A socio-digital ecology approach to understanding digital inequalities among young people

References

• Beck, V. (2015). Learning providers’ work with NEET young people. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 67, 482–496. doi:10.1080/13636820.2015.1086412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, G., & Groselj, D. (2014). Dimensions of internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Information Communication & Society, 17, 417–435. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, S., & Tuckerman, L. (2016). The information behaviours of disadvantaged and disengaged adolescents. Journal of Documentation, 72, 527–548. doi:10.1108/JD-05-2015-0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. W., Gibson, L., Hanson, V. L., Bobrowicz, A., & McKay, A. (2010). Engaging the disengaged: How do we design technology for digitally excluded older adults? Paper presented at the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’10), Aarhus, Denmark.10.1145/1858171
   Google Scholar
• Courtois, C., & Verdegem, P. (2016). With a little help from my friends: An analysis of the role of social support in digital inequalities. New Media & Society, 18, 1508–1527. doi:10.1177/1461444814562162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, M., & Klecun, E. (2006). How (can) non-users engage with technology: Bringing in the digitally excluded. In E. Trauth, D. Howcroft, T. Butler, B. Fitzgerald, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Social inclusion: Societal and organizational implications for information systems (pp. 347–364). Boston, MA: Springer.10.1007/0-387-34588-4
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Garip, F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. In K. S. Cook & D. S. Massey (Eds.), Annual review of sociology Vol. 38, 93–118. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2016). The digital skills paradox: How do digitally excluded youth develop skills to use the internet? Learning Media and Technology, 41, 463–479. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, P. (2012). ‘No good for shovelling snow and carrying firewood’: Social representations of computers and the internet by elderly Finnish non-users. New Media & Society, 14, 1198–1215. doi:10.1177/1461444812442663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22, 403–426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. (2016). Slipping through the net: Are disadvantaged young people being left further behind in the digital era? London: Prince’s Trust. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/DiSTO/DiSTO-NEETs.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., & Van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2016). Do the rich get digitally richer? Quantity and quality of support networks for digital engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 700–714. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Eynon, R. (2015). Tangible outcomes of internet use. London: LSE. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/DiSTO/
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, P. (2012). New frontiers in the digital divide: Revisiting policy for digital inclusion. Paper presented at the EGPA Annual Conference, Bergen, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M. S. (2001). Understanding internet usage: A social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 395–413. doi:10.1177/089443930101900401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., Spielhofer, T., & Golden, S. (2012). Earning not learning? An assessment of young people in the jobs without training (JWT) group. Sociological Research Online, 17, doi:10.5153/sro.2517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2014). The role of local intermediaries in the process of digitally engaging non-users of the internet. Media International Australia, 151, 137–145. doi:10.1177/1329878X1415100118
   Google Scholar
• Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59, 999–1007. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisdorf, B. C., & Groselj, D. (2015). Internet (non-) use types and motivational access: Implications for digital inequalities research. New Media & Society, Online First.. doi:10.1177/1461444815621539.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, L., Simmons, R., & Thompson, R. (2011). Ordinary lives: An ethnographic study of young people attending entry to employment programmes. Journal of Education and Work, 24, 477–499. doi:10.1080/13639080.2011.573773.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. & Wright, V. (2015). The possibilities of re-engagement: Cultures of literacy education and so-called NEETs. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 20, 400–418. doi:10.1080/13596748.2015.1081751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. (2011). Reclaiming the disengaged? A bourdieuian analysis of work-based learning for young people in England. Critical Studies in Education, 52, 15–28. doi:10.1080/17508487.2011.536510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornham, H., & Cruz, E. G. (2016). [Im]mobility in the age of [im]mobile phones: Young NEETs and digital practices. New Media & Society. Online first. doi:10.1177/1461444816643430.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., Eynon, R., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. International Journal of Communication, 11, 425–473. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: a longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the Dutch population. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 782–797. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.994544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar