Increasing knowledge about cognitive biases: An evaluation study of a radicalization prevention campaign targeted at European adolescents and young adults

References

• Ahmed, M., & George, F. L. (2017). How extremists are exploiting the internet and what to do about it. Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.
   Google Scholar
• Amini, A., Pishghadam, R., & Saboori, F. (2019). On the role of language learners’ psychological reactance, teacher stroke, and teacher success in the Iranian context. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2019.14716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baugut, P., & Neumann, K. (2020). Describing perceptions of media influence among radicalized individuals: The case of Jihadists and non-violent Islamists. Political Communication, 37(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1663323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bécuwe, N., Goudet, S., & Tsoulos-Malakoudi, D. (2018). Survey report ‘European youth and radicalisation leading to violence’: Analysis and recommendations for policy-making purposes p. 85. [ Practicies Project Objective H2020-SEC-06-FCT-2016]. https://efus-network.eu/efus/files/2020/03/D2.3-Survey-PRACTICIES-PdfLIGHT1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bouko, C., Naderer, B., Rieger, D., Van Ostaeyen, P., & Voué, P. (2021). Discourse patterns used by extremist Salafists on Facebook: Identifying potential triggers to cognitive biases in radicalized content. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(3), 252–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1879185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouko, C., Van Ostaeyen, P., & Voué, P. (2021). How Jihadi Salafists sometimes breach, but mostly circumvent, Facebook’s community standards in crisis, identity and solution frames. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2021.1963092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddock, K. (2022). Vaccinating against hate: Using attitudinal inoculation to confer resistance to persuasion by extremist propaganda. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(2), 240–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1693370
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. (2017). Determining the role of the internet in violent extremism and terrorism: Six suggestions for progressing research. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2016.1157408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Manalo, E. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, M., Hawdon, J., Ratliff, T., & Grantham, T. (2016). Who views online extremism? Individual attributes leading to exposure. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, V., & Mackie, L. (2011). Extending the constructs of active learning: Implications for teachers’ pedagogy and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 22(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2011.627204
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlinger, J., Readinger, W. O., & Kim, B. (2016). Decision-making and cognitive biases. In Encyclopedia of mental health (pp. 5–12). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00206-8
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, J., Schmitt, J. B., Rieger, D., Beier, A. K., Vorderer, P., Bente, G., & Roth, H.-J. (2017). Hate beneath the counter speech? A qualitative content analysis of user comments on YouTube related to counter speech videos. Journal for Deradicalization, 10, 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, J., Segev, S., & Leopold, J. K. (2020). When consumers learn to spot deception in advertising: Testing a literacy intervention to combat greenwashing. International Journal of Advertising, 39(7), 1115–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1765656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischlich, L. (2020). #dark inspiration: Eudaimonic entertainment in extremist Instagram posts. New Media & Society, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819899625
   Google Scholar
• Frischlich, L., Rieger, D., Morten, A., & Bente, G. (2018). The power of a good story: Narrative persuasion in extremist propaganda and videos against violent extremism. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 12, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselton, M. G., Nettle, D., & Murray, D. R. (2016). The evolution of cognitive bias. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 968–987). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, G., Brouillette-Alarie, S., Alava, S., Frau-Meigs, D., Lavoie, L., Fetiu, A., Varela, W., Borokhovski, E., Venkatesh, V., Rousseau, C., Sieckelinck, S., Scheithauer, H., Leuschner, V., Böckler, N., Akhgar, B., & Nitsch, H. (2018). Exposure to extremist online content could lead to violent radicalization: A Systematic review of empirical evidence. International Journal of Developmental Science, 12(1–2), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-170233
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., Scheider, L. S., van Deursen, A. J., & van Laar, E. (2020). The youth Digital Skills Indicator: Report on the conceptualisation and development of the ySKILLS digital skills measure.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseinmardi, H., Ghasemian, A., Clauset, A., Mobius, M., Rothschild, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2021). Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32), e2101967118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101967118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. A., Atwell Seate, A., & James, P. A. (2020). Radicalization to violence: A pathway approach to studying extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1067–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1442330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusyte, A., & Schönenberg, M. (2017). Impaired social cognition in violent offenders: Perceptual deficit or cognitive bias? European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 267(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-016-0727-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klausen, J. (2015). Tweeting the Jihad: Social media networks of Western foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2014.974948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S., & Whittaker, J. (2019). Online radicalization. In J. R. Vacca (Ed.), Online terrorist propaganda, recruitment, and radicalization (pp. 33–45). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macnair, L., & Frank, R. (2017). Voices against extremism: A case study of community-based CVE counter-narrative campaign. Journal for Deradicalization, 10, 147–174.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrew, S. (2020). Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning. Computers & Education, 145, 103711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1961). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786067
   Google Scholar
• Meleagrou-Hitchens, A., & Kaderbhai, N. (2020, January 7). New VOX-Pol report: Extreme digital speech: Contexts, responses and solutions. VOX - Pol. https://www.voxpol.eu/new-vox-pol-report-extreme-digital-speech-contexts-responses-and-solutions/
   Google Scholar
• Menke, M., & Wulf, T. (2021). The dark side of inspirational pasts: An investigation of nostalgia in right-wing populist communication. Media and Communication, 9(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i2.3803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, E. (2016). Children: Extremism and online radicalization. Journal of Children and Media, 10(4), 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1234736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderer, B., & Opree, S. J. (2021). Increasing advertising literacy to unveil disinformation in green advertising. Environmental Communication, 15(7), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1919171
   Google Scholar
• Naderer, B., Rieger, D., & Schwertberger, U. (2023). An online world of bias. The mediating role of cognitive biases on extremist attitudes. Communications. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2021-0115
   Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, D., Greene, D., Conway, M., Carthy, J., & Cunningham, P. (2015). Down the (white) rabbit hole: The extreme right and online recommender systems. Social Science Computer Review, 33(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314555329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parguel, B., Benoit-Moreau, F., & Russell, C. A. (2015). Can evoking nature in advertising mislead consumers? The power of ‘executional greenwashing’. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.996116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/208954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Scott, A. M., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2011). A close examination of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Health Communication, 16(6), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.551989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, D., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2013). Propaganda 2.0: Psychological effects of right-wing and Islamic extremist internet videos.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, D., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2019). Dealing with the dark side: The effects of right-wing extremist and Islamist extremist propaganda from a social identity perspective. Media, War & Conflict, Online First, 13(3), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219829165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, D., Schmitt, J. B., & Frischlich, L. (2018). Hate and counter-voices in the Internet: Introduction to the special issue. Studies in Communication | Media, 7(4), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-4-459
   Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., McClanahan, W., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Disentangling item and testing effects in inoculation research on online misinformation: Solomon revisited. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(2), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420940378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothut, S., Schulze, H., Hohner, J., & Rieger, D. (2023). Ambassadors of ideology: A conceptualization and computational investigation of far-right influencers, their networking structures, and communication practices. New Media & Society, 146144482311644. EPub ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231164409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. E. (1993). Project LEAN-Lessons learned from a national social marketing campaign. Public Health Reports, 108(1), 45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J. B., Harles, D., & Rieger, D. (2020). Themen, motive und mainstreaming in rechtsextremen online-memes [issues, motives, and mainstreaming in far-right online memes]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 68(1–2), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2020-1-2-73
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J. B., Rieger, D., Rutkowski, O., & Ernst, J. (2018). Counter-messages as prevention or promotion of extremism?! The potential role of YouTube. Journal of Communication, 68(4), 780–808. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., & Naderer, B. (2018). Misleading consumers with green advertising? An affect–reason–involvement account of greenwashing effects in environmental advertising. Journal of Advertising, 47(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2018.1452652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, H., Hohner, J., Greipl, S., Girgnhuber, M., Desta, I., & Rieger, D. (2022). Far-right conspiracy groups on fringe platforms: A longitudinal analysis of radicalization dynamics on Telegram. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 28(4), 1103–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221104977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, H., Hohner, J., & Rieger, D. (2022). Soziale Medien und Radikalisierung. [Social media and radicalization]. In L. Rothenberger, J. Krause, J. Jost, & K. Frankenthal (Eds.), Terrorismusforschung - interdisziplinäres handbuch für wissenschaft und praxis. [terrorism research - interdisciplinary handbook for science and practice] (pp. 319–330). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748904212-319
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., Wirth, W., & Müller, P. (2020). We are the people and you are fake news: A social identity approach to populist citizens’ false consensus and hostile media perceptions. Communication Research, 47(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabrizi, S., & Rideout, G. (2017). Active learning: Using bloom’s taxonomy to support critical pedagogy. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 8(3), 3202–3209. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2017.0429
   Google Scholar
• Tully, M., Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Designing and testing news literacy messages for social media. Mass Communication and Society, 23(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1604970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunney, C., Thorson, E., & Chen, W. (2021). Following and avoiding fear-inducing news topics: Fear intensity, perceived news topic importance, self-efficacy, and news overload. Journalism Studies, 22(5), 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1890636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eerten, J. J., Doosje, B., Konijn, E., de Graaf, B. A., & de Goede, M. (2017). Developing a social media response to radicalization: The role of counter-narratives in prevention of radicalization and de-radicalization. University of Amsterdam. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/360002/radicalization.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, J., Looney, S., Reed, A., & Votta, F. (2021). Recommender systems and the amplification of extremist content. Internet Policy Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfowicz, M., Litmanovitz, Y., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2020). A field-wide systematic review and meta-analysis of putative risk and protective factors for radicalization outcomes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(3), 407–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09439-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., Lee, J. W., Kim, H.-J., Kang, M., Chong, E., & Kim, E. (2021). Can an online educational game contribute to developing information literate citizens? Computers & Education, 161, 104057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar