Percutaneous mechanical cardiac assist in myocardial infarction. Where are we now, where are we going?

References

• Goldberg R. J., Samad N. A., Yarzebski J., Gurwitz J., Bigelow C., Gore J. M. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1162–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaev A., Frederick P. D., Pasta D. J., Every N., Sichrovsky T., Hochman J. S. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2005; 294: 448–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouki K. P., Pavlakis G., Papasteriadis E. Management of cardiogenic shock due to acute coronary syndromes. Angiology 2005; 56: 123–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochman J. S., Sleeper L. A., Webb J. G., Sanborn T. A., White H. D., Talley J. D., et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 625–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochman J. S. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm. Circulation 2003; 107: 2998–3002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalling R. W., Cassidy D. B., Barrett R., Lachterman B., Felli P., Amirian J. Improved regional myocardial blood flow, left ventricular unloading, and infarct salvage using an axial‐flow, transvalvular left ventricular assist device. A comparison with intra‐aortic balloon counterpulsation and reperfusion alone in a canine infarction model. Circulation 1992; 85: 1152–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyns B., Stolinski J., Leunens V., Verbeken E., Flameng W. Left ventricular support by catheter‐mounted axial flow pump reduces infarct size. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1087–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishi K., Mori F., Miyamoto M., Esato K. Myocardial protection by a left ventricular assist device during reperfusion following acute coronary occlusion. Jpn J Surg 1989; 19: 563–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsumoto N., Miyamoto M., Mori F., Esato K. The effect of the left ventricular assist device on the myocardium during reperfusion after coronary artery occlusion. Jpn J Surg 1990; 20: 300–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kantrowitz A., Tjonneland S., Freed P. S., Phillips S. J., Butner A. N., Sherman J. L, Jr. Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA 1968; 203: 113–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman D., Casarella W. J. Percutaneous intraaortic balloon pumping: initial clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1980; 29: 153–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo C. F., Amado L. C., Kraitchman D. L., Gerber B. L., Edvardsen T., Osman N. F., et al. The effect of intra‐aortic balloon counterpulsation on left ventricular functional recovery early after acute myocardial infarction: a randomized experimental magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1235–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haston H. H., McNamara J. J. The effects of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on myocardial infarct size. Ann Thorac Surg 1979; 28: 335–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laas J., Campbell C. D., Takanashi Y., Pick R. L., Replogle R. L. Failure of intra‐aortic balloon pumping to reduce experimental myocardial infarct size in swine. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 80: 85–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van 't Hof A. W., Liem A. L., de Boer M. J., Hoorntje J. C., Suryapranata H., Zijlstra F. A randomized comparison of intra‐aortic balloon pumping after primary coronary angioplasty in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 659–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone G. W., Marsalese D., Brodie B. R., Griffin J. J., Donohue B., Costantini C., et al. A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Second primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction (PAMI‐II) trial investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1459–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conti C. R. Myocardial infarction, urgent angioplasty and intra‐arterial balloon counterpulsation. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 638–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone G. W., Ohman E. M., Miller M. F., Joseph D. L., Christenson J. T., Cohen M., et al. Contemporary utilization and outcomes of intra‐aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: the benchmark registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1940–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antman E. M., Anbe D. T., Armstrong P. W., Bates E. R., Green L. A., Hand M., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). Circulation 2004; 110: e82–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron H. V., Every N. R., Parsons L. S., Angeja B., Goldberg R. J., Gore J. M., et al. The use of intra‐aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J 2001; 141: 933–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta S. M., Aufiero T. X., Pae W. E, Jr., Miller C. A., Pierce W. S. Combined registry for the clinical use of mechanical ventricular assist pumps and the total artificial heart in conjunction with heart transplantation: sixth official report—1994. J Heart Lung Transplant 1995; 14: 585–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose E. A., Gelijns A. C., Moskowitz A. J., Heitjan D. F., Stevenson L. W., Dembitsky W., et al. Long‐term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end‐stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1435–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks E. J., Tansley P. D., Hardy J., George R. S., Bowles C. T., Burke M., et al. Left ventricular assist device and drug therapy for the reversal of heart failure. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1873–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J. M., DeRose J. J., Slater J. P., Spanier T. B., Dewey T. M., Catanese K. A., et al. Improved survival rates support left ventricular assist device implantation early after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1903–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S. J., Nguyen D. Q., Bank A. J., Ormaza S., Bolman R. M, III. Left ventricular assist device bridge therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 1146–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Entwistle J. W, III., Bolno P. B., Holmes E., Samuels L. E. Improved survival with ventricular assist device support in cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction. Heart Surg Forum 2003; 6: 316–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels L. E., Holmes E. C., Garwood P., Ferdinand F. Initial experience with the Abiomed AB5000 ventricular assist device system. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 309–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson M., Acker M. A., Kasirajan V., Madani M., Naka Y., Raess D., et al. Mechanical circulatory support improves recovery outcomes in profound cardiogenic shock post acute myocardial infarction: a US multicenter study. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: Suppl.. 11H
   Google Scholar
• Vogel R. A., Shawl F., Tommaso C., O'Neill W., Overlie P., O'Toole J., et al. Initial report of the national registry of elective cardiopulmonary bypass supported coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 23–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholz K. H., Dubois‐Rande J. L., Urban P., Morice M. C., Loisance D., Smalling R. W., et al. Clinical experience with the percutaneous hemopump during high‐risk coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1107–10; A6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thiele H., Lauer B., Hambrecht R., Boudriot E., Cohen H. A., Schuler G. Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial‐to‐femoral arterial bypass assistance. Circulation 2001; 104: 2917–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele H., Sick P., Boudriot E., Diederich K. W., Hambrecht R., Niebauer J., et al. Randomized comparison of intra‐aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1276–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhoff D., Cohen H., Brunckhorst C., O'Neill W. W. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 469–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyns B., Autschbach R., Boning A., Konertz W., Matschke K., Schondube F., et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting supported with intracardiac microaxial pumps versus normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22: 112–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjauw K. D., Remmelink M., Lam K. Y., Baan Jr J., Schaaf R. J., Vis M. M., et al. Demonstration of LV unloading on echocardiography during high risk PCI with a left ventricular assist device. Acute Cardiac Care 2007; 9: 125–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyns B., Dens J., Sergeant P., Herijgers P., Daenen W., Flameng W. Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock—Impella support for cardiogenic shock. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 51: 312–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurmann M. J., Siniawski H., Erb M., Drews T., Hetzer R. Initial experience with miniature axial flow ventricular assist devices for postcardiotomy heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 1642–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegenthaler M. P., Brehm K., Strecker T., Hanke T., Notzold A., Olschewski M., et al. The Impella Recover microaxial left ventricular assist device reduces mortality for postcardiotomy failure: a three‐center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 812–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques J. P., Remmelink M., Baan J, Jr., van der Schaaf R. J., Vis M. M., Koch K. T., et al. Safety and feasibility of elective high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 990–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benali K., Henriques J. P. Percutaneous circulatory support during high‐risk angioplasty procedures: A multicenter experience with Impella technology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: Suppl.901–912–1B
   Google Scholar
• Remmelink M., Sjauw K. D., Henriques J. P., Vis M. M., Koch K. T., Tijssen J. G., et al. Effects of Left Ventricular Unloading by Impella Recover LP2.5 on Coronary Hemodynamics. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007, 2007; in press
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjauw K. D., Remmelink M., Baan J Jr., Schaaf R. J., Vis M. M., Koch K. T., et al. Preliminary experience of the MACH 2 trial: Safety and feasibility of left ventricular support with the Impella recover LP 2.5 device in patients with acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: Suppl.914–211–29B
   Google Scholar
• Seyfarth M., Fröhlich G., Sibbing D., Bott‐Flügel L., Bauer I., Dirschinger J., et al. Left ventricular assist device (Impella LP 2.5) versus intraaortic ballon counterpulsation for patients with cardiogenic shock by myocardial infarction: A prospective, randomized trial (ISAR‐SHOCK). 23 March 2007, Presented at: the late‐breaking emerging technologies and innovations session of the 56th Annual Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology; New Orleans, LA
   Google Scholar
• Briguori C., Sarais C., Pagnotta P., Airoldi F., Liistro F., Sgura F., et al. Elective versus provisional intra‐aortic balloon pumping in high‐risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 2003; 145: 700–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Briguori C., Airoldi F., Chieffo A., Montorfano M., Carlino M., Sangiorgi G. M., et al. Elective versus provisional intraaortic balloon pumping in unprotected left main stenting. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 565–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander J. H., Reynolds H. R., Stebbins A. L., Dzavik V., Harrington R. A., Van de W. F., et al. Effect of tilarginine acetate in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: the TRIUMPH randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 297: 1657–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques J. P., de Mol B. A. New percutaneous mechanical left ventricular support for acute myocardial infarction. The AMC MACH program. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine 2007, 2007; in press
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kar B., Adkins L. E., Civitello A. B., Loyalka P., Palanichamy N., Gemmato C. J., et al. Clinical experience with the Tandem Heart percutaneous ventricular assist device. Tex Heart Inst J 2006; 33: 111–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar