Children’s digital content creation: Towards a processual understanding of media production among Danish children

References

• Ahmadi, N., & Besançon, M. (2017). Creativity as a stepping stone towards developing other competencies in classrooms. In Education research international 2017 (pp. 1–9). Retrieved from https://www.hindawi.com/journals/edri/2017/1357456/
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 5–22). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, L. A. (1990). Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement. Play & Culture, 3, 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, J. A., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2012). Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. E. (2011). Are we all produsers now? Convergence and media audience practices. Cultural Studies, 25, 502–516.
   Google Scholar
• Blum-Ross, A. (2015). Filmmakers/educators/facilitators? Understanding the role of adult intermediaries in youth media production in the UK and the USA. Journal of Children and Media, 9(3), 308–324.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdaa, M., & Hong-Mercier, S.-K. (2012). Creating, sharing, interacting: Fandom in the age of digital convergence and globalized television. In H. Bilandzic (Ed.), Social use of media: Cultural and social scientific perspectives on audience research (pp. 241–256). Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Brake, D. (2014). Are we all online content creators now? Web 2.0 and digital divides. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 591–609.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella, & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s conception of language (pp. 241–256). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• de A. Lizarraga, M. L. S., & de A. Baquedano, M. T. S. (2013). How creative potential is related to metacognition. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 6, 69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2010). Technological supports for acquiring 21st century skills. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 51–76). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Drotner, K. (2008). Boundaries and bridges: Digital storytelling in education studies and media studies. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 61–81). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Drotner, K. (2013). Processual methodologies and digital forms of learning. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age (pp. 39–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drotner, K., & Schrøder, K. C. (Eds.). (2010). Digital content creation: Creativity, competence, critique. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Duguid, P. (2006). Limits of self-organization: Peer production and ‘laws of quality’. First Monday, 11, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O. (2010). Content in motion: Remixing and learning with digital media. In K. Drotner & K. C. Schrøder (Eds.), Digital content creation: Perceptions, practices, and perspectives (pp. 57–74). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., & Amdam, S. (2013). From protection to public participation: A review of research literature on media literacy. Javnost: The Public, 20(2), 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., Sefton-Green, J. & Arnseth, H. C. (2016). Learning identities, education and community: Young lives in the cosmopolitan city. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Film-X. (n. d.) Pædagogisk profil [Pedagogical profile]. Copenhagen: Danish Film Institute. Retrieved from https://filmcentralen.dk/grundskolen/undervisning/film-x-lav-film-i-cinemateket?sub=18728#chapter
   Google Scholar
• Fróes, I. C. G., & Tosca, S. (2018). Playful subversions: Young children and tablet use. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(1), 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, M., & Toynbee, J. (Eds.). (2006). Analysing media texts. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (2017). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners, and classrooms. In S. Goldman & Z. Kabayadondo (Eds.), Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners, and classrooms (pp. 3–19). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 11(2), 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28, 696–713.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (2004). A review of school-based initiatives in media literacy education. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 42–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to learn: Introduction to digital literacy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R., & Moore, D. C. (2014). Cinekyd: Exploring the origins of youth media production. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(2), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hoechsmann, M., & Poyntz, S. R. (2012). Media literacies: A critical introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council. (2016). The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the internet. Retrieved from https://www.article19.org/data/files/Internet_Statement_Adopted.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittani, M., boyd, D., Cody, R., Stephenson, B. H., … Yardi, S. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jansz, J., Slot, M., Tol, S., & Verstraeten, R. (2015). Everyday creativity: Consumption, participation, production, and communication by teenagers in the Netherlands. Journal of Children and Media, 9(2), 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B. (Ed.). (2006). Creative learning practices: European experiences. London: The Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241–267.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Jocson, K. M. (2018). Youth media matters: Participatory cultures and literacies in education. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2010). DIY media: A contextual background and some contemporary themes. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), DIY media: Creating, sharing and learning with new technologies (pp. 2–24). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, P. G. (2014). Kids on YouTube: Technical identities and digital literacies. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2004). The pro-am revolution: How enthusiasts are changing our society and economy. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., & McKim, K. K. (2003). Tracing the everyday ‘sitings’ of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211–240.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). EU kids online: Final report. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39351/1/EU_kids_online_final_report_%5BLSERO%5D.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Massanari, A. L. (2015). Participatory culture, community, and play: Learning from reddit. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam, E., Dawson, S., & Tan, P.-L. (2011). Less elusive, more explicit: The challenge of ‘seeing’ creativity in action. In P. Thomson & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Researching creative learning: Methods and issues (pp. 113–125). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., & Nelligan, P. (2018). The creativity hoax: Precarious work in the gig economy. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competences: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
   Google Scholar
• P21. (n. d.) P21 network. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (2008). Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 97–118). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schrøder, K. C., Drotner, K., Murray, C., & Kline, S. (2003). Researching audiences. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, L. (2011). Youth media in school: Insights from a professional development initiative in media arts and media literacy. In J. Fisherkeller (Ed.), International perspectives on youth media: Cultures of production and education (pp. 355–374). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Troman, G., & Jeffrey, B. (2011). The promise of ethnography for exploring creative learning. In P. Thomson & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Researching creative learning: Methods and issues (pp. 78–87). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (n. d.) Media and information literacy. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/media-development/media-literacy/mil-as-composite-concept/
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Edited by). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willett, R. (2009). Parodic practices: Amateur spoofs on video-sharing sites. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Video cultures: Media technology and everyday creativity (pp. 115–132). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar