Angiographic and physiologic assessment of coronary flow and myocardial perfusion in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

References

• Heberden W. Commentaries on the History and Cure of Diseases 1802.
   Google Scholar
• Gould K, Lipscomb K, Hamilton G. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperaemia as measure of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 1974; 33: 87–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus M, Chilian W, Kanatsuka H, Dellsperger K, Eaatham C, Lamping K. Understanding the coronary circulation through studies at the microvascular level. Circulation 1990; 81: 1–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The TIMI Study Group . Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. N E J Med. 1985;312:932–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross A, Neuhaus K, Ellis S. Frequent lack of correspondence among core laboratories in assessing TIMI flow grade after reperfusion therapy. Circulation 1995; 92: I–345
   Google Scholar
• The GUSTO Angiographic Investigators . The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary artery patency, ventricular function and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1615–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson CM, Cannon C, Daley W, Dodge JTJ, Alexander B, Marble S, et al. TIMI Frame Count: A Quantitative Method of Assessing Coronary Artery Flow. Circulation 1996; 93: 879–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanedo J, Kelly R, Marquez M, Burns D, Klein L, Costanzo M, et al. Assessing coronary blood flow dynamics with the TIMI frame count method: Comparison with simultaneous intracoronary doppler and ultrasound. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001; 53: 459–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vijayalakshmi K, Ashton V, Wright R, Hall J, Stewart M, Davies A, et al. Corrected TIMI frame count: Applicability in modern digital catheter laboratories when different frame acquisition rates are used. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004; 63: 426–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Mousa ENM, Dodge JTJ, Rizzo M, McLean C, Moynihan J, Kelley M, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count in saphenous vein grafts. Am Heart J. 1998; 135: 323–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faile B, Guzzo J, Tate D, Nichols T, Smith S, Dehmer G. Effect of sex, hemodynamics, body size, and other clinical variables on the corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count used as an assessment of coronary blood flow. Am Heart J. 2000; 140: 308–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abac A, Oguzhan A, Eryol N, Ergin A. Effect of Potential Confounding Factors on the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial Frame Count and Its Reproducibility. Circulation 1999; 100: 2219–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cannon C, McCabe C, Diver D. Comparison of front-loaded recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, anistreplase and combination thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 4 trial. JACC 1994; 24: 1602–10
   Google Scholar
• Cannon C, McCabe C, Gibson CM. TNK-tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocadial infarction: Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 10A dose-ranging trial. Circulation 1997; 95: 351–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amos DJ, French JK, Andrews J, Ashton NG, Williams BF, Whitlock RM, et al. Corrected TIMI frame counts correlate with stenosis severity and infarct zone wall motion after thrombolytic therapy. Am Heart J. 2001; 141: 586–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson C, Murphy S, Rizzo M. Relationship between TIMI frame count and clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration. Circulation 1999; 99: 1945–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson CM. Angioplasty guidewire velocity: A new simple method to calculate absolute coronary blood velocity and flow. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 1536–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stankovic G, Manginas A, Voudris V, Pavlides G, Athanassopoulos G, Ostojic M, et al. Prediction of restenosis after coronary angioplasty by use of a new index: TIMI frame count/minimal luminal diameter ratio. Circulation 2000; 101: 962–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoel MG, Zijlstra F, Visser CA. Frame count reserve. Circulation 2003; 107: 3034–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobis JM, Mallery J, Mahon D, Lehmann K, Zalesky P, Griffith J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of human coronary arteries in vivo. Analysis of tissue characterizations with comparison to in vitro histological specimens. Circulation 1991; 83: 913–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nissen SE, Gurley JC, Grines CL, Booth DC, McClure R, Berk M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1991; 84: 1087–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen SE, Yock P. Intravascular ultrasound: novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. Circulation 2001; 103: 604–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, Takiuchi S, Masuyama T, Hori M, et al. Clinical implications of the'no reflow' phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996; 93: 223–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito H, Okamura A, Iwakura K, Masuyama T, Hori M, Takiuchi S, et al. Myocardial perfusion patterns related to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction perfusion grades after coronary angioplasty in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996; 93: 1993–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson C. www.timi.org. The TIMI study group 2006.
   Google Scholar
• van't Hof A, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje J, de Boer M, Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 2302–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon CP, Gibson CM, McCabe CH, Adgey AA, Schweiger MJ, Sequeira RF, et al. TNK-tissue plasminogen activator compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI 10B trial. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 10B investigators. Circulation 1998; 98: 2805–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson CM, de Lemos JA, Murphy SA, Marble SJ, Dauterman KW, Michaels A, et al. Methodologic and clinical validation of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade in acute myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2002; 14: 233–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy S, Chen C, Gourlay SG. Impaired tissue level perfusion in the non-culprit artery territory in the setting of acute MI. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 325–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987; 316: 1371–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern MJ, Lerman A, Bech JW, De Bruyne B, Eeckhout E, Fearon WF, et al. Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006; 114: 1321–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucette J, Corl P, Payne H. Validation of Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurements of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation 1992; 85: 1899–1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, di Mario C, Piek J, Schroeder E, Vrints C, Probst P, et al. Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assessing the short- and long-term outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty: the DEBATE Study (Doppler endpoints balloon angioplasty trial Europe). Circulation 1997; 96: 3369–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamuleau SA, Tio RA, de Cock CC, de Muinck ED, Pijls NH, van Eck-Smit BL, et al. Prognostic value of coronary blood flow velocity and myocardial perfusion in intermediate coronary narrowings and multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 852–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caiati C, Montaldo C, Zedda N, Bina A, Iliceto S. New noninvasive method for coronary flow reserve assessment: contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler. Circulation 1999; 99: 771–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiati C, Montaldo C, Zedda N, Montisci R, Ruscazio M, Lai G, et al. Validation of a new noninvasive method (contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler) for the evaluation of coronary flow reserve: comparison with intracoronary Doppler flow wire. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 1193–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caiati C, Zedda N, Montaldo C, Montisci R, Iliceto S. Contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler with adenosine: a noninvasive, rapid and effective method for coronary flow reserve assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 122–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NH, van Gelder B, Van der V, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995; 92: 3183–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van der V, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek JKJ, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1703–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993; 87: 1354–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekamp CE, Koolen JJ, Pijls NH, Michels HR, Bonnier HJ. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation 1999; 99: 1015–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamuleau SA, Meuwissen M, Koch KT, van Eck-Smit BL, Tio RA, Tijssen JG, et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve for risk stratification of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and an intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 377–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V, Satran A, Chandra M, Masden R, et al. Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 96: 877–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Umman B, Nisanci Y, Sezer M, Umman S, Yilmaz E, Oflaz H, et al. The relationship between corrected TIMI frame count and myocardial fractional flow reserve. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002; 14: 125–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pijls NH, de Bruyne B, Smith L, Aarnoudse W, Barbato E, Bartunek J, et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans. Circulation 2002; 105: 2482–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, Caffarelli AD, Robbins RC, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 2003; 107: 3129–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarnoudse W, van den BP, van der V, Geven M, Rutten M, Van TM, et al. Myocardial resistance assessed by guidewire-based pressure-temperature measurement: in vitro validation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004; 62: 56–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng MK, Yeung AC, Fearon WF. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2006; 113: 2054–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siebes M, Verhoeff BJ, Meuwissen M, de Winter RJ, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation 2004; 109: 756–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar