“Everything’s technology now”: the role of technology in home- and school-based summer learning activities in Canada

References

• Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2007). Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media and technology. Pew Research Center. http://publicservicesalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Teens-Social-Media-Technology-2018-PEW.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., & Hamilton, L. (2013). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Attewell, P. (2001). Comment : The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252–259.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B., Walter, S. E., Martin, C. K., & Schatz, C. (2010). Predictors of creative computing participation and profiles of experience in two Silicon Valley middle schools. Computers & Education, 54(1), 178–189.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, K., Apps, T., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., & Bennett, S. (2018). Conceptualising Technology Practice In Education Using Bourdieu’s sociology. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 197–210. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1462205
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the “digital natives” debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 321–331.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, L.M., & Schwarz, I. (2018). Preventing Summer Learning Loss: Results of a Summer Literacy Program for Students from Low-SES Homes. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 34(2), 99–116. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2017.1344943
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J., & Wei, H. (2016). Exploring engaging gamification in mechanics in massive online open courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 177–203.
   Google Scholar
• Cherlin, J. (2014). Labor’s love lost: the rise and fall of the working-class family in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, T., & Phillips, M. (2004). Social Reproduction and child rearing Practices: Social Class, children’s Agency, and the Summer Activity Gap. Sociology of Education, 77(3),185–210. doi: 10.1177/003804070407700301
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, D., & Wang, T. (2014). Teacher’s use of iPads in higher education. Educational Media International, 51(3), 214–225.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. (2013). he parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, P. F., Pierce, G., & Trauth, E. M. (2006). Closing the digital divide: Understanding racial, ethnic, social class, gender and geographic disparities in Internet use among school age children in the United States. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(4), 354–373.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J., & Miles, M. (2017). Screen schooled : Two veteran teachers expose how technology overuse is making our kids dumber. Chicago, IL: Independent Publishers Group.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, S.L., Lauricell, A.R., & Wartella, E. (2015). Parental co-use of media technology with their young children in the USA. Journal of Children and Media, 9(1),5–21. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2015.997440
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. & Aurini, J. (2010–2014). Research reports for the summer literacy learning project in Ontario schools. http://www.ontariodirectors.ca/summer_literacy.html
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. C., & Eynon, R. (2018). Is digital upskilling the next generation our ‘ pipeline to prosperity ’? New Media & Society, 20(11), 3961–3979.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S., & Aurini, J. (2013). Summer learning inequality in Ontario. Canadian Public Policy, 39(2),287–307. doi: 10.3138/CPP.39.2.287
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S., & Rizk, J. (2018). The Three Generations of Cultural Capital Research: A Narrative Review. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 331–365.
   Google Scholar
• DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2006). Computer and internet use by students in 2003 (NCES 2006– 065). In U.S. department of education (Issue 1). https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006065.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47(2), 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: studying internet use as penetration increases. In Working papers (Vol. (47)). https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/cpanda/workpap15.html.html
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In K. Neckerman (Ed.) Social Inequality (p. 355-400) .New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Mukhtar, T. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and martial selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90(6), 1231–1236.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Mukhtar, T. (2004). Arts participation as cultural capital in the United States, 1982-2002: Signs of decline? Poetics, 32(2), 169–194.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, D. B., von Hippel, P. T., & Broh, B. A. (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69(5),613–635. doi: 10.1177/000312240406900501
   Google Scholar
• Downey, D.B., von Hippel, P.T., & Hughes, M. (2008). Are “failing” schools really failing? Using seasonal comparison to evaluate school effectiveness. Sociology of Education, 81(3),242–270. doi: 10.1177/003804070808100302
   Google Scholar
• Entwisle, D.R., Alexander, K.L., & Olson, L.S. (1998). Children, Schools, and Inequality. New York: Perseus.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., Deetjen, U., & Malmberg, L. E. (2018). Moving on up in the information society? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between Internet use and social class mobility in Britain. Information Society, 34(5), 316–327.
   Google Scholar
• Frenette, M., Frank, K., & Deng, Z. (2020). School closures and the online preparedness of children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Catalogue no. 11-626-X no. 103. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-626-x/11-626-x2020001-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The app generation: How todays youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J. (2010). The digital identity divide: How technology knowledge impacts college students. New Media and Society, 12(3), 497–513.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, S., Hanson, K., Rolon-Arroyo, B., & Arnold, D. (2019). Promoting early achievement in low-income preschoolers in the United States with educational apps. Journal of Children and Media, 3(3), 328–344.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, S. F., & Arnold, D. H. (2019). Home learning in the new mobile age: Parent–child interactions during joint play with educational apps in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 13(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Haste, H. (2009). What is ‘competence’ and how should education incorporate new technology’s tools to generate ‘competent civic agents.’. Curriculum Journal, 20(3), 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C.J., & Nisar, H. (2013). The efficacy of private sector providers in improving public educational outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 856–894. doi:10.3102/0002831213486334
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. (2017). A socio-digital ecology approach to understanding digital inequalities among young people. Journal of Children and Media, 11(2), 256–260.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3),503–520.
   Google Scholar
• Heyns, B. (1978). Summer learning and the effects of schooling. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, C. (2018). A Seasonal Research Design Examining Macro-Level Factors and Micro-Understandings of Parental Engagement and Children’s Literacy Achievement (Doctoral Dissertation). Waterloo, ON, Canada: University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 347–360.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M. (2009). Engineering play: A cultural history of children ’s software. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., … Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., … Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media : Summary of findings from the digital youth project (issue november). Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, V. S., Moran, M. B., & Gonzalez, C. (2017). Connecting with technology in lower-income US families. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2509–2533.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, V. S., Moran, M. B., & Ognyanova, K. (2019). Contextualizing connectivity: How internet connection type and parental factors influence technology use among lower-income children. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 313–335.
   Google Scholar
• Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245–255.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, S. (2004). Towards a sociology of educational technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 113–142). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.A., & Monti-Nussbaum, M. (2017). Can schools enable parents to prevent summer learning loss? A text-messaging field experiment to promote literacy skills. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 674(1), 85–112. doi:10.1177/0002716217732009
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (1989). Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Intervention in Elementary Education. London, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: class, race and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A. (2015a). A majority of american teens report access to a computer, game console, Smartphone and a tablet. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/a-majority-of-american-teens-report-access-to-a-computer-game-console-smartphone-and-a-tablet/
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A. (2015b). Teens, social media and technology overview, 2013: Smartphones facilitates shifts in communication landscape for teens. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2010). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation : Teenagers ’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media and Society, 10(3), 393–411.. doi:10.1177/1461444808089415
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2005). UK Children Go Online : Final report of key project findings [online]. LSE Research Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/399/1/UKCGO_Final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion : Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2008). Parental mediation and children ’ s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., & Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60143/http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60083/http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59518/http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48357/
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class: living and learning in the digital age. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., & Kim, J.S. (2017). Effects of a summer mathematics intervention for low-income children: A randomized experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1),31-53. doi:10.3102/0162373716662339
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., & Kim, J.S. (2017). Effects of a summer mathematics intervention for low-income children: A randomized experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 31–53. doi:10.3102/0162373716662339
   Google Scholar
• Mao, J. (2014). Social media for learning: A mixed methods study on high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213–223.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. (2004). The techno-literacy practices of young children. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(1), 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211.
   Google Scholar
• Min, S.-J. (2010). From the digital divide to the democratic divide: Internet skills, political interest, and the second-level digital divide in political internet use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Muntean, C. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. Proc. 6th International Conference on Virtual Learnign ICVL, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Europe, 323–329.
   Google Scholar
• Natriello, G. (2001). Comment: Bridging the second digital divide: What can sociologists of education contribute? Sociology of Education, 74(3), 260–265.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mara, J., & Laidlaw, L. (2011). Living in the iworld: Two literacy researchers reflect on the changing texts and literacy practices of childhood. English Teaching, 10(4), 149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). Towards defining 21st century competencies for Ontario. Foundation document for discussion. http://www.edugains.ca/resources21CL/About21stCentury/21CL_21stCenturyCompetencies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 303–319.
   Google Scholar
• Plowman, L., Stevenson, O., Mcpake, J., Stephen, C., & Adey, C. (2011). Parents, pre-schoolers and learning with technology at home: Some implications for policy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 361–371.
   Google Scholar
• Rideout, V., & Katz, V. (2016). Opportunity for all? Technology and learning in lower-income families. A report of the Families and Media Project. https://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/jgcc_opportunityforall.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rizk, J. (2018). The 21st century classroom: Technology as a transformative tool in educational routines, rules, and rituals (doctoral dissertation). Hamilton, ON, Canada: McMaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Rizk, J. (2020). Considerations for implementing emerging technologies and innovative pedagogies in twenty-first-century classrooms. In S. Yu, M. Ally, & A. Tsinakos (Eds.), Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum (pp. 447–460). Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_26
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for the necessary: A Bourdieuian approach to digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 12(4), 488–507.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, M., Denson, N., Kilpatrick, S., & Stehlik, T. (2014). “ I am working-class “: subjective self-definition as a missing measure of social class and socioeconomic status in higher education research. May. doi:10.3102/0013189X14528373
   Google Scholar
• Santarosa, L. M. C., & Conforto, D. (2016). Educational and digital inclusion for subjects with autism spectrum disorders in 1:1 technological configuration. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 293–300.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. A., Valley, B., & Simecka, B. A. (2017). Mental HEALTH CONCERNS IN THE DIGITAL Age. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(3), 604–613.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-green, J. (2004). Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school. Futurelab Series. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/FUTL72/FUTL72.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: Exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 1006–1021.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., & Facer, K. (2014). The sociology of education and digital technology: Past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 482–496.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada (2018). A portrait of Canadian youth. Ottawa, Ontario:Statistics Canada (issues 11-631–x). Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-631-x/11-631-x2018001-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Steeves, V., & Regan, P. (2014). Young people online and the social value of privacy. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 12(4), 298–313.
   Google Scholar
• Teichert, L. (2017). To digital or not to digital: How mothers are navigating the digital world with their young children. Language and Literacy, 19(1), 63.
   Google Scholar
• van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588.
   Google Scholar
• Vigdor, J. L., Ladd, H. F., & Martinez, E. (2014). Scaling the digital divide: Home computer technology and student achievement. Economic Inquiry, 52(3), 1103–1119.
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century, 403–413. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1111/jcal.12029
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225
   Google Scholar