Social media literacy & adolescent social online behavior in Germany

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media Literacy: A report of the national leadership conference on media literacy. Aspen, CO.: Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P. (1994). Structural equation models in marketing research: Basic principles. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Principles in marketing research (pp. 317–385). Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Borca, G., Bina, M., Keller, P. S., Gilbert, L. R., & Begotti, T. (2015). Internet use and developmental tasks: Adolescents’ point of view. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Bosancianu, C. M., Powell, S., & Bratović, E. (2013). Social capital and prosocial behavior online and offline. International Journal of Internet Science, 8(1), 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Brittian, A. S., & Humphries, M. L. (2015). Prosocial behavior during adolescence. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 221–227). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (Second ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caldarella, P., & Merell, K. W. (1997). Common dimensions of social skills of children and adolescents: A taxonomy of positive behaviours. School Psychology Review, 26(2), 264–278.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J., Francisco, R., & Relvas, A. (2015). Family functioning and information and communication technologies: How do they relate? A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media and technology 2018. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Collier, K. M., Coyne, S. M., Rasmussen, E. E., Hawkins, A. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Erickson, S. E., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2016). Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 798–812.
   Google Scholar
• Dallmann, C., Vollbrecht, R., & Wegener, C. (2017). Mediensozialisation in sozialökologischer Perspektive – Ansatzpunkte einer theoretischen Neujustierung [Media socialisation from a socio-ecological perspective - starting points for a theoretical readjustment]. In D. Hoffmann, F. Krotz, & W. Reißmann (Eds.), Mediatisierung und Mediensozialisation: Prozesse – Räume – Praktiken [Mediatization and media socialization: Processes - spaces – practices] (pp. 197–210). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
   Google Scholar
• Dewe, B., & Sander, U. (1996). Medienkompetenz und Erwachsenenbildung [Media literacy and adult education]. In A. von Rein (Ed.), Medienkompetenz als Schlüsselbegriff [Media literacy as a key concept] (pp. 125–142). Bonn: DiE.
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, M., Greenberg, B., & Hofschire, L. (2006). Parenting the internet. Journal of Communication 56, 56(3), 486–504.
   Google Scholar
• Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2018). Development of a measure of adolescents’ online prosocial behavior. Journal of Children and Media, 12(4), 448–464.
   Google Scholar
• Festl, R., & Gniewosz, G. (2019). Role of mothers’ and fathers’ Internet parenting for family climate. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1764–1784.
   Google Scholar
• Glüer, M., & Lohaus, A. (2018). Elterliche und kindliche Einschätzung von elterlichen Medienerziehungsstrategien und deren Zusammenhang mit der kindlichen Internetnutzungs-kompetenz [Parents’ and children’s perspectives of parental mediation strategies in association with children’s Internet skills]. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 67(2), 181–203.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586.
   Google Scholar
• Groeben, N. (2002). Dimensionen der Medienkompetenz: Deskriptive und normative Aspekte [Dimensions of media literacy: descriptive and normative aspects]. In: N. Groeben & B. Hurrelmann (Hrsg.), Medienkompetenz. Voraussetzungen, Dimensionen, Funktionen [Media literacy. Requirements, dimensions, functions] (S. 160-197). Weinheim und München: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Hefner, D., Knop, K., & Klimmt, C. (2017). Being mindfully connected – Encountering the challenges of adolescents living in a POPC world. In P. Vorderer, D. Hefner, L. Reinecke, & C. Klimmt (Eds.), Permanently online, permanently connected (pp. 176–187). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (1998). Teaching with and about film and television: Integrating media literacy concepts into management education. Journal of Management Development, 17(4), 259–272.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmus, V., Blinka, L., & Olafsson, K. (2013). Does it matter what mama says: Evaluating the role of parental mediation in European adolescents’ excessive internet use. Children & Society, 29(2), 122–133.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, K. V. (2015). Self-report assessments of emotional competencies: A critical look at methods and meanings. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(1), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Knop, K., Hefner, D., Schmitt, S., & Vorderer, P. (2015). Mediatisierung mobil: Handy- und mobile Internetnutzung von Kindern und Jugendlichen [ Mobile mediatisation: mobile phone and mobile Internet use by children and young people]. Düsseldorf: Schriftenreihe Medienforschung der Landesanstalt für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen (Band 77). LfM.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Perrin, A., Stepler, R., Rainie, L., & Parker, K. (2015). Teens, social media, and technology overview 2015. Smartphones facilitate shifts in communication landscape for teens. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2015/04/PI_TeensandTech_Update2015_0409151.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S. S. (2013). Media and peer culture. Young people sharing norms and collective identities with and through media. In D. Lemish (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of children, adolescents and media (pp. 322–328). Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2003) The changing nature and uses of media literacy. Media@LSE electronic working papers, 4. Media@lse, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2014). Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites. Communications, 39(3), 283–303.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society, 12(2), 309–329.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 105–182.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, H. (2010). Evaluating media literacy education: Concepts, theories and future directions. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, S. D., Wernsman, J., & Parnes, A. L. (2006). Understanding prosocial behavior: The impact of empathy and gender among African American adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(1), 135–137.
   Google Scholar
• Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest ( mpfs, 2018). JIM-Studie - Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12 - bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland [ JIM study - Youth, Information, (Multi-) Media. Basic study on the media usage of 12 - to 19-year-olds in Germany], Stuttgart. Retrieved from: www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2018/Studie/JIM_2018_Gesamt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Müller, C. R., Pfetsch, J., & Ittel, A. (2014). Ethical media competence as a protective factor against cyberbullying and cybervictimization among German school students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(10), 644–651.
   Google Scholar
• Nathanson, A. I. (2001). Mediation of children’s television viewing: working toward conceptual clarity and common understanding. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 25 (pp. 115–151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nathanson, A. I. (2015). Media and the family: Reflections and future directions. Journal of Children and Media, 9(1), 133–139.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff-Rüdiger, S., & Riesmeyer, C. (2016). Moved into action. Media literacy as social process. Journal of Children and Media, 10(2), 164–172.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff-Rüdiger, S., Riesmeyer, C., & Kümpel, A. S. (2012). Media literacy and developmental tasks: A case study in Germany. Media Studies, 3(6), 42–56.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J. (2004). Argument for the need for a cognitive theory of media literacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(2), 266–272.
   Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A. R., & Weinstein, N. (2019). Digital screen time limits and young children’s psychological well-being: Evidence from a population-based study. Child Development, 90(1), e56–e65.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, A. (2015). Australian child health poll. Melbourne: The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne. Retrieved from: https://www.rchpoll.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ACHP_Detailed-report_Dec2015-poll-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Riesmeyer, C., Pfaff-Rüdiger, S., & Kümpel, A. S. (2016). Wenn Wissen zu Handeln wird: Medienkompetenz aus motivationaler Perspektive [ When knowledge becomes action: Media literacy from a motivational perspective]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(1), 36–55.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2011). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., Martin, G. N., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2018). Trends in U.S. adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: The rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (Near) demise of print. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000203.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (2016). Media and information literacy. Retrieved from: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/media-development/media-literacy/mil-as-composite-concept
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2016). Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 804–823.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2014). Digital skills: unlocking the information society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Vossen, H. G. M., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Development of the Adolescent Measure of Empathy and Sympathy (AMES). Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, R. (2001). In words and deeds: parental involvement and mediation of children’s television viewing. Journal of Family Communication, 1(4), 211–231.
   Google Scholar
• Woerner, W., Becker, A., Friedrich, C., Klasen, H., Goodman, R., & Rothenberger, A. (2002). Normierung und Evaluation der deutschen Elternversion des Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Felderhebung. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie [ Standardisation and evaluation of the German parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Results of a representative field survey], 30, 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R., & Power, C. (1987). Aspects of the competence‐performance distinction: Educational, psychological and measurement issues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(5), 409–424.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2011). The associations between young adults’ face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1959–1962.
   Google Scholar
• Zylka, J., Christoph, G., Kroehne, U., Hartig, J., & Goldhammer, F. (2015). Moving beyond cognitive elements of ICT literacy: First evidence on the structure of ICT engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 149–160.
   Google Scholar