The youth social media literacy inventory: Development and validation using item response theory in the US

References

• Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media and technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, M. (2012). Are heavy users of computer games and social media more computer literate? Computers & Education, 59(4), 1339–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auxier, B., Anderson, M., & Kumar, M. (2019). 10 tech-related trends that shaped the decade. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/12/20/10-tech-related-trends-that-shaped-the-decade/
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, J. B., Triệu, P., & Ellison, N. B. (2020). Social media elements, ecologies, and effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, P., Manktelow, R., & Taylor, B. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review. Children & Youth Services Review, 41, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Boekkooi-Timminga, E. (1990). The construction of parallel tests from IRT-based item banks. Journal of Educational Statistics, 15(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986015002129
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. F. (2007). Applying the rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. P., Vincent, L. H., Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2009). Objective and subjective knowledge relationships: A quantitative analysis of consumer research findings. The Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 864–876. https://doi.org/10.1086/593688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten Steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M., Lee, F. L. F., & Chen, H.-T. (2021). Examining the roles of multi-platform social media news use, engagement, and connections with news organizations and journalists on news literacy: A comparison of seven democracies. Digital Journalism, 9(5), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1890168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. L., Mirpuri, S., Rao, N., & Law, N. (2021). Conceptualization and measurement of digital citizenship across disciplines. Educational Research Review, 33, 100379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., Cannon, J., Lopez, R., & Li, W. (2022). Social media literacy: A conceptual framework. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068530
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. L., Eaton, A. D., McInroy, L. B., Leung, V. W. Y., & Krishnan, S. (2021). Can social media participation enhance LGBTQ+ youth well-being? Development of the social media benefits scale. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 2056305121988931. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneels, R., & Vanwynsberghe, H. (2017). Mediating social media use: Connecting parents mediation strategies and social media literacy. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace, 11(3), 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-3-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. W W Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Festl, R. (2021). Social media literacy and adolescent social online behavior in Germany. Journal of Children and Media, 15(2), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1770110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, M., & Bazarova, N. N. (2017). Is anybody out there?: Understanding masspersonal communication through expectations for response across social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. The Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Husek, T. R., & Sirotnik, K. (1967). Item Sampling in Educational Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED013975
   Google Scholar
• James, C., Weinstein, E., & Mendoza, K. (2021). Teaching digital citizens in today’s world: Research and insights behind the common sense K–12 Digital citizenship curriculum. (2 Version) Common Sense Media.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New Media & Society, 18(9), 2063–2079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815577797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J., Fishburne, R., Rogers, R., & Chissom, B. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Institute for Simulation and Training. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/istlibrary/56
   Google Scholar
• Kitchens, B., Johnson, S. L., & Gray, P. (2020). Understanding echo chambers and filter bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS Quarterly, 44(4), 1619–1649. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/16371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc, M., & Barut, E. (2016). Development and validation of New Media Literacy Scale (NMLS) for university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 834–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriazos, T. A., & Stalikas, A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: The steps of scale development and standardization process. Psychology, 9(11), 2531–2560. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.911145
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt162f.htm
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Ólafsson, K., & Haddon, L. (2014). Children’s online risks and opportunities: Comparative findings from EU kids online and net children go mobile. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60513/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_EU%20Kids%20Online_EU%20Kids%20Online-Children’s%20online%20risks_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2015). Developing a framework for researching children’s online risks and opportunities in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2021). The 4Cs: Classifying online risk to children. CO:RE Short Report Series on Key Topics. https://doi.org/10.21241/SSOAR.71817
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, G. S., Clarke-Pearson, K., & Council on Communications and Media. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orenstein, G. A., & Lewis, L. (2021). Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556096/
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J. (2010). The state of media literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(4), 675–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.521462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, K. L., Brodsky, J. E., Blumberg, F. C., & Brooks, P. J. (2018). Creating developmentally-appropriate measures of media literacy for adolescents. In Proceedings of the Technology, Mind, and Society, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183654.3183670
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D., & Weigle, P. (2014). Social media use among adolescents: Benefits and risks. Adolescent Psychiatry, 4(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.2174/221067660402140709115810
   Google Scholar
• Schreurs, L., & Vandenbosch, L. (2021). Introducing the Social Media Literacy (SMILE) model with the case of the positivity bias on social media. Journal of Children and Media, 15(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1809481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohr, D. (2017). Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business Information Review, 34(3), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382117722446
   Google Scholar
• Third, A., Lala, G., Diniz De Oliveira, J., Bellerose, D., & Theakstone, G. (2017). Young and online: Children’s perspectives on life in the digital age (State of the World’s Children 2017 companion report). https://doi.org/10.4225/35/5A1B885F6D4DB
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., & Orlando, M. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in two categories. In Thissen, D., Wainer, H. (Eds.) Test Scoring (pp. 73–140). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Uhls, Y. T., Ellison, N. B., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2017). Benefits and costs of social media in adolescence. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement 2), S67–S70. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758E
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogels, E. A. (2019). Millennials stand out for their technology use, but older generations also embrace digital life. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/09/09/us-generations-technology-use/
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, X., Su, Y., & Lee, D. K. L. (2021). Who consumes new media content more wisely? Examining personality factors, SNS use, and new media literacy in the era of misinformation. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121990635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz Durak, H., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2020). Antecedents of social media usage status: Examination of predictiveness of digital literacy, academic performance, and fear of missing out variables. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1056–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar