Children’s and adolescents’ digital access in Chile: the role of digital access modalities in digital uses and skills

References

• Arteaga, A. C., & Martuccelli, D. (2012). Neoliberalismo, corporativismo y experiencias posicionales: Los casos de Chile y Francia. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 74(2), 275–302.
   Google Scholar
• Ayanso, A., Cho, D. I., & Lertwachara, K. (2014). Information and communications technology development and the digital divide: A global and regional assessment. Information Technology for Development, 20(1), 60–77.
   Google Scholar
• Balea, B. (2016). The role of smartphones in increasing digital and social inequalities among Romanian children. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 7(2), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Banaji, S., Livingstone, S., Nandi, A., & Stoilova, M. (2018). Instrumentalising the digital: Adolescents’ engagement with ICTs in low-and middle-income countries. Development in Practice, 28(3), 432–443.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1997). Capital cultural, escuela y espacio social. México, D.F.: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2016). Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five-country study of social differences in internet use. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2703–2722.
   Google Scholar
• Cabello, P., Claro, M., Lazcano, D., & Antezana, L. (2018). La inclusión digital de niños y adolescentes chilenos desde la perspectiva de usos y habilidades [Digital Inclusion of children and adolescents from the perspective of uses and skills]. In E. Jiménez, M. Casado, & M. Garmendia Eds., Oportunidades y Riesgos de los Menores en Internet (pp. 55–85). España: Editorial GEDISA/Universidad del País Vasco.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, D., & Hedberg, J. (2008). Learning object design considerations for small-screen handheld devices. Computers & Education, 50(3), 881–893.
   Google Scholar
• Claro, M., Cabello, T., San Martín, E., & Nussbaum, M. (2015). Comparing marginal effects of Chilean students’ economic, social and cultural status on digital versus reading and mathematics performance. Computers & Education, 82, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martí, N. E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1042–1053.
   Google Scholar
• Davaki, K. (2018). The underlying causes of the digital gender gap and possible solutions for enhanced digital inclusion of women and girls. Brussels: European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–304.
   Google Scholar
• Dolittle, P., Lusk, D., Byrd, C., & Mariano, G. (2009). iPods as mobile multimedia learning environments: Individual differences and instructional design. In H. Ryu & D. Parsons (Eds.), Innovative mobile learning: Techniques and technologies (pp. 83–101). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Donner, J. (2015). After access: Inclusion, development, and a more mobile internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2016). The digital skills paradox: How do digitally excluded youth develop skills to use the internet? Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 463–479.
   Google Scholar
• Fairlie, R., & Kalil, A. (2017). The effects of computers on children’s social development and school participation: Evidence from a randomized control experiment. Economics of Education Review, 57, 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Duckworth, D., & Friedman, T. (2019). Preparing for life in a digital age: IEA international computer and information literacy study 2018 international report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) website. Retrieved from https://www.iea.nl/studies/iea/icils/2018
   Google Scholar
• Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., & Friedman, T. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, B., & von Gillern, S. (2018). Digital citizenship with social media: Participatory practices of teaching and learning in secondary education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 200–212.
   Google Scholar
• GSMA. (2019). The mobile gender gap report 2019. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., Massey, D., & Rustin, M. (2013). After neoliberalism: Analysing the present. Soundings, 53(53), 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Kim, S. J. (2012). The prevalence of smartphone use among a wired group of young adults. Institute for Policy Research Northwestern University Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/publications/papers/2011/ipr-wp-11-01.html
   Google Scholar
• Hasebrink, U., Görzig, A., Haddon, L., Kalmus, V., & Livingstone, S. (2011). Patterns of risk and safety online: In-depth analyses from the EU kids online survey of 9-to 16-year-olds and their parents in 25 European countries. London: EU-Kids Online Network.
   Google Scholar
• Hassani, S. N. (2006). Locating digital divides at home, work, and everywhere else. Poetics, 34(4), 250–272.
   Google Scholar
• Hinostroza, J. E., Matamala, C., Labbé, C., Claro, M., & Cabello, T. (2015). Factors (not) affecting what students do with computers and internet at home. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 43–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hooft Graafland, J. (2018). New technologies and 21st century children: Recent trends and outcomes (OECD Education Working Papers No. 179). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, K. T., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. V. (2017). Access is not enough: The impact of emotional costs and self-efficacy on the changes in African-American students’ ICT use patterns. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4), 637–650.
   Google Scholar
• ITU. (2014). Manual for measuring ICT access and use by households and individuals. Geneva: International Communication Union. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/ind/D-IND-ITCMEAS-2014-PDF-E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ITU. (2017). ICT prices 2017. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union Place des Nations. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2017/IPB2017_E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ITU. (2018). ITU council contribution to the high-level political forum on sustainable development (HLPF). Report by the secretary-general. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
   Google Scholar
• Jara, I., Claro, M., Hinostroza, J. E., Rodríguez, P., San Martín, E., Cabello, T., & Ibieta, A. (2015). Understanding factors related to Chilean students’ digital skills: A mixed-methods analysis. Computers & Education, 88, 387–398.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, M. H. (2017). Learner perspectives regarding device type in technology-assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 844–863.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C. H., Yang, J. C., Chen, F. C., Ho, C. W., & Chan, T. W. (2008). Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: The interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 326–337.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & O’Neill, B. (2014). Children’s rights online: Challenges, dilemmas and emerging directions. In S. van der Hof, B. van den Berg, & B. Schermer (Eds.), Minding minors wandering the web: Regulating online child safety (pp. 19–38). Berlin: Springer. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/62276/
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Carr, J., & Byrne, J. (2015). One in three: Internet governance and children’s rights (Paper Series No 22). Waterloo, Ontario: Centre for International Governance Innovation and The Royal Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/no22_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU kids online: Final report. London: EU Kids Online.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Kardefelt-Winther, D., Kanchev, P., Cabello, P., Claro, M., Burton, P., & PhyfeIs, J. (2019). Is there a ladder of children’s online participation? Findings from three global kids online countries. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Brief. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/1019-ladder-of-childrens-online-participation-findings-from-three-gko-countries.html
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2015). Developing a framework for researching children’s online risks and opportunities in Europe. London: London School of Economics/EU Kids Online Network.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Nandi, A., Banaji, S., & Stoilova, M. (2017). Young adolescents and digital media: Uses, risks and opportunities in low-and middle-income countries: A rapid evidence review. London, UK: Gage. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/83753/
   Google Scholar
• Mariscal, J., Mayne, G., Aneja, U., & Sorgner, A. (2019). Bridging the gender digital gap. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 13(2019–9), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2018). Accesso, usi, rischi e opportunità di internet per i ragazzi italiani. I risultati di EU Kids Online 2017. London: EU Kids Online e OssCom. http://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/eu-kids-online/reports/EU-Kids-Online-Italy-report-06-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A., Farley, H., Lane, M., Hafeez-Baig, A., & Carter, B. (2014). Mobile learning anytime, anywhere: What are our students doing? Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(3), 331–345.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M, & Obar, J. A. (2014). Second class netizens: Race and the emerging mobile internet underclass. In R. A. Lind (Ed.), Race and gender in electronic media. (pp. 311–329). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Are there differences in how advantaged and disadvantaged students use the Internet?. PISA in Focus, 64, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlv8zq6hw43-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018a). Estudios económicos de la OCDE: Chile. Visión general. Chile: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018b). Bridging the digital gender divide: Include, upskill, innovate. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, L. (2018). Politics in Chile: Democracy, authoritarianism, and the search for development. Londres: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. J. (2015). My whole world’s in my palm! The second-level divide of teenagers’ mobile use and skill. New Media & Society, 17(6), 977–995.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, D., Wishart, J., & Thomas, H. (2016). Exploring mobile affordances in the digital classroom. In I. Arnedillo Sanchez & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings of 12th international conference on mobile learning (Mobile Learning 2016) (pp. 43–50. Portugal: Vilamoura.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for the necessary: A Bourdieuian approach to digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 12(4), 488–507.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. (2018). The identity curation game: Digital inequality, identity work, and emotion management. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 661–680.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Mapping digital makers: A review exploring everyday creativity, learning lives and the digital. United Kingdom: Nominet.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2010). Degrees of digital division: Reconsidering digital inequalities and contemporary higher education. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 7(1). http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/780/78012953011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sey, A., & Hafkin, N. (2019). Taking stock: Data and evidence on gender equality in digital access, skills, and leadership. Macau: EQUALS Global Partnership/UN University. https://i.unu.edu/media/cs.unu.edu/attachment/4040/EQUALS-Research-Report-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
   Google Scholar
• Third, A., Bellerose, D., Oliveira, J. D. D., Lala, G., & Theakstone, G. (2017). Young and online: Children’s perspectives on life in the digital age. Sydney: Western Sydney University.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Student access to digital learning resources outside of the classroom (NCES 2017-098). Executive Summary.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2017). The state of the world’s children 2012: children in a digital world. New York: Author. https://www.unicef.org/publications/files/SOWC_2017_ENG_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A., & Helsper, E. (2017). Collateral benefits of internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the internet. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2333–2351.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. A. (2015). Toward a multifaceted model of Internet access for understanding digital divides: An empirical investigation. The Information Society, 31(5), 379–391.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2018). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. A. (2017). Digital divide: Impact of access. In P. Rössler (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (Vol. IV, ppp. 384–392). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. A., & van Deursen, A. J. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vigdor, J. L., Ladd, H. F., & Martinez, E. (2014). Scaling the digital divide: Home computer technology and student achievement. Economic Inquiry, 52(3), 1103–1119.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Y. C., Ho, K. M., Chen, H., Gu, D., & Zeng, Q. (2015). Digital divide challenges of children in low-income families: The case of Shanghai. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(1), 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, World development indicators. (2019). GINI index (World Bank estimate) (data file). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Huang, W., & Wang, Q. (2010). Internet inequality: The relationship between high school students’ Internet use in different locations and their Internet self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1405–1423.
   Google Scholar