Multi‐slice computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain

References

• McCaig L. F., Nawar E. W. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Adv Data 2006; 372: 1–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pope J. H., Ruthazer R., Beshansky J. R., Griffith J. L., Selker H. P. Clinical features of emergency department patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia: A multicenter study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 1998; 6: 63–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T. H., Rouan G. W., Weisberg M. C., Brand D. A., Acampora D., Stasiulewicz C., et al. Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60: 219–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy B. D., Beshansky J. R., D'Agostino R. B., Selker H. P. Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: results from a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22: 579–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K., Oudkerk M., Rensing B. J., van Ooijen P., Munne A., van Geuns R. J., et al. Coronary angiography with multi‐slice computed tomography. Lancet 2001; 357: 599–603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland P., Bonow R. O., Brundage B. H., Budoff M. J., Eisenberg M. J., Grundy S. M., et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 378–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudon D. A., Vukov L. F., Breen J. F., Rumberger J. A., Wollan P. C., Sheedy P. F. Use of electron‐beam computed tomography in the evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33: 15–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou D., Budoff M. J., Kaufer E., Kennedy J. M., Lu B., Brundage B. H. Screening patients with chest pain in the emergency department using electron beam tomography: A follow‐up study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 105–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Rourke R. A., Brundage B. H., Froelicher V. F., Greenland P., Grundy S. M., Hachamovitch R., et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron‐beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 326–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinshtein R., Gaspar T., Halon D. A., Goldstein J., Peled N., Lewis B. S. Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64‐slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of a chest pain syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 472–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf J. D., Bax J. J., Shaw L. J., de Roos A., Lamb H. J., van der Wall E. E., et al. Meta‐analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2005; 151: 404–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehara M., Surmely J. F., Kawai M., Katoh O., Matsubara T., Terashima M., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64‐slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 2006; 70: 564–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber A. W., Knez A., von Ziegler F., Becker A., Nikolaou K., Paul S., et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64‐slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 147–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S., Alkadhi H., Plass A., Desbiolles L., Grunenfelder J., Marincek B., et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64‐slice technology: First experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1482–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollet N. R., Cademartiri F., van Mieghem C. A., Runza G., McFadden E. P., Baks T., et al. High‐resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112: 2318–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou K., Knez A., Rist C., Wintersperger B. J., Leber A., Johnson T., et al. Accuracy of 64‐MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 111–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass A., Grunenfelder J., Leschka S., Alkadhi H., Eberli F. R., Wildermuth S., et al. Coronary artery imaging with 64‐slice computed tomography from cardiac surgical perspective. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 109–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pugliese F., Mollet N. R., Runza G., van Mieghem C., Meijboom W. B., Malagutti P., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non‐invasive 64‐slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 575–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff G. L., Gallagher M. J., O'Neill W. W., Goldstein J. A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64‐slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ropers D., Rixe J., Anders K., Kuttner A., Baum U., Bautz W., et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64‐ x 0.6‐mm collimation and 330‐ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 343–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser T., Mohrs O. K., Magedanz A., Nowak B., Voigtlander T., Barkhausen J., et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64‐detector‐row computed tomography in patients with a low to moderate pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. Acta Radiol 2007; 48: 300–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf J. D., Pundziute G., Jukema J. W., Lamb H. J., van der Hoeven B. L., de Roos A., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64‐slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 145–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U., Nagurney J. T., Moselewski F., Pena A., Ferencik M., Chae C. U., et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 2006; 114: 2251–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein J. A., Gallagher M. J., O'Neill W. W., Ross M. A., O'Neil B. J., Raff G. L. A randomized controlled trial of multi‐slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 863–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder S., Kopp A. F., Baumbach A., Meisner C., Kuettner A., Georg C., et al. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1430–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunimasa T., Sato Y., Sugi K., Moroi M. Evaluation by multislice computed tomography of atherosclerotic coronary artery plaques in non‐culprit, remote coronary arteries of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circ J 2005; 69: 1346–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf J. D., Beck T., Burgstahler C., Jukema J. W., Dirksen M. S., de Roos A., et al. Differences in plaque composition and distribution in stable coronary artery disease versus acute coronary syndromes; non‐invasive evaluation with multi‐slice computed tomography. Acute Card Care 2007; 9: 48–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pundziute G., Schuijf J. D., Jukema J. W., Boersma E., de Roos A., van der Wall E. E., et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 62–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohle K., Achenbach S., MacNeill B., Ropers D., Ferencik M., Moselewski F., et al. Characterization of non‐calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi‐detector row CT: Comparison to IVUS. Atherosclerosis 2007; 190: 174–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henneman M. M., Schuijf J. D., Jukema J. W., Holman E. R., Lamb H. J., de Roos A., et al. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64‐slice MSCT: a comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2006; 13: 480–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salm L. P., Schuijf J. D., de Roos A., Lamb H. J., Vliegen H. W., Jukema J. W., et al. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16‐detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006; 7: 308–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henneman M. M., Schuijf J. D., Jukema J. W., Lamb H. J., de Roos A., Dibbets P., et al. Comprehensive cardiac assessment with multislice computed tomography: evaluation of left ventricular function and perfusion in addition to coronary anatomy in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Heart 2006; 92: 1779–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K., Cury R. C., Ferencik M., Nomura C. H., Abbara S., Hoffmann U., et al. Differentiation of recent and chronic myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 303–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baks T., Cademartiri F., Moelker A. D., Weustink A. C., van Geuns R. J., Mollet N. R., et al. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 144–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffel H., Alkadhi H., Plass A., Vachenauer R., Desbiolles L., Gaemperli O., et al. Accuracy of dual‐source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre‐test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2739–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kido T., Kurata A., Higashino H., Sugawara Y., Okayama H., Higaki J., et al. Cardiac imaging using 256‐detector row four‐dimensional CT: preliminary clinical report. Radiat Med 2007; 25: 38–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hacker M., Jakobs T., Hack N., Nikolaou K., Becker C., von Ziegler F., et al. Sixty‐four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with stable angina. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34: 4–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf J. D., Wijns W., Jukema J. W., Atsma D. E., de Roos A., Lamb H. J., et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi‐slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2508–514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar