A. A. (2022). Exploring the mental health correlates of overdose loss. Stress and Health, 38(2), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3092
  • Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press.
  • Bradbury, H. (2015). The SAGE handbook of action research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Drug Overdoses. June2, 2024, from NVSS-DrugOverdoseDeaths cdc.gov)
  • Chalachanová, A., Jaeger Fjetland, K., & Gjermestad, A. (2023). Citizenship in everyday life: Stories of people with intellectual disabilities in Norway. Nordic Social Work Research, 13(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2021.1981985
  • Christiansen, S. G., Reneflot, A., Stene-Larsen, K., & Hauge, L. J. (2020). Parental mortality following the loss of a child to a drug-related death. European Journal of Public Health, 30(6), 1098–1102. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa094
  • Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 264–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477
  • De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
  • Djelantik, A. M. J., Smid, G. E., Mroz, A., Kleber, R. J., & Boelen, P. A. (2020). The prevalence of prolonged grief disorder in bereaved individuals following unnatural losses: Systematic review and meta regression analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 265, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.034
  • European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. (2023). European drug report 2023: Trends and developments. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved June 2, 2024, from https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/european-drug-report/2023_en
  • Fjær, S., & Dyregrov, K. (2021). Advice to policy-makers for improving services to the drug-death bereaved. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 38(6), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725211018333
  • Follevåg, B.-M., Dale, G. E., Udberg, E., & Selseng, L. B. (2023). Samarbeid om brukarmedverknad. Refleksjonar frå deltakarar i ein forskingssirkel [Collaboration on user participation. Reflections from participants in a research circle]. Tidsskrift for Psykisk Helsearbeid, 20(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.18261/tph.20.4.5
  • Follevåg, B.-M., & Seim, S. (2021). Bridge over troubled water: Patients’ opportunities for collective participation in substance use institutions through research circles. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (21), 11060. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111060
  • Gabbay, J., & le May, A. (2023). Knowledge transformation in health and social care. Routledge.
  • Gergen, K. J. (2022). An invitation to social construction (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47
  • Gulbrandsen, M., Høiland, G. C. L., Gulbrandsen, M., & Høiland, G. C. L. (2021). The relationship between research and innovation in the public sector – an analysis of five cases from labour and welfare services. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 12(2), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.3687
  • Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136
  • Haug, N. (2023). Actor roles in co‐production – Introducing intermediaries: Findings from a systematic literature review. Public Administration, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12965
  • Hersted, L., Ness, O., & Frimann, S. (Eds.). (2020). Action research in a relational view: Dialogue, reflexivity, power and ethics. Routledge.
  • Holmstrand, L., Härnsten, G., & Löwstedt, J. (2008). The research circle approach: A democratic form for collaborative research in organizations. In A. B. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne, & N. Adler (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 1–20). Sage Publications.
  • Kalsås, Ø. R., Titlestad, K. B., Dyregrov, K., & Fadnes, L. T. (2023). Needs for help and received help for those bereaved by a drug-related death: A cross-sectional study. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 40(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725221125378
  • Khan, S., Chambers, D., & Neta, G. (2021). Revisiting time to translation: Implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control. Cancer Causes & Control, 32(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-020-01376-z
  • Löfqvist, C., Månsson Lexell, E., Nilsson, M. H., & Iwarsson, S. (2019). Exploration of the research circle methodology for user involvement in research on home and health dynamics in old age. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 33(2), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2018.1534176
  • McMullin, C. (2023). Individual, group, and collective co-production: The role of public value conceptions in shaping co-production practices. Administration & Society, 55(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221131790
  • Meijer, A. (2019). Public innovation capacity: Developing and testing a self-assessment survey instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102
  • Meyer, C., Stensaker, I., Bjerke, R., & Haueng, A. C. (2023). Innovation capacity. Fagbokforlaget.
  • Møgster, B., Selseng, L. B., & Reime, M. A. (2023). Innovation in bereavement care – Research circles as framework for translation of research-based knowledge. OMEGA - Journal of Death & Dying. https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228231206737
  • Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S., & Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180
  • Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: Are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461
  • Osborne, S. P. (2021). Public service logic: Creating value for public service users, citizens, and society through public service delivery. Routledge.
  • Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK: The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
  • Osborne, S. P., Cui, T., Aulton, K., & Macfarlane, J. (2023). Theory and practice in dis-harmony? Toward a praxis ecosystem approach to the public administration and management discipline and profession. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 45(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2022.2158638
  • Osborne, S. P., Powell, M., Cui, T., & Strokosch, K. (2022). Value creation in the public service ecosystem: An integrative framework. Public Administration Review, 82(4), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13474
  • Palumbo, R. (2016). Contextualizing co-production of health care: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0125
  • Persson, S. (2016). Mötet mellan kunnskapsformer: Forskningscirkeln och den skolnära forskningen. [A meeting between forms of knowledge: The research circle and school-based research. In E. Anderberg (Ed.), Skolnära forskningsmetoder [School-based research methods] (pp. 159–174). Studentlitteratur AB.
  • Pestoff, V., Osborne, S. P., & Brandsen, T. (2006). Patterns of co-production in public services: Some concluding thoughts. Public Management Review, 8(4), 591–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030601022999
  • Rauch, F., Shuster, A., Stern, T., & Pribila, M, & Townsend, A. (Eds.). (2014). Promoting change through action research. Springer.
  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2018). Co-initiation of collaborative innovation in urban spaces. Urban Affairs Review, 54(2), 388–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416651936
  • Steen, T., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). The dark side of co-creation and co-production: Seven evils. In T. Steen, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 284–293). Routledge.
  • Straus, S., Tetroe, J., & Graham, I. D. (2013). Knowledge translation in health care: Moving from evidence to practice. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Titlestad, K. B., & Dyregrov, K. (2022). Does “time heal all wounds?” the prevalence and predictors of prolonged grief among drug-death bereaved family members: A cross-sectional study. OMEGA - Journal of Death & Dying. https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221098584
  • Torfing, J., Ferlie, E., Jukić, T., & Ongaro, E. (2021). A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16108172803520
  • Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Breimo, J. P. (2023). When Norway met co-creation: The import, diffusion, and onboarding of a magic concept in public administration. International Public Management Journal, 26(5), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2128127
  • Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
  • Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
  • Witsø, A. E., Gjermestad, A., Skarsaune, S. N., Luteberget, L., & Midjo, T. (2022). Hvordan kan utprøving av PAAR inspirere profesjonelle praksiser sammen med personer med utviklingshemming? [How can the testing of PAAR inspire professional practices alongside individuals with people with developmental disabilities?]. Forskning & Forandring, 5(2), 61–83. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3049903
  • Yeo, J., & Lee, E. S. (2020). Whole community co-production: A full picture behind the successful COVID-19 response in S. Korea. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(2), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-05-2020-0088